Skip to main content
Log in

A Cosserat peridynamic model with Bresler–Pister criterion and numerical simulation of concrete fracture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bond-based peridynamics and its extended forms are widely used for crack predicting in many materials like concrete. In peridynamics, as for the bond failure, the tensile failure criterion or tensile-compression failure criterion are commonly applied, the combined tensile-shear or compression-shear failure are rarely considered. In this paper, a Cosserat peridynamic model with a novel bond failure criterion (CPD-BP) is proposed for concrete fracture simulation. The peridynamic bond failure criterion is derived from the Bresler–Pister criterion, with which the composite bond failure can be considered properly. Besides, the Cosserat parameters which relate to microstructures of concrete are introduced. Three benchmarks are designed: simple tensile, direct shear, and compression tests. Results show that the CPD-BP can simulate the combined tensile-shear and compressive-shear concrete failure. Crack patterns predicted by CPD-BP generally follow particle flow code in two dimensions results and physical experiments. The larger Cosserat shear modulus will enhance the shear effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan, X., Hu, Z., Li, W., Zhou, S., Li, T.: Failure process of modeled recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial compression, Materials (Basel) 13 (2020)

  2. Ferretti, D., Savoia, M.: Non-linear model for R/C tensile members strengthened by FRP-plates. Eng. Fract. Mech. 70, 1069–1083 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cendón, D., Gálvez, J., Elices, M., Planas, J.: Modelling the fracture of concrete under mixed loading. Int. J. Fract. 103, 293–310 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Du, X., Jin, L., Ma, G.: Numerical modeling tensile failure behavior of concrete at mesoscale using extended finite element method. Int. J. Damage Mech 23, 872–898 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, J.J., Li, G.D., Ren, Z.Y., Zhang, W., Tang, J.Q., Zhang, L., Si, X.L., Zhao, Z.M.: Mixed-mode I-II mesoscale fracture behavior of concrete determined by the realistic aggregate numerical model. Constr. Build. Mater. 226, 802–817 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ruiz, G., Pandolfi, A., Ortiz, M.: Three-dimensional cohesive modeling of dynamic mixed-mode fracture. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 52, 97–120 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Su, X., Yang, Z., Liu, G.: Finite element modelling of complex 3D static and dynamic crack propagation by embedding cohesive elements in Abaqus. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 23, 271–282 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Unger, J.F., Eckardt, S., Könke, C.: Modelling of cohesive crack growth in concrete structures with the extended finite element method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 4087–4100 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wen, M., Fang, Q., Zhang, D., Fang, H.: A numerical algorithm for multiple cracks propagation in concrete structure. Struct. Concr. 21, 2168–2177 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, Z., Rong, H., Zheng, J., Dong, W.: Numerical method for mixed-mode I–II crack propagation in concrete. J. Eng. Mech. 139, 1530–1538 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, X., Bui, T.Q.: A fictitious crack XFEM with two new solution algorithms for cohesive crack growth modeling in concrete structures. Eng. Comput. 32, 473–497 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leski, A.: Implementation of the virtual crack closure technique in engineering FE calculations. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 43, 261–268 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, J., Wu, Q., Guan, J., Zhang, P., Fang, H., Hu, S.: Numerical simulation on size effect of fracture toughness of concrete based on mesomechanics. Materials (Basel) 13, 1370 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saleh, A., Aliabadi, M.: Crack growth analysis in concrete using boundary element method. Eng. Fract. Mech. 51, 533–545 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farid Uddin, A.K.M., Numata, K., Shimasaki, J., Shigeishi, M., Ohtsu, M.: Mechanisms of crack propagation due to corrosion of reinforcement in concrete by AE-SiGMA and BEM. Construct. Build. Mater. 18, 181–188 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, J., Zhao, C., Yun, B.: Numerical study on explosion-induced fractures of reinforced concrete structure by beam-particle model. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 412–419 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sarfarazi, V., Ghazvinian, A., Schubert, W., Blumel, M., Nejati, H.R.: Numerical simulation of the process of fracture of echelon rock joints. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47, 1355–1371 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, D., Lu, G., Liu, Y.: Nonlocal peridynamic modeling and simulation on crack propagation in concrete structures. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 1–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Silling, S.A.: Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48, 175–209 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, Z., Wan, J., Xiu, C.X., Chu, X.H., Guo, X.Y.: A bond-based correspondence model and its application in dynamic plastic fracture analysis for quasi-brittle materials. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 113, 10294 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gu, X., Li, X., Xia, X.Z., Madenci, E., Zhang, Q.: A robust peridynamic computational framework for predicting mechanical properties of porous quasi-brittle materials. Compos. Struct. 303, 116245 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hu, Y.L., Wang, J.Y., Madenci, E., Mu, Z.C., Yu, Y.: Peridynamic micromechanical model for damage mechanisms in composites. Compos. Struct. 301, 116182 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, J., Li, S., Lai, X., Liu, L.: Peridynamic stress is the static first Piola-Kirchhoff Virial stress. Int. J. Solids Struct. 241, 111478 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ma, X., Wang, L., Xu, J., Feng, Q., Liu, L., Chen, H.: A two-dimensional ordinary state-based peridynamic model for surface fatigue crack propagation in railheads. Eng. Fract. Mech. 265, 108362 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wan, J., Yang, D., Chu, X., Qu, W.: A micropolar peridynamic differential operator and simulation of crack propagation. Eng. Fract. Mech. 269, 108532 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, P., Chen, Z.G.: Peridynamic electromechanical modeling of damaging and cracking in conductive composites: a stochastically homogenized approach. Compos. Struct. 305, 116528 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yao, X., Huang, D.: Coupled PD-SPH modeling for fluid-structure interaction problems with large deformation and fracturing. Comput. Struct. 270, 106847 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zeleke, M.A., Lai, X., Liu, L.S.: A peridynamic computational scheme for thermoelectric fields. Materials 13, 2546 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, J.M., Chu, X.H., Yu, M.: Bond-based Cosserat peridynamic simulation of early-age fracture in cement-based materials. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 122, 103603 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou, X., Zhang, T.: Generalized plastic ordinary state-based peridynamic model with shear deformation of geomaterials. Acta Geotech. 18, 609–623 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yaghoobi, A., Chorzepa, M.G.: Fracture analysis of fiber reinforced concrete structures in the micropolar peridynamic analysis framework. Eng. Fract. Mech. 169, 238–250 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu, Q.Z., Ni, T.: Peridynamic formulations enriched with bond rotation effects. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 121, 118–129 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, Y., Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Shou, Y.: A 3-D conjugated bond-pair-based peridynamic formulation for initiation and propagation of cracks in brittle solids. Int. J. Solids Struct. 134, 89–115 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Shou, Y., Kou, M.: A novel conjugated bond linear elastic model in bond-based peridynamics for fracture problems under dynamic loads. Eng. Fract. Mech. 188, 151–183 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, Z., Wan, J., Chu, X., Liu, H.: Two Cosserat peridynamic models and numerical simulation of crack propagation. Eng. Fract. Mech. 211, 341–361 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Diana, V., Casolo, S.: A bond-based micropolar peridynamic model with shear deformability: elasticity, failure properties and initial yield domains. Int. J. Solids Struct. 160, 201–231 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Guo, X., Chen, Z., Chu, X., Wan, J.: A plane stress model of bond-based Cosserat peridynamics and the effects of material parameters on crack patterns. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 123, 48–61 (2021)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Breitenfeld, M.S., Geubelle, P.H., Weckner, O., Silling, S.A.: Non-ordinary state-based peridynamic analysis of stationary crack problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 272, 233–250 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Madenci, E., Oterkus, S.: Ordinary state-based peridynamics for plastic deformation according to von Mises yield criteria with isotropic hardening. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 86, 192–219 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Gerstle, W., Sau, N., Silling, S.: Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nucl. Eng. Des. 237, 1250–1258 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gu, X., Zhang, Q.: A modified conjugated bond-based peridynamic analysis for impact failure of concrete gravity dam. Meccanica 55, 547–566 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Huang, X., Li, S., Jin, Y., Yang, D., Su, G., He, X.: Analysis on the influence of Poisson’s ratio on brittle fracture by applying uni-bond dual-parameter peridynamic model. Eng. Fract. Mech. 222, 106685 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Prakash, N., Seidel, G.D.: A novel two-parameter linear elastic constitutive model for bond based peridynamics. In: 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (2015)

  44. Wang, Y.T., Zhou, X.P., Kou, M.M.: Three-dimensional numerical study on the failure characteristics of intermittent fissures under compressive-shear loads. Acta Geotech. 14, 1161–1193 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zheng, G., Shen, G., Xia, Y., Hu, P.: A bond-based peridynamic model considering effects of particle rotation and shear influence coefficient. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 121, 93–109 (2019)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Guo, X.Y., Chu, X.H.: The performance of five extended bond-based peridynamic models on crack simulation. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 13, 2150101 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Huang, D., Lu, G.D., Wang, M.W.: Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Appl. Mech. Mater. 638–640, 1725–1729 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lu, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, Z.: Peridynamic modeling of plain concrete structures under monotonic loading. In: Second International Conference on Mechanics, Materials and Structural Engineering (ICMMSE 2017), pp. 227–231. Atlantis Press (2017)

  49. Lammi, C.J., Zhou, M.: Multi-scale peridynamic modeling of dynamic fracture in concrete (2017)

  50. Li, W., Guo, L.: Meso-fracture simulation of cracking process in concrete incorporating three-phase characteristics by peridynamic method. Constr. Build. Mater. 161, 665–675 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wu, L., Huang, D.: Peridynamic modeling and simulations on concrete dynamic failure and penetration subjected to impact loadings. Eng. Fract. Mech. 259, 108135 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wu, P., Yang, F., Chen, Z., Bobaru, F.: Stochastically homogenized peridynamic model for dynamic fracture analysis of concrete. Eng. Fract. Mech. 253, 107863 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wu, P., Zhao, J., Chen, Z., Bobaru, F.: Validation of a stochastically homogenized peridynamic model for quasi-static fracture in concrete. Eng. Fract. Mech. 237, 107293 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhou, L., Zhu, S., Zhu, Z., Xie, X.: Simulations of fractures of heterogeneous orthotropic fiber-reinforced concrete with pre-existing flaws using an improved peridynamic model. Materials (Basel) 15, 3977 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yang, S., Gu, X., Xia, X., Zhang, Q.: Explosion damage analysis of concrete structure with bond-associated non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Eng Comput Germany 39, 607–624 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Papamichos, E.: Continua with microstructure: Cosserat theory. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 14, 1011–1029 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bresler, B., Pister, K.S.: Strength of concrete under combined stresses. J. Proc. 321–345 (1958)

  58. Silling, S.A., Askari, E.: A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput. Struct. 83, 1526–1535 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gerstle, W., Sau, N., Aguilera, E.: Micropolar peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete structures (2007)

  60. Dede, T., Ayvaz, Y.: Plasticity models for concrete material based on different criteria including Bresler–Pister. Mater. Des. 31, 278–286 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Dede, T., Ayvaz, Y.: Composed material models for nonlinear behavior of reinforced concrete. Comput. Concr. 12, 303–318 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Haeri, H., Sarfarazi, V., Marji, M.F., Hedayat, A., Zhu, Z.: Experimental and numerical study of shear fracture in brittle materials with interference of initial double cracks. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 29, 555–566 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are pleased to acknowledge the support of this work by the National Natural Science Foundation of China through contract/grant numbers 12172263 and 11772237.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xihua Chu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, X., Chu, X. & Li, S. A Cosserat peridynamic model with Bresler–Pister criterion and numerical simulation of concrete fracture. Acta Mech 235, 1715–1735 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03806-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03806-w

Navigation