Abstract
As an intermediate step between laboratory and (semi-)field experiments, in situ bioassays are a valuable active biomonitoring tool for the assessment of effects. By measuring lethal or sublethal responses of caged aquatic (in)vertebrates in the field, the biological consequences of point and nonpoint sources of pollution can be determined. As the test organisms—here we focus on aquatic invertebrates—and response variables selected can be diverse, we first provide some general considerations related to the experimental design including the selection of test species, sampling sites, response variables, replication, as well as data evaluation. Subsequently, a case study using leaf-shredding amphipods as model organisms for the assessment of point sources of pollution is presented to underpin these theoretical considerations by a practical example. Thereby, a more detailed protocol is provided to contextualize the results of this case study. All in all, this book chapter aims at providing guidance for researchers interested in employing in situ bioassays in their studies or monitoring efforts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chappie DJ, Burton GA (1997) Optimization of in situ bioassays with Hyalella azteca and Chironomus tentans. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:559–564
Crane M, Maltby L (1991) The lethal and sublethal responses of Gammarus pulex to stress: sensitivity and sources of variation in an in situ bioassay. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:1331–1339
Schulz R (2005) Aquatic in situ bioassays to detect agricultural non-point source pesticide pollution: a link between laboratory and field. In: Ostrander GK (ed) Techniques in aquatic toxicology, vol 2. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, p 784
Bundschuh M, Schulz R (2011) Ozonation of secondary treated wastewater reduces ecotoxicity to Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea; Amphipoda): are loads of (micro)pollutants responsible? Water Res 45:3999–4007
Jergentz S, Pessacq P, Mugni H, Bonetto C, Schulz R (2004) Linking in situ bioassays and population dynamics of macroinvertebrates to assess agricultural contamination in streams of the Argentine pampa. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 59:133–141
Schulz R, Liess M (1999) Validity and ecological relevance of an active in situ bioassay using Gammarus pulex and Limnephilus lunatus. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2243–2250
Bundschuh M, Pierstorf R, Schreiber WH, Schulz R (2011) Positive effects of wastewater ozonation can be displayed by in situ bioassays in the receiving stream. Environ Sci Technol 45:3774–3780
Englert D, Zubrod JP, Schulz R, Bundschuh M (2013) Effects of municipal wastewater on aquatic ecosystem structure and function in the receiving stream. Sci Total Environ 454-455:401–410
Englert D, Zubrod JP, Schulz R, Bundschuh M (2015) Variability in ecosystem structure and functioning in a low order stream: implications of land use and season. Sci Total Environ 538:341–349
Fernandez D, Voss K, Bundschuh M, Zubrod JP, Schäfer RB (2015) Effects of fungicides on decomposer communities and leaf decomposition in vineyard streams. Sci Total Environ 533:40–48
Schulz R (2003) Using a freshwater amphipod in situ bioassay as a sensitive tool to detect pesticide effects in the field. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1172–1176
Schlenk D et al (2001) Toxicity of fipronil and its degradation products to Procambarus sp.: field and laboratory studies. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 41:325–332
Den Besten PJ, Naber A, Grootelaar EMM, Van de Guchte C (2003) In situ bioassays with Chironomus riparius: laboratory-field comparisons of sediment toxicity and effects during wintering. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage 6:217–228
Faria MS et al (2006) Biological and functional responses of in situ bioassays with Chironomus riparius larvae to assess river water quality and contamination. Sci Total Environ 371:125–137
Salmelin J, Leppanen MT, Karjalainen AK, Vuori KM, Gerhardt A, Hamalainen H (2017) Assessing ecotoxicity of biomining effluents in stream ecosystems by in situ invertebrate bioassays: a case study in Talvivaara, Finland. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:147–155
Lopes I, Moreira-Santos M, da Silva EM, Sousa JP, Guilhermino L, Soares AMVM, Ribeiro R (2007) In situ assays with tropical cladocerans to evaluate edge-of-field pesticide runoff toxicity. Chemosphere 67:2250–2256
Pereira AMM, Soares AMVM, Goncalves F, Ribeiro R (1999) Test chambers and test procedures for in situ toxicity testing with zooplankton. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1956–1964
Pereira AM, Soares AMVM, Goncalves F, Ribeiro R (2000) Water-column, sediment, and in situ chronic bioassays with cladocerans. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 47:27–38
Salazar MH, Duncan PB, Salazar SM, Rose KA (1995) In situ bioassays using transplanted mussels: II. Assessing contaminated sediments at a superfund site in Puget sound. In: Hughes JS, Biddinger GR, Mones E (eds) Environmental toxicology and risk assessment, vol ASTM STP 1218. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 242–263
Burton GA Jr et al (2005) In situ exposures using caged organisms: a multi-compartment approach to detect aquatic toxicity and bioaccumulation. Environ Pollut 134:133–144
Herrero O, Morcillo G, Planello R (2017) Transcriptional deregulation of genetic biomarkers in Chironomus riparius larvae exposed to ecologically relevant concentrations of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). Plos One 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171719
Wagner M, Oehlmann J (2009) Endocrine disruptors in bottled mineral water: total estrogenic burden and migration from plastic bottles. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:278–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0107-7
Wagner M, Oehlmann J (2011) Endocrine disruptors in bottled mineral water: estrogenic activity in the E-Screen. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 127:128–135
Prato E, Biandolino F (2006) Monocorophium insidiosum (Crustacea, Amphipoda) as a candidate species in sediment toxicity testing. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 77:1–8
Newman MC (2013) Quantitative ecotoxicology. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Adam O, Degiorgi F, Crini G, Badot PM (2010) High sensitivity of Gammarus sp. juveniles to deltamethrin: outcomes for risk assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:1402–1407
Pascoe D, Kedwards TJ, Blockwell SJ, Taylor EJ (1995) Gammarus pulex (L.) feeding bioassay—effects of parasitism. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 55:629–632
Grabner DS, Weigand AM, Leese F, Winking C, Hering D, Tollrian R, Sures B (2015) Invaders, natives and their enemies: distribution patterns of amphipods and their microsporidian parasites in the Ruhr Metropolis, Germany Parasite Vector 8 doi: ARTN 419. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1036-6
Franke U (1977) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Respiration von Gammarus fossarum in Abhängigkeit von Temperatur, Sauerstoffkonzentration und Wasserbewegung. Archiv Hydrobiol Suppl 48:369–411
Hoffman ER, Fisher S (1994) Comparison of a field and laboratory-derived population of Chironomus riparius (Diptera, Chironomidae)—biochemical and fitness evidence for population divergence. J Econ Entomol 87:318–325
Bundschuh M, Goedkoop W, Kreuger J (2014) Evaluation of pesticides monitoring strategies in agricultural streams based on the toxic-unit concept—experiences from long-term measurements. Sci Total Environ 484:84–91
Stehle S, Knäbel A, Schulz R (2013) Probabilistic risk assessment of insecticide concentrations in agricultural surface waters: a critical appraisal. Environ Monit Assess 185:6295–6310
Liess M, Schulz R (2000) Sampling methods in surface waters. In: LML N (ed) Handbook of water analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–24
Matthiessen P et al (1995) Use of a Gammarus pulex bioassay to measure the effects of transient carbofuran runoff from farmland. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 30:111–119
Maltby L, Clayton SA, Wood RM, McLoughlin N (2002) Evaluation of the Gammarus pulex in situ feeding assay as a biomonitor of water quality: robustness, responsiveness and relevance. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:361–368
Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Pearson Education Inc., London
Ashauer R (2016) Post-ozonation in a municipal wastewater treatment plant improves water quality in the receiving stream. Environ Sci Eur 28:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-12015-10068-z
Dangles O, Gessner MO, Guerold F, Chauvet E (2004) Impacts of stream acidification on litter breakdown: implications for assessing ecosystem functioning. J Appl Ecol 41:365–378
Macneil C, Dick JTA, Elwood RW (1999) The dynamics of predation on Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Biol Rev 74:375–395
Bundschuh M, Zubrod JP, Schulz R (2011) The functional and physiological status of Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea; Amphipoda) exposed to secondary treated wastewater. Environ Pollut 159:244–249
Coulaud R et al (2011) In situ feeding assay with Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea): modelling the influence of confounding factors to improve water quality biomonitoring. Water Res 45:6417–6429
Bärlocher F (1992) Effects of drying and freezing autumn leaves on leaching and colonization by aquatic hyphomycetes. Freshw Biol 28:1–7
Bärlocher F (1985) The role of fungi in the nutrition of stream invertebrates. Bot J Linn Soc 91:83–94
Dang CK, Chauvet E, Gessner MO (2005) Magnitude and variability of process rates in fungal diversity-litter decomposition relationships. Ecol Lett 8:1129–1137
Naylor C, Maltby L, Calow P (1989) Scope for growth in Gammarus pulex, a freshwater benthic detritivore. Hydrobiologia 188/189:517–523
Poulton M, Pascoe D (1990) Disruption of precopula in Gammarus pulex (L.)—development of a behavioural bioassay for evaluating pollutant and parasite induced stress. Chemosphere 20:403–415
Maltby L, Naylor C, Calow P (1990) Effect of stress on a freshwater benthic detritivore: scope for growth in Gammarus pulex. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 19:285–291
Baird DJ et al (2007) In situ-based effects measures: determining the ecological relevance of measured responses. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3:259–267
Bundschuh M, Schulz R (2011) Population response to ozone application in wastewater: an on-site microcosm study with Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Ecotoxicology 20:466–473
Wieczorek MV, Bakanov N, Bilancia D, Szöcs E, Stehle S, Bundschuh M, Schulz R (2018) Structural and functional effects of a short-term pyrethroid pulse exposure on invertebrates in outdoor stream mesocosms. Sci Total Environ 610–611:810–819
Acknowledgments
Figures 3 and 4 were reprinted with permission from Bundschuh, M., Pierstorf, R., Schreiber, W.H., and Schulz, R. (2011). Positive effects of wastewater ozonation can be displayed by in situ bioassays in the receiving stream. Environmental Science & Technology 45(8), 3774-3780. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bundschuh, M., Schulz, R. (2019). In Situ Exposure of Aquatic Invertebrates to Detect the Effects of Point and Nonpoint Source-Related Chemical Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystems. In: Seiler, TB., Brinkmann, M. (eds) In Situ Bioavailability and Toxicity of Organic Chemicals in Aquatic Systems. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/7653_2019_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7653_2019_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2352-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2353-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols