Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Angioleiomyoma of the extremities: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with histopathological findings in 25 cases

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To identify the characteristic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in angioleiomyoma and to clarify its relationship with histopathological findings.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the MRI findings and pathological subtypes in 25 patients with subcutaneous angioleiomyoma of the extremities. Based on the previous reports, MRI findings that could be characteristic of angioleiomyoma were extracted. According to the World Health Organization classification, all cases were classified into three pathological subtypes: solid, venous, and cavernous. The relationship between MRI findings and pathological subtypes was analyzed.

Results

The pathological subtypes were solid (n = 10), venous (n = 11), and cavernous (n = 4). The following MRI findings were observed: (a) hypo- or iso-intense linear and/or branching structures on a T2-weighted image (positive total/solid/venous/cavernous: 19/5/10/4, respectively), which we defined as “dark reticular sign”; (b) peripheral hypointense rim on a T2-weighted image (positive total/solid/venous/cavernous: 19/7/8/4, respectively); and (c) presence of any adjacent vascular structures (positive total/solid/venous/cavernous: 6/3/3/0, respectively). Chi-square test showed a significant relationship between dark reticular sign and pathological subtypes (p = 0.0426). The dark reticular sign was found more frequently in the venous and cavernous types than in the solid type. The other MRI findings did not reveal a significant relationship between pathological subtypes.

Conclusion

We present the largest case series exploring MRI findings in angioleiomyoma. The dark reticular sign was a characteristic MRI finding of angioleiomyoma and was seen in most of the venous and cavernous types, which may facilitate preoperative diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stout AP. Solitary Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Leiomyoma. Am J Cancer. 1937;29(3):435–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuyama A. Angioleiomyoma. In: Board tWCoTE, ed. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board Soft tissue and bone tumours. Soft tissue tumours. 3. 5th ed. Lyon (France): World Health Organization; 2020. p. 186–7.

  3. Hachisuga T, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Angioleiomyoma. A clinicopathologic reappraisal of 562 cases. Cancer. 1984;54(1):126–30.

  4. Morimoto N. Angiomyoma (vascular leiomyoma): a clinicopathologic study. Med J Kagoshima Univ. 1973;24:663–88.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang JW, Ahn JM, Kang HS, Suh JS, Kim SM, Seo JW. Vascular leiomyoma of an extremity: MR imaging-pathology correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(4):981–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoo HJ, Choi JA, Chung JH, et al. Angioleiomyoma in soft tissue of extremities: MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):W291–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sayit E, Sayit AT, Zan E, Bakirtas M, Akpinar H, Gunbey HP. Vascular leiomyoma of an extremity: report of two cases with MRI and histopathologic correlation. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2014;5(2):110–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang BS, Shim HS, Kim JH, et al. Angioleiomyoma of the Extremities: findings on ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(5):1201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupte C, Butt SH, Tirabosco R, Saifuddin A. Angioleiomyoma: magnetic resonance imaging features in ten cases. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(11):1003–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klumpp R, Compagnoni R, Patelli G, Trevisan CL. Angioleiomyoma in the posterior knee: a case report and literature review. Knee. 2017;24(3):675–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramesh P, Annapureddy SR, Khan F, Sutaria PD. Angioleiomyoma: a clinical, pathological and radiological review. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58(6):587–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar S, Hasan R, Maddukuri SB, Mathew M. Angiomyoma presenting as a painful subcutaneous mass: a diagnostic challenge. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2014206606.

  13. Jin Q, Lu H. Angioleiomyoma of the hand with nerve compression. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(6):300060520928683.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kinoshita T, Ishii K, Abe Y, Naganuma H. Angiomyoma of the lower extremity: MR findings. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(7):443–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blacksin MF, Ha DH, Hameed M, Aisner S. Superficial soft-tissue masses of the extremities. Radiographics. 2006;26(5):1289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang J, Li Y, Zhao Y, Qiao J. CT and MRI of superficial solid tumors. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8(2):232–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith J, Wisniewski SJ, Lee RA. Sonographic and clinical features of angioleiomyoma presenting as a painful Achilles tendon mass. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(10):1365–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bermejo A, De Bustamante TD, Martinez A, Carrera R, Zabía E, Manjón P. MR imaging in the evaluation of cystic-appearing soft-tissue masses of the extremities. Radiographics. 2013;33(3):833–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.com) for editing this manuscript for English language.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hiromi Edo and Hiroshi Shinmoto were involved in study design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. Ayano Matsunaga and Susumu Matsukuma were involved in acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. Ayako Mikoshi was involved in analysis and interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript. Michiro Susa and Keisuke Horiuchi were involved in data collection and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromi Edo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (4302).

Informed consent

Approval from the Institutional Review Board was obtained, and in keeping with the policies for a retrospective review, informed consent was not required. In addition, the patient’s records were anonymously analyzed.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edo, H., Matsunaga, A., Matsukuma, S. et al. Angioleiomyoma of the extremities: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with histopathological findings in 25 cases. Skeletal Radiol 51, 837–848 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03888-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03888-4

Keywords

Navigation