Abstract
The organizational culture of nonprofit organizations is affected by the context in which they are embedded. Based on a qualitative study of local civic associations in Novosibirsk, Russia, this article illustrates how nonprofit organizational culture has been shaped by historical and contemporary social and cultural conditions. The fluid situation for civil society in Russia has generated varied organizational culture across nonprofits. Interview data reveal different value orientations, distinct group identities, and different images of the ideal civic association: as a social establishment, as an outlet for self-expression, as a network of experts, or as a social startup. This resulting diversity of organizational culture has implications for the potential for partnerships among nonprofits, between nonprofits and government, between nonprofits and businesses, and also for the organizational survival of nonprofits in this setting.
Résumé
La culture organisationnelle des organismes sans but lucratif est influencée par leur contexte. En se basant sur une étude qualitative d’associations civiques locales de Novossibirsk en Russie, le présent article illustre comment la culture organisationnelle desdits organismes a été façonnée par des conditions sociales et culturelles historiques et contemporaines. La fluidité de la situation de la société civile en Russie a favorisé la création de cultures organisationnelles variées parmi les organismes sans but lucratif. Des données tirées d’entrevues ont révélé la présence de différentes orientations des valeurs, d’identités de groupe distinctes et d’images variées de l’association civique idéale : comme institution, comme voie d’expression personnelle, comme réseau d’experts ou comme nouvelle entreprise sociale. Cette diversité a donc des implications sur les partenariats possibles entre différents organismes sans but lucratif, entre ces derniers et le gouvernement ou encore entre ces organismes et les entreprises, ainsi que sur la survie organisationnelle des organismes sans but lucratif dans ce contexte.
Zusammenfassung
Die Organisationskultur gemeinnütziger Organisationen wird von dem sie umgebenden Kontext beeinflusst. Beruhend auf einer qualitativen Studie lokaler Bürgervereinigungen in Nowosibirsk in Russland zeigt dieser Artikel, wie die Kultur der gemeinnützigen Organisationen von den historischen und aktuellen sozialen und kulturellen Bedingungen geprägt worden ist. Aufgrund der dynamischen Situation für die Bürgergesellschaft in Russland haben sich verschiedenen Kulturen in den gemeinnützigen Organisationen entwickelt. Interviewdaten offenbarten unterschiedliche Wertorientierungen, Gruppenidentitäten und Vorstellungen über die optmale Bürgervereinigung: als eine soziale Einrichtung, eine Möglichkeit zur Selbstentfaltung, ein Expertennetzwerk oder ein neues soziales Unternehmen. Die daraus entstehenden diversen Organisationskulturen haben Auswirkungen auf potenzielle Partnerschaften zwischen gemeinnützigen Organisationen, zwischen gemeinnützigen Organisationen und der Regierung und zwischen gemeinnützigen Organisationen und Wirtschaftsunternehmen sowie auf das organisatorische Überleben der gemeinnützigen Organisationen unter diesen Rahmenbedingungen.
Resumen
La cultura organizativa de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro se ve afectada por el contexto en el que están enclavadas. Basándose en un estudio cualitativo de asociaciones cívicas locales en Novosibirsk (Rusia), el presente artículo ilustra cómo las condiciones culturales y sociales históricas y contemporáneas han dado forma a la cultura organizativa de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro. La fluida situación de la sociedad civil en Rusia ha generado una cultura organizativa variada en las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro. Los datos de entrevistas revelan diferentes orientaciones del valor, identidades grupales distintas, y diferentes imágenes de la asociación cívico-social: como establecimiento social, como salida de la autoexpresión, como red de expertos o como “startup” social. Esta diversidad resultante de la cultura organizativa tiene implicaciones para el potencial de asociación entre las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro, entre las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro y el gobierno, o entre las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro y las empresas, y también para la supervivencia organizativa de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro en este escenario.
Arabic
تتأثر الثقافة التنظيمية للمنظمات الغير اربحية بالسياق الذي تكون فيه جزء لا يتجزأ منها. إستنادا” إلى دراسة نوعية للجمعيات المدنية المحلية في (Novosibirsk)، روسيا، توضح هذه المقالة كيف تم تشكيل الثقافة التنظيمية الغير ربحية عن طريق الظروف الإجتماعية والثقافية التاريخية والمعاصرة. قد أحدثت حالة السوء للمجتمع المدني في روسيا ثقافة تنظيمية متنوعة عبر المنظمات الغير ربحية. تكشف بيانات الملقابلة عن توجهات قيمة مختلفة، هويات جماعية متميزة، وصور مختلفة عن الجمعية المدنية المثالية: كمؤسسة إجتماعية، كمنطلق للتعبير عن الذات، كشبكة من الخبراء، أو كمشروع ناشئ إجتماعي.هذا التنوع الناجم عن الثقافة التنظيمية له إنعكاسات على إمكانية إقامة شراكات بين المنظمات الغير ربحية، بين المنظمات الغير ربحية والحكومة، أو بين المنظمات الغير ربحية والأعمال التجارية، كذلك لبقاء المنظمات الغير ربحية في هذا الإطار.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anheier, H. K., Toepler, S., & List, R. (Eds.). (2010). International encyclopedia of civil society. New York: Springer.
Ashraf, N., Ahmadsimab, A., & Pinkse, J. (2017). From animosity to affinity: The interplay of competing logics and interdependence in cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 793–822.
Ashwin, S. (1998). Endless patience: Explaining soviet and post-soviet social stability. Communist & Post-communist Studies, 31(2), 187.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112–121.
Bassous, M. (2015). What are the factors that affect worker motivation in faith-based nonprofit organizations? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(1), 355–381.
Benevolenski, V. B., & Toepler, S. (2017). Modernising social service delivery in Russia: Evolving government support for non-profit organisations. Development in Practice, 27(1), 64–76.
Besel, K., Williams, C. L., & Klak, J. (2011). Nonprofit sustainability during times of uncertainty. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(1), 53–65.
Bradley, J. (2009). Voluntary associations in tsarist Russia: Science, patriotism, and civil society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brandl, J., & Guettel, W. H. (2007). Organizational antecedents of pay-for-performance systems in nonprofit organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(2), 176–200.
Buxton, C., & Konovalova, E. (2013). Russian civil society: Background, current, and future prospects. Development in Practice, 23(5/6), 771–783.
Caldwell, M. L. (2012). Placing faith in development: How Moscow’s religious communities contribute to a more civil society. Slavic Review, 71(2), 261–287.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Chebankova, E. (2015). Competing ideologies of Russia’s civil society. Europe-Asia Studies, 67, 244–268.
Cook, L. J., & Vinogradova, E. (2006). NGOs and social policy-making in Russia’s regions. Problems of Post-Communism, 53(5), 28.
Crotty, J., Hall, S. M., & Ljubownikow, S. (2014). Post-soviet civil society development in the Russian federation: The impact of the NGO law. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(8), 1253–1269.
Dastmalchian, A., Lee, S., & Ng, I. (2000). The interplay between organizational and national cultures: a comparison of organizational practices in Canada and South Korea using the competing values framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(2), 388–412.
Daucé, F. (2014). The government and human rights groups in Russia: Civilized oppression? Journal of Civil Society, 10(3), 239–254.
Daucé, F. (2015). The duality of coercion in Russia: Cracking down on “Foreign Agents”. Demokratizatsiya, 23(1), 57–75.
Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Anheier, H. K. (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 137–159.
Duncan, C., & Schoor, M. (2015). Talking across boundaries: A case study of distributed governance. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(3), 731–755.
Fey, C. F., & Denison, D. R. (2003). Organizational culture and effectiveness: Can American theory be applied in Russia? Organization Science, 14(6), 686–706.
Fine, G. A. (2014). The hinge: Civil society, group culture, and the interaction order. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(1), 5–26.
Fröhlich, C. (2012). Civil society and the state intertwined: the case of disability NGOs in Russia. East European Politics, 28(4), 371–389.
Ganopolskii, M. G., & Tyumentseva, G. A. (2012). Professional morals as a phenomenon of project culture (Professionalnaya Moral’ Kak Fenomen Proyektnoyi Kul’turi) (in Russian). Vestnik Tyumenskovo Gosudarstvennovo Universiteta, 10, 76–83.
Giffords, E. D., & Dina, R. P. (2003). Changing organizational cultures: The challenge in forging successful mergers. Administration in Social Work, 27(1), 69–82.
Givens, R. J. (2012). The study of the relationship between organizational culture and organizational performance in non-profit religious organizations. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 15(2), 239–263.
Gordon, G. G. (1991). Industry determinants of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 396–415.
Hager, M. A., Galaskiewicz, J., & Larson, J. A. (2004). Structural embeddedness and the liability of newness among nonprofit organizations. Public Management Review, 6(2), 159–188.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hemment, J. (2012). Nashi, youth voluntarism, and Potemkin NGOs: Making sense of civil society in post-soviet Russia. Slavic Review, 71(2), 234–260.
Henderson, S. L. (2003). Building democracy in contemporary Russia: Western support for grassroots organizations. London: Cornell University Press.
Henderson, S. L. (2011). Civil society in Russia. Problems of Post-communism, 58(3), 11–27.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Ivanova, E., & Neumayr, M. (2017). The multi-functionality of professional and business associations in a transitional context: Empirical evidence from Russia. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(1), 45–70.
Jakobson, L., Mersiyanova, IV, & Kononykhina, O. N. (2011). Civil society in modernising Russia (results of “Civil Society Index—CIVICUS” project ed.). Moscow: The Centre for Studies of Civil Society and the Non-for-Profit Sector of the National Research University Higher School of Economics.
Jakobson, L., & Sanovich, S. (2010). The changing models of the Russian third sector: Import substitution phase. Journal of Civil Society, 6(3), 279–300.
Jaskyte, K. (2004). Transformational leadership, organizational culture, and innovativeness in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(2), 153–168.
Javeline, D., & Lindemann-Komarova, S. (2010). A balanced assessment of Russian civil society. Journal of International Affairs, 63(2), 171–188.
Jensen, K. B., & McKeage, K. K. (2015). Fostering volunteer satisfaction. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 5(3), 174–189.
Kamerāde, D., Crotty, J., & Ljubownikow, S. (2016). Civil liberties and volunteering in six former soviet union countries. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(6), 1150–1168.
Kezar, A. (2011). Organizational culture and its impact on partnering between community agencies and postsecondary institutions to help low-income students attend college. Education and Urban Society, 43(2), 205–243.
Kharkhordin, O. (1999). The collective and the individual in Russia: A study of practices. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Khvorostianov, N., & Remennick, L. (2017). ‘By Helping Others, We Helped Ourselves:’ Volunteering and social integration of ex-soviet immigrants in Israel. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 335–357.
Knutsen, W. L. (2013). Value as a self-sustaining mechanism: Why some nonprofit organizations are different from and similar to private and public organizations. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(5), 985–1005.
Kobernyuk, E., Stiles, D., & Ellson, T. (2014). International joint ventures in Russia: Cultures’ influences on alliance success. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 471–477.
Krasnopolskaya, I., & Mersiyanova, I. V. (2014). Civil society as an environment for production and diffusion of social innovation. Foresight: Russia, 8(4), 40–53.
Krasnopolskaya, I., Roza, L., & Meijs, L. (2016). The relationship between corporate volunteering and employee civic engagement outside the workplace in Russia. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(2), 640–672.
Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2004). Validating the competing values model as a representation of organizational culture through inter-institutional comparisons. Organizational Analysis, 12(1), 21–37.
Langer, J., & LeRoux, K. (2017). Developmental culture and effectiveness in nonprofit organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(3), 457–479.
Lau, C.-M., & Ngo, H.-Y. (1996). One country many cultures: Organizational cultures of firms of different country origins. International Business Review, 5(5), 469–486.
Lewis, D. (2001). The management of non-governmental development organizations: An introduction. London: Routlege.
Lewis, D. (2003). NGOs, organization culture, and institutional sustainability. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 590, 212.
Ljubownikow, S., & Crotty, J. (2014). Civil society in a transitional context: The response of health and educational NGOs to legislative changes in Russia’s industrialized regions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(4), 759–776.
Mahalinga, S. M., & Suar, D. (2012). Transformational leadership, organizational culture, organizational effectiveness, and programme outcomes in non-governmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(3), 684–710.
Maran, D. A., & Soro, G. (2010). The influence of organizational culture in women participation and inclusion in voluntary organizations in Italy. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(4), 481–496.
Mersiyanova, IV, & Jakobson, L. (2007a). Civic activeness of the population and citizen’s assessment of the development of civil society (Obshchestvennaya Aktivnost’ Naseleniya i Vospriyatiye Grazhdanami Uslovii Razvitiya Grazhdanskovo Obshchestva) (Vol. I)., Monitoring of civil society (Monitoring Grazhdanskovo Obshchestva) Moscow: Higher School of Economics.
Mersiyanova, IV, & Jakobson, L. (2007b). Nongovernmental nonprofit organizations: institutional environment and effective operation (Negosudarstvenniye Nekomercheskiye Organizatsii: Institutional’naya Sreda i Effektivnost’ Deyatel’nosti) (Vol. II)., Monitoring of civil society (Monitoring Grazhdanskovo Obshchestva) Moscow: Higher School of Economics.
Michailova, S. (2000). Contrasts in culture: Russian and Western perspectives on organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 99–112.
Mitchell, G. E. (2015). The attributes of effective NGOs and the leadership values associated with a reputation for organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 26(1), 39–57.
Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization (Updated ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Morrill, C. (2008). Culture and organization theory. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619, 15–40.
Moshtari, M., & Gonçalves, P. (2017). Factors influencing interorganizational collaboration within a disaster relief context. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(4), 1673–1694.
Naumov, A. I., & Puffer, S. M. (2000). Measuring Russian culture using Hofstede’s dimensions. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(4), 709–719.
Nezhina, T., & Ibrayeva, A. (2013). Explaining the role of culture and traditions in functioning of civil society organizations in Kazakhstan. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(2), 335–358.
Orru, M., Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. (1997). The economic organization of East Asian Capitalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Parker, B., & Selsky, J. W. (2004). Interface dynamics in cause-based partnerships: An exploration of emergent culture. Nonprofit And Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 458–489.
Patterson, O. (2014). Making sense of culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 1–30.
Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 57–77.
Puffer, S. (1993). A riddle wrapped in an enigma: Demystifying Russian managerial motivation. European Management Journal, 11(4), 473–480.
Riordan, J. (1988). The role of sport in soviet foreign policy. International Journal, 43(4), 569–595.
Roy, M., Sato, K., & Calò, F. (2015). Further limits to institutional isomorphism? Introducing the ‘Neo-contingency Approach’ to the field of community-led social ventures. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2536–2553.
Salamon, L. M., Benevolenski, V., & Jakobson, L. (2015). Penetrating the dual realities of government-nonprofit relations in Russia. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2178–2214.
Schein, E. H. (1983). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 13–28.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.
Shekshnia, S. V., Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. (2007). Cultural myths and leadership in Russia. INSEAD working papers collection, No 29, pp. 1–28.
Shieh, S. (2017). Same bed, different dreams? The divergent pathways of foundations and grassroots NGOs in China. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(4), 1785–1811.
Skalaban, I. (2005). The institutionalization of NGPOs in Russia: Historical and sociological analysis. In M. Bianchi & L. Tampieri Forli (Eds.), Life long learning and managerial development in transition countries: Cases on strategy, management and performance control (pp. 139–147). Cesena: Societa Editrice “Il Ponte Vecchio”.
Spencer, S. B. (2004). Novosibirsk: The globalization of Siberia. In L. McCann (Ed.), Russian transformations: Challenging the global narrative (pp. 128–147). London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Spencer, S. B. (2009). Culture at work in post-socialist society. In N. Bandelj (Ed.), Economic sociology of work: Research in the sociology of work (Vol. 18, pp. 287–311). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Spencer, S. B. (2011). Culture as structure in emerging civic organizations in Russia. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1073–1091.
Statistics, F. S. o. G. (2016). Russian statistical yearbook: Statistical collection (Rossiiskii Statisticheskii Ezhegodnik: Statistiticheskii Sbornik). Moscow: Rossstat.
Sundstrom, L. M. (2002). Women’s NGOs in Russia: Struggling from the margins. Demokratizatsiya, 10(2), 207–230.
Teegarden, P. H., Hinden, D. R., & Sturm, P. (2010). The nonprofit organizational culture guide: Revealing the hidden truths that impact performance. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Toennies, F. (1957). Community and society (C. P. Loomis, Trans., Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
Vermeulen, F., Minkoff, D. C., & van der Meer, T. (2016). The local embedding of community-based organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 23–44.
Voss, Z. G., Cable, D. M., & Voss, G. B. (2006). Organizational identity and firm performance: What happens when leaders disagree about “Who We Are?”. Organization Science, 17(6), 741–755.
Wedel, J. R. (2001). Collision and collusion: The strange case of Western aid to Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave.
Wollebaek, D. (2009). Survival in local voluntary associations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19(3), 267–284.
Xiao, M., & Lin, H. (2016). Carrots and sticks: A case study of government-caused Danwei tradition in Chinese NGOs. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2027–2036.
Zavyalova, E., & Kucherov, D. (2010). Relationship between organizational culture and job satisfaction in Russian business enterprises. Human Resource Development International, 13(2), 225–235.
Zhao, R., Wu, Z., & Tao, C. (2016). Understanding service contracting and its impact on NGO development in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2229–2251.
Zudin, A. Y. (1999). The culture of soviet society: The logic of political transformation (Kul’tura Sovetskovo Obshchestva: Logika Politicheskoi Transformatsii). Social Sciences and Modernity (Obshchestvenniye Nauki i Sovremennost’), 3, 59–72.
Acknowledgements
A previous version of this paper was presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting in 2014. We are grateful for the very helpful comments from two anonymous reviewers and for advice from colleagues at our respective universities. The first author acknowledges financial support from the Center for Advanced Study at the Higher School of Economics, Moscow, during the period when this article was being revised.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
Data were collected from interviews conducted with NGO leaders and members in Novosibirsk, Russia. Names of individuals and their organizations are kept confidential; therefore, pseudonyms of organizations are used in the article to conceal identities of groups and their leaders. Individual respondents were explained the purpose of the research, were given a choice whether to voluntarily participate in the study, gave informed consent to audio recording and subsequent transcription of the interview, and to have their statements used in research publications.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spencer, S.B., Skalaban, I.A. Organizational Culture in Civic Associations in Russia. Voluntas 29, 1080–1097 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9925-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9925-2