Skip to main content
Log in

A mathematical model for intracellular effects of toxins on DNA adduction and repair

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The processes by which certain classes of toxic compounds or their metabolites may react with DNA to alter the genetic information contained in subsequent generations of cells or organisms are a major component of hazard associated with exposure to chemicals in the environment. Many classes of chemicals may form DNA adducts and there may or may not be a defined mechanism to remove a particular adduct from DNA independent of replication. Many compounds and metabolites that bind DNA also readily bind existing proteins; some classes of toxins and DNA adducts have the capacity to inactivate a repair enzyme and divert the repair process competitively. This paper formulates anintracellular dynamic model for one aspect of the action of toxins that form DNA adducts, recognizing a capacity for removal of those adducts by a repair enzyme combined with reaction of the toxin and/or the DNA adduct to inactivate the repair enzyme. This particular model illustrates the possible saturation of repair enzyme capacity by the toxin dosage and shows that bistable behavior can occur, with the potential to induce abrupt shifts away from steady-state equilibria. The model suggests that bistable behavior, dose and variation between individuals or tissues may combine under certain conditions to amplify the biological effect of dose observed as DNA aduction and its consequences as mutation. A model recognizing stochastic phenomena also indicates that variation in within-cell toxin concentration may promote jumps between stable equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberts B., D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Ratt, K. Roberts and J. D. Watson. 1994.Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldous, D. 1989.Probability Approximations via the Poisson Clumping Heuristic. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrami, E. 1987.Mathematics for Dynamic Modeling. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Commission on Life Sciences. National Research Council. 1989. Biologic significance of DNA adducts and protein adducts. InDrinking Water and Health. Selected Issues in Risk Assessment, Vol. 9, pp. 6–59. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, S. M., J. E. Cochrane, T. R. Craft, J. A. Swenberg and T. R. Skopek. 1991. Toxicity, mutagenicity, and mutational specitra ofN-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in human cell lines with different DNA repair phenotypes.Cancer Res. 51, 5188–5197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, S. M., T. R. Skopek and J. A. Swenberg. 1992. Efficient repair ofO 6-ethylguanine, but notO 4-ethylthymine orO 2-ethylthymine, is dependent uponO 6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and nucleotide excision repair activities in human cells.Cancer Res. 52, 2008–2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklew, J. A. 1990.Large Deviation Techniques in Decision, Simulation, and Estimation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, J. G. 1995. Perspectives on molecular assays for measuring mutation in humans and rodents.Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 25, 88–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chae, M. Y., M. G. McDougall, M. E. Dolan, K. Swenn, A. E. Pegg and R. C. Moschel. 1994. SubstitutedO 6-benzylguanine derivatives and their inactivation of humanO 6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase.J. Med. Chem. 37, 342–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. and G. P. Margison. 1988. Expression of anE. coli O 6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase gene in Chinese hamster cells protects againstN-methyl andN-ethyl-nitrosourea induced reverse mutation at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase locus.Mutagenesis 3, 409–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidlin, M. I. and A. D. Wentzell. 1984.Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgman, C. D. (Ed). 1963.CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 12th ed. Cleveland, OH: Chemical Rubber Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hora, J. F., A. Eastman and E. Bresnick. 1983.O 6-methyl guanine methyltransferase rat liver.Biochemistry 22, 3759–3763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijinsky, W., A. E. Pegg, M. R. Anver and R. C. Moschel. 1994. Effects of inhibition ofO 6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in rats on carcinogenesis by methylnitrosourea and ethylnitrosourea.Japan.J. Cancer Res. 85, 226–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, J. 1993. Biology of disease, cellular selection in the genesis of multicellular organization.Laboratory Investigation 69, 136–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineura, K., I. Izumi, K. Watanabe, M. Kowada, K. Kohda, K. Koyama, I. Terashima and M. Ikenaga, 1994. Enhancing effect ofO 6-alkylguanine derivatives on chlorethylnitrosourea cytotoxicity toward tumor cells.Int. J. Cancer 58, 706–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegg, A. E. 1990. MammalianO 6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: regulation and importance in response to alkylating carcinogenic and therapeutic agents.Cancer Res. 50, 6119–6129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegg, A. E. and T. L. Byers, 1992. Repair of DNA containingO 6-alkylguanine.FASEB J.6, 2302–2310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling and B. P. Flanney, 1992.Numerical Recipes in Fortran, 2nd. ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuss, Z. 1980.Theory and Applications of Stochastic Differential Equations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonian, A. 1995. Asymptotic distribution of exit time for small-noise diffusions.SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55, 809–826.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B. 1985. In vivo formation and persistence of modified nucleosides resulting from alkylating agents.Environ. Health Persp. 62, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, H. J., A. K. Meeker, E. M. Posadas and D. S. Coffey. 1995. Frontiers in prostate cancer.Cancer Suppl. 75, 2027–2035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz, S. H. 1994.Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadhan, S. 1984.Large Deviations and Applications. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaver, D.P., Jacobs, P.A., Carpenter, R.L. et al. A mathematical model for intracellular effects of toxins on DNA adduction and repair. Bltn Mathcal Biology 59, 89–106 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459472

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459472

Keywords

Navigation