Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive assessment of the l-lysine production process from fermentation of sugarcane molasses

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

l-Lysine is an essential amino acid that can be produced by chemical processes from fossil raw materials, as well as by microbial fermentation, the latter being a more efficient and environmentally friendly procedure. In this work, the production process of l-lysine-HCl is studied using a systematic approach based on modeling and simulation, which supports decision making in the early stage of process design. The study considers two analysis stages: first, the dynamic analysis of the fermentation reactor, where the conversion of sugars from sugarcane molasses to l-lysine with a strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum is carried out. In this stage, the operation mode (either batch or fed batch) and operating conditions of the fermentation reactor are defined to reach the maximum technical criteria. Afterwards, the second analysis stage relates to the industrial production process of l-lysine-HCl, where the fermentation reactor, upstream processing, and downstream processing are included. In this stage, the influence of key parameters on the overall process performance is scrutinized through the evaluation of several technical, economic, and environmental criteria, to determine a profitable and sustainable design of the l-lysine production process. The main results show how the operating conditions, process design, and selection of evaluation criteria can influence in the conceptual design. The best plant design shows maximum product yield (0.31 g l-lysine/g glucose) and productivity (1.99 g/L/h), achieving 26.5% return on investment (ROI) with a payback period (PBP) of 3.8 years, decreasing water and energy consumption, and with a low potential environmental impact (PEI) index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hatti-Kaul R, Tornvall U, Gustafsson L, Borjesson P (2007) Industrial biotechnology for the production of bio-based chemicals—a cradle-to-grave perspective. Trends Biotechnol 25(3):119–124. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.01.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. de Jong E, Higson A, Walsh P, Wellisch M (2012) Bio-based chemicals value added products from biorefineries. IEA Bioenergy, Task42 Biorefinery

  3. Eggeling L, Bott M (2015) A giant market and a powerful metabolism: l-lysine provided by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(8):3387–3394. doi:10.1007/s00253-015-6508-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buechs J (1994) Precise optimization of fermentation processes through integration of bioreaction. Process computations in biotechnology. McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heinzle E, Biwer AP, Cooney CL (2007) Development of sustainable bioprocesses: modeling and assessment. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taras S, Woinaroschy A (2012) An interactive multi-objective optimization framework for sustainable design of bioprocesses. Comput Chem Eng 43:10–22. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.04.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunet R, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Pérez-Correa JR, Caballero JA, Jiménez L (2012) Hybrid simulation-optimization based approach for the optimal design of single-product biotechnological processes. Comput Chem Eng 37:125–135. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.07.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anastassiadis S (2007) l-Lysine fermentation. recent patents on. Biotechnology 1(1):11–24. doi:10.2174/187220807779813947

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfefferle W, Mockel B, Bathe B (2003) Biotechnological manufacture of lysine. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 79:59–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li T, Chen X, Chen J, Wu Q, Chen G (2014) Open and continuous fermentation: products, conditions and bioprocess economy. Biotechnol J 9:1503–1511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR (2009) Product & process design principles: synthesis. analysis and evaluation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA (2008) Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  13. Young DM, Cabezas H (1999) Designing sustainable processes with simulation: the waste reduction (WAR) algorithm. Comput Chem Eng 23(10):1477–1491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Razak MA, Viswanath B (2014) Optimization of fermentation upstream parameters and immobilization of Corynebacterium glutamicum MH 20-22 B cells to enhance the production of l-lysine. 3. Biotech 5(4):531–540. doi:10.1007/s13205-014-0252-7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rajvanshi M, Gayen K, Venkatesh KV (2013) Lysine overproducing Corynebacterium glutamicum is characterized by a robust linear combination of two optimal phenotypic states. Syst Synth Biol 7(1):51–62. doi:10.1007/s11693-013-9107-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Rodolfo Quintero-Ramirez from UAM and Rafiqul Gani from DTU for useful discussions. Partial financial support is gratefully acknowledged from UAM (Omar Anaya-Reza, Grant 2131800687) and Conacyt (Teresa Lopez-Arenas, project 133325).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Lopez-Arenas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anaya-Reza, O., Lopez-Arenas, T. Comprehensive assessment of the l-lysine production process from fermentation of sugarcane molasses. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 40, 1033–1048 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1766-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1766-2

Keywords

Navigation