Skip to main content

Enacting App-Based Learning Activities with Viewing and Representing Skills in Preschool Mathematics Lessons

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mobile Learning Design

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

This chapter comprises discussion on research findings of this study on how apps can be used in the classroom to promote children’s construction of mathematical knowledge by setting up specific learning contexts in ways that fundamentally transform the instructional environment. The study results identify how children enact viewing and representing skills through digital texts to acquire new strategies in their addition and subtraction learning. These skills enable children to externalise their understanding and internalise new meaning-making when interacting with peers. However, these dual reciprocal learning approaches require due consideration of the elements of the learners’ learning styles, the standard of the game designs and the community settings of the classroom, all of which are crucial in determining the learners’ engagement in a learning activity and active involvement in associated learning processes. With the appropriate level of autonomy and opportunity for choice, learner engagement will contribute to subsequent learning, with behavioural intensity and emotional quality at optimal levels. A detailed examination of the meaning-making processes through which viewing and representing skills mediate children’s knowledge acquisition while seamlessly switching between individual and social interactions has led to the development of the framework in the preschool classroom’s learner-centred mathematics learning model presented here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beishuizen, J., Volman, M., & Pol, J. V. D. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Education Psychology Review, 22(1), 271–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethany, R.-J., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identify, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). The theory of didactic situations (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Trans.). Dordreht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D. M., Schoen, S. F., & Lentz, F. E. (1986). Learning to learn through observation. Journal of Special Education, 20(4), 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canobi, K. H. (2009). Concept-procedure interactions in children’s addition and subtraction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(2009), 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canobi, K. H., Reeves, R. A., & Pattison, P. E. (1998). The role of conceptual understanding in children’s addition problem solving. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 882–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., McLeod, D. B., & McCornack, R. L. (1978). Cognitive Style and Mathematics Learning: The Interaction of Field Independence and Instructional Treatment in Numeration Systems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(3), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cereijo, M. V. P., Young, J., & Wilhelm, R. W. (2001). Factors facilitating student participation in asynchronous web-based courses. The Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(1), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2015a). Design of learning objects for concept learning: Effects of multimedia learning principles and an instructional approach. Interactive Learning Environments, ahead of print, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1006237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2015b). Exploring the characteristics of an optimal design of digital materials for concept learning in mathematics: Multimedia learning and variation theory. Computers & Education, 82, 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen-May, T. (2013). Teaching mathematics visually & actively. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes in development: Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 167–216). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Greer, B. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning. New York: MacMillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, M., & Hengst, R. (2012). Software on demand: An early childhood numeracy partnership. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12, 189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). the ecology approach to visual perception Boston. MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 136–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg, C., & Olsson, J. (2015). ICT-supported problem solving and collaborative creative reasoning: Exploring linear functions using dynamic mathematics software. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37(2015), 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, Understanding, and skill in Multidigit Addition and Subtraction. Cognitive and instruction, 14(3), 251–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffkamp, A. (2011). The use of interactive visualizations to foster the understanding of concepts of calculus: Design principles and empirical results. ZMD Mathematics Education, 43(3), 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W.-Y., & Hu, S.-S. (2013). Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyungshim, J., Hohnmarshall, R., & Edward, L. D. (2010). Engaging Students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support an structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, B., Norqvist, M., Liljekvist, Y., & Lithner, J. (2014). Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Remineni, C., & Locuniak, N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M. (2011). A further study productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39(4), 561–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, K. Y. (2012). A case study of children’s viewing and representing practices through digital text. Doctor of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, K. Y., & Churchill, D. (2013). The framework of viewing and representing skills through digital text. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. California: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koong, C.-S., Yang, T.-I., Wu, C.-C., Li, H.-T., & Tseng, C.-C. (2014). An investigation into effectiveness of different reflective learning strategies for learning operational software. Computers & Education, 72(1), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality- A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, G., & Folkesson, A. (2012). ICT in Preschool: Friend or foe? The significance of norms in a changing practice. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20, 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn, S. (2012). Toddlers, touch screens and the parents’ dilemma. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/toddlers-touch-screens-and-the-parents-dilemma/story-e6frg6z6-1226238471750.

  • MDG Advertising. (2012). Kid Tech according to Apple [Infographic]. Retrieved from http://www.mdgadvertising.com/blog/kid-tech-according-to-apple-infographic/.

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education- A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. (2011). Transmediation in young children’s multimodal and digital texts. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(3), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE Singapore. (2010). English language syllabus 2010 (Primary & Secondary). Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/languages-and-literature/files/english-primary-secondary-express-normal-academic.pdf.

  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, D.C.: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orelove, F. P. (1982). Acquisition of incidental learning in moderately and severely handicapped adults. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17(2), 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, L. S. (2004). What ever teacher needs to know about comprehension. Reading Teacher, 58(1), 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976). Conversation theory: Applications in education and epistemology. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G., Smedt, B. D., Torbeyns, J., Verchaffel, L., & Ghesquière, P. (2013). Children’s use of addition to solve two-digit subtraction problems. British Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 495–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploetzner, R., Lippitsch, S., Galmbacher, M., Heuer, D., & Scherrer, S. (2009). Students’ difficulties in learning from dynamic visualizations and how they may be overcome. Computer in Human Behavior, 25, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakes, C. R., Valentine, J. C., McGatha, M. B., & Ronau, R. N. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Reseach, 80(3), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscroft, A. (2000). Designing Argumentation for Conceptual Development. Computer & Education, 34(2000), 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, R. A., Canobi, K. H., & Pattison, P. E. (2003). Patterns of knowledge in children’s addition. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 521–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative processs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P., & Wighting, M. J. (2005). Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, F. (2011). On meaning making in mathematics education: Social, emotional, semiotic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Rosé, C. P., & Goggins, S. (2011). Analyzing the discourse of GeoGebra collaborations. Essays in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (186), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., Schneider, M., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2011). Relations among conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and procedural flexibility in two samples differencing in prior knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1525–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J., & Smith, D. (2012). From socrates to satellites: iPad learning in an undergraduate course. Creative Education, 3, 643–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelland, N. (2015). Young children as multimodal learners in the information age. In K. L. Heider, & K.L. Renck Jalongo (Eds.), Young children and families in the information age. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational studies in mathematics, 63(2), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaranis, N., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. (2013). Using mobile devices for teaching realistic mathematics in kindergarten education. Creative Education, 4(7), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kay Yong Khoo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khoo, K.Y. (2016). Enacting App-Based Learning Activities with Viewing and Representing Skills in Preschool Mathematics Lessons. In: Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chiu, T., Fox, B. (eds) Mobile Learning Design. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0025-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0027-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics