Skip to main content

On the Dynamic Semantics of Fǒuzé and Bùrán in Mandarin Chinese

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chinese Lexical Semantics (CLSW 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13249))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper argues that fǒuzé and bùrán share a unified dynamic semantics: they update an information state by adding, into the information state, a proposition which is evaluated, provided the negation of the information expressed by the discourse before the proposition comes in. SDRT is used to model their dynamic semantics. It is also briefly discussed what it means to evaluate an imperative or a question when fǒuzé/bùrán connects one of them to another clause. Moreover, it is shown that fǒuzé and bùrán can be distinguished in two aspects. First, fǒuzé is not compatible with two propositions which have a parallel relationship, but, instead, is fine when two propositions have a causal relationship. Second, fǒuzé has an ‘anti-good consequence’ property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The abbreviations used in this paper include: ASSO for an associative marker, CL for a classifier, DUR for a durative aspect marker, PRG for a progressive aspect marker, Prc for a sentence-final particle, Q for a question particle.

References

  1. Lü, S., et al.: Xiàndài Hànyǔ BābǎiCí Zēngdìngběn [Eight Hundred Words in Modern Chinese: Extended Version] Commercial Publishing, Beijing (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, Z.: Fǒuzé Zuòyòng de Quèdìng [Ascertaining the Function of fǒuzē]. Huáiyīn Shīfàn Xuéyuàng Xuébào Zhéxué Shèhuìkēxué Bǎn [J. Huaiyin Teacher’s College Philos. Soc. Sci. Edn.] 91 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meng, J.: “Fǒuzé jù zhōng fǒuzé hòu de chéngfèn [the constituent after fouze in fouze construction]. Yǔwén Xuékān: Gāoděng Jiàoyùbǎn [J. Lang. Lit. Higher Educ. Vers.], 34–36 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng, Y.: Fǒuzé hàn nìjiǎjù – jiānlùn Xíng Fúyì xiānshēng de jiǎyánnìzhuǎjù [Fouze and Hypothetical Inversion Construction: On Mr. Xing’s Hypothetical Inversion Construction]. Jīngmén Zhíyè Jìshù Xuéyuàn Xuébào [J. Jingmen College Voc. Technol.] 16, 27–33 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, B.: Fǒuzé biǎodá de pànduàn hàn tuīlǐ [Judgement and reasoning denoted by fouze]. Huángshān xuébào [J. Huangshan] 10, 109–113 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, C.: Fǒuzé de piānzhāng xiénjiǎ gōngnēng jí qí cíxìng wètí [On the Part of Speech and Discourse Function of Fouze]. Hànyǔ xuéxí [Chinese Learning] 4 (2008) 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y.: Fǎnzhī, xiāngfǎn, fǒuzē [On fanzhi ‘on the contrary’, Xiangfan ‘oppositely’ and fouze ‘otherwise’]. Zūnyì Shīfàn Xuéyuàn Xuébào [J. Zunyin Teacher’s College] 11, 91 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cao, X., Zhang, L.: Fǒuzé lèi liáncí de yǔfǎhuà tīdù jí qī biǎxiàn [On the grammaticaliztion of connectives of fouze type]. Hànyǔ xuéxí [Chinese Learn.] 4, 11–21 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jīn, Y.: Guānyú liáncí fǒuzé de chūjià niándài jí qí tèshū yòngfǎ [On the year of origin and the special function of fouze]. Císhū yánjiù [Dic. Study] 1, 45–47 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lǚ, M.: Bùrán géshì de yǔyì fēnxī [Semantic analysis of buran]. Zhèngzhōu dàxué xuébào zhéxué shèhuì kéxué bǎn [J. Zhengzhou Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci. Edn.] 43, 112–114 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ju, F.: The Formal Semantics of Fǒuzē. J. Jinan Univ. Nat. Sci. Edn. 31, 477–484 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, B., Ruguo, A.: fǒuzé C de yǔyì guānlián jí qí ‘fǒu’ de xiáyù [ON the semantics of Ruguo A, name B, fouze C and the scope of negation]. Shìjiè hànyǔ jiāoxué [Global Chinese Teach.] 25, 479–489 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu, B., Wu, Y.: Jùlián Cénggòu yǔ fǒuzé de jiāodiǎn tóushè [Sentence hierarchy and Focus of fouze]. Hànyǔ Xuébào [J. Chinese]. 4, 81–87 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, B., Wu, Y.: Fǒuzé de yǐnshěng guīlǜ [On the optionality of fouze]. Yǔyán yánjiù [Lang. Res.] 32, 91–93 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deng, M.: Bùrán de liáncíhuà [Grammaticalization toward a connective of buran]. Xiàndài Yǔwén [Mod. Lang. Lit.] 10, 62–64 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Y.: Chúfēi A, fǒuzé B Jùshǐ Kǎochá [On the construction of chufei A, fouze B]. Hēilóngjiāng Kēxué [Heilongjian Sci.] 10, 216–217 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ye, Y., Kao, S., Bing, H.: yě shuō fǒuzé lèi fùjù [Complex sentences of fouze revisited]. Yǔyán yánjiù [Lang. Res.] 34, 85–88 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Y., Tsai, B., Xu, M., Hu, K.: Huáyǔ fǒuzé lèi duǎnyǔ de piānzhāng yǔ rénjì gōngnéng tànjiù [On the discourse and inter-personal function of phrases such as fouzei]. Taiwan J. Chinese Second Lang. 9, 31–65 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, T.: Jiǎshè liáncí fǒuzé de cíhuìhuà tàxī [On the lexicaliztion of fouze]. Xīnyú xuéyuàn xuébào [J. Xinyu College] 19, 119–121 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Veltman, F.: Defaults in update semantics. J. Philos. Logic 25(1996), 221–261 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mann, W., Thompson, S.: Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8, 243–281 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taboada, M., Mann, W.: Rhetorical structure theory: looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Stud. 8, 423–459 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taboada, M., Mann, W.: Applications of rhetorical structure theory. Disc. Stud. 8, 567–587 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chierchia, G.: Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition and the Theory of Gram-mar. University of Chicago, Chicago (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Dynamic Predicate logic. Linguist. Philos. 14, 39–100 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamp, H., Reyle, U.: From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Berlin (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Yalcin, S.: Epistemic modals. Mind 116, 983–1026 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, P., Pan, H.: The Chinese negation bu and its association with focus. Linguistics 39, 703–731 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rooth, M.: Association with Focus. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rooth, M.: A theory of focus interpretation. Nat. Lang. Seman. 1(1992), 75–116 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. von Stechow, A.: Topic, Focus and Local Relevance. In: Klein, W., Levelt, W. (eds.) Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics, pp. 95–130. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. von Stechow, A.: Focusing and Backgrounding Operators. Technical report 6. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft. Universität Konstanz (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  34. von Stechow, A.: Current issus in the theory of focus. In: von Stechow, A., Wunderlich, D. (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pp. 804–825. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kadmon, N.: Formal Pragmatics. Blackwell Malden (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Portner, P.: The Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause Types. In: Young, R. (eds): SALT XIV, pp. 235–252. Cornell University, Ithaca (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Portner, P.: Imperatives and modals. Nat. Lang. Seman. 15, 351–383 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hamblin, L.: Questions in Montague English. Found. Lang. 10, 41–53 (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Karttunen, L.: Synax and Semantics of questions. Linguist. Philos. 3–44 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dekker, P., Aloni, M., Groenendijk, J.: Questions. In: Aloni, M., Dekker, P. (eds): The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, pp. 560–592. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Questions. In van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 1055–1124. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this paper is presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of International Association of Chinese Linguistics in 2017. I thank the audience at IACL 25 for enlightening discussions. I am also grateful to CLSW 2021 reviewers and on-line workshop participants for comments, questions and discussions. I acknowledge the financial support of Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under the grant number MOST 105-2410-H-194-086.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiun-Shiung Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wu, JS. (2022). On the Dynamic Semantics of Fǒuzé and Bùrán in Mandarin Chinese. In: Dong, M., Gu, Y., Hong, JF. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13249. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06703-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06703-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06702-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06703-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics