Skip to main content

Osteoporosis Detection Based on X-Ray Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering (ICMETE 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 894))

  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

In this study, we describe a computer-based technique for identifying osteoporosis by analyzing medical X-ray images utilizing deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs). During the preprocessing phase, the suggested system prepares the original picture by acquiring the area of interest, enhancing contrast, and reducing noise. Subsequently, the smudging procedure was used to improve the system's accuracy and decrease mistake by creating a nearly identical fragile region throughout the database photos. The next step is using the suggested DCNN model to diagnose the problem. To do this, the dataset was preprocessed, smudged, and then put into the model in two parts: 75% for training and 25% for testing. With Dataset 1 and Dataset 2, the diagnoses’ accuracy was 94.7% and 91.5, respectively. It is important to note that two datasets were used: Dataset 1 is the Osteoporosis Knee X-ray Dataset from Kaggle, which has two classes (osteopenia and osteoporosis), and Dataset 2 is from Mendeley, which contains three classes (osteopenia, normal, and osteoporosis).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Derkatch S, Kirby C, Kimelman D, Jozani MJ, Davidson JM, Leslie WD (2019) Identification of vertebral fractures by convolutional neural networks to predict nonvertebral and hip fractures: a registry-based cohort study of dual X-ray absorptiometry. Radiology 293(2):405–411. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandirali M et al (2015) A new diagnostic score to detect osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI. EurRadiol 25:2951–2959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3699-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Majumdar SR et al (2008) Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 178(5):569–575. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker DJ, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA (2010) The societal burden of osteoporosis. CurrRheumatol Rep 12:186–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-010-0097-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clynes MA, Harvey NC, Curtis EM, Fuggle NR, Dennison EM, Cooper C (2020) The epidemiology of osteoporosis. Br Med Bull. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ji M-X, Yu Q (2015) Primary osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Chronic Dis Transl Med 1(01):9–13. 10.1016%2Fj.cdtm.2015.02.006

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J-Y, and S. A. B. of the E. S. for C. and E. A. of O. (ESCEO) and the C. of S. A. and N. S. of the I. O. F. (IOF) (2019) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 30:3–44. 10.1007%2Fs00198-018-4704-5

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hans D, Baim S (2017) Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the management of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. J Clin Densitom 20(3):322–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sela EI, Widyaningrum R (2015) Osteoporosis detection using important shape-based features of the porous trabecular bone on the dental X-ray images. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 6(9):247–250. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2015.060933

  10. Ferizi U et al (2019) Artificial intelligence applied to osteoporosis: a performance comparison of ma-chine learning algorithms in predicting fragility fractures from MRI data. J Magn Reson Imaging 49(4):1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hussain D, Naqvi RA, Loh W-K, Lee J (2021) Deep learning in DXA image segmentation. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.013031

  12. Dimai HP (2017) Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for diagnosis and fracture risk assessment; WHO-criteria, T-and Z-score, and reference databases. Bone 104:39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.12.016

  13. Brett AD, Brown JK (2015) Quantitative computed tomography and opportunistic bone density screening by dual use of computed tomography scans. J OrthopTranslat 3(4):178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fang Y et al (2021) Opportunistic osteoporosis screening in multi-detector CT images using deep convolutional neural networks. EurRadiol 31:1831–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07312-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He QF et al (2018) Radiographic predictors for bone mineral loss: cortical thickness and index of the distal femur. Bone Joint Res 7(7):468–475. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.77.bjr-2017-0332.r1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang H, Yates CJ, Gorelik A, Kale A, Song Q, Wark JD (2018) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) measures contribute to the understanding of bone fragility in older patients with low-trauma fracture. J Clin Densitom 21(1):140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2017.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shayganfar A, Khodayi M, Ebrahimian S, Tabrizi Z (2019) Quantitative diagnosis of osteoporosis using lumbar spine signal intensity in magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 92(1097):20180774. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Radominski SC et al (2017) Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Rev Bras Reumatol 57:s452–s466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbre.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomita N, Cheung YY, Hassanpour S (2018) Deep neural networks for automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on CT scans. Comput Biol Med 98:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bortone I et al. (2018) A supervised approach to classify the status of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women through static and dynamic baropodometry. In: 2018 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), IEEE, 2018, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489205

  21. Lee J-S, Adhikari S, Liu L, Jeong H-G, Kim H, Yoon S-J (2019) Osteoporosis detection in panoramic radiographs using a deep convolutional neural network-based computer-assisted diagnosis system: a preliminary study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 48(1):20170344. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu J, Wang J, Ruan W, Lin C, Chen D (2020) Diagnostic and gradation model of osteoporosis based on improved deep U-Net network. J Med Syst 44:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1502-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee S, Choe EK, Kang HY, Yoon JW, Kim HS (2020) The exploration of feature extraction and machine learning for predicting bone density from simple spine X-ray images in a Korean population. Skeletal Radiol 49:613–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03342-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Kiryu S, Abe O (2020) Prediction of bone mineral density from computed tomography: application of deep learning with a convolutional neural network. EurRadiol 30:3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06677-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/stevepython/osteoporosis-knee-xray-dataset?select=osteoporosis

  26. Abubakar UB, Boukar MM, Adeshina S (2022) Comparison of transfer learning model accuracy for osteoporosis classification on knee radiograph. In: 2022 2nd international conference on computing and machine intelligence (ICMI), IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMI55296.2022.9873731

  27. https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/fxjm8fb6mw/1

  28. Abubakar UB, Boukar MM, Adeshina S (2022) Evaluation of parameter fine-tuning with transfer learning for osteoporosis classification in knee radiograph. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 13(8)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wani IM, Arora S (2022) Osteoporosis diagnosis in knee X-rays by transfer learning based on convolution neural network. Multimed Tools Appl 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13911-y

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abulkareem Z. Mohammed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mohammed, A.Z., George, L.E. (2024). Osteoporosis Detection Based on X-Ray Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network. In: Sharma, D.K., Peng, SL., Sharma, R., Jeon, G. (eds) Micro-Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering. ICMETE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 894. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9562-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9562-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-9561-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-9562-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics