Skip to main content

Developments in Risk and Insurance Economics: The Past 40 Years

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Insurance

Abstract

The chapter reviews the evolution in insurance economics over the past 40 years, by first recalling the situation in 1973, then presenting the developments and new approaches which flourished since then. The chapter argues that these developments were only possible because steady advances were made in the economics of risk and uncertainty and in financial theory. Insurance economics has grown in importance to become a central theme in modern economics, providing not only practical examples to illustrate new theories, but also inspiring new ideas of relevance for the general economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that all chapters appearing in the 2000 version of this Handbook are excluded from the reference list, on the expectations that the present version includes revised version of these surveys.

  2. 2.

    Note that two of these six authors, Kenneth Arrow and Gary Becker, received later the highest distinction for economic research—the Nobel Prize in economics.

  3. 3.

    See Gollier (1992) for a review of the economic theory of risk exchanges, Drèze (1979) for an application to human capital, and Drèze (1990) for an application to securities and labor markets.

  4. 4.

    Actually, Borch’s theorem was already present in Borch (1960), but the latter article was primarily written for actuaries, whereas the 1962 Econometrica article was addressed to economists.

  5. 5.

    HARA = Hyperbolic Absolute Risk Aversion. As noted by Drèze (1990), the linearity of the sharing rule follows from the linearity of the absolute risk tolerance implied by hyperbolic absolute risk aversion.

  6. 6.

    The question whether or not “institutions” are needed to allocate risks in the economy was tackled later in the finance literature.

  7. 7.

    The applications of Borch’s theorem in the actuarial literature are reviewed by Lemaire (1990).

  8. 8.

    More precisely, Schlesinger (1997) considers one version of Arrow’s theorem: the case where the insurer is risk neutral and the insured is risk averse (risk aversion being defined by Schlesinger as preferences consistent with second-degree stochastic dominance). In this case a straight deductible policy is optimal whenever the insurer’s costs are proportional to the indemnity payment.

  9. 9.

    Optimal insurance coverage using a deductible was also analyzed by Pashigian et al. (1966) and by Gould (1969).

  10. 10.

    Incomplete insurance may be obtained using a deductible or coinsurance (or both).

  11. 11.

    The survey of developments presented in the next three sections draws on the excellent survey of insurance economics originally proposed by Dionne and Harrington (1992).

  12. 12.

    Other strange results were observed later on, for example an increased loss probability has an ambiguous impact on insurance purchasing if the insured has DARA preferences and the insurer adjusts the premium to take the increased loss probability into account (Jang and Hadar 1995).

  13. 13.

    It is obvious that the paradox may be resolved if one introduces differential information. If the insured overestimates the probability (or the amount) of loss, full insurance may be optimal, even when the premium is loaded with a fixed proportional factor.

  14. 14.

    On a related theme, see also Doherty and Schlesinger (1990) for the case where the insurance contract itself is risky, due to a nonzero probability of insurer default. The article shows that full insurance is not optimal under fair insurance pricing, and that the usual comparative statics result from the single risk model do not carry over to the model with default risk. Their work was extended by Cummins and Mahul (2003) to the case where the insurer and policyholder have divergent beliefs about the insurer default risk.

  15. 15.

    In a recent article, Hong et al. (2011) argue that correlation is not an adequate measure of stochastic dependence when expected utility is used. Turning to more general notions of positive and negative dependence, and focussing on coinsurance, they show that the individual will purchase less than full (more than full) insurance if and only if the insurable risk is positively (negatively) expectation dependent with random initial wealth.

  16. 16.

    These theoretical advances closely followed similar advances in the theory of risk premiums under multiple sources of risk: Kihlstrom et al. (1981), Ross (1981), and Doherty et al. (1987). This literature on optimal insurance in presence of a background risk has also close links to the literature on the demand for a risky asset which was pioneered by Arrow (1963b) in a single risk setting and developed later to consider the impact of background risks: see, e.g., Tsetlin and Winkler (2005) and Li (2011) for recent contributions.

  17. 17.

    This case corresponds to a negative cross-derivative of the two-attribute utility function (u 12 ≤ 0). Eeckhoudt et al. (2007) show that this is equivalent to “correlation aversion,” the aversion to losses affecting simultaneously the two attributes of utility (health and wealth for example).

  18. 18.

    Following Eeckhoudt et al. (2007), the individual is then “correlation loving.” For him, in this case, purchasing more insurance against a loss in wealth helps to mitigate the adverse impact of a negative correlation between the two risks.

  19. 19.

    The following developments on this topic borrow from the literature review in Loubergé and Watt (2008).

  20. 20.

    Coinsurance must be excluded to avoid corner solutions of either no holding of the riskless asset or zero demand for insurance. Meyer and Meyer (1998b) address the specific case of deductible insurance.

  21. 21.

    In this case, with increasing wealth, the rate of increase of the possible loss amount is higher than the rate of decrease of relative risk aversion.

  22. 22.

    Using Mossin’s (1968) approach, Jang and Hadar (1995) obtain that the effect of an increase in the probability of loss is in this case indeterminate if the utility function displays DARA, and that the demand for insurance decreases with CARA or IARA utility.

  23. 23.

    Jullien et al. (1999) showed later that “self-protection increases with risk aversion if and only if the initial probability of loss is low enough.”

  24. 24.

    See also Courbage and Rey (2006) for an extension of this result to the case of two-argument utility functions, wealth, and health.

  25. 25.

    The effect of wealth on self-protection expenses is null under CARA and it depends on the level of the loss probability under DARA and IARA.

  26. 26.

    Note that all this literature on self-insurance and self-protection has been driving away from the study of the links between insurance demand and prevention. In addition, except for the recent article by Lee (2012), it has focussed on the case where prevention implies a monetary cost (prevention expenditures), instead of the case where prevention implies an “effort” producing a direct loss in utility—presumably because the analysis of the latter case is more straightforward.

  27. 27.

    Under the negligence rule, an injurer cannot be made liable for the losses imposed on a victim if the injurer has applied the appropriate level of care. In theoretical work, the appropriate level of care is the socially efficient level of care optimally chosen by a risk averse potential injurer if the judgment proof problem does not arise. This level balances the marginal benefits and marginal cost of care.

  28. 28.

    In addition, the injurer would run the risk of being denied indemnification by the insurer if it turned out ex post that the level of care was inappropriate.

  29. 29.

    The orders of risk aversion, as defined by Segal and Spivak (1990), rest on the behavior of the risk premium in the limit, as the risk tends toward zero.

  30. 30.

    This result is reminiscent of the same result obtained under Hurwicz’s model of choice under risk: see Briys and Loubergé (1985).

  31. 31.

    An economic equilibrium is efficient if it is Pareto optimal: it is impossible to organize a reallocation of resources which would increase the satisfaction of one individual without hurting at least one other individual. The first theorem of welfare economics states that any competitive equilibrium is Pareto optimal, and the second theorem states that a particular Pareto optimum may be reached by combining lump sum transfers among agents with a competitive economic system. In an efficient equilibrium, market prices reflect social opportunity costs.

  32. 32.

    In an interesting article on the history of the term “moral hazard” Rowell and Connelly (2012) note that the concepts of moral hazard and adverse selection have often been confused in the insurance literature. They also remark that this literature tends to attribute a pejorative meaning to “moral hazard,” often associated with fraud, in contrast to the economic literature which focuses on incentives and maintains that “moral hazard has in fact little to do with morality” (Pauly 1968).

  33. 33.

    Ex post moral hazard is particularly important in medical insurance, where claimed expenses are dependent on decisions made by the patient and the physician once illness has occurred.

  34. 34.

    Note that moral hazard is also present in the insurer–reinsurer relationship (see Jean-Baptiste and Santomero 2000). The success of index products in insurance securitization is partly due to the fact that they remove the moral hazard from the relationship between insurers and providers of reinsurance coverage (Doherty and Richter 2002).

  35. 35.

    The situation is of course different in monopolistic insurance markets (see Boyer and Dionne 1989a) or in markets where retrospective rating is mandatory.

  36. 36.

    At some point, the moral hazard problem becomes a fraud problem—see Picard (1996), Crocker and Morgan (1998), the special issue on fraud in The Journal of Risk and Insurance, September 2002 (Derrig 2002), and more recently Dionne et al. (2009).

  37. 37.

    Dionne et al. (2011) claim to have found evidence of moral hazard in the statistical relationship between traffic violations and accumulated “demerit points” in the system of driving license suspension threat introduced in Quebec in 1978, but they do not find such evidence when they test the effect of the 1992 insurance pricing scheme on the relationship between “demerit points” and car accidents: road infractions were reduced by 15 %, with no significant effect on car accidents.

  38. 38.

    Insurance contracts are defined in terms of price and quantity, instead of price for any quantity. Insureds reveal their class by their choice in the menu of contracts. There is no “pooling” equilibrium, but a “separating” equilibrium.

  39. 39.

    Stiglitz (1977) studied the monopolistic insurance case. Under asymmetric information, the monopolist insurer maximizes profit by supplying a menu of disciminating contracts. At the equilibrium situation, the high risks get some consumer surplus, but the low risks are restricted to partial insurance and do not get any surplus.

  40. 40.

    See Crocker and Snow (1985) for a review of these models, and Dionne and Doherty (1992) for a early survey of adverse selection theory.

  41. 41.

    On the other hand, Cohen (2005) finds some evidence of adverse selection for drivers with more than 3 years of driving experience.

  42. 42.

    See Finkelstein and Poterba (2002, 2004).

  43. 43.

    See Makki and Somwaru (2001).

  44. 44.

    See Cawley and Philipson (1999) and Hendel and Lizzeri (2003).

  45. 45.

    See Cutler and Reber (1998) and Cardon and Hendel (2001).

  46. 46.

    Advantageous selection can lead to too much insurance being purchased if there are transaction costs and competition among insurers drives profits to zero. In equilibrium, the marginal cost of insurance exceeds the market price (see Einav and Finkelstein 2011). The possibility of advantageous selection was first introduced by Hemenway (1990), who termed it “propitious” selection, and analyzed later on by De Meza and Webb (2001).

  47. 47.

    In the monopoly case, insureds cannot switch to an other insurer over time.

  48. 48.

    In Kunreuther and Pauly (1985), the insurers have no information about the other contracts that their customers might write. For this reason, price–quantity contracts are unavailable. The equilibrium is a pooling equilibrium with partial insurance for the good risks, as in Pauly (1974).

  49. 49.

    In the first period, insureds may choose either a pooling contract with partial coverage and possible renegociation in the second year, or the Rothschild–Stiglitz contract designed for high risks.

  50. 50.

    For good risks who do not file a claim in the first period the reward takes the form of additional coverage in the second period.

  51. 51.

    See also Bonato and Zweifel (2002) on the use of multiple risks to improve the assessment of loss probability.

  52. 52.

    This is an example of the well-known result that additional public information may have adverse welfare consequences (see, e.g., Arrow 1978).

  53. 53.

    In contrast, Doherty and Thistle (1996) find that additional private information has no value if there is no treatment option conditional on this information.

  54. 54.

    Note, however, that there exists alternative views on the welfare effect of asymmetric information. Using a two-period model where insureds have the option to switch insurers in the second period, de Garidel-Thoron (2005) shows that information sharing among insurers is welfare-decreasing. The reason is that this reduces the set of viable long-term contracts available to individuals in the first period competition game.

  55. 55.

    See also Zweifel and Ghermi (1990) for a study using Swiss data.

  56. 56.

    Berry-Stölzle and Born (2012) provide an empirical account of the deregulation introduced in Germany in 1994. They find evidence of a significant price decrease in highly competitive lines, offset by higher prices in the other lines.

  57. 57.

    AIG failure is mainly attributed to two causes. First, a subsidiary of AIG—AIG Financial Products—became heavily involved in the writing of credit default swaps (CDS). Second, an other subsidiary, operating in the life branch, had engaged in securities lending programs that were severely hurt by the outburst of the subprime crisis. In either case, insurance operations were not concerned.

  58. 58.

    The Solvency II regulation is presented and analyzed in Eling et al. (2007).

  59. 59.

    See, in particular, Froot (1999), OECD  (2005), Wharton Risk Management Center  (2007), Kunreuther and Michel-Kerjan (2009), as well as Courbage and Stahel (2012).

  60. 60.

    Monti (2011) provides a recent review of public-private arrangements already existing in the OECD area.

  61. 61.

    See Boubakri (2011) and the September 2011 Special Issue of The Journal of Risk and Insurance for a recent survey of corporate governance in the insurance industry.

  62. 62.

    The similarity between option contracts and insurance policies was stressed by Briys and Loubergé (1983).

  63. 63.

    See also Loubergé (1983) for an application to international reinsurance operations, taking foreign exchange risk into account, and MacMinn and Witt (1987) for a related model.

  64. 64.

    Myers and Cohn (1986) extended the model to multi-period cash flows, while Kraus and Ross (1982) considered the application to insurance of the more general arbitrage pricing theory.

  65. 65.

    The same kind of argument was used by Doherty and Tinic (1981) to question the motivation of reinsurance demand by insurers.

  66. 66.

    Rochet and Villeneuve (2011) show that cash-poor firms should hedge using financial derivatives but not insure, whereas the opposite is true for cash-rich firms.

  67. 67.

    Tobin’s Q is defined in this case as the market value of equity plus the book value of liabilities divided by the book value of assets.

  68. 68.

    The convergence between reinsurance and investment banking was emphasized by Cummins (2005).

  69. 69.

    The debate has regained importance after the 2008 financial market crisis and the collapse of AIG. Large insurance companies have been ranked with banks in the group of “Systemic Important Financial Institutions” (SIFI) and are threatened to be subject to the same regulations as banks. This is an occasion for the insurance industry to underline the differences between banking and insurance (see Lehmann and Hofmann 2010; Geneva Association 2010).

  70. 70.

    Public insurance may also be justified on equity considerations, e.g., in medical insurance.

  71. 71.

    In the USA, where a National Flood Insurance program already exists for long, and where California has established a government earthquake insurance program (the California Earthquake Authority), the possible creation of state or regional catastrophe funds is being hotly debated, given the unconvincing example of the two above-mentioned programs (see Klein and Wang 2009).

  72. 72.

