Skip to main content
Log in

Genome-based reclassification of Actinopolyspora righensis Meklat et al. 2013 as a later heterotypic synonym of Actinopolyspora lacussalsi Guan et al. 2013 and description of Actinopolyspora lacussalsi subsp. lacussalsi subsp. nov. and Actinopolyspora lacussalsi subsp. righensis subsp. nov.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A genome led phylophasic study was designed to determine the taxonomic status of a strain, DSM 45956, recovered from a Saharan desert soil. A wealth of taxonomic data, including average nucleotide identity and DNA:DNA hybridization (DDH) values, showed that the isolate and the type strains of Actinopolyspora lacussalsi and Actinopolyspora righensis belong to the same species. Consequently, it is proposed that A. righensis is a heterotypic synonym of A. lacussalsi. Similarly, DDH values and associated phenotypic data show that A. lacussalsi contains two subspecies, A. lacussalsi subsp. lacussalsi and A. lacussalsi subsp. righensis which includes isolate DSM 45956.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain DSM 45956 is KJ574193.1. The genomics datasets used during the current study are available at the JGI website (https://img.jgi.doe.gov) with accession codes SAMN04487904 (A. righensis), SAMN18243356 (A. lacussalsi), SAMN10872242 (strain DSM 45956) and SAMN04487820 (A. mzabensis).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the late Prof. N. Sabaou (LBSM, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Kouba, Algiers, Algeria) for great help in the isolation and taxonomic analysis of strain DSM 45956.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding declarations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.S. performed experiments, data analysis, and manuscript drafting; N.B. carried out annotation, biosynthetic gene cluster analysis, supervised and corrected draft manuscript; A.M. assisted in the isolation of actinobacterial strains; M.D.H. corrected the manuscript and technical support; H-P.K. performed chemotaxonomic analysis, review and edited; I.N. supervised, analysed the data, and corrected the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noureddine Bouras.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

This study does not describe any experimental work related to human or animals.

Additional information

Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saker, R., Bouras, N., Meklat, A. et al. Genome-based reclassification of Actinopolyspora righensis Meklat et al. 2013 as a later heterotypic synonym of Actinopolyspora lacussalsi Guan et al. 2013 and description of Actinopolyspora lacussalsi subsp. lacussalsi subsp. nov. and Actinopolyspora lacussalsi subsp. righensis subsp. nov.. Arch Microbiol 204, 501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03120-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03120-4

Keywords

Navigation