Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The clinical outcome of minimally invasive popliteal tendon recess procedure is comparable to arthroscopic popliteal tendon reconstruction in patients with type A posterolateral rotational instability

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the objective and subjective clinical outcome of minimally invasive popliteal tendon (PT) recess procedure versus arthroscopic PT reconstruction, combined with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with Type A posterolateral rotational instability (PLRI). The hypothesis was that the two techniques had comparable clinical outcomes.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2017, patients who were eligible for inclusion in this study if they (1) had Type A PLRI according to Fanelli’s classification with posterior tibial translation > 12 mm on stress radiography and side-to-side difference of dial test external rotation > 10°, (2) PT peel-off lesion or laxity with structural integrity (3) were followed for a minimum of 2 years with examination under anesthesia (EUA) and stress radiograph results. Evaluation included subjective scoring, knee stability examinations and second-look arthroscopic lateral gutter drive-through (LGDT) test. Patients who underwent PT recess procedure were designated as Group A, while patients who underwent arthroscopic PT reconstruction were labelled as Group B. The differences between the two groups were analyzed.

Results

A total of 61 eligible patients with a minimum follow-up time of 2 years were evaluated in the present study. At the final follow-up, there were no significant inter-group differences in Lysholm scores (Group A: 69.0 ± 16.5, Group B: 75.8 ± 14.6, ns), Tegner scores [Group A: 2 (1–4), Group B: 3 (1–5), ns], or IKDC subjective scores (Group A: 70.5 ± 13.5, Group B: 71.1 ± 9.1, ns). No significant difference in side-to-side difference on posterior stress radiography (Group A: 4.3 ± 3.8 mm, Group B: 4.7 ± 4.6 mm, P = 0.701), dial test result (Group A: 0.9 ± 4.4°, Group B: 1.6 ± 4.9°, ns) or LGDT test positive rate (Group A: 2/34, 5.9%, Group B: 2/27, 7.7%, ns) was observed.

Conclusion

Both minimally invasive PT recess procedure and arthroscopic PT reconstruction significantly improved the knee stability and subjective outcome comparing with preoperative value. In a comparison with arthroscopic PT reconstruction, the recess procedure demonstrated comparable subjective and objective clinical outcome. When both PT reconstruction and PT recess procedure are indicated, the minimally invasive and graft-free recess procedure can be a viable option.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn JH, Wang JH, Lee SY, Rhyu IJ, Suh DW, Jang KM (2019) Arthroscopic-assisted anatomical reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee joint. Knee 26:1136–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker CL Jr, Norwood LA, Hughston JC (1983) Acute posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am 65:614–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonanzinga T, Zhang H, Song GY, Zhang J, Signorelli C, Feng H (2015) Is PLC repair of a peel-off femoral lesion an effective option in a multiligament setting? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2936–2942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chahla J, James EW, Cinque ME, LaPrade RF (2018) Midterm outcomes following anatomic-based popliteus tendon reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:812–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chahla J, Murray IR, Robinson J, Lagae K, Margheritini F, Fritsch B et al (2019) Posterolateral corner of the knee: an expert consensus statement on diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2520–2529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cinats DJ, Stone T (2020) Comminuted fibular head fractures with posterolateral knee instability: a novel repair technique using a tension-slide device. J Orthop Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuevas-Ramos G, Cova M, Arguelles D, Prades M (2019) Anatomical variations of the equine popliteal tendon. J Vet Sci 20:e36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang CH, Cheng CK, Qu TB, Zhang JH, Zhang B, Hua Q et al (2020) The posterolateral corner-locked technique is applicable in a chinese population regarding the tibial component rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 33:466–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng H, Hong L, Geng XS, Zhang H, Wang XS, Zhang J (2009) Posterolateral sling reconstruction of the popliteus tendon: an all-arthroscopic technique. Arthroscopy 25:800–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng H, Zhang H, Hong L, Wang XS, Cheng KB, Zhang J (2011) Femoral peel-off lesions in acute posterolateral corner injuries: incidence, classification, and clinical characteristics. Arthroscopy 27:951–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng H, Zhang H, Hong L, Wang XS, Zhang J (2009) The “lateral gutter drive-through” sign: an arthroscopic indicator of acute femoral avulsion of the popliteus tendon in knee joints. Arthroscopy 25:1496–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freychet B, Sonnery-Cottet B, Vieira TD, Sanders TL, Kennedy NI, Krych AJ et al (2020) Arthroscopic identification of the knee posterolateral corner structures and anatomic arthroscopic posterolateral corner reconstruction: technical note—Part 1. Arthrosc Tech 9:e1977–e1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freychet B, Sonnery-Cottet B, Vieira TD, Sanders TL, Kennedy NI, Krych AJ et al (2020) Arthroscopic identification of the knee posterolateral corner structures and anatomic arthroscopic posterolateral corner reconstruction: technical note—Part 2. Arthrosc Tech 9:e1985–e1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geeslin AG, Moulton SG, LaPrade RF (2016) A systematic review of the outcomes of posterolateral corner knee injuries, part 1: surgical treatment of acute injuries. Am J Sports Med 44:1336–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hughston JC, Jacobson KE (1985) Chronic posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67:351–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacob RW (1992) Lateral and posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee. In: Jacob RS, HU (eds) The knee and the cruciate ligaments. Springer, Berlin, pp 463–494

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobson KE, Longacre MD (2015) Posterolateral reconstruction of the knee using capsular procedures for evaluation and treatment of posterolateral instability of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 23:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahan JB, Li D, Schneble CA, Huang P, Bullock J, Porrino J et al (2020) The pathoanatomy of posterolateral corner ligamentous disruption in multiligament knee injuries is predictive of peroneal nerve injury. Am J Sports Med 48:3541–3548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kennedy MI, Bernhardson A, Moatshe G, Buckley PS, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2019) Fibular collateral ligament/posterolateral corner injury: when to repair, reconstruct, or both. Clin Sports Med 38:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krause M, Akoto R, Drenck TC, Frosch KH, Preiss A (2019) Posterolateral rotatory knee instability-MRI evaluation of anatomic landmarks for tibial drill tunnel placement in open and arthroscopic popliteus tendon reconstruction. J Knee Surg 32:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee DY, Park YJ, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Nam DC, Park JS et al (2018) The role of isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in knees with combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral complex injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2669–2678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li Y, Hong L, Wang XS, Zhang H, Li X, Zheng T et al (2019) Midterm clinical outcome of combined posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and posterolateral corner surgery using second-look arthroscopic “lateral gutter drive-through” test as an adjunctive evaluation. Orthop Surg 11:422–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, Li X, Zheng T, Zhang Z et al (2019) The clinical outcome of arthroscopic versus open popliteal tendon reconstruction combined with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with type A posterolateral rotational instability. Arthroscopy 35:2402–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu P, Gong X, Zhang J, Ao Y (2020) Anatomic, all-arthroscopic reconstruction of posterolateral corner of the knee: a cadaveric biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 36:1121–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2007) Posterolateral knee reconstruction with an anatomical bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament. Am J Sports Med 35:259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanders TL, Johnson NR, Pareek A, Krych AJ, Marx RG, Stuart MJ et al (2018) Satisfactory knee function after single-stage posterolateral corner reconstruction in the multi-ligament injured/dislocated knee using the anatomic single-graft technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1258–1265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Senese M, Greenberg E, Todd Lawrence J, Ganley T (2018) Rehabilitation following isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a literature review of published protocols. Int J Sports Phys Ther 13:737–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen J, Zhang H, Lv Y, Hong L, Wang X, Zhang J et al (2013) Validity of a novel arthroscopic test to diagnose posterolateral rotational instability of the knee joint: the lateral gutter drive-through test. Arthroscopy 29:695–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Teo HLT, Ang KXM, Loh SYJ (2020) A reproducible reference point for the common peroneal nerve during surgery at the posterolateral corner of the knee: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Relat Res 32:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Treme GP, Salas C, Ortiz G, Gill GK, Johnson PJ, Menzer H et al (2019) A biomechanical comparison of the arciero and laprade reconstruction for posterolateral corner knee injuries. Orthop J Sports Med 7:2325967119838251

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. van Gennip S, van der Wal WA, Heesterbeek PJC, Wymenga AB, Busch V (2020) Posterolateral corner reconstruction in combined injuries of the knee: Improved stability with Larson’s fibular sling reconstruction and comparison with LaPrade anatomical reconstruction. Knee 27:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weiler A, Frosch KH, Gwinner C, Strobel MJ, Lobenhoffer P (2020) The Posterolateral Instability Score (PoLIS) of the knee joint: a guideline for standardized documentation, classification, and surgical decision-making. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06044-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Weiss S, Krause M, Frosch KH (2020) Posterolateral corner of the knee: a systematic literature review of current concepts of arthroscopic reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:2003–2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Westermann RW, Marx RG, Spindler KP, Huston LJ, Ganesh MK, Amendola A et al (2019) No difference between posterolateral corner repair and reconstruction with concurrent ACL surgery: results from a prospective multicenter cohort. Orthop J Sports Med 7:23

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yoon KH, Park SW, Lee SH, Kim MH, Park SY, Oh H (2013) Does cast immobilization contribute to posterior stability after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arthroscopy 29:500–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang H, Hong L, Wang XS, Zhang J, Geng XS, Liu X et al (2010) Single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and mini-open popliteofibular ligament reconstruction in knees with severe posterior and posterolateral rotation instability: clinical results of minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 26:508–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Hui Zhang, Xu Li, and Zhijun Zhang have received funding from the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (L192051).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sports Medicine Service, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China

    Yue Li, Hua Feng, Xu Li, Guanyang Song, Zhijun Zhang, Tong Zheng, Yanwei Cao & Hui Zhang

Authors
  1. Yue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hua Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guanyang Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhijun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tong Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yanwei Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Ethics Board approved the study (201209-11).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Feng, H., Li, X. et al. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive popliteal tendon recess procedure is comparable to arthroscopic popliteal tendon reconstruction in patients with type A posterolateral rotational instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 200–207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06444-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06444-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation