Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of limestone rock mass deformation modulus using empirical equations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining the geomechanical parameters of rock masses at dam sites is a very important task. Different methods of determining these parameters have been proposed, depending on various factors such as the study phase, facilities, budget, and the time available. The deformation modulus is an important input parameter in any analysis of rock mass behavior. In the present study, the deformation modulus of the rock mass at the site of the Khersan II double-arch concrete dam was investigated using different field and experimental methods. The Khersan II Dam is located in the southwest of Lordegan, Chaharmahal Bakhtiary Province, Iran. The predominant formation at the site of the dam is the Upper Asmari limestone. The results of in situ tests such as plate load tests (PLTs) were analyzed to determine the deformation modulus, using the ASTM standard, Unal, and ISRM methods. These results were then compared to one another and interpreted. After that, engineering classification parameters such as RMR, GSI, and Q were evaluated at the same site that the PLTs were performed. Finally, the correlations between these classification ratings and the in situ deformation modulus of the rock mass were assessed, and some formulae for determining the deformation modulus of the rock mass at the Khersan II Dam site were derived. The accuracy and credibility of every formula was evaluated. These formulae for estimating the deformation modulus of the rock mass at the Khersan II Dam site were found to be highly accurate compared to other similar formulae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM (2008) D4394-08: Standard test method for determining the in situ modulus of deformation of rock mass using the rigid plate loading method. In: Annual book of ASTM standards, v.04.08. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value corrections to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6:189–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Loset F, Lien R, Lunde J (1980) Application of the Q-system in design decisions concerning dimensions and appropriate support for underground installations. Int Conf Subsurf Space Rock Store Stockholm Subsurf Space 2:553–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashary A (2010) Determination rock mass deformability modulus, important factor of dam design. In: 2nd Symp on Dam Construction, Islamic Azad University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran, 1 March 2010

  • Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Civil Eng S Afr 15:335–344

  • Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech J 15:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classification. Wiley, New York

  • Faramarzi L, Fatahi H (2008) Interpretation of plate loading test result on major projects. In: 5th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium (ARMS5), Tehran, Iran, 24–26 Nov 2008, pp 225–260

  • Gokceoglua C, Sonmeza H, Kayabasi A (2003) Predicting the deformation moduli of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimstad E, Barton N (1993) Updating the Q-system for NMT. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sprayed Concrete, Fagernes, Norway. Norwegian Concrete Association, Oslo, p 20

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 Edition. In: Proceedings of NARMS-TAC conference, Toronto, vol 1, pp 267–273

  • Isik NS, Ulusay R, Doyuran V (2008) Deformation modulus of heavily jointed–sheared and blocky greywackes by pressuremeter tests: Numerical, experimental and empirical assessments. Eng Geol J 101:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for determining in situ deformability of rock. Part 1: suggested method for deformability determination using a plate test (superficial loading). Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose M, Galeral M, A’lvarez Z, Bieniawski T (2005) Evalution of the deformation modulus of rock masses: comparison of pressuremeter and dilatometer tests with RMR prediction. In: Proc ISP5-Pressio Int Symp, Paris, France, 22–24 Aug 2005

  • Kayabasi A, Gokceoglu C, Ercanoglu M (2003) Estimating the deformation modulus of rock masses: a comparative study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahab Ghods Consulting Engineers Co. (2009) Rock mechanics report of Khersan II project. Mahab Ghods Consulting Engineers Co., Tehran

  • Mehrotra VK (1992) Estimation of engineering parameters of rock mass. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee

  • Mitri HS, Edrissi R, Henning J (1994) Finite element modeling of cablebolted stopes in hard rock ground mines. Presented at: SME Annu Meet, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 14–17 Feb 1994, pp 94–116

  • Nicholson GA, Bieniawski ZT (1990) A nonlinear deformation modulus based on rock mass classification. Int J Min Geol Eng 8:181–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmstrom A (2005) Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD). Tunn Undergr Space Technol 20:362–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmstrom A, Singh R (2001) The deformation modulus of rock masses: comparisons between in situ tests and indirect estimates. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read SAL, Richards LR, Perrin ND (1999) Applicability of the Hoek–Brown failure criterion to New Zealand greywacke rocks. In: Vouille G, Berest P (eds) Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Paris, France, 1999, vol 2. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 655–660

  • Serafim JL, Pereira JP (1983) Considerations on the geomechanical classification of Bieniawski. In: Proc Symp on Engineering Geology and Underground Openings, Lisbon, Portugal, 12–15 Sept 1983, pp 1133–1144

  • Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C, Ulusay R (2004) Indirect determination of the modulus of deformation of rock masses based on the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech 1:849–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Taheri A, Tani K (2010) Assessment of the stability of rock slopes by the slope stability rating classification system. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal E (1997) Determination of in situ deformation modulus: new approaches for plate-loading tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:897–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Einstein HH (2004) Using RQD to estimate the deformation modulus of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are expressed to Isfahan University for funding this research, and to the Mahab Ghods Consulting Engineers Company for access to the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology, The University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

    Rassoul Ajalloeian & Mojtaba Mohammadi

Authors
  1. Rassoul Ajalloeian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mojtaba Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rassoul Ajalloeian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ajalloeian, R., Mohammadi, M. Estimation of limestone rock mass deformation modulus using empirical equations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73, 541–550 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0530-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0530-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation