Abstract
This article examines roll-call voting by members of the U.S. Senate on three proposals to limit members’ outside income in the 1980s. I find that several factors influenced legislators’ votes on outside income limits legislation (OILL). First, financial self-interest was an important constraint on members’ willingness to support OILL. Members who earned more honoraria were less likely to vote yes, but this opposition was neutralized when limits were attached to the compensating mechanism of a pay raise. Senators from poorer states were generally more likely to support honoraria limits alone but less likely to support limits linked to a pay raise, suggesting a responsiveness to constituent interests in both cases. Finally, when OILL was linked to a pay raise, electoral considerations became prominent in legislators’ vote decisions, with electorally vulnerable members less likely to vote yes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond, G. A. (1950). The American people and foreign policy. New York: Praeger.
Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J. M., & Stewart III, C. (2001). Candidate positioning in U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 136–151.
Bartlett, R. V. (1979). The marginality hypothesis: Electoral insecurity, self-interest and voting behavior. American Politics Quarterly, 7, 498–508.
Beard, C. (1935). An economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Free Press.
Beard, E., & Horn, S. (1976). Congressional ethics: The view from the house. Washington: Brookings.
Berry, J. M. (1999). The new liberalism: The rising power of citizen groups. Washington: Brookings.
Bianco, W. (1994). Trust: Representatives and constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bianco, W., Spence, D. B., & Wilkerson, J. D. (1996). The electoral connection in the early Congress: The case of the compensation Act of 1816. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 145–171.
Bishin, B. G. (2000). Constituency influence in Congress: Does subconstituency matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 389–415.
Bogart, W. T., & Vandoren, P. M. (1993). Do legislators vote their constituents’ wallets (and how would we know if they did?). Southern Economic Journal, 60, 357–375.
Bradbury, V. (1996). Government ethics reform: The Massachusetts financial disclosure law. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Boston College.
Clark, J. A. (1996). Congressional salaries and the politics of unpopular votes. American Politics Quarterly, 24, 150–168.
Chappell, H. (1981). Conflict of interest and congressional voting: A note. Public Choice, 37, 331–336.
Chappell, H. (1982). Campaign contributions and congressional voting: Simultaneous probit/tobit models. Public Choice, 36, 301–312.
Coates, D., & Munger, M. (1995). Legislative voting and the economic theory of politics. Southern Economic Journal, 61, 861–872.
Common Cause (1990). Common Cause conflict of interest legislation in the States. Washington: Common Cause
Congressional ethics: History, facts and controversy (1992). Washington: Congressional Quarterly Books
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.
Couch, J. F., Atkinson, K. E., & Shughart II, W. F. (1992). Ethics laws and the outside earnings of politicians: The case of Alabama’s ‘legislator-educators’. Public Choice, 73, 135–145.
Cox, G. W. (1984). Expected utility model of electoral competition. Quality and Quantity, 18, 337–349.
Dougan, W. R., & Munger, M. C. (1989). The rationality of ideology. Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 119–142.
Fiorina, M. P. (1994). Divided government in the American States: A byproduct of legislative professionalism? American Political Science Review, 88, 304–316.
Garment, S. (1991). Scandal: The crisis of mistrust in American politics. New York: Times Books.
Ginsberg, B., & Shefter, M. (2002). Politics by other means: The declining importance of elections in America. New York: Basic Books.
Goodman, M. R., Holp, T. J., & Ludwig, K. M. (1996). Understanding state legislative ethics reform: The importance of political and institutional culture. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Public integrity annual. Lexington: Council of State Governments.
Greene, I. (2006). Degrees of distinction: Comparison of federal and provincial ethics regimes. Working Paper.
Griffin, J. (2006). Electoral competition and democratic responsiveness: A defense of the marginality hypothesis. Journal of Politics, 68, 911–921.
Gulati, G. (2004). Revisiting the link between electoral competition and policy extremism in the U.S. Congress. American Politics Research, 32, 495–520.
Hall, R. L. Van Houweling, R. P. (1995). Avarice and ambition in Congress: Representatives’ decisions to run from the U.S. House. American Political Science Review, 89, 121–136.
Henshaw, S. K., & Martire, G. (1982). Morality and legality. Family Planning Perspectives, 14, 53–60.
Hibbing, J. R. (1982). Voluntary retirements from the House in the 20th century. Journal of Politics, 44, 1020–1034.
Hibbing, J. R. (1983). Washington on 75 dollars a day: Members of Congress voting on their own tax break. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8, 219–30.
Hogan, R. E. (2003). Sources of competition in state legislative primary elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 28, 103–126.
Kalt, J. P., & Zupan, M. Z. (1984). Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics. American Economic Review, June, 279–300.
Kalt, J. P., & Zupan, M. Z. (1990). The apparent ideological behavior of legislators: Testing of principal-agent slack in political institutions. Journal of Law and Economics, 33, 103–131.
Katz, A. (1981). The politics of congressional ethics. In J. Cooper, & G.C. Mackenzie (Eds.), The House at work. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Kau, J. B., & Rubin, P. H. (1982). Congressmen, constituents, and contributors. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Krosnick, J. A. (1988). Attitude importance and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 240–255.
Kuklinski, J. (1978). Electoral margins, district homogeneity, and the responsiveness of legislators. In S. Greer, R. Hedlund, & J. Gibson (Eds.), Accountability in urban society. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Link, A. S., & McCormick, R. L. (1983). Progressivism. Illinois: Harlan Davidson, Inc.
Loftus, T. (1994). The art of legislative politics. Washington: CQ Press.
Lott, J. R. (1987). Political cheating. Public Choice, 52, 169–187.
Lott, J. R. (1990). Attendance rates, political shirking, and the effect of post-elective office employment. Economic Inquiry, 28, 133–150.
Mackenzie, G. C. (2002). Scandal proof: Do ethics laws make government more ethical? Washington: Brookings.
Mayer, W. G. (2001). Public attitudes on campaign finance. In G. C. Lubenow (Ed.), A User’s Guide to Campaign Finance Reform. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
McArthur, J. R., & Marks, S. V. (1988). Constituent interest versus legislator ideology: The role of political opportunity cost. Economic Inquiry, 26, 461–470.
McCann, M. (1986). Taking reform seriously: Perspectives on public interest liberalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
McFarland, A. S. (1984). Common cause: Lobbying in the public interest. New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.
McGuire, R., & Ohsfeldt, R. (1989). Public choice analysis and the ratification of the constitution. In B. Grofman & D. Wittman (Eds.), The federalist papers and the new institutionalism. Agathon Press
McRae, D. (1952). The relation between roll call votes and constituencies in the Massachusetts House of representatives. American Political Science Review, 46, 1046–1055.
Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1963). Constituency influence in congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45–56.
Moncrief, G. F., Squire, P., & Jewell, M. E. (2001). Who runs for the legislature? Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Moncrief, G. F., Niemi, R. G., & Powell, L. W. (2004). Time, term limits, and turnover: Trends in membership stability in U.S. state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29, 357–382.
Nelson, D., & Silberberg, III (1987). Ideology and legislator shirking. Economic Inquiry, 25, 15–25.
Parker, G. R. (1992). The distribution of honoraria income in the United States Congress: Who gets rents in Congress and why? Public Choice, 73, 167–181.
Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 181–210.
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 228–278.
Richardson, L. E., & Munger, M. C. (1990). Shirking, representation, and congressional behavior: Voting on the 1983 amendments to the social security act. Public Choice, 67, 11–33.
Rosenson, B. A. (2003). Legislative voting on ethics reform in two states: The influence of economic self-interest, ideology and institutional power. Public Integrity, 5, 205–222.
Rosenson, B. A. (2005). The shadowlands of conduct: Ethics and state politics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Rosenson, B. A. (2006, forthcoming). The impact of ethics laws on legislative recruitment and the occupational composition of state legislatures. Political Research Quarterly.
Rosenthal, A. (1996). Drawing the line: Legislative ethics in the States. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Rosenthal, A. (1974). Turnover in state legislatures. American Journal of Political Science, 18, 609–616.
Silberman, J. I., & Durden, G. C. (1976). Determining legislative preferences on the minimum wages: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 317–330.
Squire, P. (1988). Career opportunities and membership stability in legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 13, 65–81.
Thelen, D. P. (1976). Robert M. LaFollette and the insurgent spirit. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Theriault, S. M. (2005). The power of the people: Congressional competition, public attention, and voter retribution. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Thompson, D. F. (1995). Ethics in Congress. Washington: Brookings.
Tolchin, S. J., & Tolchin, M. (2001). Glass houses: Congressional ethics and the politics of venom. Boulder: Westview.
Vanbeek, J. (1991). Does the decision to retire increase the amount of political shirking? Public Finance Quarterly, 19, 444–456.
Wiebe, R. (1967). The search for order, 1877–1920. New York: Hill and Wang.
Williams, R. L. (1996). Controlling ethical practices through laws and rules: Evaluating the Florida commission on ethics. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Public integrity annual. Lexington: Council of State Governments.
Zupan, M. (1990). The last-period problem in politics: Do congressional representatives not subject to a reelection constraint alter their voting behavior? Public Choice, 65, 167–179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenson, B.A. Explaining legislators’ positions on outside income limits: Voting on honoraria ceilings in the U.S. Senate, 1981–1983. Public Choice 133, 111–128 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9181-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9181-x