Abstract
Purpose
This paper studies the influence of the mechanical design of five different induction hob generations (G1 to G5), which are currently installed in several million homes, on the evolution of their environmental impact.
Methods
Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been applied using SimaPro 8.0.3.14 and EcoInvent v2.2 database. Samples of each design were obtained to generate a life cycle inventory. These induction hobs have been developed and produced in Zaragoza (Spain). The functional unit has been defined as all of the components influenced by the mechanical design of a cooktop with four induction hobs and a width of 60 cm, including every component except the electronic boards and the use phase, as they are not affected by the mechanical design. The limits of the LCA model include the production of the raw materials and energy, the manufacture and production processes, the distribution, and the end of life.
Results and discussion
This study has revealed that the differences in mechanical design highly affect the environmental impact, especially in the environmental categories of abiotic depletion and human toxicity due to the consumption of copper, steel, and plastics. The manufacturing phase highly affects human toxicity, mainly due to the variation in PPS use. There is a decreasing tendency in the environmental impact from the first (G1) to the last generation (G5), as G5 causes the lowest burden in 8 out of 11 analysed categories. The different generations analysed in this paper show that the compact designs of induction hobs help to decrease the environmental impact, especially thanks to the reduction in wiring lengths. It is also important to enhance the wiring separation at the end-of-life phase, avoiding designs that hinder recycling processes.
Conclusions
Compact designs and reduced wiring lengths help to reduce the environmental impact. The consumption of copper, steel, aluminium, and polymers creates considerable impact, although the end-of-life phase reduces the burden created by metals, thanks to recycling. Manufacturing processes such as injection moulding also produce a noteworthy impact, especially in ozone layer depletion due to the inclusion of solvents in EcoInvent’s injection moulding dataset. The impact caused by the distribution phase for this product is almost negligible in most categories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrae ASG (2012) The effect of revised characterization indices for N2O and CO2 in life cycle assessment of optical fiber networks-the case of ozone depletion and aquatic acidification. J Green Eng 3(1):12–32
Bevilacqua M, Caresana F, Comodi G, Venella P (2010) Life cycle assessment of a domestic cooker hood. J Clean Prod 18(18):1822–1832
BIO Intelligence Service and ERA Technology (2011) Preparatory Studies for Eco-design Requiremens of EuPs (III) Lot 23 Domestic and commercial hobs and grills, included when incorporated in cookers. European Commission (DG ENER), Paris
Cetinkaya E, Dincer I, Naterer G (2012) Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(3):2071–2080
Das S (2011) Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(3):268–282
Dhaliwal H et al (2014) A life cycle assessment of packaging options for contrast media delivery: comparing polymer bottle vs. glass bottle. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(12):1965–1973
Elduque D, Javierre C, Pina C, Martínez E, Jimenez E (2014) Life cycle assessment of a domestic induction hob: electronic boards. J Clean Prod 76:74–84
European Parliament (2005) Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products: Official Journal of the European Union
European Parliament (2009) Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products: Official Journal of the European Union
European Parliament (2012) Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Official Journal of the European Union
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (2007) Ecoinvent report No. 1 Overview and Methodology. s.l.: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories
Goedkoop M, Oele M, Leijting J, Ponsioen T, Meijer E (2013) SimaPro. Introduction into LCA with SimaPro. PRé Consultants, Amersfoort
Grignon-Massé L, Rivière P, Adnot J (2011) Strategies for reducing the environmental impacts of room air conditioners in Europe. Energ Policy 39(4):2152–2164
Guinée J (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Springer, Leiden
Hajjaji N, Pons M-N, Renaudin V, Houas A (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment of eight alternatives for hydrogen production from renewable and fossil feedstock. J Clean Prod 44:177–189
Hischier R (2015) Life cycle assessment study of a field emission display television device. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(1):61–73
Hischier R, Baudin I (2010) LCA study of a plasma television device. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:428–438
IEC (2012) IEC/TR 62635 Guidelines for end-of-life information provided by manufacturers and recyclers and for recyclability rate calculation of electrical and electronic equipment. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. International Standard Organization, Geneva
ISO (2006b) ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. International Standard Organization, Geneva
Ma J, Yin F, Liu Z, Zhou X (2012) The eco-design and green manufacturing of a refrigerator. Procedia Environ Sci 16:522–529
Martínez E, Sanz F, Pellegrini S, Jiménez E, Blanco J (2009) Life-cycle assessment of a 2-MW rated wind turbine: CML method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:52–63
Martínez E, Jiménez E, Blanco J, Sanz F (2010) LCA sensitivity analysis of a multi-megawatt wind turbine. Appl Energy 87(7):2293–2303
Pegoretti T, Mathieux F, Evrard D, Brissaud D, Arruda JRF (2014) Use of recycled natural fibres in industrial products: a comparative LCA case study on acoustic components in the Brazilian automotive sector. Resour Conserv Recycl 84:1–14
PRé Consultants (2013) SimaPro database manual. Methods library. PRé Consultants, Amersfoort
Rubin R, Castro MASD, Brandao D, Schalch V, Ometto AR (2014) Utilization of Life Cycle Assessment methodology to compare two strategies for recovery of copper from printed circuit board scrap. J Clean Prod 64:297–305
Scharnhorst W, Hilty L, Jolliet O (2006) Life cycle assessment of second generation (2G) and third generation (3G) mobile phone networks. Environ Int 32(5):656–675
Sebastián F, Royo J, Gómez M (2011) Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology. Energy 36(4):2029–2037
Villanueva-Reya P, Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira M, Feijoo G (2014) Comparative life cycle assessment in the wine sector: biodynamic vs. conventional viticulture activities in NW Spain. J Clean Prod 65:330–341
Acknowledgments
The research in this paper has been partially supported by the Spanish MICINN under Project IPT-2011-1158-920000 and by the Bosch and Siemens Home Appliances Group. The authors would like to thank BSH’s engineering team.
Compliance with ethical standards
ᅟ
Funding
The research in this paper has been partially supported by the Spanish MICINN under Project IPT-2011-1158-920000.
Employment
Carmelo Pina is an employee of BSH Electrodomésticos España S.A. and is currently finishing his Ph.D. on LCA and mechanical design.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Zbigniew Stanislaw Klos
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pina, C., Elduque, D., Javierre, C. et al. Influence of mechanical design on the evolution of the environmental impact of an induction hob. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 937–946 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0890-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0890-y