Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

PROLAPSE: survey about local prostate cancer relapse salvage treatment with external beam re-irradiation: results of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

  • Original Article – Cancer Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We herein present the results of the first Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) survey regarding salvage external beam re-irradiation of local prostate cancer relapse named PROLAPSE.

Methods

A questionnaire with 12 items was administered to the 775 Italian radiation oncologist members of the AIRO.

Results

One hundred of the members completed the survey. The survey highlighted that 59% of the participants are currently performing prostate re-EBRT, while nearly two-thirds (65%) affirmed that they are taking into consideration the procedure in case of intraprostatic relapse. Regarding the clinical target volume (CTV), only a minority (16%) declared to always prefer the partial prostate re-irradiation, while a consistent portion (nearly two-thirds) relied on clinical considerations of the choice towards partial or whole gland irradiation. The main techniques used for re-irradiation resulted to be intensity-modulated RT (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and SBRT, having received approximately 40% of responses each. Regarding the criteria for patients’ selection, more than 75% of responders agreed on the use of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-choline to exclude distant metastases and of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) to detect intraprostatic recurrence. A sufficient timeframe (> 3 years) between primary RT and reirradiation was indicated by more than half of participants as an important driver in decision-making, while histological confirmation of the relapse was considered not essential by more than two-thirds. For the use of concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), most AIRO members (79%) agreed that the prescription should be based on a case-by-case analysis. Extreme hypofractionation (> 5 Gy/fraction) was preferred by the majority (52%) of the AIRO members. In most centers (more than 74%), the planning dose–volume constraints were generally extrapolated from the published data. In half of the cases, the interviewed responders affirmed that no major gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were registered in the follow-up of their re-EBRT patients. Bladder complications represented the most commonly observed form of toxicity, with an incidence of 67%.

Conclusion

This first AIRO survey about salvage prostate re-EBRT provides an interesting snapshot and suggests increasing interest in re-EBRT patients in Italy. Consensus about some aspects of patients’ selection, the necessity of biopsy, fractionation, and highly selective techniques seems feasible, but other key points such as irradiated volume, dosimetry parameters, and hormonal treatment association need to be clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACROP:

Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice

ADT:

Androgen deprivation therapy

AIRO:

Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology

CT:

Computed tomography

CTV:

Clinical target volume

ESTRO:

European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology

GI:

Gastrointestinal

GU:

Genitourinary

HIFU:

High-intensity focused ultrasound

IGRT:

Image-guided radiotherapy

IMRT:

Intensity-modulated RT

LINAC:

Linear accelerator

mp-MRI:

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

OAR:

Organ at risk

PCa:

Prostate cancer

PET:

Positron emission tomography

QoL:

Quality of life

re-EBRT:

External beam re-irradiation

RT:

Radiotherapy

SBRT:

Stereotactic body RT

SRP:

Salvage radical prostatectomy

VMAT:

Volumetric modulated arc therapy

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank the Scientific Committee and Board of the AIRO for the critical revision of the paper. The Authors thank Mattia Zaffaroni MSc for his help in the final revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Zerini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to the Survey.

Ethical approval

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients who underwent radiotherapy, and all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zerini, D., Jereczek-Fossa, B.A., Ciabattoni, A. et al. PROLAPSE: survey about local prostate cancer relapse salvage treatment with external beam re-irradiation: results of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 146, 2311–2317 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03297-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03297-5

Keywords

Navigation