Skip to main content

Mobile Learning in K-12 Education: Personal Meets Systemic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mobile Learning Design

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

This paper investigates one school’s journey towards integrating mobile learning within its institutional structures. This includes a comparison of the school’s objectives against mobile learning affordances. The approach takes into account the cultural contexts, dynamic nature of digital change, and school structural challenges that impact on providing worthwhile education outcomes. Several in-school case reviews on mobile learning use within the school look at mobile learning integration. As well as providing insights for other schools to consider, possible ways forward are presented for better understanding the dynamic relationship between mobile learning and school intentions, as well as challenges that go with ever-evolving digital technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bain, A., & Weston, M. (2012). The learning edge: What technology can do to educate all children. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackley, S., & Walker, R. (2015). One-to-one laptop programs: Is transformation occurring in mathematics teaching? Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 99–117. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/blackley.pdf.

  • Bjerede, M., & Bondi, T. (2012). Learning is personal: Stories of android tablet use in the 5th grade. Learning Untethered. In B. Clarke & S. Svanaes (Eds.). An updated literature review on the use of tablets in education. Tablets for Schools. Retrieved from http://www.tabletsforschools.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/T4S-Literature-Review-9-4-14.pdf.

  • Churchill, D., & Churchill, N. (2008). Educational affordances of PDAs: a study of a teacher’s exploration of this technology. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1439–1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, D., Fox, B., & King, M. (2012). Study of affordances of iPads and teachers’ private theories. International Journal of Information and Education Technology., 2(3), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., & Svanaes, S. (2014). Tablets for schools: An updated literature review on the use of tablets in education. Retrieved from http://www.tabletsforschools.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/T4S-Literature-Review-9-4-14.pdf.

  • Cochrane, T., Narayan, V., & Oldfield, J. (2013). iPadagogy: Appropriating the iPad within pedagogical contexts. International Journal of Mobile Learning & Organisation, 17(1), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbus, L. (2014, November). Mobile is eating the world. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2014/11/09/mobile-is-eating-the-world/.

  • Craig, T., & Van Lom, M. (2009) Impact Constructivist Learning Theory and Mobile Technology Integration, Theories of Educational Technology. EDTech, Boise State University, Boise. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/boisestate.edu/edtechtheories/craig_and_vanlom.

  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2014). Larry Cuban on school reform and classroom practice. Retrieved from https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/.

  • Duncan, D., Hoekstra, A., & Wilcox, B. (2012). Digital devices, distraction, and student performance: does in-class cell phone use reduce learning? Astronomy Education Review, 11, 010108–1, 10.3847/AER2012011.

  • Florida Centre for Instructional Technology. (2011). Technology integration matrix (TIM). Retrieved from http://fcit.usf.edu/matrix.

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S. (2015). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laouris Y., & Eteokleous, N. (2005). We need an educationally relevant definition of mobile learning. In Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Mobile Learning, mLearn 2005, October 25–28, Cape Town, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2014a). A look at research on mobile learning in K-12 education From 2007 to the present. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Navarrete, C., & Wivagg, J. (2014b). Potentials of mobile technology for K-12 education: An investigation of iPod touch use for english language learners in the united states. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(2), 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, B. (2013). Digital distractions in the classroom: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 4(4), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, A. (2015). Authentic learning for the digital generation – Realising the potential of technology in the classroom. Abingdon, UK: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf.

  • New Media Consortium. (2013). Horizon report, K-12 edition 2013. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/publications/2013-horizon-report-k12.

  • New Media Consortium. (2014). Horizon report, K-12 edition 2014. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/publications/2014-horizon-report-k12.

  • OECD. (2013). Governing complex education systems: Framework for case studies. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/governingcomplexeducationsystemsgces.htm OECD.

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (2009). Methods for Evaluating Mobile Learning. In G. N. Vavoula, N. Pachler, & A. Kukulska-Hulme (Eds.), Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs (pp. 17–39). Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges (In Chinese, J. Xiao, Trans.). Distance Education in China, 3:5–11, 44. Also reprinted as Sharples, M. (2013). Mobile Learning: Research, Practice and Challenges (In Chinese, Trans. J. Xiao). Adult Education, 9, 28–35. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/37510/2/sharples.pdf.

  • Shuler, C., Winters, N., & West, N. (2013). The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seipold, J., & Pachler, N. (2011). Evaluating mobile learning practice - towards a framework for analysis of user-generated contexts with reference to the socio-cultural ecology of mobile learning Medienpaedagogik (Vol. 19, pp. 1–13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Evaluating mobile learning: Reflections on current practice. In Proceedings of mLearn2005: 4th World Conference on mLearning, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/12819/1/.

  • Turner, J. (1999). Use of the Logo programming language as software to support constructivist learning within a post-primary school mathematics environment. Unpublished PHD thesis. Monash University, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2012). Turning on mobile learning: global themes. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning. (pp. 1–14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, A. (2014). The monsters of educational technology. Retrieved from http://hackeducation.com/2014/12/01/the-monsters-of-education-technology/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Turner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turner, J. (2016). Mobile Learning in K-12 Education: Personal Meets Systemic. In: Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chiu, T., Fox, B. (eds) Mobile Learning Design. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0025-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0027-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics