Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cognitive and behavioral profile of progressive supranuclear palsy and its phenotypes

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although several progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) phenotypes have recently been described, studies identifying cognitive and neuropsychiatric differences between them are lacking.

Methods

An extensive battery of cognitive and behavioural assessments was administered to 63 PSP patients, 25 PD patients with similar sociodemographic characteristics, and 25 healthy controls. We analysed differences in phenomenology, frequency and severity of cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms between PSP, PD and HC, and between PSP subtypes.

Results

Regarding phenotypes, 64.6% met criteria for Richardson’s syndrome (PSP-RS), 10.7% PSP with predominant Parkinsonism (PSP-P), 10.7% with PSP progressive gait freezing (PSP-PGF), and 10.7% PSP with predominant speech/language disorder (PSP-SL). Impairment was more severe in the PSP group than in the PD and HC groups regarding motor scores, cognitive testing and neuropsychiatric scales. Cognitive testing did not clearly differentiate between PSP phenotypes, but PSP-RS and PSP-SL appeared to have more cognitive impairment than PSP-PGF and PSP-P, mainly due to an increased impairment in frontal executive domains. Regarding neuropsychiatric disturbances, no specific behavior was more common in any of the PSP subtypes.

Conclusion

Motor deficits delineate the phenotypes included in currently accepted MDS-PSP criteria. Cognition and behavioural disturbances are common in PSP and allow us to distinguish this disorder from other neurological diseases, but they do not differentiate between PSP phenotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Nath U (2001) The prevalence of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome) in the UK. Brain 124(7):1438–1449. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.7.1438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coughlin D, Irwin DJ (2017) Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for tauopathies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 17:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0779-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boxer AL, Yu JT, Golbe LI, Litvan I, Lang AE, Höglinger GU (2017) Advances in progressive supranuclear palsy: new diagnostic criteria, biomarkers, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol 16(7):552–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30157-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cordato NJ, Halliday GM, Caine D, Morris JGL (2006) Comparison of motor, cognitive, and behavioral features in progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 21(5):632–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams DR, Lees AJ (2009) Progressive supranuclear palsy: clinicopathological concepts and diagnostic challenges. Lancet Neurol 8(3):270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70042-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Osaki Y et al (2004) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord 19(2):181–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Respondek G et al (2014) The phenotypic spectrum of progressive supranuclear palsy: a retrospective multicenter study of 100 definite cases. Mov Disord 29(14):1758–1766. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Respondek G, Hoglinger GU (2016) The phenotypic spectrum of progressive supranuclear palsy. Park Relat Disord 22:S34–S36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali F et al (2019) Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord 34(8):1144–1153. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27619

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kehagia AA, Barker RA, Robbins TW (2010) Neuropsychological and clinical heterogeneity of cognitive impairment and dementia in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 9(12):1200–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70212-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Albert ML (1998) The subcortical dementia’ of progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurocase 4(2):95–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/neucas/4.2.95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burrell JR, Hodges JR, Rowe JB (2014) Cognition in corticobasal syndrome and progressive supranuclear palsy: a review. Mov Disord 29(5):684–693. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parthimos TP, Schulpis KH (2020) The progressive supranuclear palsy: past and present aspects. Clin Gerontol 43(2):155–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2019.1694115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koga S et al (2017) Cognitive impairment in progressive supranuclear palsy is associated with tau burden. Mov Disord 32(12):1772–1779. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Blankson S, Lees AJ (1993) A clinicopathologic study of 100 cases of Parkinson’s Disease. Arch Neurol 50(2):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1993.00540020018011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rittman T, Coyle-Gilchrist IT, Rowe JB (2016) Managing cognition in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurodegener Dis Manag 6(6):499–508. https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2016-0027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaat LD, Boon AJW, Kamphorst W, Ravid R, Duivenvoorden HJ, Van Swieten JC (2007) Frontal presentation in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 69(8):723–729. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000267643.24870.26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Höglinger GU et al (2017) Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: the movement disorder society criteria. Mov Disord 32(6):853–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26987

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerstenecker A, Duff K, Mast B, Litvan I (2013) Behavioral abnormalities in progressive supranuclear palsy. Psychiatry Res 210(3):1205–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Litvan I, Mega MS, Cummings JL, Fairbanks L (1996) Neuropsychiatric aspects of progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 47(5):1184–1189. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.47.5.1184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lansdall CJ et al (2017) Apathy and impulsivity in frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. Brain 140(6):1792–1807. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Picillo M et al (2019) Motor, cognitive and behavioral differences in MDS PSP phenotypes. J Neurol 266(7):1727–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09324-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grimm MJ et al (2019) How to apply the movement disorder society criteria for diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord 34(8):1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27666

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Golbe LI, Ohman-Strickland PA (2007) A clinical rating scale for progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain 130(6):1552–1565. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B (2000) The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 55(11):1621–1626. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.55.11.1621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Appollonio I et al (2005) The frontal assessment battery (FAB): Normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 26(2):108–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-005-0443-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown RG et al (2010) Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain 133(8):2382–2393. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Caso F et al (2016) Cognitive impairment in progressive supranuclear palsy-Richardson’s syndrome is related to white matter damage. Park Relat Disord 31:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kobylecki C et al (2015) Cognitive–behavioural features of progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome overlap with frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol 262(4):916–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7657-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Duff K, McDermott D, Luong D, Randolph C, Boxer AL (2019) Cognitive deficits in progressive supranuclear palsy on the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 41(5):469–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1572073

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Duff K, Randolph C, Boxer AL (2020) Cognitive decline on the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status in progressive supranuclear palsy. Clin Neuropsychol 34(3):529–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1670865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fiorenzato E, Antonini A, Camparini V, Weis L, Semenza C, Biundo R (2019) Characteristics and progression of cognitive deficits in progressive supranuclear palsy vs. multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Trans 126(11):1437–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-019-02065-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shoeibi A et al (2019) Are the International Parkinson disease and movement disorder society progressive supranuclear palsy (IPMDS-PSP) diagnostic criteria accurate enough to differentiate common PSP phenotypes? Park Relat Disord 69:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Santangelo G, Cuoco S, Pellecchia MT, Erro R, Barone P, Picillo M (2018) Comparative cognitive and neuropsychiatric profiles between Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol 265(11):2602–2613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9038-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pilotto A et al (2017) Mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurodegener Dis 17(6):286–291. https://doi.org/10.1159/000479110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Borroni B, Alberici A, Agosti C, Cosseddu M, Padovani A (2009) Pattern of behavioral disturbances in corticobasal degeneration syndrome and progressive supranuclear palsy. Int Psychogeriatrics 21(3):463–468. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209008862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Erro R, Barone P, Moccia M, Amboni M, Vitale C (2013) Abnormal eating behaviors in progressive supranuclear palsy. Eur J Neurol 20(3):47–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Keeffe FM et al (2007) Loss of insight in frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain 130(3):753–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Plutino A et al (2020) Insight in frontotemporal dementia and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04290-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jabbari E et al (2020) Diagnosis across the spectrum of progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome. JAMA Neurol 77(3):377–387. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Martí-Andrés G et al (2020) Multicenter validation of metabolic abnormalities related to PSP according to the MDS-PSP criteria. Mov Disord 4:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the patients and their families for their participation in this study.

Funding

In the last 12 months, Andrea Horta-Barba received a salary from the Research Institute of Sant Pau and received compensation for speaker activities from UCB and AbbVie. Javier Pagonabarraga has received honoraria as speaker or Member of Advisory Board for Zambon, Bial, UCB, Allergan, Abbvie, and Ipsen. Saül Martínez-Horta received a salary from the Research Institute of Sant Pau, has been awarded a grant from the Huntington’s Disease Society of America and received compensation for speaker activities from UCB, AbbVie and Roche. Laura Busteed is studying her Master of Science and has not received honoraria. Berta Pascual-Sedano received compensation for speaker activities from Abbvie, UCB and Ferrer. Ignacio Illán-Gala is supported by the Global Brain Health Institute (Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health). Juan Marín-Lahoz received a salary from the PERIS of the Generalitat of Catalonia. Ignacio Aracil-Bolaños has received a salary from the Research Institute of Sant Pau and research support from Carlos III Institute Research Grant. Jesús Pérez-Pérez is supported by a research grant from the Government of Spain (ISCIII). Frederic Sampedro is supported by a research grant from the Government of Spain (ISCIII). Helena Bejr-Kasem has received a salary from a pre-doctoral grant awarded by the Spanish Government (ISCIII), from the Research Institute of Sant Pau and received compensation for speaker activities in scientific meetings supported by Zambon, and non-financial support for congress attendance from Abbvie, Zambon and Allergan. Jaime Kulisevsky has received public research support from CIBERNED and Carlos III Institute, unrestrictive research support from Zambon and TEVA, and honoraria for lecturing and/or consulting from Zambon and TEVA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AH-B: research project conception, organization, execution, design. Formal analysis. Writing – original draft. JP: research project conception, organization, execution, design. Formal analysis. Writing – original draft. SM-H: research project conception, design. Formal analysis. Writing – review and critique. LB: research project organization and execution. Writing – review and critique. BP-S: research project organization and execution. Writing – review and critique. II-G: research project organization and execution. Writing – review and critique. JM-L: research project organization and execution. Writing – review and critique. IA-B: research project organization and execution. Writing – review and critique. JP-P: research project organization and execution. Writing – review and critique. FS: statistical analysis execution. Writing – review and critique. HB-K: research project organization and execution. Writing – review and critique. JK: research project conception, organization, design. Formal analysis. Writing – original draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Javier Pagonabarraga or Jaime Kulisevsky.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Nothing to report.

Ethical standard

The study has been approved by the ethical committee of Sant Pau Hospital (Barcelona, Spain). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 24 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 23 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horta-Barba, A., Pagonabarraga, J., Martínez-Horta, S. et al. Cognitive and behavioral profile of progressive supranuclear palsy and its phenotypes. J Neurol 268, 3400–3408 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10511-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10511-y

Keywords

Navigation