    The early options and futures on four narrow-based indices of natural catastrophes were replaced in October 1995 by call spreads on nine broad-based indices. Lewis and Murdock (1996) proposed to have the same kind of contract supplied by Federal authorities, in order to complete the reinsurance market.

  73. 73.

    Harrington and Niehaus (1999) had reached the conclusion that basis risk would not be a significant problem for PCS derivative contracts, but later on Cummins et al. (2004) reached a different conclusion: they attibute the lack of success to basis risk. One may add that, possibly, the failure was due to the absence of arbitrage trading. Arbitrage trading between a derivative market and the market for the underlying instrument is essential to the provision of liquidity in derivatives trading for hedging and speculation purposes. However, in the case of PCS option contracts such trading was impossible. The only market for the trading of insurance portfolios is the reinsurance market, not liquid enough to be used as a vehicle in arbitrage trading.

  74. 74.

    Exposure to moral hazard for the investor is traded against basis risk for the sponsor.

  75. 75.

    The risk of default by the reinsurance provider is a concern in the high-layer segment of the reinsurance market.

  76. 76.

    Still, it remains that the use of insurance-linked securities raises sensitive issues in terms of regulation. Not because these instruments would represent a danger for the stability of the financial system, but because regulators, more particularly in the USA, are reluctant to consider them as genuine alternative mechanisms for risk transfer: see Klein and Wang (2009).

  77. 77.

    The success with cat bonds stimulated interest for other insurance-linked securities, particularly in the life insurance sector (mortality bonds, longevity bonds): see Cowley and Cummins (2005), Lin and Cox (2005), Albertini and Barrieu (2009), Cummins and Weiss (2009), and Chen and Cox (2009).

  78. 78.

    Other innovations, such as sidecars and ILWs (Industry Loss Warranties), are different in nature from those presented in this section. They represent innovations that improve the capacity of the reinsurance market, without introducing an alternative or complement to reinsurance contracts.

References

Publication until 1973

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84: 488–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1963a) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 53:941–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1963b) Liquidity preference. In: Arrow KJ (ed) The economics of uncertainty, vol 285. Lecture Notes for Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, pp 33–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1953) “Le rôle des valeurs boursières pour la répartition la meilleure des risques,” in Econométrie, CNRS, Paris, 41–47. English version: “The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing,” Rev Econ Stud, 1964, 31:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1970) Insurance, risk and resource allocation. In: Arrow KJ (ed) Essays in the theory of risk bearing. North Holland, Amsterdam, p 134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch K (1960) The safety loading of reinsurance premiums. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift 43:163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch K (1962) Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica 30:424–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter RL (1972) Economics and insurance PH Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1959) Theory of value Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich J, Becker G (1972) Market insurance, self insurance and self protection. J Polit Econ 80:623–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M, Savage LJ (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J Polit Econ 56:279–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould JP (1969) The expected utility hypothesis and the selection of optimal deductibles for a given insurance policy. J Bus 42:143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene M (1971) Risk aversion, insurance and the future. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene M (1973) Risk and insurance. South Western, Memphis

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurley J, Shaw ES (1960) Money in a theory of finance. Brookings Institution, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond JD (1968) Essays in the theory of risk and insurance. Scott Foresman

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education (1972) Risk and insurance instruction in American colleges and universities. University of Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow PJ (1973) Cartels, competition and regulation in the property-liability insurance industry. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 4:327–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom RE, Pauly M (1971) The role of insurance in the allocation of risk. Am Econ Rev 61:371–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J (1965) Security prices, risk and maximal gain from diversification. J Finan 20:587–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahr W (1964) Einführung in die Versicherungswirtschaft. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection—efficient diversification of investments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehr R, Hedges B (1963) Risk management in the business enterprise. Irwin, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson JB, Goshay RC (1967) Portfolio selection in financial intermediaries: a new approach. J Finan Quant Anal 2:166–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34:768–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J (1968) Aspects of rational insurance purchasing. J Polit Econ 79:553–568

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashigian B, Schkade L, Menefee G (1966) The selection of an optimal deductible for a given insurance policy. J Bus 39:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M (1968) The economics of moral hazard: comment. Am Econ Rev 58:531–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer I (1956) Insurance and economic theory. Irwin, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt J (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32:122–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (1973) The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. Am Econ Rev 63:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M, Stiglitz J (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. J Econ Theory 2:225–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ (1954) Foundation of statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finan 19: 425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith V (1968) Optimal insurance coverage. J Polit Econ 79:68–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M, Zeckhauser R (1971) Insurance, information and individual action. Am Econ Rev 61:380–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (1973) Job market signalling. Q J Econ 87:355–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R (1968) The theory of syndicates. Econometrica 36:113–132

    Google Scholar 

Publication after 1973

  • Aase K (1999) An equilibrium model of catastrophe insurance futures and spreads. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 24:69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbring J, Chiappori PA, Pinquet J (2003) Moral hazard and dynamic insurance data. J Eur Econ Assoc 1: 767–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertini L, Barrieu P (2009) The handbook of insurance-linked securities. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard M, Cresta JP, Rochet JC (1997) Pooling and separating equilibria in insurance markets with adverse selection and distribution costs. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 22:103–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen F (1985) Repeated principal-agent relationships with lending and borrowing. Econ Lett 17:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkell J (2011) The essential role of insurance services for trade growth and development. Geneva Association, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R (1992) Moral hazard and competitive insurance markets. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 325–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R, Stiglitz JE (1990) The welfare economics of moral hazard. In: Loubergé H (ed) Risk, information and insurance: essays in the memory of Karl Borch. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 91–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1974) Optimal insurance and generalized deductibles. Scand Actuar J 1:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1978) Risk allocation and information: some recent theoretical developments. Gen Papers Risk Insur 8:5–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Auñon-Nerin D, Ehling P (2008) Why firms purchase property insurance. J Finan Econ 90:298–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrese J, Doerpinghaus H, Nelson J (1995) Do independent agent insurers provide superior service? The insurance marketing puzzle. J Risk Insur 62:297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrieu P, El Karoui N (2002) Reinsuring climatic risk using optimally designed weather bonds. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 27:87–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrieu P, Loubergé H (2009) Hybrid cat bonds. J Risk Insur 76:547–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger A, Cummins D, Weiss M (1997) The coexistence of multiple distribution systems for financial services: the case of property-liability insurance. J Bus 70:515–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry-Stölzle T, Born P (2012) The effect of regulation on insurance pricing: the case of Germany. J Risk Insur 79:129–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Biener C, Eling M (2012) Insurability in microinsurance markets: an analysis of problems and potential solutions. Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 37:77–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Biger N, Kahane Y (1978) Risk considerations in insurance ratemaking. J Risk Insur 45:121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond EW, Crocker KJ (1991) Smoking, skydiving and knitting: the endogenous categorization of risks in insurance markets with asymmetric information. J Polit Econ 99:177–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonato D, Zweifel P (2002) Information about multiple risks: the case of building and content insurance. J Risk Insur 69:469–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond EW, Crocker KJ (1997) Hardball and the soft touch: the economics of optimal insurance contracts with costly state verification and endogenous monitoring costs. J Public Econ 63:239–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch K (1974) Capital markets and the supervision of insurance companies. J Risk Insur 41:397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri N (2011) Corporate governance and issues from the insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:501–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri N, Dionne G, Triki T (2008) Consolidation and value creation in the insurance industry: the role of governance. J Bank Finan 32:56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer M, Dionne G (1989a) An empirical analysis of moral hazard and experience rating. Rev Econo Stat 71:128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer M, Dionne G (1989b) More on insurance, protection and risk. Can J Econ 22:202–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan MJ, Schwartz E (1976) The pricing of equity-linked life insurance policies with an asset value guarantee. J Finan Econ 3:195–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E (1988) On the theory of rational insurance purchasing in a continuous time model. Gen Papers Risk Insur 13:165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L (1989) More on insurance as a Giffen good. J Risk Uncertainty 2:420–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Kahane Y, Kroll Y (1988) Voluntary insurance coverage, compulsory insurance, and risky-riskless portfolio opportunities. J Risk Insur 55:713–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Loubergé H (1983) Le contrat d’assurance comme option de vente. Finance 4:139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Loubergé H (1985) On the theory of rational insurance purchasing. J Finan 40:577–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Schlesinger H (1990) Risk aversion and the propensities for self-insurance and self-protection. South Econ J 57:458–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Schlesinger H, von Schulenburg M (1991) Reliability of risk management: market insurance, self-insurance and self-protection reconsidered. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 16:45

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, de Varenne F (1994) Life insurance in a contingent claims framework: pricing and regulatory implications. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 19:53–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballé J, Pomansky A (1996) Mixed risk aversion. J Econ Theory 71:485–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagle J, Harrington S (1995) Insurance supply with capacity constraints and endogenous insolvency risk. J Risk Uncertainty 11:219–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon J, Hendel I (2001) Asymmetric information in health insurance: evidence from the National Health Expenditure Survey. Rand J Econ 32:408–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawley J, Philipson T (1999) An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance. Am Econ Rev 89:827–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang PM, Peng J-L, Fan CK (2011) A comparison of bancassurance and traditional insurer sales channels. Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 36:76–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang YM, Ehrlich I (1985) Insurance, protection from risk and risk bearing. Can J Econ 18:574–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Cox S (2009) Modeling mortality with jumps: applications to mortality securitization. J Risk Insur 76:727–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Wong KA, Lee HC (1999) Underwriting cycles in Asia. J Risk Insur 66:29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Elyasani E, Jia J (2011) Institutional ownership stability and risk-taking: evidence from the life-health insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:609–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney M, Loubergé H (1986) Risk aversion and the composition of wealth in the demand for full insurance coverage. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 122:359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori P, Durand F, Geoffard PY (1998) Moral hazard and the demand for physician services: first lessons from a French natural experiment. Eur Econ Rev 42:499–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori PA, Macho I, Rey P, Salanié B (1994) Repeated moral hazard: the role of memory, commitment and the access to credit markets. Eur Econ Rev 38:1527–1553

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori P, Salanié B (2000) Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets. J Polit Econ 108: 56–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi S, Hardigree D, Thistle P (2002) The property-liability insurance cycle: acomparison of alternative models. South Econ J 68:530–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A (2005) Asymmetric information and learning in the automobile insurance market. Rev Econ Stat 87:197–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Dehejia R (2004) The effects of automobile insurance and accident liabilities laws on traffic fatalities. J Law Econ 47:357–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Siegelman P (2010) Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. J Risk Insur 77: 39–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook PJ, Graham DA (1977) The demand for insurance production: the case of irreplaceable commodities. Q J Econ 91:143–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R, Hayes B (1987) Multi-period insurance contracts. Int J Ind Organ 5:211–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Courbage C, Rey B (2006) Prudence and optimal prevention for health risks. Health Econ 15:1323–1327

    Google Scholar 

  • Courbage C, Rey B (2012) Optimal prevention and other risks in a two-period model. Math Soc Sci 63:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Courbage C, Stahel W (eds) (2012) Extreme events and insurance: 2011 Annus Horribilis, Geneva Reports No 5, Geneva Association, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley A, Cummins JD (2005) Securitization of life insurance assets and liabilities. J Risk Insur 72:193–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Morgan J (1998) Is honesty the best policy? Curtailing insurance fraud through optimal incentive contracts. J Polit Econ 106:355–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Snow A (1985) The efficiency of competitive equilibria in insurance markets with adverse selection. J Public Econ 26:207–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Snow A (1986) The efficiency effects of categorical discrimination in the insurance industry. J Polit Econ 94:321–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Snow A (2008) Background risk and the performance of insurance markets under adverse selection. Gen Risk Insur Rev 33:137–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Croker KJ, Snow A (2011) Multidimensional screening in insurance markets with adverse selection. J Risk Insur 78:287–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (1988) Risk-based premiums for insurance guaranty funds. J Finan 43:823–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (2005) Convergence in wholesale financial services: reinsurance and investment banking. Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 30:187–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (2007) Reinsurance for natural and man-made catastrophes in the United States: current state of the market and regulatory reforms. Risk Manag Insur Rev 10:179–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (2008) Cat bonds and other risk-linked securities: state of the market and recent developments. Risk Manag Insur Rev 11:23–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (2012) Cat bonds and other risk-linked securities: product design and evolution of the market. In: Courbage C, Stahel R (ed) Chapter 4, Geneva Association, Geneva, p 39–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Danzon P (1997) Price, financial quality, and capital flows in insurance markets. J Finan Intermed 6:3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Doherty N (2002) Capitalization of the property-liability insurance industry: overview. J Finan Serv Res 21:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Doherty N (2006) The economics of insurance intermediaries. J Risk Insur 73:359–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Doherty N, Lo A (2002) Can insurers pay for the ‘big one’? Measuring the capacity of the insurance market to respond to catastrophic losses. J Banking Finan 26:557–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Geman H (1995) Pricing catastrophe futures and call spreads. J Fixed Income 4: 46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Harrington SE (1985) Property-liability insurance rate regulation: estimation of underwriting betas using quarterly profit data. J Risk Insur 52:16–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Harrington SE (1987) The impact of rate regulation on property-liability insurance loss ratios: a cross-sectional analysis with individual firm data. Gen Papers Risk Insurance 12:50–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Lalonde D, Phillips RD (2004) The basis risk of index-linked catastrophic loss securities. J Finan Econ 71:77–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Mahul O (2003) Optimal insurance with divergent beliefs about insurer total default risk. J Risk Uncertainty 27:121–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Nini G (2002) Optimal capital utilization by financial firms: evidence from the property-liability insurance industry. J Finan Serv Res 21:15–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Outreville JF (1987) An international analysis of underwriting cycles in property-liability insurance. J Risk Insur 54:246–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Phillips R, Tennyson S (2001) Regulation, political influence and the price of automobile insurance. J Insur Regul 20:9–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, VanDerhei JL (1979) A note on the relative efficiency of property-liability insurance distribution systems. Bell J Econ 10:709–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Weiss M (2009) Convergence of insurance and financial markets: hybrid and securitized risk-transfer solutions. J Risk Insur 76:493–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Weiss M, Zi H (1999) Organizational form and efficiency: the coexistence of stock and mutual property-liability insurers. Manag Sci 45:1254–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler D, Reber S (1998) Paying for health insurance: the trade-off between competition and adverse selection. Q J Econ 113:433–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachraoui K, Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L, Godfroid P (2004) Comparative mixed risk aversion: definition and application to self-protection and willingness to pay. J Risk Uncertainty 29:261–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlby B (1983) Adverse selection and statistical discrimination: an analysis of Canadian automobile insurance market. J Public Econ 20:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlby B (1992) Testing for asymmetric information in Canadian automobile insurance. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 423–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzon PM (1983) Rating bureaus in US property-liability insurance markets: anti or pro-competitive? Gen Papers Risk Insur 8:371–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzon PM, Harrington S (1992) The demand for and supply of liability insurance. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy SP (1988) Application of economic theories of regulation to the property-liability insurance industry. J Insur Regul 7:19–52

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy SP, Doherty N (1990) Adverse selection, private information and lowballing in insurance markets. J Bus 63:145–163

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy SP, France VG (1992) Catastrophe futures: a better hedge for insurers. J Risk Insur 59:575–601

    Google Scholar 

  • de Garidel-Thoron T (2005) Welfare-improving asymmetric information in dynamic insurance markets. J Polit Econ 113:121–150

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meza D, Webb D (2001) Advantageous selection in insurance markets. Rand J Econ 32:249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrig R (2002) Insurance fraud. J Risk Insur 69:271–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson GM (1977) International insurance transactions and the balance of payments. Gen Papers Risk Insur No 6:17–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G (1982) Moral hazard and state-dependent utility function. J Risk Insur 49:405–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G (1983) Adverse selection and repeated insurance contracts. Gen Papers Risk Insur 8:316–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G (1984) Search and insurance. Int Econ Rev 25:357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Doherty N (1992) Adverse selection in insurance markets: a selective survey. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 97–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Doherty N (1994) Adverse selection, commitment and renegociation: extension to and evidence from insurance markets. J Polit Econ 102:209–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L (1984) Insurance and saving: some further results. Insur Math Econ 3:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L (1985) Self insurance, self protection and increased risk aversion. Econ Lett 17:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L (1988) Increasing risk and self-protection activities. Gen Papers Risk Insur 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Giuliano F, Picard P (2009) Optimal auditing with scoring: theory and application to insurance fraud. Manag Sci 55:58–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Gollier C (1992) Comparative statics under multiple sources of risk with applications to insurance demand. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 17:21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Gourieroux C, Vanasse C (2001) Testing for evidence of adverse selection in the automobile insurance market: a comment. J Polit Econ 109:444–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Harrington SE (1992) An introduction to insurance economics. In: Dionne G, Harrington SE (eds) Foundations of insurance economics.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Lasserre P (1985) Adverse selection, repeated insurance contracts and announcement strategy. Rev Econ Stud 52:719–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Lasserre P (1987) Dealing with moral hazard and adverse selection simultaneously working paper. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Li J (2011) The impact of prudence on optimal prevention revisited. Econ Lett 113:147–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Michaud PC, Dahchour M (2013) Separating moral hazard from adverse selection and learning in automobile insurance: longitudinal evidence from France. J Eur Econ Assoc 11:897–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Pinquet J, Maurice M, Vanasse C (2011) Incentive mechanisms for safe driving: a comparative analysis with dynamic data. Rev Econ Stat 93:218–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, St-Michel P (1991) Workers’ compensation and moral hazard. Rev Econ Stat 73:236–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N (1981) The measurement of output and economies of scale in property-liability insurance. J Risk Insur 48:390–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N (1984) Portfolio efficient insurance buying strategies. J Risk Insur 51:205–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N (1997) Corporate insurance: competition from capital markets and financial institutions. Assurances 65:63–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Dionne G (1993) Insurance with undiversifiable risk: contract structure and organizational form of insurance firms. J Risk Uncertainty 6:187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Eeckhoudt L (1995) Optimal insurance without expected utility: the dual theory and the linearity of insurance contracts. J Risk Uncertainty 10:157–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Garven JR (1995) Insurance cycles: interest rates and the capacity constraint model. J Bus 68:383–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Garven JR (1986) Price regulation in property-liability insurance: a contingent claims approach. J Finan 41:1031–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Jung HJ (1993) Adverse selection when loss severities differ: first-best and costly equilibria. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 18:173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Kang HB (1988) Price instability for a financial intermediary: interest rates and insurance price cycle. J Bank Finan 12:191–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Loubergé H, Schlesinger H (1987) Risk premiums with multiple sources of risk. Scand Actuar J 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Phillips R (2002) Keeping up with the Joneses: changing rating standards and the buildup of capital by U.S. property-liability insurers. J Finan Serv Res 21:55–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Posey L (1998) On the value of a checkup: adverse selection, moral hazard and the value of information. J Risk Insur 65:189–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Richter A (2002) Moral harard, basis risk and gap insurance. J Risk Insur 69:9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1983a) Optimal insurance in incomplete markets. J Polit Econ 91:1045–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1983b) The optimal deductible for an insurance policy when initial wealth is random. J Bus 56:555–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1990) Rational insurance purchasing: considerations of contract non-performance. Q J Econ 105:243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1995) Severity risk and the adverse selection of frequency risk. J Risk Insur 62:649–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (2002) Insurance contracts and securitization. J Risk Insur 69:45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Thistle P (1996) Adverse selection with endogenous information in insurance markets. J Public Econ 63:83–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Tinic S (1981) Reinsurance under conditions of capital market equilibrium. J Finan 36:949–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J (1979) Human capital and risk-bearing. Gen Papers Risk Insur No 12:5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J (1990) The role of securities and labor contracts in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing. In: Loubergé H (ed) Risk, information and insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckart M, Räthke-Döppner S (2010) The quality of insurance intermediaries services—empirical evidence for Germany. J Risk Insur 77:667–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C (2005) The impact of prudence on optimal prevention. Econ Theory 26:989–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1991) Increases in risk and deductible insurance. J Econ Theory 55: 435–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1996) Changes in background risk and risk-taking behavior. Econometrica 64:683–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Kimball M (1992) Background risk, prudence, and the demand for insurance. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 239–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Meyer J, Ormiston MB (1997) The interactions between the demand for insurance and insurable assets. J Risk Uncertainty 14:25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Rey B, Schlesinger H (2007) A good sign for multivariate risk taking. Manag Sci 53:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Einav L, Finkelstein A, Cullen M (2010) Estimating welfare in insurance markets using variations in prices. Q J Econ 125:877–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Einav L, Finkelstein A (2011) Selection in insurance markets: theory and empirics in pictures. J Econ Perspect 25:115–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen R (1990) Problems of equilibria in insurance markets with asymmetric information. In: Loubergé H (ed) Risk, information and insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 123–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekern S, Persson SA (1996) Exotic unit-linked life insurance contracts. In Loubergé H, Subrahmanyam M (eds) Financial risk and derivatives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 35–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Eling M, Schmeiser H (2010) Insurance and the credit crisis: impact and ten consequences for risk management and supervision. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory Pract 35:9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Eling M, Schmeiser H, Schmit J (2007) The Solvency II process: overview and critical analysis. Risk Manag Insur Rev 10:69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagart MC, Picard P (1999) Optimal insurance under random auditing. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 24:29–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang H, Keane M, Silverman D (2008) Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the medigap insurance market. J Polit Econ 116:303–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairley W (1979) Investment income and profit margins in property-liability insurance: theory and empirical results. Bell J Econ 10:192–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Fecher F, Perelman S, Pestieau P (1991) Scale economies and performance in the French insurance industry. Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract No 60:315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2006) Multiple dimensions of private information: evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Am Econ Rev 96:938–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, Poterba J (2002) Selection effects in the United Kingdom individual annuities market. Econ J 112:28–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, Poterba J (2004) Adverse selection in insurance markets: policyholder evidence from the U.K. annuity market. J Polit Econ 112:183–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Finken S, Laux C (2009) Catastrophe bonds and reinsurance: the competitive effect of information-sensitive triggers. J Risk Insur 76:579–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Finsinger J, Pauly M (1984) Reserve levels and reserve requirements for profit-maximizing insurance firms. In: Bamberg G, Spremann K (eds) Risk and capital. Springer Verlag, Berlin, p 160–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluet C, Pannequin F (1997) Complete versus incomplete insurance contracts under adverse selection with multiple risks. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 22:81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot K (1999) The evolving market for catastrophic event risk. Risk Manag Insur Rev 2:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot K (ed.) (1999) The financing of catastrophe risk University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot K (2001) The market for catastrophic risk: a clinical examination. J Finan Econ 60:529–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot K, O’Connell P (2008) On the pricing of intermediated risks: theory and application to catastrophe reinsurance. J Bank Finan 32:69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot K, Sharfstein D, Stein J (1993) Risk management: coordinating corporate investment and financial policies. J Finan 48:1629–1658

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1990) Moral hazard and renegociation in agency contracts. Econometrica 58:1279–1319

    Google Scholar 

  • Garven JR (1987) On the application of finance theory to the insurance firm. J Finan Serv Res 1:57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Garven JR, Lamm-Tenant J (2003) The demand for reinsurance: theory and tests. Insur Risk Manag 71:217–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Garven JR, Loubergé H (1996) Reinsurance, taxes and efficiency: a contingent claims model of insurance market equilibrium. J Finan Intermed 5:74–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Geneva Association (2010) Systemic risk in insurance—an analysis of insurance and financial stability. Geneva Association, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (1992) Economic theory of risk exchanges: a review. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (1995) The comparative statics of changes in risk revisited. J Econ Theory 66:522–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (2003) To insure or not to insure? An insurance puzzle. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 28:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Pratt JW (1996) Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica 64:1109–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Scarmure P (1994) The spillover effect of compulsory insurance. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 19:23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Schlee E (1997) Increased risk taking with multiple risks, working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1995) Second best insurance contract design in an incomplete market. Scand J Econ 97:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1996) Arrow’s theorem on the optimality of deductibles: a stochastic dominance approach. Econ Theory 7:359–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace MF, Hotchkiss JL (1995) External impacts on the property-liability insurance cycle. J Risk Insur 62: 738–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Gron A (1994) Evidence of capacity constraints in insurance markets. J Law Econ 37:349–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S, Hart OD (1983) An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica 51:7–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso L, Jappelli T (1998) Background uncertainty and the demand for insurance against insurable risks. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 23:7–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley J (1993) A cointegration analysis of the relationship between underwriting margins and interest rates: 1930–1989. J Risk Insur 60:480–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann H (1985) The organization of insurance companies: mutual versus stock. J Law Econ Organ 1: 125–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE (1984) The impact of rate regulation on prices and underwriting results in the property-liability insurance industry: a survey. J Risk Insur 51: 577–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE (1987) A note on the impact of auto insurance rate regulation. Rev Econ Stat 69:166–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE (1988) Prices and profits in the liability insurance market. In: Litan R, Winston C (eds) Liability: perspectives and policy. The Brooking Institution, Washington DC, p 42–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE (2009) The financial crisis, systemic risk, and the future of insurance regulation. J Risk Insur 76:785–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE, Danzon P (1994) Price-cutting in liability insurance markets. J Bus 67:511–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington S, Niehaus G (1999) Basis risk with PCS catastrophe insurance derivative contracts. J Risk Insur 66:49–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington S, Niehaus G (2002) Capital structure decisions in the insurance industry: stocks versus mutuals. J Finan Serv Res 21:145

    Google Scholar 

  • He E, Sommer D (2011) CEO turnover and ownership structure: evidence from the US property-liability insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:673–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig M (1988) A note on the specification of interfirm communication in insurance markets with adverse selection. J Econ Theory 46:154–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Laffont JJ (1975) On moral hazard in general equilibrium. J Econ Theory 10:8–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemenway D (1990) Propitious selection. Q J Econ 105:1063–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendel I, Lizzeri A (2003) The role of commitment in dynamic contracts: evidence from life insurance. Q J Econ 118:299–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RD (1979) Profit regulation in property-liability insurance. Bell J Econ 10:172–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RD, Modigliani F (1986) The Massachussets model of profit regulation in nonlife insurance: theory and empirical results. In: Cummins JD, Harrington SE (eds) Fair rate of return in property-liability insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong SK, Lew KO, MacMinn R, Brockett P (2011) Mossin’s theorem given random initial wealth. J Risk Insur 78:309–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J Econ 10:74–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosios AJ, Peters M (1989) Repeated insurance contracts with adverse selection and limited commitment. Q J Econ 104:229–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy M (1982) Categorizing risks in the insurance industry. Q J Econ 97:321–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy M, Robson RJ (1981) Insurance as a Giffen good. Econ Lett 8:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt R, Liebenberg A (2011) The value of enterprise risk management. J Risk Insur 78:795–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt R, Mustard D, Powell L (2006) The effectiveness of state legislation mitigating moral hazard: evidence from automobile insurance. J Law Econ 49:427–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang L-Y, Lai G, McNamara M, Wang J (2011) Corporate governance and efficiency: evidence from US property-liability insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:519–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman G, Mayers D, Smith CW (1983) Optimal insurance policy indemnity schedules. Bell J Econ 14: 415–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito R (1979) The effects of price regulation in the automobile insurance industry. J Law Econ 22: 55–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Hadar J (1995) A note on increased probability of loss and the demand for insurance. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 20:213–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean-Baptiste E, Santomero A (2000) The design of private reinsurance contracts. J Finan Intermed 9: 274–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien B, Salanié B, Salanié F (1999) Should more risk averse agents exert more effort? Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 24:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane Y (1977) Capital adequacy and the regulation of financial intermediaries. J Bank Finan 1:207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane Y, Kroll Y (1985) Optimal insurance coverage in situations of pure and speculative risk and the risk-free asset. Insur Math Econ 4:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane Y, Nye DJ (1975) A portfolio approach to the property-liability insurance industry. J Risk Insur 42:579–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni E (1992) Optimal insurance: a nonexpected utility analysis. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 217–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni E (1995) Non-expected utility and the robustness of the classical insurance paradigm—discussion. In: Gollier C, Machina M (eds) Non-expected utility and risk management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielholz W, Durrer A (1997) Insurance derivatives and securitization: new hedging perspectives for the US cat insurance market. Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract, No 82:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom RE, Romer D, Williams S (1981) Risk aversion with random initial wealth. Econometrica 49:911–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball M (1990) Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58:53–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R (2012) Principles for insurance regulation: an evaluation of current practices and potential reforms. Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 37:175–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Phillips R, Shiu W (2002) The capital structure of firms subject to price regulation: evidence from the insurance industry. J Finan Serv Res 21:79–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Wang S (2009) Catastrophe risk financing in the United States and the European Union: a comparative analysis of alternative regulatory approaches. J Risk Insur 76:607–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Klick J, Stratmann T (2007) Diabetes treatment and moral hazard. J Law Econ 50:519–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad K, Skaperdas S (1993) Self-insurance and self-protection: a non-expected utility analysis. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus A, Ross SA (1982) The determinants of fair profits for the property-liability insurance firm. J Finan 37:1015–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H (1996) Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. J Risk Uncertainty 12:171–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Michel-Kerjan E (2009) At war with the weather. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Pauly M (1985) Market equilibrium with private knowledge: an insurance example. J Public Econ 26:269–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Pauly M (2004) Neglecting disaster: why don’t people insure against large losses? J Risk Uncertainty 28:5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Pauly M (2005) Insurance decision-makink and market behavior. Found Trends Microecon 1:63–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Pauly M (2006) Rules rather than discretion: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. J Risk Uncertainty 33:101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert R (1983) Long-term contracts and moral hazard. Bell J Econ 14:441–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm-Tennant J, Weiss M (1997) International insurance cycles: rational expectations/institutional intervention. J Risk Insur 64:415–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger M, Meilijson I (1996) Extraction of surplus under adverse selection: the case of insurance markets. J Econ Theory 69:234–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JP, Yu MT (2002) Pricing default-risky cat bonds with moral hazard and basis risk. J Risk Insur 69: 25–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K (2005) Wealth effects on self-insurance and self-protection against monetary and nonmonetary losses. Gen Risk Insur Rev 30:147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K (2010) Wealth effects on self-insurance. Gen Risk Insur Rev 35:160–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K (2012) Background risk and self-protection. Econ Lett 114:262–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A, Hofmann D (2010) Lessons learned from the financial crisis for risk management: contrasting developments in insurance and banking. Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 35:63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire J (1990) Borch’s theorem: a historical survey of applications. In: Loubergé H (ed) Risk, information and insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng CC, Meier U (2006) Analysis of multinational underwriting cycles in property-liability insurance. J Risk Finan 7:146–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis CM, Murdock KC (1996) The role of government contracts in discretionary reinsurance markets for natural disasters. J Risk Insur 63:567–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J (2011) The demand for a risky asset in the presence of a background risk. J Econ Theory 146:372–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Cox S (2005) Securitization of mortality risks in life annuities. J Risk Insur 72:227–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Litzenberger R, Beaglehole D, Reynold C (1996) Assessing catastrophe reinsurance-linked securities as a new asset class. J Portfolio Manag 23:76–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Loubergé H (1983) A portfolio model of international reinsurance operations. J Risk Insur 50:44–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Loubergé H, Kellezi E, Gilli M (1999) Using catastrophe-linked securities to diversify insurance risk: a financial analysis of cat bonds. J Insur Issues 22:125–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Loubergé H, Watt R (2008) Insuring a risky investment project. Insur Math Econ 42:301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina M (1982) Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica 50:277–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina M (1995) Non-expected utility and the robustness of the classical insurance paradigm. In: Gollier C, Machina M (eds) Non-expected utility and risk management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 9–50

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMinn RD, Witt RC (1987) A financial theory of the insurance firm under uncertainty and regulatory constraints. Gen Papers Risk Insur 12:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnan S (1995) Catastrophe insurance system in France. Gen Papers Risk Insur No 77:474–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahul O (2000) Optimal insurance design with random initial wealth. Econ Lett 69:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Main B (1982) Business insurance and large, widely-held corporations. Gen Papers Risk Insur 7:237–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Makki S, Somwaru A (2001) Evidence of adverse selection in crop insurance markets. J Risk Insur 68:685–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JM (1974) Insurance theory: reserves versus mutuality. Econ Inquiry 12:476–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JM (1976) Moral hazard. Am Econ Rev 66:880–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1981) Contractual provisions, organizational structure, and conflict control in insurance markets. J Bus 54:407–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1982) On the corporate demand for insurance. J Bus 55:281–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1983) The interdependence of individual portfolio decisions and the demand for insurance. J Polit Econ 91:304–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1986) Ownership structure and control: the mutualization of stock life insurance companies. J Finan Econ 16:73–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1988) Ownership structure across lines of property-casualty insurance. J Law Econ 31:351–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1990) On the corporate demand for insurance: evidence from the reinsurance market. J Bus 63:19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (2002) Ownership structure and control: property-casualty insurer conversion to stock charter. J Finan Serv Res 21:117–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier U, Outreville JF (2006) Business cycles in insurance and reinsurance: the case of France, Germany and Switzerland. J Risk Finan 7:160–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J (1992) Beneficial changes in random variables under multiple sources of risk and their comparative statics. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 17:7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D, Meyer J (1998a) Changes in background risk and the demand for insurance. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 23:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D, Meyer J (1998b) The comparative statics of deductible insurance and insurable assets. J Risk Insur 66:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D, Meyer J (2004) A more reasonable model of insurance demand. In: Aliprantis CD et al. (eds.) Assets, beliefs and equilibria in economic dynamics—essays in honor of Mordecai Kurz. Springer, Berlin, p 733–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Ormiston MB (1995) Demand for insurance in a portfolio setting. Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 20:203–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulbroek L (2002) Integrated risk management for the firm: a senior manager’s guide. J Appl Corpor Finan 14: 56–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel-Kerjan E, Morlaye F (2008) Extreme events, global warming, and insurance-linked securities: how to trigger the ‘Tipping point’. Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 33:153–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki H (1977) The rat race and internal labor markets. Bell J Econ 8:394–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffet D (1977) Optimal deductible and consumption theory. J Risk Insur 44:669–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffet D (1979) The risk-sharing problem. Gen Papers Risk Insur 4:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Monti A (2011) “Public-private initiative to cover extreme events” Chapter 3 in Courbage and Stahel (2012), 27–38

  • Mookherjee D, Png I (1989) Optimal auditing, insurance and redistribution. Q J Econ 104:205–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormino CA (1979) “Insurance cycles: an Italian experience”. Etudes et Dossiers de l’Association de Genève No 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch P, Smallwood DE (1980) Solvency regulation in the property-liability insurance industry: empirical evidence. Bell J Econ 11:261–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers SC, Cohn RA (1986) A discounted cash flow approach to property-liability insurance rate regulation. In: Cummins JD, Harrington SE (eds) Fair rate of return in property-liability insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Nell M, Richter A (2004) Improving risk allocation through indexed cat bonds Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 29:183–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JA, Sandmann K (1996) Uniqueness of the fair premium for equity-linked life insurance contracts In: Loubergé H, Subrahmanyam M (eds) Financial risk and derivatives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 65–102

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) Catastrophic risk and insurance. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M (1974) Overinsurance and public provision of insurance: the role of moral hazard and adverse selection Q J Econ 88:44–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M, Kleindorfer PR, Kunreuther H (1986) Regulation and quality competition in the US insurance industry. In: Finsinger J, Pauly M (eds) The economics of insurance regulation. MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard P (1996) Auditing claims in insurance markets with fraud: the credibility issue J Public Econ 63:27–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pita Barros P (1993) Freedom of services and competition in insurance markets Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantin G (2006) Does reinsurance need reinsurers? J Risk Insur 73:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Polemarchakis H (1990) Competitive allocation when the asset market is incomplete Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell LS, Sommer DW (2007) Internal versus external markets in the insurance industry: the role of reinsurance J Finan Serv Res 31:173–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest GL (1996) The government, the market and the problem of catastrophic losses J Risk Uncertainty 12:219–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Puelz R, Snow A (1994) Evidence on adverse selection: equilibrium signalling and cross-subsidization in the insurance market J Polit Econ 102:236–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin JC (1982) A theory of anticipated utility J Econ Behav Organ 3:323–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner R (1981) Monitoring cooperative agreements in a repeated principal-agent relationship Econometrica 49:1127–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Raviv A (1979) The design of an optimal insurance policy Am Econ Rev 69:84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Razin A (1976) Rational insurance purchasing J Finan 31:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea SA (1992) Insurance classifications and social welfare. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 377–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees R, Gravelle H, Wambach A (1999) Regulation of insurance markets Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 24: 55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey B (2003) A note on optimal insurance in the presence of a nonpecuniary background risk Theory Decis 54:73–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Richaudeau D (1999) Automobile insurance contracts and risk of accident: an empirical test using French individual data Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 24: 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley JG (1979) Informational equilibrium Econometrica 47:331–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson C, Zheng B (2010) Moral hazard, insurance claims and repeated insurance contracts Can J Econ 43:967–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet JC, Villeneuve S (2011) Liquidity management and corporate demand for hedging and insurance J Finan Intermed 20:303–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (1981) Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and in the large with applications Econometrica 49:621–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild C (2011) The efficiency of categorical discrimination in insurance markets J Risk Insur 78:267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: the economics of markets with imperfect information Q J Econ 90:629–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1997) Competition and insurance twenty years later Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 22: 73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell D, Connelly L (2012) A history of the term ‘moral hazard’ J Risk Insur 79:1051–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A, Yaari ME (1983) Repeated insurance contracts and moral hazard J Econ Theory 30: 74–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito K (2006) Testing for asymmetric information in the automobile insurance market under rate regulation J Risk Insur 73:335–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandroni A, Squintani F (2007) Overconfidence, insurance and paternalism Am Econ Rev 97:1994–2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlee E (1995) The comparative statics of deductible insurance in expected- and non-expected utility theories. In: Gollier C, Machina M (ed) Non-expected utility and risk management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 57–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H (1984) Optimal insurance for irreplaceable commodities J Risk Insur 51:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H (1997) Insurance demand without the expected utility paradigm J Risk Insur 64:19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H (1999) Decomposing catastrophic risk Insur Math Econ 24:95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H, Doherty N (1985) Incomplete markets for insurance: an overview J Risk Insur 52:402–423

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schulenburg M (1986) Optimal insurance purchasing in the presence of compulsory insurance and insurable risks Gen Papers Risk Insur 38:5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal U, Spivak A (1990) First order versus second order risk aversion J Econ Theory 51:111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1979) On moral hazard and insurance Q J Econ 93:541–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1982) On liability and insurance Bell J Econ 13:120–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1986) The judgment proof problem Int Rev Law Econ 6:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (2000) On the social function and the regulation of liability insurance Gen Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 25:166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim J (2011) Mergers & acquisitions, diversification and performance in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry J Finan Serv Res 39:119–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiu YM (2011) Reinsurance and capital structure: evidence from the United Kingdom non-life insurance industry J Risk Insur 78:475–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn HW (1982) Kinked utility and the demand for human wealth and liability insurance Eur Econ Rev 17: 149–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart M (2000) Competitive insurance markets with two unobservables Int Econ Rev 41:153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Smithson C, Wilford S (1990) Financial engineering: why hedge? In: Handbook of financial engineering. Harper & Row, New York, Chapter 5, p 126–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Stulz R (1985) The determinants of firms’ hedging policies J Finan Quant Anal 20:391–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (1978) Product differentiation and performance in insurance markets J Pub Econ 10:427–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopoly, non-linear pricing and imperfect information: the insurance market Rev Econ Stud 44:407–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1983) Risk, incentives and insurance: the pure theory of moral hazard Gen Papers Risk Insur 8:4–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information Am Econ Rev 71:393–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz R (1984) Optimal hedging policies J Finan Quant Anal 19:127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney GH, Beard R (1992) The comparative statics of self-protection J Risk Insur 59:301–309

    Google Scholar 

  • SwissRe (2009) The role of indices in transferring insurance risks to capital markets. Sigma, Zurich, No 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibiletti L (1995) Beneficial changes in random variables via copulas: an application to insurance Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 20:191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend R (1979) Optimal contracts and competitive contracts with costly state verification J Econ Theory 22:265–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsetlin I, Winkler RL (2005) Risky choices and correlated background risk Manag Sci 51:1336–1345

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull S (1983) Additional aspects of rational insurance purchasing J Bus 56:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezian E (1985) Ratemaking methods and profit cycles in property and liability insurance J Risk Insur 52: 477–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK (1995) Insurance and Catastrophes: the changing role of the liability system Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 20:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M (2007) Underwriting cycles: a synthesis and further directions J Insur Issues 30:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton Risk Management Center (2007) Managing large-scale risks in a new era of catastrophe. Wharton School, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C (1977) A model of insurance markets with incomplete information J Econ Theory 12:167–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter RA (1992) Moral hazard and insurance contracts. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 61–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter RA (1994) The dynamics of competitive insurance markets J Finan Intermed 3:379–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari M (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk Econometrica 55: 95–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Young VR, Browne MJ (1997) Explaining insurance policy provisions via adverse selection Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 22:121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanjani G (2002) Pricing and capital allocation in catastrophe insurance J Finan Econ 65: 283–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser R (1995) Insurance and catastrophes Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 20: 157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou H, Adams M (2008) Debt capacity, cost of debt, and corporate insurance J Finan Quant Anal 43:433–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel P, Ghermi P (1990) Exclusive vs. independent agencies: a comparison of performance Gen Papers Risk Insur Theory 15:171–192

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This survey is the revised and updated version of earlier surveys published as “Risk and insurance economics 25 years after” and “Developments in risk and insurance economics: the past 25 years” respectively in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practices (No 89, October 1998, pp. 540–567) and in Handbook of Insurance, G. Dionne (Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000, Chapter 1, pp. 3–33. I thank Georges Dionne, Louis Eeckhoudt, Harris Schlesinger and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on successive versions. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Loubergé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science + Business media, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loubergé, H. (2013). Developments in Risk and Insurance Economics: The Past 40 Years. In: Dionne, G. (eds) Handbook of Insurance. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0155-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics