Skip to main content

Cu/Zeolite SCR Catalysts for Automotive Diesel NOx Emission Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urea-SCR Technology for deNOx After Treatment of Diesel Exhausts

Part of the book series: Fundamental and Applied Catalysis ((FACA))

Abstract

Cu/zeolite catalysts have long been recognized to be highly active in the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 [1–16]. Compared to titania supported vanadia SCR catalysts, which have been successfully commercialized for stationary NOx emission control since the 1970s and installed on certain Heavy Duty Diesel (HDD) vehicles to meet the NOx emission regulations since the early 2000s, Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts exhibit higher NOx conversion efficiency, particularly at low temperatures [11, 17]. In addition, Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts are more tolerant to high temperature excursions. For automotive applications, this is a critical requirement for the SCR component when it is combined with a Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) in the emission control system. In order to effectively regenerate the DPF component, the entire system is exposed to temperatures above 600 °C periodically. Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts are significantly more stable than vanadium-based SCR catalysts at temperatures above 650 °C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Seiyama T, Arakawa T, Matsuda T et al (1977) Catalytic activity of transition metal ion exchanged Y zeolites in the reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Journal of Catalysis 48:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Komatsu T, Nunokawa M, Moon IS et al (1994) Kinetic Studies of Reduction of Nitric Oxide with Ammonia on Cu2+-Exchanged Zeolites. Journal of Catalysis 148:427–437

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mizumoto M, Yamazoe N, Seiyama T (1979) Effects of coexisting gases on the catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over Cu(II) NaY. Journal of Catalysis 59:319–324

    Google Scholar 

  4. Centi G, Perathoner S (1995) Nature of active species in copper-based catalysts and their chemistry of transformation of nitrogen oxides. Applied Catalysis A: General 132:179–259

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson LAH, Brandin JGM, Odenbrand CUI (1989) Selective catalytic reduction of NOx over acid-leached mordenite catalysts. Catalysis Today 4:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palomares AE, Prato JG, Corma A (2002) A new active zeolite structure for the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of nitrogen oxides, ITQ7 zeolite, the influence of NO2 on this reaction. Catalysis Today 75:367–371

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delahay G, Coq B, Kieger S et al (1999) The origin of N2O formation in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 in O2 rich atmosphere on Cu-faujasite catalysts. Catalysis Today 54:431–438

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delahay G, Kieger S, Tanchoux N et al (2004) Kinetics of the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 on a Cu-faujasite catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 52:251–257

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu L, McCabe RW, Hammerle RH (2002) NOx self-inhibition in selective catalytic reduction with urea (ammonia) over a Cu-zeolite catalyst in diesel exhaust. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 39:51–63

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tennison P, Lambert C, Levin M (2004) NOx Control Development with Urea SCR on a Diesel Passenger Car. SAE Technical Paper 2004–01–1292

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lambert C, Cavataio G, Cheng Y et al (2006) Urea SCR and DPF system for Tier 2 diesel light-duty trucks. DEER Conference 2006. [Online] Available: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/deer_2006/session5/2006_deer_lambert.pdf.

  12. Schmieg SJ, Lee J-H (2005) Evaluation of supplier catalyst fromulations for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia. SAE Technical Paper 2005–01–3881

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baik JH, Yim SD, Nam I-S et al (2004) Control of NOx emissions from diesel engine by selective catalytic reduction (SCR) with urea. Topics in Catalysis 30/31:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  14. Park J-H, Park HJ, Baik JH et al (2006) Hydrothermal stability of CuZSM5 catalyst in reducing NO by NH3 for the urea selective catalytic reduction process. Journal of Catalysis 240:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pârvulescu VI, Grange P, Delmon B (1998) Catalytic removal of NO. Catalysis Today 46:233–316

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brandenberger S, Kröcher O, Tissler A et al (2008) The State of the art in selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia using metal‐exchanged zeolite catalysts. Catalysis Reviews 50:492–531

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kamasamudram K, Currier NW, Chen X et al (2010) Overview of the practically important behaviors of zeolite-based urea-SCR catalysts, using compact experimental protocol. Catalysis Today 151:212–222

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kamasamudram K, Currier NW, Szailer T et al (2010) Why Cu- and Fe-zeolite SCR catalysts behave differently at low temperatures. SAE Technical Paper 2010–01–1182

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng Y, Xu L, Hangas J et al (2007) Laboratory postmortem analysis of 120 k mi engine aged urea SCR catalyst. SAE Technical Paper 2007–01–1579

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ishihara T, Kagawa M, Hadama F et al (1997) Copper ion-exchanged SAPO-34 as a thermostable catalyst for selective reduction of NO with C3H6. Journal of Catalysis 169:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zones SI, Yuen LT, Miller SJ (2004) Small crystallite zeolite CHA. U.S. Patent US 6,709,644

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bull I, Xue WM, Burk P et al (2009) Copper CHA zeolite catalysts. U.S. Patent US 7,601,662

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andersen PJ,Bailie JE, Casci JL et al (2008) Transition metal/zeolite SCR catalysts. Patent application WO 2008/132452

    Google Scholar 

  24. Database of zeolite structures. [Online]. Available: http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/

  25. Fedeyko JM, Chen B, Chen H-Y (2010) Mechanistic study of the low temperature activity of transition metal exchanged zeolite SCR catalysts. Catalysis Today 151:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cruciani G (2006) Zeolites upon heating: Factors governing their thermal stability and structural changes. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 67:1973–1994

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang QL, Giannetto G, Torrealba M et al (1991) Dealumination of zeolites II, kinetic study of the dealumination by hydrothermal treatment of a NH4NaY zeolite. Journal of Catalysis 130:459–470

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sano T, Ikeya H, Kasuno T et al (1997) Influence of crystallinity of HZSM-5 zeolite on its dealumination rate. Zeolites 19:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  29. Grinsted RA, Jen H-W, Montreuil CN et al (1993) The relation between deactivation of CuZSM-5 in the selective reduction of NO and dealumination of the zeolite. Zeolites 13:602–606

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yan JY, Sachtler WMH, Kung HH (1997) Effect of Cu loading and addition of modifiers on the stability of Cu/ZSM-5 in lean NOx reduction catalysis. Catalysis Today 33:279–290

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wilken N, Wijayanti K, Kamasamudram K et al (2012) Mechanistic investigation of hydrothermal aging of Cu-Beta for ammonia SCR. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 111–112:58–66

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kharas KCC, Robota HJ, Liu DJ (1993) Deactivation in Cu-ZSM-5 lean-burn catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2:225–237

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ding L, Zheng Y, Hong Y et al (2007) Effect of particle size on the hydrothermal stability of zeolite beta. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 101:432–439

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kucherov AV, Hubbard CP, Shelef M (1995) Rearrangement of cationic sites in CuH-ZSM-5 and reactivity loss upon high-temperature calcination and steam aging. Journal of Catalysis 157:603–610

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chang HL, Chen H-Y, Fedeyko JM et al (2007) Thermal durability and deactivation of Cu-zeolite SCR catalyst. Paper presented at the 20th North American Catalysis Society Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fedeyko JM, Chen H-Y, Ballinger TH et al (2009) Development of thermally durable Cu/SCR catalysts. SAE Technical Paper 2009–01–0899

    Google Scholar 

  37. Andersen PJ, Casci JL, Chen H-Y et al (2011) Small pore molecular sieve supported transition metal catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Paper presented at the 22nd North American Society Meeting

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jardim PM, Marinkovic BA, Saavedra A et al (2004) A comparison between thermal expansion properties of hydrated and dehydrated orthorhombic HZSM-5 zeolite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 76:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  39. Long RQ, Yang RT (2002) Selective catalytic reduction of NO with ammonia over Fe3+-exchanged mordenite (Fe–MOR): catalytic performance, characterization, and mechanistic study. Journal of Catalysis 207:274–285

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cavataio G, Girard J, Patterson J et al (2007) Laboratory testing of urea-SCR formulations to meet Tier 2 Bin 5 emissions. SAE Technical Paper 2007–01–1575

    Google Scholar 

  41. Montreuil CN, Lambert C (2008) The effect of hydrocarbons on the selective catalyzed reduction of NOx over low and high temperature catalyst fromulations. SAE Technical Paper 2008–01–1030

    Google Scholar 

  42. Girard J, Snow R, Cavataio G et al (2008) Influence of hydrocarbon storage on the durability of SCR catalysts. SAE Technical Paper 2008–01–0767

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cheng Y, Montreuil CN, Cavataio G et al (2008) Sulfur tolerance and DeSOx studies on diesel SCR catalysts. SAE Technical Paper 2008–01–1023

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng Y, Montreuil CN, Cavataio G et al (2009) The effects of SO2 and SO3 poisoning on Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts. SAE Technical Paper 2009–01–0898

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cheng Y, Lambert C, Kim DH et al (2010) The different impacts of SO2 and SO3 on Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts. Catalysis Today 151:266–270

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yim SD, Kim SJ, Baik JH et al (2004) Decomposition of Urea into NH3 for the SCR Process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 43:4856–4863

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xu L, WatkinsW, Snow R et al (2007) Laboratory and engine study of urea-related deposits in diesel urea-SCR after-treatment systems. SAE Technical Paper 2007–01–1582

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cheng Y, Hoard J, Lambert C et al (2008) NMR studies of Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts hydrothermally aged with urea. Catalysis Today 136:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schmieg SJ, Oh SH, Kim CH et al (2012) Thermal durability of Cu-CHA NH3-SCR catalysts for diesel NOx reduction. Catalysis Today 184:252–261

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cavataio G, Jen HW, Dobson D et al (2009) Laboratory study to determine impact of Na and K exposure on the durability of DOC and SCR catalyst formulations. SAE Technical Paper 2009–11–02

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ishihara T,Kagawa M, Mizuhara Y et al (1992) Selective reduction of nitrogen monoxide with propene over Cu-silicoaluminophosphate (SAPO) under oxidizing atmosphere. Chemistry Letters 2119–2122.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Akolekar DB, Bhargava SK, Foger K (1998) FTIR investigations of the adsorption and disproportionation of NO on Cu-exchanged silicoaluminophophate of type 34. Journal of Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans 94:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  53. Frache A, Palella BI,Cadoni M et al (2003) CuAPSO-34 catalysts for N2O decomposition in the presence of H2O. Topics in Catalysis 22:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  54. Frache A, Palella B, Cadoni M et al (2002) Catalytic DeNOx activity of cobalt and copper ions in microporous MeALPO-34 and MeAPSO-34. Catalysis Today 75:359–365

    Google Scholar 

  55. Poignant F, Saussey J, Lavalley JC et al (1995) NH3 formation during the reduction of nitrogen monoxide by propane on H-Cu-ZSM-5 in excess oxygen. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications 1:89–90

    Google Scholar 

  56. Poignant F, Saussey J, Lavalley JC et al (1996) In situ FT-IR study of NH3 formation during the reduction of NOx with propane on H/Cu-ZSM-5 in excess oxygen. Catalysis Today 29:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chen H-Y, Sun Q, Wen B et al (2004) Reduction over zeolite-based catalysts of nitrogen oxides in emissions containing excess oxygen: unraveling the reaction mechanism. Catalysis Today 96:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fickel DW, Lobo RF (2009) Copper coordination in Cu-SSZ-13 and Cu-SSZ-16 investigated by variable-temperature XRD. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 114:1633–1640

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fickel DW, D’Addio E, Lauterbach JA et al (2011) The ammonia selective catalytic reduction activity of copper-exchanged small-pore zeolites. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 102:441–448

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ye Q, Wang L, Yang RT (2012) Activity, propene poisoning resistance and hydrothermal stability of copper exchanged chabazite-like zeolite catalysts for SCR of NO with ammonia in comparison to Cu/ZSM-5. Applied Catalysis A: General 427/428:24–34

    Google Scholar 

  61. Moliner M, Franch C, Palomares E et al (2012) Cu-SSZ-39, an active and hydrothermally stable catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx, Chemical Communications 48:8264–8266

    Google Scholar 

  62. Erichinger M, Maletz G, Eisert K (2011) KFI-type copper-containing zeolite and use in SCR catalyst. Patent application WO 2011/098512

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lorena Picone A, Warrender SJ, Slawin AMZ et al (2011) A co-templating route to the synthesis of Cu SAPO STA-7, giving an active catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 146: 36–47

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ren L, Zhu L, Yang C et al (2011) Designed copper-amine complex as an efficient template for one-pot synthesis of Cu-SSZ-13 zeolite with excellent activity for selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3. Chemical Communications 47:9789–9791

    Google Scholar 

  65. Deka U,Lezcano-Gonzalez I, Warrender SJ et al (2013) Changing active sites in Cu–CHA catalysts: deNOx selectivity as a function of the preparation method. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 166:144–152

    Google Scholar 

  66. Martínez-Franco R, Moliner M, Franch C et al (2012) Rational direct synthesis methodology of very active and hydrothermally stable Cu-SAPO-34 molecular sieves for the SCR of NOx. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 127:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kwak JH, Tonkyn RG, Kim DH et al (2010) Excellent activity and selectivity of Cu-SSZ-13 in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Journal of Catalysis 275:187–190

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kwak JH, Tran D, Burton SD et al (2012) Effects of hydrothermal aging on NH3-SCR reaction over Cu/zeolites. Journal of Catalysis 287:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  69. Castagnola M, Caserta J, Chatterjee S et al (2011) Engine performance of Cu- and Fe-based SCR emission control systems for heavy duty diesel applications. SAE Technical Paper 2011–01–1329

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tang W, Huang X, Kumar S (2011) Sulfur effect and performance recovery of a DOC + CSF + Cu-zeolite SCR system. Presented at DEER Conference 2011. [Online] Available: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/deer_2011/tuesday/presentations/deer11_tang.pdf

  71. Watanabe Y, Koiwai A, Takeuchi H et al (1993) Multinuclear NMR studies on the thermal stability of SAPO-34. Journal of Catalysis 143:430–436

    Google Scholar 

  72. Palella BI, Cadoni M, Frache A et al (2003) On the hydrothermal stability of CuAPSO-34 microporous catalysts for N2O decomposition: a comparison with CuZSM-5. Journal of Catalysis 217:100–106

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wang L, Li W, Qi G et al (2012) Location and nature of Cu species in Cu/SAPO-34 for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Journal of Catalysis 289:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wang J, Yu T, Wang X et al (2012) The influence of silicon on the catalytic properties of Cu/SAPO-34 for NOx reduction by ammonia-SCR. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 127:137–147

    Google Scholar 

  75. Korhonen ST, Fickel DW, Lobo RF et al (2011) Isolated Cu2+ ions: active sites for selective catalytic reduction of NO. Chemical Communications 47:800–802

    Google Scholar 

  76. Deka U, Juhin A, Eilertsen EA et al (2012) Confirmation of isolated Cu2+ Ions in SSZ-13 zeolite as active sites in NH3-selective catalytic reduction. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116:4809–4818

    Google Scholar 

  77. McEwen J-S, Anggara T, Schneider WF et al (2012) Integrated operando X-ray absorption and DFT characterization of Cu–SSZ-13 exchange sites during the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Catalysis Today 184:129–144

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kispersky VF, Kropf AJ, Ribeiro FH et al (2012) Low absorption vitreous carbon reactors for operando XAS: a case study on Cu/Zeolites for selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 14:2229–2238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to many of my colleagues at Johnson Matthey for their contributions to the work presented in this chapter. I also want to express my sincere gratitude to many collaborators across industry and academia for their valuable discussions. Finally, I thank Johnson Matthey for the permission of this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-Ying Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, HY. (2014). Cu/Zeolite SCR Catalysts for Automotive Diesel NOx Emission Control. In: Nova, I., Tronconi, E. (eds) Urea-SCR Technology for deNOx After Treatment of Diesel Exhausts. Fundamental and Applied Catalysis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8071-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics