Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association claim payout of commercial buildings from Hurricane Ike

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following growing public awareness of the danger from hurricanes and tremendous demands for analysis of loss, many researchers have conducted studies to develop hurricane damage analysis methods. Although researchers have identified the significant indicators, there is currently a shortage of comprehensive research for identifying the relationship among the vulnerabilities, natural disasters, and insured losses associated with individual buildings. To address this lack of research, this study will identify vulnerabilities and hazard indicators, develop metrics to measure the influence of economic losses from hurricanes, and visualize the spatial distribution of vulnerability to evaluate overall hurricane damage. This paper has utilized the Geographic Information System to facilitate collecting and managing data, and has combined vulnerability factors to assess the financial losses suffered by Texas coastal counties. A multiple regression method has been applied to develop hurricane damage prediction models. To reflect the pecuniary loss, insured loss payment was used as the dependent variable to predict the actual financial damage. Exposures, built environment vulnerability indicators, and hazard indicators were all used as independent variables. Accordingly, the models and findings may possibly provide vital references for government agencies and emergency planners to establish the hurricane damage mitigation strategies. In addition, insurance companies could utilize the model to predict hurricane damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Source: AIR Model Performance-Hurricane Ike (http://www.air-worldwide.com/Publications/White-Papers/Hurricane-Ike--Performance-of-the-AIR-Model/).

  2. Source: Report of AIR’s Typhoon Models for the Asia–Pacific Region (2009).

References

  • Berg R (2009) Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane ike (al092008). 1–14 September 2008. National Hurricane Center

  • Brody SD, Zahran S, Highfield WE, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2008) Identifying the impact of the built environment on flood damage in Texas. Disasters 32(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton CG (2010) Social vulnerability and hurricane impact modeling. Nat Hazards Rev 11(2):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chock GY (2005) Modeling of hurricane damage for Hawaii residential construction. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 93(8):603–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colle BA, Buonaiuto F, Bowman MJ, Wilson RE, Flood R, Hunter R, Mintz A, Hill E (2008) New York City’s vulnerability to coastal flooding. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89(6):829–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton D (1999) The risk triangle. Natural disaster management, Tudor Rose, London

  • Cummins D, Lewis C, Phillips R (1999) Pricing excess-of-loss reinsurance contracts against cat as trophic loss. The financing of catastrophe risk. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 93–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (1996) Societal responses to environmental hazards. Int Soc Sci J 48(150):525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Emrich C (2005) Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the US increasing? Trans Am Geophys Union 86(41):381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehring CA, Halek M (2006) Do coastal building codes mitigate hurricane damage to residential property?. Available at SSRN 928009

  • Dunion JP, Landsea CW, Houston SH, Powell MD (2003) A reanalysis of the surface winds for Hurricane Donna of 1960. Mon Weather Rev 131(9):1992–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossi P (2005) Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk, 25th edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid S, Kibria BG, Gulati S, Powell M, Annane B, Cocke S, Chen SC (2010) Predicting losses of residential structures in the state of Florida by the public hurricane loss evaluation model. Stat Methodol 7(5):552–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard JW, Scott DM, Higgins DW (2005) U.S. Patent No. 6,842,698. Washington DC, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

  • Huang Z, Rosowsky DV, Sparks PR (2001) Hurricane simulation techniques for the evaluation of wind-speeds and expected insurance losses. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 89(7):605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim BD, Muller RA, Stone GW (2007) Spatiotemporal patterns and return periods of tropical storm and hurricane strikes from Texas to Maine. J Clim 20(14):3498–3509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanduri AC, Morrow GC (2003) Vulnerability of buildings to windstorms and insurance loss estimation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91(4):455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King RO (2005) Hurricane Katrina: insuring losses and national capacities for financing disaster risk. CRS Report for Congress no. RL 33086. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, DC

  • Kunreuther H, Meyer R, Van den Bulte C, Chapman RE (2004) Risk analysis for extreme events: economic incentives for reducing future losses. US Department of Commerce. Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Emanuel KA, Smith JA, Vanmarcke E (2010) Risk assessment of hurricane storm surge for New York City. J Geophys Res Atmos 115(18):112–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowther JL (2008) Application of the Hazus-MH risk assessment tool in planning for continuity of operations. Arkansas Tech University, Russellville

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel JM, Maxwell A, Platt WJ, Pace L (1995) Effects of Hurricane Andrew on cypress (taxodium distichum var. nutans) in south Florida. J Coast Res 21:184–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott R, Longnecker M (2008) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Cengage Learning,, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Highfield WE, Peacock, WG, Van ZS. (2010) Determinants and characteristics of damage in single-family island households from Hurricane Ike1. The Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference, Minneapolis

  • Pielke RA Jr, Landsea CW (1998) Normalized hurricane damages in the United States: 1925–95. Weather Forecast 13(3):621–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr, Gratz J, Landsea CW, Collins D, Saunders MA, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Hazards Rev 9(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MD, Houston SH (1998a) Surface wind fields of 1995 hurricanes Erin, Opal, Luis, Marilyn, and Roxanne at landfall. Mon Weather Rev 126(5):1259–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MD, Houston SH, Amat LR, Morisseau-Leroy N (1998b) The HRD real-time hurricane wind analysis system. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 77:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MD, Murillo S, Dodge P, Uhlhorn E, Gamache J, Cardone V, Cox A, Otero S, Carrasco N, Fleur RS (2010) Reconstruction of Hurricane Katrina’s wind fields for storm surge and wave hindcasting. Ocean Eng 37(1):26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders DEA, Brix A, Duffy P, Forster W, Hartington T, Jones G, Wilkinson M, Rix S (2002) The management of losses arising from extreme events. In Convention General Insurance Study Group GIRO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson CC Jr, Johnson ME, Simons M (2004) Insurance rate filings and hurricane loss estimation models. J Insur Regul 22(3):39–45

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the 2015 Research Fund of University of Ulsan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Son.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.M., Woods, P.K., Park, Y.J. et al. Estimating the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association claim payout of commercial buildings from Hurricane Ike. Nat Hazards 84, 405–424 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2425-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2425-7

Keywords

Navigation