Skip to main content
Log in

The immunohistochemical, DNA methylation, and chromosomal copy number profile of cauda equina paraganglioma is distinct from extra-spinal paraganglioma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Neuropathologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paragangliomas are neuroendocrine tumors of the autonomic nervous system that are variably clinically functional and have a potential for metastasis. Up to 40% occur in the setting of a hereditary syndrome, most commonly due to germline mutations in succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) genes. Immunohistochemically, paragangliomas are characteristically GATA3-positive and cytokeratin-negative, with loss of SDHB expression in most hereditary cases. In contrast, the rare paragangliomas arising in the cauda equina (CEP) or filum terminale region have been shown to be hormonally silent, clinically indolent, and have variable keratin expression, suggesting these tumors may represent a separate pathologic entity. We retrospectively evaluated 17 CEPs from 11 male and 6 female patients with a median age of 38 years (range 21–82), none with a family history of neuroendocrine neoplasia. Six of the 17 tumors demonstrated prominent gangliocytic or ganglioneuromatous differentiation. By immunohistochemistry, none of the CEPs showed GATA3 positivity or loss of SDHB staining; all 17 CEPs were cytokeratin positive. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling was performed on 12 of the tumors and compared with publicly available genome-wide DNA methylation data. Clustering analysis showed that CEPs form a distinct epigenetic group, separate from paragangliomas of extraspinal sites, pheochromocytomas, and other neuroendocrine neoplasms. Copy number analysis revealed diploid genomes in the vast majority of CEPs, whereas extraspinal paragangliomas were mostly aneuploid with recurrent trisomy 1q and monosomies of 1p, 3, and 11, none of which were present in the cohort of CEP. Together, these findings indicate that CEPs likely represent a distinct entity. Future genomic studies are needed to further elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of these tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

DNA methylation array data files for the 12 cauda equina paragangliomas generated as part of this study are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository under accession number GSE156358 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).

References

  1. Akbik O, Floruta C, Chohan M, SantaCruz K, Carlson A (2016) A unique case of an aggressive gangliocytic paraganglioma of the filum terminale. Case Rep Surg. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1232594

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, Ladd-Acosta C, Feinberg AP, Hansen KD et al (2014) Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30:1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Asa S, Ezzat S, Mete O (2018) The diagnosis and clinical significance of paragangliomas in unusual locations. J Clin Med 7:280. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090280

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanco Sampascual S, Bereciartua E, Fernández Ramos JR, Martínez Cadilla J, Testillano Tarrero M, Moretó Canela M (1995) Duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 87:813–815. https://doi.org/10.14309/crj.0000000000000272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burnichon N, Abermil N, Buffet A, Favier J, Gimenez-Roqueplo A-P (2012) The genetics of paragangliomas. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129:315–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2012.04.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calenbergh F, Plets C, Ardon H, Sciot R (2011) Paraganglioma of the cauda equina region: a report of three cases. Surg Neurol Int 2:96. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.82989

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M, Hovestadt V, Schrimpf D, Sturm D et al (2018) DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature 555:469–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan CS, Laddha SV, Lewis PW, Koletsky MS, Robzyk K, Da Silva E et al (2018) ATRX, DAXX or MEN1 mutant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a distinct alpha-cell signature subgroup. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06498-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dermawan JK, Mukhopadhyay S, Shah AA (2019) Frequency and extent of cytokeratin expression in paraganglioma: an immunohistochemical study of 60 cases from 5 anatomic sites and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 93:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorini F, Lavrador JP, Vergani F, Bhangoo R, Gullan R, Reisz Z et al (2020) Primary lumbar paraganglioma: clinical, radiologic, surgical, and histopathologic characteristics from a case series of 13 patients. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fishbein L, Leshchiner I, Walter V, Danilova L, Robertson AG, Johnson AR et al (2017) Comprehensive molecular characterization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Cancer Cell 31:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fliedner SMJ, Lehnert H, Pacak K (2010) Metastatic paraganglioma. Semin Oncol 37:627–637. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.10.017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fortin JP, Labbe A, Lemire M, Zanke BW, Hudson TJ, Fertig EJ et al (2014) Functional normalization of 450 k methylation array data improves replication in large cancer studies. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0503-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gill AJ, Benn DE, Chou A, Clarkson A, Muljono A, Meyer-Rochow GY et al (2010) Immunohistochemistry for SDHB triages genetic testing of SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD in paraganglioma–pheochromocytoma syndromes. Hum Pathol 41:805–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.12.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henrich KO, Bender S, Saadati M, Dreidax D, Gartlgruber M, Shao C et al (2016) Integrative genome-scale analysis identifies epigenetic mechanisms of transcriptional deregulation in unfavorable neuroblastomas. Cancer Res 76:5523–5537. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hovestadt V, Zapatka M (2020) conumee: Enhanced copy-number variation analysis using Illumina DNA methylation arrays. R package version 1.9.0. https://bioconductor.org/packages/conumee/

  17. Krijthe J (2015) Rtsne: T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding using a Barnes–Hut implementation. Version 0.15. https://github.com/jkrijthe/Rtsne

  18. Lefebvre M, Foulkes WD (2014) Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma syndromes: genetics and management update. Curr Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1579

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lloyd R, Osamura R, Kloppel G, Rosai J (2017) WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs, 4th edn. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mamilla D, Manukyan I, Fetsch PA, Pacak K, Miettinen M (2020) Immunohistochemical distinction of paragangliomas from epithelial neuroendocrine tumors—gangliocytic duodenal and cauda equina paragangliomas align with epithelial neuroendocrine tumors. Hum Pathol 103:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2020.07.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Masuoka J, Brandner S, Paulus W, Soffer D, Vital A, Chimelli L et al (2001) Germline SDHD mutation in paraganglioma of the spinal cord. Oncogene 20:5084–5086. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mishra T, Goel NA, Goel AH (2014) Primary paraganglioma of the spine: a clinicopathological study of eight cases. J Craniovertebr Junct Spine 5:20–24. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.135211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohammad HP, Smitheman KN, Kamat CD, Soong D, Federowicz KE, VanAller GS et al (2015) A DNA hypomethylation signature predicts antitumor activity of LSD1 inhibitors in SCLC. Cancer Cell 28:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2015.06.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Orrell J, Hales S (1992) Paragangliomas of the cauda equina have a distinctive cytokeratin immunophenotype. Histopathology 21:479–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb00436.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pai R, Manipadam MT, Singh P, Ebenazer A, Samuel P, Rajaratnam S (2014) Usefulness of succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) immunohistochemistry in guiding mutational screening among patients with pheochromocytoma–paraganglioma syndromes. APMIS 122:1130–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Papathomas TG, Oudijk L, Persu A, Gill AJ, Van Nederveen F, Tischler AS et al (2015) SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a multicenter interobserver variation analysis using virtual microscopy: a multinational study of the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENS@T). Mod Pathol 28:807–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roche PH, Figarella-Branger D, Regis J, Peragut JC (1996) Cauda equina paraganglioma with subsequent intracranial and intraspinal metastases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138:475–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Strommer K, Brandner S, Sarioglu A, Sure U, Yonekawa Y (1995) Symptomatic cerebellar metastasis and late local recurrence of a cauda equina paraganglioma. J Neurosurg 83:169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Udager AM, Magers MJ, Goerke DM, Vinco ML, Siddiqui J, Cao X et al (2018) The utility of SDHB and FH immunohistochemistry in patients evaluated for hereditary paraganglioma–pheochromocytoma syndromes. Hum Pathol 71:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2017.10.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang SY, Jin YJ, Park SH, Jahng TA, Kim HJ, Chung CK (2005) Paragangliomas in the cauda equina region: clinicopathoradiologic findings in four cases. J Neurooncol 72:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-004-2159-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco clinical research endowment fund. This study was also supported in part by the NIH Director’s Early Independence Award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (DP5 OD021403) to D.A.S.; a Developmental Research Program Award from the UCSF Brain Tumor SPORE from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (P50 CA097257) to D.A.S.; and the UCSF Glioblastoma Precision Medicine Program from the Sandler Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arie Perry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional file1: Supplementary Tables 1–3 (XLSX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramani, B., Gupta, R., Wu, J. et al. The immunohistochemical, DNA methylation, and chromosomal copy number profile of cauda equina paraganglioma is distinct from extra-spinal paraganglioma. Acta Neuropathol 140, 907–917 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02221-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02221-y

Keywords

Navigation