Abstract
This study tests a number of theoretical predictions based on subjective wellbeing (SWB) Homeostasis Theory. This theory proposes that SWB is actively maintained and defended within a narrow, positive range of values around a ‘set-point’ for each person. Due to homeostatic control, it is predicted to be very difficult to substantially increase SWB in samples operating normally within their set-point-range. However, under conditions of homeostatic defeat, where SWB is lower than normal, successful interventions should be accompanied by a substantial increase as each person’s SWB returns to lie within its normal range of values. This study tests these propositions using a sample of 4,243 participants in an Australian Federal Government Program for ‘at-risk’ adolescents. SWB was measured using the Personal Wellbeing Index and results are converted to a metric ranging from 0 to 100 points. The sample was divided into three sub-groups as 0–50, 51–69, and 70+ points. The theoretical prediction was confirmed. The largest post-intervention increase in SWB was in the 0–50 group and lowest in the 70+ group. However, a small increase in SWB was observed in the normal group, which was significant due to the large sample size. The implications of these findings for governments, schools and policy makers are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 100, 1–16.
Brunwasser, S. M., Gillham, J. E., & Kim, E. S. (2009). A meta-analytic review of the Penn resiliency program’s effect on depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(6), 1042–1054.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling in AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17.
Cummins, R. A. (2013). Positive psychology and subjective wellbeing homeostasis: A critical examination of congruence. In D. Moraitou & A. Efklides (Eds.), Quality of life: A positive psychology perspective (pp. 67–86). New York: Springer.
Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2005). Personal wellbeing index-school children (PWI-SC) (3rd Edn.). Melbourne: Deakin University. Retrieved July 12, 2011 from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.
Cummins, R. A., Li, L., Wooden, M., & Stokes, M. (2014). A demonstration of set-points for subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 183–206. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9444-9.
Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.
Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., Hartley-Clark, L., Perera, C., et al. (2012). Australian unity wellbeing index survey 28.0 part A: The report. The wellbeing of Australians—The impact of marriage. Retrieved from: http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/auwbi/survey-reports/survey-028-report-part-a.pdf on February 18, 2013.
Curran, P. J., West, G. W., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective wellbeing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7(3), 181–185.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.
DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 225–241.
Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective wellbeing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 89–97.
Froh, J. J., & Bono, G. (2011). Gratitude in youth: A review of gratitude interventions and some ideas for applications. NASP Communiqué, 39(5), 1, 26–28.
Froh, J. J., Sefick, W. J., & Emmons, R. A. (2008). Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 213–233.
Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930–944.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective wellbeing: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731–739.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective wellbeing. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Huebner, E. S., Suldo, S. M., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Psychometric properties of two brief measures of children’s life satisfaction: The Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale and the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS). Indicators of Positive Development Conference March 12–13, 2003 Bureau of Labor Statistics Conference Center Washington, DC.
International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index—Adult. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. Retrieved March 13, 2010, from: http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.
McGue, M., Bacon, S., & Lykken, D. T. (1993). Personality stability and change in early adulthood: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 29, 96–109. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.1.96.
Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.
Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P., Ernst, R., Gillham, K., & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 293–311.
Seligson, J., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61, 121–145.
SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. (2011). Armonk. New York: IBM Corp.
Steel, P., & Ones, D. S. (2002). Personality and happiness: A national level analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 767–781.
Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011a). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 897–914. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9235-5.
Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011b). The subjective wellbeing of high-school students: Validating the personal wellbeing index-school children. Social Indicators Research, 101, 405–418.
Tomyn, A. J., Fuller Tyszkiewicz, M. D., & Cummins, R. A. (2013). The Personal Wellbeing Index: Psychometric equivalence for adults and school children. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 913–924.
Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait’? Test of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research, 32, 101–160.
Vitterso, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective wellbeing: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 903–914.
Vitterso, J., & Nilsen, F. (2002). The conceptual and relational structure of subjective wellbeing, neuroticism, and extraversion: once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 57, 89–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomyn, A.J., Weinberg, M.K. & Cummins, R.A. Intervention Efficacy Among ‘At Risk’ Adolescents: A Test of Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis Theory. Soc Indic Res 120, 883–895 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0619-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0619-5