Abstract
This paper argues that fǒuzé and bùrán share a unified dynamic semantics: they update an information state by adding, into the information state, a proposition which is evaluated, provided the negation of the information expressed by the discourse before the proposition comes in. SDRT is used to model their dynamic semantics. It is also briefly discussed what it means to evaluate an imperative or a question when fǒuzé/bùrán connects one of them to another clause. Moreover, it is shown that fǒuzé and bùrán can be distinguished in two aspects. First, fǒuzé is not compatible with two propositions which have a parallel relationship, but, instead, is fine when two propositions have a causal relationship. Second, fǒuzé has an ‘anti-good consequence’ property.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The abbreviations used in this paper include: ASSO for an associative marker, CL for a classifier, DUR for a durative aspect marker, PRG for a progressive aspect marker, Prc for a sentence-final particle, Q for a question particle.
References
Lü, S., et al.: Xiàndài Hànyǔ BābǎiCí Zēngdìngběn [Eight Hundred Words in Modern Chinese: Extended Version] Commercial Publishing, Beijing (1999)
Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University, Cambridge (2003)
Wang, Z.: Fǒuzé Zuòyòng de Quèdìng [Ascertaining the Function of fǒuzē]. Huáiyīn Shīfàn Xuéyuàng Xuébào Zhéxué Shèhuìkēxué Bǎn [J. Huaiyin Teacher’s College Philos. Soc. Sci. Edn.] 91 (1995)
Meng, J.: “Fǒuzé jù zhōng fǒuzé hòu de chéngfèn [the constituent after fouze in fouze construction]. Yǔwén Xuékān: Gāoděng Jiàoyùbǎn [J. Lang. Lit. Higher Educ. Vers.], 34–36 (1996)
Zheng, Y.: Fǒuzé hàn nìjiǎjù – jiānlùn Xíng Fúyì xiānshēng de jiǎyánnìzhuǎjù [Fouze and Hypothetical Inversion Construction: On Mr. Xing’s Hypothetical Inversion Construction]. Jīngmén Zhíyè Jìshù Xuéyuàn Xuébào [J. Jingmen College Voc. Technol.] 16, 27–33 (2001)
Liu, B.: Fǒuzé biǎodá de pànduàn hàn tuīlǐ [Judgement and reasoning denoted by fouze]. Huángshān xuébào [J. Huangshan] 10, 109–113 (2008)
Wang, C.: Fǒuzé de piānzhāng xiénjiǎ gōngnēng jí qí cíxìng wètí [On the Part of Speech and Discourse Function of Fouze]. Hànyǔ xuéxí [Chinese Learning] 4 (2008) 17–23
Wang, Y.: Fǎnzhī, xiāngfǎn, fǒuzē [On fanzhi ‘on the contrary’, Xiangfan ‘oppositely’ and fouze ‘otherwise’]. Zūnyì Shīfàn Xuéyuàn Xuébào [J. Zunyin Teacher’s College] 11, 91 (2009)
Cao, X., Zhang, L.: Fǒuzé lèi liáncí de yǔfǎhuà tīdù jí qī biǎxiàn [On the grammaticaliztion of connectives of fouze type]. Hànyǔ xuéxí [Chinese Learn.] 4, 11–21 (2009)
Jīn, Y.: Guānyú liáncí fǒuzé de chūjià niándài jí qí tèshū yòngfǎ [On the year of origin and the special function of fouze]. Císhū yánjiù [Dic. Study] 1, 45–47 (2009)
Lǚ, M.: Bùrán géshì de yǔyì fēnxī [Semantic analysis of buran]. Zhèngzhōu dàxué xuébào zhéxué shèhuì kéxué bǎn [J. Zhengzhou Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci. Edn.] 43, 112–114 (2010)
Ju, F.: The Formal Semantics of Fǒuzē. J. Jinan Univ. Nat. Sci. Edn. 31, 477–484 (2010)
Zhu, B., Ruguo, A.: fǒuzé C de yǔyì guānlián jí qí ‘fǒu’ de xiáyù [ON the semantics of Ruguo A, name B, fouze C and the scope of negation]. Shìjiè hànyǔ jiāoxué [Global Chinese Teach.] 25, 479–489 (2011)
Zhu, B., Wu, Y.: Jùlián Cénggòu yǔ fǒuzé de jiāodiǎn tóushè [Sentence hierarchy and Focus of fouze]. Hànyǔ Xuébào [J. Chinese]. 4, 81–87 (2012)
Zhu, B., Wu, Y.: Fǒuzé de yǐnshěng guīlǜ [On the optionality of fouze]. Yǔyán yánjiù [Lang. Res.] 32, 91–93 (2012)
Deng, M.: Bùrán de liáncíhuà [Grammaticalization toward a connective of buran]. Xiàndài Yǔwén [Mod. Lang. Lit.] 10, 62–64 (2012)
Wang, Y.: Chúfēi A, fǒuzé B Jùshǐ Kǎochá [On the construction of chufei A, fouze B]. Hēilóngjiāng Kēxué [Heilongjian Sci.] 10, 216–217 (2013)
Ye, Y., Kao, S., Bing, H.: yě shuō fǒuzé lèi fùjù [Complex sentences of fouze revisited]. Yǔyán yánjiù [Lang. Res.] 34, 85–88 (2014)
Wang, Y., Tsai, B., Xu, M., Hu, K.: Huáyǔ fǒuzé lèi duǎnyǔ de piānzhāng yǔ rénjì gōngnéng tànjiù [On the discourse and inter-personal function of phrases such as fouzei]. Taiwan J. Chinese Second Lang. 9, 31–65 (2014)
Xu, T.: Jiǎshè liáncí fǒuzé de cíhuìhuà tàxī [On the lexicaliztion of fouze]. Xīnyú xuéyuàn xuébào [J. Xinyu College] 19, 119–121 (2015)
Veltman, F.: Defaults in update semantics. J. Philos. Logic 25(1996), 221–261 (1996)
Mann, W., Thompson, S.: Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8, 243–281 (1998)
Taboada, M., Mann, W.: Rhetorical structure theory: looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Stud. 8, 423–459 (2006)
Taboada, M., Mann, W.: Applications of rhetorical structure theory. Disc. Stud. 8, 567–587 (2006)
Chierchia, G.: Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition and the Theory of Gram-mar. University of Chicago, Chicago (1995)
Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Dynamic Predicate logic. Linguist. Philos. 14, 39–100 (1991)
Kamp, H., Reyle, U.: From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Berlin (1993)
Yalcin, S.: Epistemic modals. Mind 116, 983–1026 (2007)
Lee, P., Pan, H.: The Chinese negation bu and its association with focus. Linguistics 39, 703–731 (2001)
Rooth, M.: Association with Focus. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst (1985)
Rooth, M.: A theory of focus interpretation. Nat. Lang. Seman. 1(1992), 75–116 (1992)
von Stechow, A.: Topic, Focus and Local Relevance. In: Klein, W., Levelt, W. (eds.) Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics, pp. 95–130. Springer, Berlin (1981)
von Stechow, A.: Focusing and Backgrounding Operators. Technical report 6. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft. Universität Konstanz (1989)
von Stechow, A.: Current issus in the theory of focus. In: von Stechow, A., Wunderlich, D. (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pp. 804–825. Springer, Berlin (1991)
Kadmon, N.: Formal Pragmatics. Blackwell Malden (2001)
Portner, P.: The Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause Types. In: Young, R. (eds): SALT XIV, pp. 235–252. Cornell University, Ithaca (2004)
Portner, P.: Imperatives and modals. Nat. Lang. Seman. 15, 351–383 (2007)
Hamblin, L.: Questions in Montague English. Found. Lang. 10, 41–53 (1973)
Karttunen, L.: Synax and Semantics of questions. Linguist. Philos. 3–44 (1977)
Dekker, P., Aloni, M., Groenendijk, J.: Questions. In: Aloni, M., Dekker, P. (eds): The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, pp. 560–592. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Questions. In van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 1055–1124. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)
Acknowledgments
An earlier version of this paper is presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of International Association of Chinese Linguistics in 2017. I thank the audience at IACL 25 for enlightening discussions. I am also grateful to CLSW 2021 reviewers and on-line workshop participants for comments, questions and discussions. I acknowledge the financial support of Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under the grant number MOST 105-2410-H-194-086.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, JS. (2022). On the Dynamic Semantics of Fǒuzé and Bùrán in Mandarin Chinese. In: Dong, M., Gu, Y., Hong, JF. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13249. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06703-7_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06703-7_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06702-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06703-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)