Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aging society and gerontechnology: A solution for an independent living?

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Recent studies report that the majority of older adults wish to live in their own homes, for as long as possible. This creates a growing interest in technologies to enable older people to remain living independently at home. The purpose of this article is to provide a narrative review of current technology appropriate for older adults’ home use. The key research questions were as follow: 1- What is the evidence demonstrating that gerontechnologies are effective in enabling independent living? 2- What are devices designed specifically for frail elderly persons ? Several publications were identified about devices targeting social isolation (videophonic communication, affective orthotic devices or companion-type robots, personal emergency response systems [security]), autonomy loss (technologies for maintenance of autonomy in the activities of daily living) and cognitive disorders (cognitive orthotics, wandering management systems, telemonitoring). Very few articles dealt specifically with the frail older person. In particular, there was extremely limited evidence on use and efficacy of these devices within this population. There is a need to obtain a consensus on definition of the technologies, and also to revisit work strategies and develop innovative business models. To meet this goal, we need to create a network of technological companies, aging services organizations, end-users, academics, and government representatives to explore the real needs of the frail older population and to develop and validate new devices promoting aging at home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Metsemakers JF, Roos S, Knottnerus JA. Multimorbidity in general practice: prevalence, incidence, and determinants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:367–375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balas EA, Iakovidis I. Distance technologies for patient monitoring. Interview by Abi Berger. BMJ. 1999;319:1309.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, Foster L, Edmonson E, Wakefield B, Lancaster A. Care Coordination/Home Telehealth: the systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:1118–1126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Niefeld MR, Kasper JD. Access to ambulatory medical and long-term care services among elderly Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries: organizational, financial, and geographic barriers. Med Care Res Rev. 2005;62:300–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pilotto A, D’Onofrio G, Benelli E, Zanesco A, Cabello A, Margelí MC, Wanche-Politis S, Seferis K, Sancarlo D, Kilias D. Information and communication technology systems to improve quality of life and safety of Alzheimer’s disease patients: a multicenter international survey. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23:131–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Faucounau V, Wu YH, Boulay M, Maestrutti M, Rigaud AS. Caregivers’ requirements for in-home robotic agent for supporting community-living elderly subjects with cognitive impairment. Technol Health Care. 2009;17:33–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shenk D, Kuwahara K, Zablotsky D. Older women’s attachments to their home and possessions. Journal of Aging Studies 2004;18:157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Santos-Eggimann B, Cuénoud P, Spagnoli J, Junod J. Prevalence of frailty in middle-aged and older community-dwelling Europeans living in 10 countries. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64:675–681.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan M, Campo E, Estève D, Fourniols JY. Smart homes — current features and future perspectives. Maturitas. 2009;64:90–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barlow J, Singh D, Bayer S, Curry R. A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:172–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi PY, Pecina JL, Upatising B, Chaudhry R, Shah ND, Van Houten H, Cha S, Croghan I, Naessens JM, Hanson GJ. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Telemonitoring in Older Adults With Multiple Health Issues to Prevent Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:773–779.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent C, Reinharz D, Deaudelin I, Garceau M, Talbot LR. Public telesurveillance service for frail elderly living at home, outcomes and cost evolution: a quasi experimental design with two follow-ups. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:41.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Czaja SJ, Rubert MP. Telecommunications technology as an aid to family caregivers of persons with dementia. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:469–476.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisdorfer C, Czaja SJ, Loewenstein DA, Rubert MP, Argüelles S, Mitrani VB, Szapocznik J. The effect of a family therapy and technology-based intervention on caregiver depression. Gerontologist. 2003;43:521–531.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson J. Social, ethical, legal barriers to E-Health. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:480–483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barlow J (2006). Building an evidence base for successful telecare implementation — updated report of the Evidence Working Group of the Telecare Policy Collaborative chaired by James Barlow.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alwan M, Nobel J (2008). State of Technology in Aging Services According to Field Experts and Thought Leaders. Report Submitted to: Blue Shield of California Foundation. Center for Aging Services Technologies (Cast).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin S, Kelly G, Kernohan WG, McCreight B, Nugent C. Smart home technologies for health and social care support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD006412.

  20. World Health Organization (2001). World Health Organization: International classification of impairment, disability and handicaps. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Micera S, Bonato P, Tamura T. Gerontechnology: advanced solutions for an ageing society? IEEE EMB Mag. 2008;27:10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Age UK (2010). Technology and Older People Evidence Review. http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/For-professionals/Research/. Accessed: 22 June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  23. Demiris G, Hensel BK, Skubic M, Rantz M. Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:120–124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ní Scanaill C, Carew S, Barralon P, Noury N, Lyons D, Lyons GM. A review of approaches to mobility telemonitoring of the elderly in their living environment. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:547–563.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rialle V, Duchene F, Noury N, Bajolle L, Demongeot J. Health “Smart” home: information technology for patients at home. Telemed J E Health 2002;8:395–409.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lauriks S, Reinersmann A, Van der Roest HG, Meiland FJ, Davies RJ, Moelaert F, Mulvenna MD, Nugent CD, Dröes RM. Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. Ageing Res Rev. 2007;6:223–246.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kang HG, Mahoney DF, Hoenig H, Hirth VA, Bonato P, Hajjar I, Lipsitz LA; Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology Working Group on Advanced Approaches to Physiologic Monitoring for the Aged. In situ monitoring of health in older adults: technologies and issues. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:1579–1586.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sung M, Marci C, Pentland A. Wearable feedback systems for rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005;2:17.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morris M. Social networks as health feedback displays. IEEE Internet Computing. 2005; Vol9: 29–37 in Morris, M., “Technologies for Heart and Mind: New Directions in Embedded Assessment.” Intel Technology Journal (February 2007). Available online at: http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2007/v11i1/7-heart-mind/1-abstract.htm, last accessed 10/06/2012

    Google Scholar 

  30. Willems C, Vlaskamp FJ, De Vlieger S. Attention Care and Monitoring of Behavior. Promoting independence for older persons with disabilities in W. C. Mann and A. Helal. Amsterdam, IOS Press 2006:99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sävenstedt S, Zingmark K, Sandman PO. Video-phone communication with cognitively impaired elderly patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9 Suppl 2:S52–S54.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Freeman ED, Clare L, Savitch N, Royan L, Litherland R, Lindsay M. Improving website accessibility for people with early-stage dementia: a preliminary investigation. Aging Ment Health. 2005;9:442–448.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Savolainen L, Hanson E, Magnusson L, Gustavsson T. An Internet-based videoconferencing system for supporting frail elderly people and their carers. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:79–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM, Zhou X, Potthoff S, Ratner ER. Perception, satisfaction and utilization of the VALUE home telehealth service. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17:288–292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Horton K. Falls in older people: the place of telemonitoring in rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:1183–1194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bourke AK, van de Ven P, Gamble M, O’Connor R, Murphy K, Bogan E, McQuade E, Finucane P, Olaighin G, Nelson J. Evaluation of waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer based fall-detection algorithms during scripted and continuous unscripted activities. J Biomech. 2010;43:3051–3057.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rimminen H, Lindström J, Linnavuo M, Sepponen R. Detection of falls among the elderly by a floor sensor using the electric near field. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010;14:1475–1476.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li Y, Ho KC, Popescu M. A microphone array system for automatic fall detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59:1291–1301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Auvinet E, Reveret L, St-Arnaud A, Rousseau J, Meunier J. Fall detection using multiple cameras. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:2554–2557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Najafi B, Aminian K, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Loew F, Büla CJ, Robert P. Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003;50:711–723.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sabatini AM, Genovese V, Maini ES. Portable system for data acquisition and transmission based on handheld PC technology. Electron. Lett. 2002;38:1635–1637.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bagalà F, Becker C, Cappello A, Chiari L, Aminian K, Hausdorff JM, Zijlstra W, Klenk J. Evaluation of accelerometer-based fall detection algorithms on real-world falls. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37062.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lai CK, Chung JC, Leung NK, Wong JC, Mak DP. A survey of older Hong Kong people’s perceptions of telecommunication technologies and telecare devices. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:441–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Noury N, Herve T, Rialle V, Virone G, Mercier E, Morey G, Moro A, Porcheron T. Monitoring behavior in home using a smart fall sensor and position sensors, in IEEEEMBS Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology 2000 607–610, doi:10.1109/MMB.2000.893857

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kelly KE, Phillips CL, Cain KC, Polissar NL, Kelly PB. Evaluation of a non intrusive monitor to reduce falls in nursing home patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2002;3:377–382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dadd M, Doyle B, Wilson L, Gunaratnam M. Lessons learned from the Hospital Without Walls project. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8Suppl 3:S3:11–4.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ní Scanaill, C., G. M. Lyons, A. Bourke, M. Keller, M. Schneiders, K. L. Culhane, and B. Aherne (2003). Use of accelerometry for the long-term mobility monitoring of the elderly. In: 7th European Conference for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sarela, A., I. Korhonen, J. Lotjonen, M. Sola, and M. Myllymaki. IST Vivago—an intelligent social and remote wellness monitoring system for the elderly. In: 4th International IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, pp. 362–365, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  49. Culhane KM, Lyons GM, Hilton D, Grace PA, Lyons D. Long-term mobility monitoring of older adults using accelerometers in a clinical environment. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:335–343.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Alwan M, Rajendran PJ, Kell S, Mack D, Dalal S, Wolfe M, Felder R, A Smart and Passive Floor-Vibration Based Fall Detector for Elderly, In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications (ICTTA’06), April 23rd–28th 2006, Damascus, Syria

  51. Tyrer HW, Aud MA, Alexander G, Skubic M, Rantz M. Early detection of health changes in older adults. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;2007:4045–4048.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bourke AK, van de Ven PW, Chaya AE, OLaighin GM, Nelson J. Testing of a long-term fall detection system incorporated into a custom vest for the elderly. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:2844–2847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vass CD, Sahota O, Drummond A, et al. REFINE (Reducing Falls in In-patient Elderly)—a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2009;10:83.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Londei ST, Rousseau J, Ducharme F, St-Arnaud A, Meunier J, Saint-Arnaud J, Giroux F. An intelligent videomonitoring system for fall detection at home: perceptions of elderly people. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15:383–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Marschollek M, Rehwald A, Wolf KH, Gietzelt M, Nemitz G, Meyer Zu Schwabedissen H, Haux R. Sensor-based fall risk assessment—an expert ‘to go’. Methods Inf Med. 2011;50:420–426.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gitlin LN, Winter L, Dennis MP, Corcoran M, Schinfeld S, Hauck WW. A randomized trial of a multicomponent home intervention to reduce functional difficulties in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:809–816.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mann WC, Ottenbacher KJ, Fraas L, Tomita M, Granger CV. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly. A randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:210–217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilson DJ, Mitchell JM, Kemp BJ, Adkins RH, Mann W. Effects of assistive technology on functional decline in people aging with a disability. Assist Technol. 2009;21(4):208–217.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Carrera I, Moreno HA, Saltarén R, Pérez C, Puglisi L, Garcia C. ROAD: domestic assistant and rehabilitation robot. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011;49:1201–1211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Spenko M, Yu H, Dubowsky S. Robotic personal aids for mobility and monitoring for the elderly. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006;14:344–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rentschler AJ, Cooper RA, Blasch B, Boninger ML. Intelligent walkers for the elderly: performance and safety testing of VA-PAMAID robotic walker. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40:423–431.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rentschler AJ, Simpson R, Cooper RA, Boninger ML. Clinical evaluation of Guido robotic walker. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:1281–1293.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Shimada H, Hirata T, Kimura Y, Naka T, Kikuchi K, Oda K, Ishii K, Ishiwata K, Suzuki T. Effects of a robotic walking exercise on walking performance in community-dwelling elderly adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009;9:372–381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wasson G, Gunderson J, Graves S, Felder R. Effective shared control in cooperative mobility aids. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference; 2001 May 21–23; Key West, Florida. Menlo Park (CA): AAAI Press; p. 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Morris AC, Donamukkala RR, Kapuria A, Steinfeld A, Matthews J, Dunbar-Jacobs J, Thrun S. Robotic Walker that Provides Guidance. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’ 03), May, 2003

  66. Graf B, Hans M, Schraft RD. Mobile robot assistants. IEEE Rob Autom Mag. 2004;11:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mihailidis A, Boger JN, Craig T, Hoey J. The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: an efficacy study. BMC Geriatr 2008;7:28.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Pigot H, Lussier-Desrochers D, Bauchet J, Giroux S, Lachapelle Y, (Eds):A Smart Home to Assist in Recipe Completion. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press; 2008

    Google Scholar 

  69. Yasuda K, Beckman B, Yoneda M, Yoneda H, Iwamoto A, Nakamura T. Successful guidance by automatic output of music and verbal messages for daily behavioural disturbances of three individuals with dementia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006;16:66–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lancioni GE, La Martire ML, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Pinto K, Minervini MG. Persons With Mild or Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease Managing Daily Activities via Verbal Instruction Technology, American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias 2008;23:552–562.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Donnelly MP, Nugent CD, Craig D, Passmore P, Mulvenna M. Development of a cell phone-based video streaming system for person with early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008;2008:5330–5333.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Boman IL, Bartfai A, Borell L, Tham K, Hemmingsson H. Support in everyday activities with a home-based electronic memory aid for persons with memory impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:339–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Tatulli E, Rigante V, Zonno N, Perilli V, Pinto K, Minervini MG. Technology-aided verbal instructions to help persons with mild or moderate Alzheimer’s disease perform daily activities. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31:1240–1250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Chen JF, Kam AH, Zhang JM, Liu N, Shue L. Bathroom activity monitoring based on sound, Pervasive Computing, Proceedings 3468 (2005), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Franco GC, Gallay F, Berenguer M, Mourrain C, Couturier P. Non-invasive monitoring of the activities of daily living of elderly people at home—a pilot study of the usage of domestic appliances. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:231–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Schikhof Y, Mulder I. Under Watch and Ward at Night: Design and Evaluation of a Remote Monitoring System for Dementia Care, Hci and Usability for Education and Work, Proceedings 5298 (2008), 475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dishman E, Carrillo MC. Perspective on everyday technologies for Alzheimer’s care: research findings, directions, and challenges. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3:227–234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Aalten P, Verhey FR, Boziki M, et al. Neuropsychiatric syndromes in dementia. Results from the European Alzheimer Disease Consortium: part I. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;24(6):457–463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Carswell W, McCullagh PJ, Augusto JC, Martin S, Mulvenna MD, Zheng H, Wang HY, Wallace JG, McSorley K, Taylor B, Jeffers WP. A review of the role of assistive technology for people with dementia in the hours of darkness. Technol Health Care. 2009;17:281–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Smith G, Kokmen E, O’Brien P. Risk factors for nursing home placement in a population-based dementia cohort. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:519–525.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, Scheyer RD, Ouellette VL. How often is medication taken as prescribed? a novel assessment technique. JAMA 1989;261:3273–3277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Mahtani KR, Heneghan CJ, Glasziou PP, Perera R. Reminder packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-term medications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD005025.

  83. Campbell NL, Boustani MA, Skopeljia EN, Gao S, Unverzagt FW, Murray MD. Medication adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic evidence-based review. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012;10:165–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Wilson BA, Scott H, Evans J, Emslie H. Preliminary report of a NeuroPage service within a health care system. NeuroRehabilitation. 2003;18:3–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Oriani M, Moniz-Cook E, Binetti G, Zanieri G, Frisoni GB, Geroldi C, De Vreese LP, Zanetti O. An electronic memory aid to support prospective memory in patients in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study. Aging Ment Health. 2003;7:22–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Adlam T, Faulkner R, Orpwood R, Jones K, Macijauskiene J, Budraitiene A. The installation and support of internationally distributed equipment for people with dementia. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2004;8(3):253–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Helal S, Mann W, El-Zabadani H, King J, Kaddoura Y, Jansen E: The Gator Tech Smart House: A Programmable Pervasive Space. IEEE Computer 2005,38:50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Pollack ME: Autominder: A Case Study of Assistive Technology for Elders with Cognitive Impairment. Generations 2006,30:67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Smith GE, Lunde AM, Hathaway JC, Vickers KS. Telehealth home monitoring of solitary persons with mild dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2007;22:20–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Cahill S, Begley E, Faulkner J.P, Hagen I. It gives me a sense of independence — Findings from Ireland on the use and usefulness of assistive technology for people with dementia. Technology and Disability, — IOS Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  91. LoPresti EF, Simpson RC, Kirsch N, Schreckenghost D, Hayashi S. Distributed cognitive aid with scheduling and interactive task guidance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:505–521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Cahill, E. Begley, J.P. Faulkner and I. Hagen. It gives me a sense of independence — Findings from Ireland on the use and usefulness of assistive technology for people with dementia. Technology and Disability, — IOS Press, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  93. T. Adlam, R. Faulkner, R. Orpwood, K. Jones, J. Macijauskiene and A. Budraitiene, The installation and support of internationally distributed equipment for people with dementia, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine8(3) (2004), 253–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, de Witte L. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13:114–120.e1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, de Witte L. Socialy assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med dir Assoc 2012;13:114–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Libin A, Cohen-Mansfield J. Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: preliminary inquiry. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2004;19:111–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Tamura T, Yonemitsu S, Itoh A, Oikawa D, Kawakami A, Higashi Y, Fujimooto T, Nakajima K. Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:83–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Wada K, Shibata T, Saito T, Tanie K: Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proc IEEE 2004;92:1780–1788.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Wada K, Shibata T: Living with seal robots — its socio-psychological and physiological influences on the elderly in a care house. IEEE Trans Robot 2007;23:972–980.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Banks MR, Willoughby LM, Banks WA. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9:173–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Clatworthy S, Bjorneby S, eds. Project BESTA. Oslo, Norway: Human Factors Solutions; 1994

    Google Scholar 

  102. Campo E, Chan M. Detecting Abnormal Behavior by Real-Time Monitoring of Patients, Proc. AAAI Workshop Automation as Caregiver, AAAI Press, 2002, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Nakano T, Koyama E, Nakamura T, Ito T, Tamura K, Yaginuma M. Use of an infrared sensor system to take long-term bedside measurements of rest-activity patterns in the elderly with dementia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;56:287–288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Chan ME, Campo E, Esteve D. Assessment of elderly mobility using a remote multisensor monitoring system. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;90:72–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Algase DL, Beattie ER, Leitsch SA, Beel-Bates CA. Biomechanical activity devices to index wandering behavior in dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2003;18:85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Banerjee S, Couturier P, Steenkeste F, Moulin P, Franco A. Measuring nocturnal activity in Alzheimer’s disease patients in a ‘smart’ hospital room. Gerontechnology 2004;3:29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Miskelly F. A novel system of electronic tagging in patients with dementia and wandering. Age Ageing. 2004;33:304–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Miskelly F. Electronic tracking of patients with dementia and wandering using mobile phone technology. Age Ageing. 2005;34:497–499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Holmes D, Teresi JA, Ramirez M, Ellis J, Eimicke J, Jian Kong, Orzechowska L, Silver S. An evaluation of a monitoring system intervention: falls, injuries, and affect in nursing homes. Clin Nurs Res. 2007;16:317–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Chen D, Wactlar H, Chen MY, Gao C, Bharucha A, Hauptmann A. Recognition of aggressive human behavior using binary local motion descriptors. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5238–5241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Bonhomme S, Campo E, Estève D, Guennec J. PROSAFE-extended, a telemedicine platform to contribute to medical diagnosis. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:116–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Mahoney DM, Mutschler PH, Tarlow B, Liss E. Real world implementation lessons and outcomes from the Worker Interactive Networking (WIN) project: workplace-based online caregiver support and remote monitoring of elders at home. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:224–234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Mahoney DF, Mahoney EL, Liss E. Outcomes from aging in place with “AT EASE” automated technology for elder assessment, safety, and environmental monitoring. Gerontechnology 2009;8:11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Project LifesaverFoundation —. http://www.projectlifesaverfoundation.org/index2.cfm. Accessed: 05 July 2012.

  115. Spring HJ, Rowe MA, Kelly A. Improving caregivers’ well-being by using technology to manage nighttime activity in persons with dementia. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2009;2:39–48. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20090101-10.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Bourenanne W, Charlon Y, Chan M, Estève D, Campo E. Integration of wearable device with actimetry system for monitoring alzheimer’s patients. International Conference on Wearable Micro and Nano Technologies for Personalised Health (pHealth 2011), Lyon (France), June 29–July 01, 2011.

  117. Mulin E, Zeitzer JM, Friedman L, et al. Relationship between apathy and sleep disturbance in mild and moderate Alzheimer’s disease: an actigraphic study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;25(1):85–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Rowe MA, Kelly A, Horne C, Lane S, Campbell J, Lehman B, Phipps C, Keller M, Benito AP. Reducing dangerous nighttime events in persons with dementia by using a nighttime monitoring system. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;5:419–426.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Hughes JC, Louw SJ. Electronic tagging of people with dementia who wander. BMJ 2002;325:847–848.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Robinson L, Hutchings D, Corner L, Beyer F, Dickinson H, Vanoli A, Finch T, Hughes J, Ballard C, May C, Bond J. A systematic literature review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent wandering in dementia and evaluation of the ethical implications and acceptability of their use. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:iii, ix–108

    Google Scholar 

  121. Schulz R, Burgio L, Burns R, Eisdorfer C, Gallagher-Thompson D, Gitlin LN, Mahoney DF. Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH): overview, site-specific outcomes, and future directions. Gerontologist. 2003;43:514–520.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Eisdorfer C, Czaja SJ, Loewenstein DA, Rubert MP, Argüelles S, Mitrani VB, Szapocznik J. The effect of a family therapy and technology-based intervention on caregiver depression. Gerontologist. 2003;43:521–531.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Gallienne RL, Moore SM, Brennan PF. Alzheimer’s caregivers. Psychosocial support via computer networks. J Gerontol Nurs. 1993;19:15–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Johnston B, Wheeler L, Deuser J, Sousa KH: Outcome of the Kaiser permanent telehome health research project. Arch Fam Med 2000, 9:40–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Magnusson L, Hanson E, Brito L, Berthold H, Chambers M, Daly T. Supporting family carers through the use of information and communication technology—the EU project ACTION. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39:369–381.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Mahoney DF, Tarlow BJ, Jones RN. Effects of an automated telephone support system on caregiver burden and anxiety: findings from the REACH for TLC intervention study. Gerontologist. 2003;43:556–567.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Beauchamp N, Irvine AB, Seeley J, Johnson B Worksite-based internet multimedia program for family caregivers of persons with dementia. Gerontologist. 2005;45:793–801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Becker SA, Webbe FM (2008). The Potential of Hand-held Assistive Technology to Improve Safety for Elder Adults Aging in Place. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 4: Technology and Medication Safety). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Celler, B. G., T. Hesketh, W. Earnshaw, and E. Ilsar. An instrumentation system for the remote monitoring of changes in functional health status of the elderly at home. In: Proceedings of the 16thAnnual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, vol. 2, pp. 908–909, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  130. Doughty K, Cameron K. Continuous assessment of the risk of falling using telecare. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4Suppl 1:88–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Sixsmith AJ. An evaluation of an intelligent home monitoring system. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:63–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Perry M, Dowdall A, Lines L, Hone K. Multimodal and ubiquitous computing systems: supporting independent-living older users. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2004;8:258–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Matsuoka K. Aware home understanding life activities. Towards a humanfriendly assistive environment. In: ICOST’2004. Proceedings of the international conference on smart homes and health telematics. IOS Press; 2004. p. 186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Adlam T, Gibbs C, Orpwood R. The Gloucester Smart House bath monitor for people with dementia. Phys Med 2001;17:189.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Demongeot J, Virone G, Duchêne F, Benchetrit G, Hervé T, Noury N, Rialle V. Multi-sensors acquisition, data fusion, knowledge mining and alarm triggering in health smart homes for elderly people. C R Biol 2002;325:673–682.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Chan M, Campo E, Estève D. Assessment of activity of elderly people using a home monitoring system. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2005;28:69–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. E. Campo E, Daran X, van den Bossche A. Conception d’une plateforme pluridisciplinaire ouverte et évolutive pour l’évaluation des technologies d’aide au maintien à domicile. Congrès National de la Recherche en IUT, Tours (France), June 06–08, 2012.

  138. Woolham J (2005). The Effectiveness of Assistive Technology in Supporting the Independence of People with dementia: the Safe At Home project. London, Hawker Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Robinson L, Brittain K, Lindsay S, Jackson D, Olivier P. Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) project: developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21:494–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Evans N, Orpwood R, Adlam T, Chadd J, Self D. Evaluation of an enabling smart flat for people with dementia. J Dement Care 2007;15:33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Marziali E, Serafini JM, McCleary L. A systematic review of practice standards and research ethics in technology-based home health care intervention programs for older adults. J Aging Health. 2005;17:679–696.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000;320:1517–1520.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CHU de Toulouse, Gérontopôle, F-31000, Toulouse, France

    Antoine Piau, P. Rumeau, B. Vellas & F. Nourhashemi

  2. Université Paul Sabatier, F-31000, Toulouse, France

    Antoine Piau

  3. Inserm 1027, Toulouse, France

    P. Rumeau, B. Vellas & F. Nourhashemi

  4. CNRS, LAAS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, F-31400, Toulouse, France

    Antoine Piau & E. Campo

  5. Univ de Toulouse, UTM, LAAS, F-31400, Toulouse, France

    Antoine Piau & E. Campo

Authors
  1. Antoine Piau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Campo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Rumeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Vellas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Nourhashemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Piau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piau, A., Campo, E., Rumeau, P. et al. Aging society and gerontechnology: A solution for an independent living?. J Nutr Health Aging 18, 97–112 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-013-0356-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-013-0356-5

Key words

Search

Navigation