Skip to main content
Log in

The meaning and ethics of sustainability

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some have argued that the meaning of sustainability varies according to context, forcing us to be as explicit as possible when defining our terms. An argument is offered that disputes this conclusion by maintaining that it is not the meaning of sustainability that changes with respect to context, but rather our understanding of the context itself. This is frequently apparent in contradictions that arise when conceiving each context in terms of sustainability. If this argument is correct, then we should be concerned not with the “meaning” of sustainability but rather the implications of sustainability as they affect the status quo. And in order to do this we must be prepared to answer the question: Why is sustainability desirable? This approach is illustrated through a preliminary conceptual and ethical analysis of ecologically sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Aga Khan, Prince Sadruddin. 1986. Forewordin ICIHI Staff Staff (ICIHI staff report for the International Commission on International Humanitarian Issues), The vanishing forest: The human consequences of deforestation. Zed Books Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. H. 1988. Biocultural restoration of a tropical forest.BioScience 38(3):156–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., M. E. Hanson, D. M. Liverman, R. W. Merideth, Jr. 1987. Global sustainability: Toward definition.Environmental Management 11(6):713–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., and E. C. Wolf. 1988. Reclaiming the future. Pages 170–188in L. Starke (ed.), State of the world 1988. W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L. K. 1984. Political aspects of ecologically sustainable development.Environmental Conservation 11:299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R. A., and J. A. Dixon. 1985. Ecology meets economics: A guide to sustainable development.Environment 27(5):6–11, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, A. H. 1988. Sustainable resource use and development: uncertainty, irreversibility and rational choice. Pages 188–216in C. Tisdell and P. Maitra (eds.), Technological change, development and the environment. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, J. P. 1988. Culture and conservation.BioScience 38(7):450–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. 1988. On sustainable development and national accounts. Pages 41–56in D. Collard, D. Pearce, and D. Ulph (eds.), Economics, growth, and sustainable environments: Essays in memory of Richard Lecomber. St. Martins Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasmann, R. 1984. An introduction to world conservation. Pages 16–24in F. R. Thibodeau and H. H. Field (eds.), Sustaining tomorrow: A strategy for world conservation and development. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasmann, R. 1988. Biosphere reserves, buffers, and boundaries.BioScience 38(7):487–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckholm, E. 1979. The dispossessed of the earth: Land reform and sustainable development.Worldwatch paper 30.

  • Ehrenfeld, D. W. 1976. The conservation of non-resources.American Scientist 64:648–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann, L., and J. W. Bruce (eds.). 1988. Whose trees? Proprietary dimensions of forestry. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. 341 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, D. 1987. Sustainability, policies, natural resources and institutions. Pages 5–16in T. J. Davis and I. A. Schirmer (eds.), Sustainability issues in agricultural development. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufschmidt, M. M., D. E. James, A. D. Meister, B. T. Bower, J. A. Dixon. 1983. Environment, natural systems, and development: An economic valuation guide. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 338 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, P., and D. A. Munro (eds.). 1987. Conservation with equity: Strategies for sustainable development. Page Brothers, Norwich. 466 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C. (ed.). 1986. Community management: Asian experience and perspectives. Kumarian Press, West Hartford, Connecticut. 328 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. A. 1986. The environment, public health, and human ecology: Considerations for economic development. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 300 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1966. A Sand County almanac — with essays on conservation from Round River. Ballantine Books, New York. 295 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, A. 1986. Ecology and philosophy: By way of introduction.Philosophical Inquiry 8(1–2):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. 1986. The deep ecological movement: Some philosophical aspects.Philosophical Inquiry 8(1–2):10–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. B. 1984. Coevolutionary development potential.Land Economics 60(2):160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. 1987. Why preserve natural variety? Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 281 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan, T. 1988. The politics of sustainability. Pages 29–50in R. K. Turner (ed.), Sustainable environmental management. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. 292 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D., and A. Markandya. 1987. Marginal opportunity cost as a planning concept in natural resource management.Annals of Regional Science 21(3):18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrings, C. 1987. Economy and environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 179 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. 1987. Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions. Methuen, London. 221 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. 1988. Economic models and environmental values: A discourse on theory. Pages 51–66in K. Turner (ed.), Sustainable environmental management. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. 292 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H., III. 1988. Environmental ethics: duties to and values in the natural world. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 391 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1984a. Development: Which way now? Pages 485–508in A. Sen, Resources, values and development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1984b. Goods and people. Pages 509–532in A. Sen, Resources, values and development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions, G. 1987. The deep ecology movement: A review.Environmental Review Summer: 105–125.

  • Sober, E. 1986. Philosophical problems for environmentalism: The value of biological diversity. Pages 173–194in B. Norton (ed.), The preservation of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel, O. 1980. The interaction between styles of development and the environment in latin america.Cepal Review December:15–49.

  • Sunkel, O. 1987. Beyond the world conservation strategy: Integrating conservation and development in latin america and the caribbean. Pages 35–54in P. Jacobs and D. A. Munro (eds.), Conservation with equity: Strategies for sustainable development. Page Brothers, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangley, L. 1988a. Beyond national parks.BioScience 38(3):146–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangley, L. 1988b. A new era for biosphere reserves.BioScience 38(3):148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. 1986. Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 329 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C. 1985a. World conservation strategy, economic policies and sustainable resource-use in developing countries.The Environmental Professional 7:102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C. 1985b. Economics, ecology, sustainable agricultural systems and development.Development Southern Africa 2(4):512–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C. 1988. Sustainable development: Differing perspectives of ecologists and economists, and relevance to LDCs.World Development 16(3):373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K. 1988a. Sustainability, resource conservation and pollution control. Pages 1–25in R. K. Turner (ed.), Sustainable environmental management. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. 292 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K. 1988b. Wetland conservation: Economics and ethics. Pages 121–159in D. Collard, D. Pearce, and D. Ulph (eds.), Economics, growth, and sustainable environments: Essays in memory of Richard Lecomber. St. Martins Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 400 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute and the International Institute for Environment and Development. 1986. World resources 1986. Basic Books, New York. 353 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shearman, R. The meaning and ethics of sustainability. Environmental Management 14, 1–8 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394014

Key words

Navigation