Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of charging voltage and capacitance on energy conversion efficiency of electromagnetic launcher

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electromagnetic launcher is a kind of active protection system, which launches metal flying plate to intercept incoming objects. Different from the traditional active protection system, the flying plate gains kinetic energy from energy stored in the capacitor through electromagnetic induction. Under the same condition of energy storage, the higher the energy conversion efficiency is, the faster the initial velocity of the flying plate gains and the better the interception effect is. Based on the self-made launcher including a pulse capacitor, a crowbar circuit, a trigger vacuum switch, a self-made coil launcher and a high-speed camera, influence of the charging voltage and capacitance of the capacitor on the energy conversion efficiency by the method of numerical simulation and high-speed camera experiment has been performed. The results show that the higher the charging voltage or capacitance, the higher the energy conversion efficiency of the launcher is, but the increasing rate gradually decreases with the increase in charging voltage and capacitance. The main reason is that the flying plate has produced significant displacement in the acceleration stage, which makes flying plate separate from the coupling with the coil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wickert M (2006) Electric armor against shaped charges: analysis of jet distortion with respect to jet dynamics and current flow. IEEE Trans Magn 43(1):426–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li X, Meng T, Zhao C, Li L (2006) Multiprojectile active electromagnetic armor. IEEE Trans Magn 43(1):460–462

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang T, Dong W, Guo W, Cao B, Su Z, Sun X, Li M, Fan W (2017) Spatial movement analysis on the intercepting projectile in the active electromagnetic armor. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 45(7):1302–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fair HD (2013) Guest editorial the past, present, and future of electro-magnetic launch technology and the IEEE international EML symposia. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 41(5):1024–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma W, Lu J (2017) Thinking and study of electromagnetic launch technology. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 45(7):1071–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sterzelmeier K, Brommer V, Sinniger L (2001) Active armor protection-conception and design of steerable launcher systems fed by modular pulsed-power supply units. IEEE Trans Magn 37(1):238–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang H, Huang Y, Li R, Duan H, Jin H (2011) Structural optimization of electromagnetic launcher in active electromagnetic armor. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 39(1):487–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng Q, Li J, Gui Y, Yuan J, Wang Z (2004). Study of a single-stage electromagnetic launcher system using pancake coil. In: 2004 12th symposium on electromagnetic launch technology. IEEE, pp 282–284

  9. Li Z, Sun M, Ming F, Chao Y (2004) The finite element analysis for the magnetic of the active EM armor projectile interceptor. In: 2004 12th symposium on electromagnetic launch technology, pp 441–443

  10. Owlia E, Mirjalili SA (2021) The effect of launcher parameters on the projectile velocity in laboratory electromagnetic weft insertion system. J Text Inst 112(8):1232–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar VP, Swarup S, Rajput S, Kumar G, Nomula AP, Jadhav KB, Taral SY, Daniel KJ, Datar S (2019) Design and development of 4-MJ capacitor bank-based pulsed power system for electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 47(3):1681–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao R, Hu X, Dong E, Ma X, Zhou Y (2021) Research on a projectile-borne measuring apparatus for electromagnetic launcher. J Phys Conf Ser 1983:012047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceylan D, Karagöz M, Çevik Y, Yıldırım B, Polat H, Keysan O (2019) Simulations and experiments of EMFY-1 electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 47(7):3336–3343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li C, Wu P, Ruan J, Wang Z, Chen L, Li L, Xia S (2020) Influence of caliber width on launch performance in electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 48(4):1184–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong L, Wu H, Sun S, Liu J (2021) Analysis of the influence of the number of coil pairs per wing on multiwing reconnection electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 49(10):3251–3256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. An S, Lee B, Bae Y, Lee YH, Kim SH (2017) Numerical analysis of the transient inductance gradient of electromagnetic launcher using 2-D and 3-D finite-element methods. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 45(7):1635–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fan G, Wang Y, Xu Q, Nie X, Yan Z (2019) Design and analysis of a novel three-coil reconnection electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 47(1):814–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin YS, Lee HS, Kim JS, Kim YB, Rim G (2004) Novel crowbar circuit for compact 50-kJ capacitor bank. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 32(2):525–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang E, Zheng T, Han Y, Chen C (2019) Study on the influence of plane coil geometric parameters on initial launch velocity. IEEE Access 7:166667–166675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gee RM, Persad C (2001) Multishot performance of an insulator in a laboratory electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Trans Magn 37(1):257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Engel TG, Dickens JC, Kristiansen M (1993) Insulator and electrode mass erosion and surface voltage holdoff recovery for transient, high current surface discharges. IEEE Trans Magn 29(1):1143–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang C, Cao Y, Wang H, Huang Y, Li S (2013) Multifield coupled analysis of a launch coil in active EM armor. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 41(5):1034–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fan G, Wang Y, Hou K, Miao Y, Hu Y, Yan Z (2021) Research on energy conversion efficiency of the reconfigurable reconnection electromagnetic launcher. Energy 215:119088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chi Y (2011) Research on induced current distribution of active electromagnetic armor. Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11472178) to provide fund for conducting experiments.

Funding

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Enling Tang or Ruizhi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, E., Gao, Q., Wang, R. et al. Influence of charging voltage and capacitance on energy conversion efficiency of electromagnetic launcher. Electr Eng 104, 2485–2495 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01495-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01495-7

Keywords

Navigation