Skip to main content

Application of Nanobiosensor in Health Care Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bio-Nano Interface

Abstract

Nanotechnology is expected to have a revolutionary effect on biology and medicine. It has been able to provide special perspectives to the probe and control a variety of biological along with medical processes that take place at nanometer scales. Nanoparticles offer some advantages like sensing, image enhancement, and delivery agents. These are the approaches for exploiting nanotechnology in medicine as well as in the health care sector. Nanobiosensors are nano-scaled quantifiable devices, those involve nano-conjugated biological particulars as a transducing system to detect the minute quanta of any physical, chemical, or biological analytes. The appearance of nanobiosensors has actually developed the detection of many disorders like cancer, allergic responses, diabetes, and many other diseases and malfunctions related to these diseases. The present review comprehensively scrutinizes various types of cancer detection biosensors fabricated so far along with their technical evaluation regarding the potency and efficiency of selected bioreceptors biotransducers. For the diagnosis as well as monitoring of prostate cancer, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been identified and considered as the most valid clinical tool. By using amperometric immunosensor, prostate cancer can be monitored. For lung cancer detection a new rapid, as well as sensitive technique for screening, is required. With this approach, for the identification of many major disease biomarkers through sensitive, easy as well as rapid applications, biosensors have provided a promising technology as diagnostics tools. In this paper we discuss about lung cancer, prostate cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Also, current disease diagnostics techniques, protein and genetic biomarkers of diseases, as well as emerging biosensor technology for quick identification, are discussed. Moreover, the use of different nanomaterials in various forms as components of biosensors for the detection of various human pathogens has been further explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abhimanyu T et al (2017) Direct detection of two different tumor-derived extracellular vesicles by SAM-AuNIs LSPR biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 94:400–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal S, Sane R, Oberoi R, Ohlfest JR, Elmquist WF (2011) Delivery of molecularly targeted therapy to malignant glioma, a disease of the whole brain. Expert Rev Mol Med 13:e17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altintas Z, Tothill I (2013) Biomarkers and biosensors for the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Sens Actuators B: Chem 188:988–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amanda J et al (2005) Detection of a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease from synthetic and clinical samples using a nanoscale optical biosensor. J Am Chem Soc 127:2264–2271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ariga K, Yamauchi Y, Rydzek G, Ji Q, Yonamine, Wu KCW, Hill JP (2014) Layer-by-layer nanoarchitectonics: invention, innovation, and evolution. Chem Lett 43:36–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai L et al (2019) Ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis IS6110 fragment using gold nanoparticles decorated fullerene nanoparticles/nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheet as signal tags. Analytica Chimica Acta 1080:75–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee T et al (2016) Multiparametric magneto-fluorescent nanosensors for the ultrasensitive detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7. ACS Infect Dis 2:667–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barlési F, Gimenez C, Torre JP, Doddoli C, Mancini J, Greillier L, Roux F, Kleisbauer JP (2004) Prognostic value of combination of Cyfra 21-1, CEA and NSE in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Respir Med 98:357–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barreda-García S et al (2015) Attomolar quantitation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by asymmetric helicase-dependent isothermal DNA-amplification and electrochemical detection. Biosens Bioelectron 68:122–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernacka-Wojcik I et al (2013) Bio-microfluidic platform for gold nanoprobe based DNA detection—application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biosens Bioelectron 48:87–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blijenberg BG, Kranse R, Eman I, Schroder FH (1996) Some analytical considerations on the measurement of prostate-specific antigen. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 34:817–821

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borsa BA et al (2016) Staphylococcus aureus detection in blood samples by silica nanoparticle-oligonucleotides conjugates. Biosens Bioelectron 86:27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capobianco JA, Shih WY, Yuan Q, Adams GP, Shih W (2008) Label-free, all-electrical, in situ human epidermal growth receptor 2 detection. Rev Sci Instrum 79:076101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Garcia A, Merkoçi A (2016) Nanobiosensors in diagnostics. Nanobiomedicine 3:1849543516663574

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y et al (2017) A polyaniline-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as a redox nanoprobe in a voltammetric DNA biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microchim Acta 184:1801–1808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng MS et al (2011) Membrane-based electrochemical nanobiosensor for Escherichia coli detection and analysis of cells viability. Environ Sci Technol 45:6453–6459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi Y, Kendziorski C (2009) Statistical methods for gene set co-expression analysis. Bioinformatics 25:2780–2786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JD, Li L, Wang Y, Thoburn C, Afsari B, Danilova L, Douville C, Javed AA, Wong F, Mattox A, Hruban RH, Wolfgang CL, Goggins MG, Dal Molin M, Wang TL, Roden R, Klein AP, Ptak J, Dobbyn L, Schaefer J, Silliman C, Diaz L, Tomasetti C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lennon AM, Papadopoulos N (2018) Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multianalyte blood test. Science 359:926–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dannenberg AM Jr (1982) Pathogenesis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 125:25–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das R et al (2019) Aptamer-mediated colorimetric and electrochemical detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa utilizing peroxidase-mimic activity of gold NanoZyme. Anal Bioanal Chem 411:1229–1238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Bentzmann S, Plésiat P (2011) The Pseudomonas aeruginosa opportunistic pathogen and human infections. Environ Microbiol 13:1655–1665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz H (2009) Schröder, screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 360:1320–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gdowski A, Ranjan AP, Mukerjee A, Vishwanatha JK (2014) Nanobiosensors: role in cancer detection and diagnosis. In: Infectious diseases and nanomedicine I. Springer, New Delhi, pp 33–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani F, Abbaszadeh H, Mehdizadeh A, Ebrahimi-Warkiani M, Rashidi MR, Yousefi M (2019) Biosensors and nanobiosensors for rapid detection of autoimmune diseases: a review. Microchim Acta 186:838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gokce ZG et al (2011) Impedimetric DNA biosensor based on polyurethane/poly (m-anthranilic acid) nanofibers. Sens Actuators B: Chem 254:719–726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu B, Xu C, Yang C, Liu S, Wang M (2011) ZnO quantum dot labeled immunosensor for carbohydrate antigen 19–9. Biosens Bioelectron 26:2720–2723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haes AJ, Hall WP, Chang L, Klein WL, Van Duyne RP (2004) A localized surface plasmon resonance biosensor: first steps toward an assay for Alzheimer’s disease. Nano Lett 4:1029–1034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao R, Wang D, Zuo G, Wei H, Yang R, Zhang Z, Zhou Y (2009) Rapid detection of Bacillus anthracis using monoclonal antibody functionalized QCM sensor. Biosens Bioelectron 24:1330–1335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He X et al (2014) Aptamer-fluorescent silica nanoparticles bioconjugates based dual-color flow cytometry for specific detection of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biomed Nanotechnol 10:1359–1368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herschkovitz Y, Eshkenazi I, Campbell CE, Rishpon J (2000) An electrochemical biosensor for formaldehyde. J Electroanal Chem 491:182–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho JA, Chang HC, Shih NY, Wu LC, Chang YF, Chen CC, Chou C (2010) Diagnostic detection of human lung cancer-associated antigen using a gold nanoparticle-based electrochemical immunosensor. Anal Chem 82:5944–5950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Homola J (2003) Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Anal Bioanal Chem 377:528–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain SZ et al (2012) Multiplexed paper test strip for quantitative bacterial detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:1567–1576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jang HS et al (2009) Optical fiber SPR biosensor with sandwich assay for the detection of prostate specific antigen. Opt Commun 282:2827–2830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaewphinit T, Santiwatanakul S, Chansiri K (2013) Colorimetric DNA based biosensor combined with loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis by using gold nanoprobe aggregation. Sens Transducers 149:123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL (2004) Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:123–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karaballi R et al (2015) Development of an electrochemical surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (EC-SERS) aptasensor for direct detection of DNA hybridization. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:21356–21363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur G et al (2015) Pyrimidine-based functional fluorescent organic nanoparticle probe for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Org Biomol Chem 13:4673–4679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim G et al (2015) A microfluidic nano-biosensor for the detection of pathogenic Salmonella. Biosens Bioelectron 67:243–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinugasa H, Nouso K, Miyahara K, Morimoto Y, Dohi C, Tsutsumi K, Kato H, Matsubara T, Okada H, Yamamoto K (2015) Detection of K-ras gene mutation by liquid biopsy in patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer 121:2271–2280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi H, Ogawa M, Alford R, Choyke PL, Urano Y (2009) New strategies for fluorescent probe design in medical diagnostic imaging. Chem Rev 110:2620–2640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai M, Kano MR, Morishita Y, Ota M, Imai Y, Nishiyama N et al (2009) Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of experimental pancreatic tumor in vivo by block copolymercoated magnetite nanoparticles with TGF-beta inhibitor. J Control Release 140:306–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labib M et al (2012) Aptamer-based viability impedimetric sensor for bacteria. Anal Chem 84:8966–8969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C-W et al (2019) Ultra-sensitive electrochemical detection of bacteremia enabled by redox-active gold nanoparticles (raGNPs) in a nano-sieving microfluidic system (NS-MFS). Biosens Bioelectron 133:215–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li C-z et al (2011) Paper based point-of-care testing disc for multiplex whole cell bacteria analysis. Biosens Bioelectron 26:4342–4348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilach B et al (2010) Carbon nanotubes based electrochemical biosensor for detection of formaldehyde released from a cancer cell line treated with formaldehyde-releasing anticancer prodrugs. Bioelectrochemistry 77:94–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y-Y et al (2008) A nanoparticle label/immunochromatographic electrochemical biosensor for rapid and sensitive detection of prostate-specific antigen. Biosens Bioelectron 23:1659–1665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C et al (2014) An electrochemical DNA biosensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, based on signal amplification of graphene and a gold nanoparticle–polyaniline nanocomposite. Analyst 139:5460–5465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P et al (2016) Gold nanoprobe functionalized with specific fusion protein selection from phage display and its application in rapid, selective and sensitive colorimetric biosensing of Staphylococcus aureus. Biosens Bioelectron 82:195–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339:520–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y et al (2010) Surface functionalization of electrospun nanofibers for detecting E. coli O157:H7 and BVDV cells in a direct-charge transfer biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 26:1612–1617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madumali K et al (2018) Early detection of pancreatic cancers in liquid biopsies by ultrasensitive fluorescence nanobiosensors. Nanomed: Nanotechnol Biol Med 14:1823–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maksim S, Andrey K (2006) Plasmon excitation by the Gaussian-like core mode of a photonic crystal waveguide. Opt Express 14:8419–8424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra BD, Chaubey A (2003) Biosensors for clinical diagnostics industry. Sens Actuators B: Chem 91:117–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manajit O et al (2018) Development of uracil-DNA-glycosylase-supplemented loop-mediated isothermal amplification coupled with nanogold probe (UDG-LAMP-AuNP) for specific detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Med Rep 17:5734–5743

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Matsishin M et al (2017) Selective amplification of SPR biosensor signal for recognition of rpob gene fragments by use of gold nanoparticles modified by thiolated DNA. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mihi Y et al (2009) Effects of bisphenol A on breast cancer and its risk factors. Arch Toxicol 83:281–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minnaei ME et al (2016) Label-free, PCR-free DNA hybridization detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7 based on electrochemical nanobiosensor. Electroanalysis 28:2582–2589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miodek A et al (2015) E-DNA sensor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on electrochemical assembly of nanomaterials (MWCNTs/PPy/PAMAM). Anal Chem 87:9257–9264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal S et al (2017) Biosensors for breast cancer diagnosis: a review of bioreceptors, biotransducers and signal amplification strategies. Biosens Bioelectron 88:217–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mogha NK et al (2018) Reduced graphene oxide nanoribbon immobilized gold nanoparticle based electrochemical DNA biosensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Mater Chem B 6:5181–5187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad FS et al (2017) Synthesis and characterization of polyaniline/graphene composite nanofiber and its application as an electrochemical DNA biosensor for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sensors 17:2789

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moongkarndi P, Rodpai E, Kanarat S (2011) Evaluation of an immunochromatographic assay for rapid detection of Salmonella entericaserovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis. J Vet Diagn Invest 23:797–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris Stiff G, Taylor MA (2012) Cal9-9 and pancreatic cancer: is it really that good? J Gastrointest Oncol 3:88–89

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa A et al (2016) An electrochemical nanobiosensor for plasma miRNA-155, based on graphene oxide and gold nanorod, for early detection of breast cancer. Biosens Bioelectron 77:99–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee MD et al (2015) Facile synthesis of 2-dimensional transparent graphene flakes for nucleic acid detection. Sens Actuators B: Chem 210:281–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulpur P et al (2015) Flexible Ag–C 60 nano-biosensors based on surface plasmon coupled emission for clinical and forensic applications. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:25049–25054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mura S et al (2012) FTIR nanobiosensors for Escherichia coli detection. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 3:485–492

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy TF et al (2008) Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:853–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadzirah S et al (2020) Titanium dioxide–mediated resistive nanobiosensor for E. coli O157: H7. Microchim Acta 187:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng SP, Qiu G, Ding N, Lu X, Wu CML (2017) Biosens Bioelectron 89:468–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohman DE, Chakrabarty A (1981) Genetic mapping of chromosomal determinants for the production of the exopolysaccharide alginate in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis isolate. Infect Immun 33:142–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan H, Kaya M, Cengiz A (2003) Comparison of tumor marker CA 242 with CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 50:1669–1674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pan et al (2017) Electrochemical biosensor to simultaneously detect VEGF and PSA for early prostate cancer diagnosis based on graphene oxide/ssDNA/ PLLA nanoparticles. Biosens Bioelectron 89:598–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit S, Dasgupta D, Dewan N, Prince A (2016) Nanotechnology based biosensors and its application. Pharma Innov 5:18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak P, Katiyar VK, Giri S (2007) Cancer research-nanoparticles, nanobiosensors and their use in cancer research. J Nanotechnol 3:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Perumal V et al (2018) Gold nanorod embedded novel 3D graphene nanocomposite for selective bio-capture in rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biosens Bioelectron 116:116–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prabowo BA et al (2016) Graphene-based portable SPR sensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA strain. Procedia Eng 168:541–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad M, Lambe UP, Brar B, Shah I, Manimegalai J, Ranjan K, Iqbal HM (2018) Nanotherapeutics: an insight into healthcare and multi-dimensional applications in medical sector of the modern world. Biomed Pharmacother 97:1521–1537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabti A, Raouafi A, Raouafi N (2020) DNA markers and nano-biosensing approaches for tuberculosis diagnosis. In: Nanotechnology based approaches for tuberculosis treatment, pp 207–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbar S, Shahrokhian S, Nurmohammadi F (2018) Nanoporous gold as a suitable substrate for preparation of a new sensitive electrochemical aptasensor for detection of Salmonella typhimurium. Sens Actuators B: Chem 255:1536–1544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rydzek G, Ji Q, Li M, Schaaf P, Hill JP, Boulmedais F, Ariga K (2015) Electrochemical nanoarchitectonics and layer-by-layer assembly: from basics to future. Nano Today 10:138–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sagadevan S, Periasamy M (2014) Recent trends in nanobiosensors and their applications-a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 36:62–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakao Y, Tomimitsu S, Takeda Y, Natsuaki M, Itoh T (2004) Carcinoembryonic antigen as a predictive factor for postoperative tumor relapse in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 25:520–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salam F, Uludag Y, Tothill IE (2013) Real-time and sensitive detection of Salmonella Typhimurium using an automated quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) instrument with nanoparticles amplification. Talanta 115:761–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarabaegi M, Roushani M (2019) A nano-sized chitosan particle based electrochemical aptasensor for sensitive detection of P. aeruginosa. Anal Methods 11:5591–5597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar P et al (2002) Amperometric biosensors for detection of the prostate cancer marker (PSA). Int J Pharm 238:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller et al (2002) Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346:92–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbazi R et al (2018) Highly selective and sensitive detection of Staphylococcus aureus with gold nanoparticle-based core-shell nano biosensor. Mol Cell Probes 41:8–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shandilya R, Bhargava A, Bunkar N, Tiwari R, Goryacheva IY, Mishra PK (2019) Nanobiosensors: point-of-care approaches for cancer diagnostics. Biosens Bioelectron 130:147–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shangguan J et al (2015) A combination of positive dielectrophoresis driven on-line enrichment and aptamer-fluorescent silica nanoparticle label for rapid and sensitive detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Analyst 140:4489–4497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y et al (2014) Nicking enzyme-assisted biosensor for Salmonella enteritidis detection based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Biosens Bioelectron 55:400–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SK et al (2015) Highly sensitive and specific detection of E. coli by a SERS nanobiosensor chip utilizing metallic nanosculptured thin films. Analyst 140:3201–3209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava AK, Dev A, Karmakar S (2018) Nanosensors and nanobiosensors in food and agriculture. Environ Chem Lett 16:161–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan C, Klaas M, Muller C, Schnorr D, Loening S, Jung K (2006) Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostate-specific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations: an update. Clin Chem 52:59–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suaifan GA, Alhogail S, Zourob M (2017) Paper-based magnetic nanoparticle-peptide probe for rapid and quantitative colorimetric detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7. Biosens Bioelectron 92:702–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H et al (2009) Nano-silver-modified PQC/DNA biosensor for detecting E. coli in environmental water. Biosens Bioelectron 24:1405–1410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J et al (2015) DNA biosensor-based on fluorescence detection of E. coli O157: H7 by Au@ Ag nanorods. Biosens Bioelectron 70:239–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suter JD, Sun Y, Howard JD, Viator J, Fan X (2008) PDMS embedded opto-fluidic microring resonator lasers. Opt Express 16:10248–10253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamada K, Nakamura F, Ito M, Li X, Baba A (2007) SPR-based DNA detection with metal nanoparticles. Plasmonics 2:185–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y et al (2013) Highly sensitive and rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa based on magnetic enrichment and magnetic separation. Theranostics 3:85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thiruppathiraja C et al (2011) Specific detection of Mycobacterium sp. genomic DNA using dual labeled gold nanoparticle based electrochemical biosensor. Anal Biochem 417:73–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Chavolla E, Alocilja EC (2011) Nanoparticle based DNA biosensor for tuberculosis detection using thermophilic helicase-dependent isothermal amplification. Biosens Bioelectron 26:4614–4618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai TT et al (2017) Diagnosis of tuberculosis using colorimetric gold nanoparticles on a paper-based analytical device. ACS Sens 2:1345–1354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varshney M, Li Y (2007) Interdigitated array microelectrode based impedance biosensor coupled with magnetic nanoparticle–antibody conjugates for detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in food samples. Biosens Bioelectron 22:2408–2414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vianello F, Boscolo-Chio R, Signorini S, Rigo A (2007) On-line detection of atmospheric formaldehyde by a conductometric biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 22:920–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viter R et al (2017) Toward development of optical biosensors based on photoluminescence of TiO2 nanoparticles for the detection of Salmonella. Sens Actuators B: Chem 252:95–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J et al (2015) Magnetically assisted surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus based on aptamer recognition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:20919–20929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim HF et al (2005) The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 5:751–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward DL, Khakhria R, Johnson WM (1997) Human salmonellosis associated with exotic pets. J Clin Microbiol 35:2786–2790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xia S et al (2016) Developing a novel immunochromatographic test strip with gold magnetic bifunctional nanobeads (GMBN) for efficient detection of Salmonella choleraesuis in milk. Food Control 59:507–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Y et al (2015) Real-time monitoring of mycobacterium genomic DNA with target-primed rolling circle amplification by a Au nanoparticle-embedded SPR biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 66:512–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X-W et al (2016) Detection EGFR exon 19 status of lung cancer patients by DNA electrochemical biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 80:411–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Mao H, Cao Z, Wang YA, Peng X, Wang X et al (2009) Molecular imaging of pancreatic cancer in an animal model using targeted multifunctional nanoparticles. Gastroenterology 136:1514–1525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J et al (2014) A visual detection method for Salmonella typhimurium based on aptamer recognition and nanogold labeling. Food Control 37:188–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman M, Baral TN, Jakubek ZJ, Zhang J, Wu X, Lai E et al (2011) Single-domain antibody bioconjugated near-IR quantum dots for targeted cellular imaging of pancreatic cancer. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11:3757–3763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelada-Guillén GA et al (2012) Label-free detection of Staphylococcus aureus in skin using real-time potentiometric biosensors based on carbon nanotubes and aptamers. Biosens Bioelectron 31:226–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng D et al (2017) DNA tetrahedral nanostructure-based electrochemical miRNA biosensor for simultaneous detection of multiple miRNAs in pancreatic carcinoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:24118–24125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J et al (2013) An amperometric biosensor for the detection of hydrogen peroxide released from human breast cancer cells. Biosens Bioelectron 41:815–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng M et al (2015) Self-targeting fluorescent carbon dots for diagnosis of brain cancer cells. ACS Nano 9:11455–11461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Z et al (2018) Selective capture and sensitive fluorometric determination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by using aptamer modified magnetic nanoparticles. Microchim Acta 185:377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo P et al (2013) A PDMS/paper/glass hybrid microfluidic biochip integrated with aptamer-functionalized graphene oxide nano-biosensors for one-step multiplexed pathogen detection. Lab Chip 13:3921–3928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arun Kumar Pradhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Preetam, S., Dash, L., Sarangi, S.S., Sahoo, M.M., Pradhan, A.K. (2022). Application of Nanobiosensor in Health Care Sector. In: Arakha, M., Pradhan, A.K., Jha, S. (eds) Bio-Nano Interface. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2516-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics