Skip to main content

A Comparison of Rock Mass Deformation Modulus from Empirical Correlations Versus Plate Load Test at Pare Hydro-electric Power Project, Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ground Characterization and Foundations

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 167))

  • 594 Accesses

Abstract

Deformation modulus (Em) is one of the most important parameters needed for the evaluation of the rock mass behaviour under loading and unloading conditions. Many empirical correlations have been developed over the years to determine this parameter from various rock mass classification systems. Although the preliminary design of various components of a Hydro-electric power project is based on the empirically obtained parameters, which are found to deviate substantially in the field quite often. The field values of the rock mass deformation modulus can be determined by more direct tests like plate load test (PLT) and Plate Jacking test. In this paper, deformation modulus (Em) of the rock mass at the dam site is obtained using various empirical correlations relevant to the site conditions. An attempt has been made to develop an empirical correlation between deformation modulus and GSI at Pare H.E.P site consisting of weak rock mass. Additionally, some critical comments pertaining to the empirical correlation developed have been made in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ISRM (International Society of Rock Mechanics): The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006, pp. 628. ISRM Turkish National Group, Ankara, Turkey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palmstrom, A., Singh, R.: The deformation modulus of rock masses—comparisons between in situ tests and indirect estimates. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 16, 115–131 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoek, E., Brown, E.T.: Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34(8), 1165–1186 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Isik, N.S., Ulusay, R., Doyuran, V.: Deformation modulus of heavily jointed-sheared and blocky greywackes by pressure meter tests: numerical, experimental and empirical assessments. Eng. Geol. 101, 269–282 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sonmez, H., Gokceoglu, C., Ulusay, R.: Indirect determination of the modulus of deformation of rock masses based on the GSI system. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41, 849–857 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoek, E.: Strength of rock and rock masses. ISRM News J. 2(2), 4–16 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marinos, P., Hoek, E.: GSI—a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering (GeoEng), pp. 1422–1466, Melbourne, 19–24 Nov 2000

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cai, M., Kaiser, P.K., Uno, H., Tasaka, Y., Minami, M.: Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41(1), 3–19 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IS 7317: Code of practice for uniaxial jacking test for modulus of deformation of rock. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beiki, M., Bashari, A., Majdi, A.: Genetic programming approach for estimating the deformation modulus of rock mass using sensitivity analysis by neural network. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47, 1091–1103 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoek, E., Diederichs, M.: Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 43, 203–215 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alemdag, S., Gurocak, Z., Gokceoglu, C.: A simple regression based approach to estimate deformation modulus of rock masses. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 110, 75–80 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cai, M., Kaiser, P.K.: Visualization of rock mass classification systems. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 24(4), 1089–1102 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, P.K., Goswami, D., Kalita, D. (2022). A Comparison of Rock Mass Deformation Modulus from Empirical Correlations Versus Plate Load Test at Pare Hydro-electric Power Project, Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. In: Satyanarayana Reddy, C.N.V., Muthukkumaran, K., Satyam, N., Vaidya, R. (eds) Ground Characterization and Foundations. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 167. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3383-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3383-6_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3382-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3383-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics