Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Drivers of plant species richness and phylogenetic composition in urban yards at the continental scale

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

As urban areas increase in extent globally, domestic yards play an increasingly important role as potential contributors to ecosystem services and well-being. These benefits largely depend on the plant species richness and composition of yards.

Objectives

We aim to determine the factors that drive plant species richness and phylogenetic composition of cultivated and spontaneous flora in urban yards at the continental scale, and how these potential drivers interact.

Methods

We analyzed plant species richness and phylogenetic composition of cultivated and spontaneous flora of 117 private yards from six major metropolitan areas in the US. Yard plant species richness and phylogenetic composition were expressed as a function of biophysical and socioeconomic variables and yard characteristics using linear mixed-effects models and spatially explicit structural equation modeling.

Results

Extreme temperatures largely determined yard species richness and phylogenetic composition at the continental scale. Precipitation positively predicted spontaneous richness but negatively predicted cultivated richness. Only the phylogenetic composition of the spontaneous flora was associated with precipitation. The effect of lower temperatures and precipitation on all yard diversity parameters was partly mediated by yard area. Among various socioeconomic variables, only education level showed a significant effect on cultivated phylogenetic composition.

Conclusions

Our results support the hypothesis that irrigation compensates for precipitation in driving cultivated yard plant diversity at the continental scale. Socioeconomic variables among middle and upper class families have no apparent influence on yard diversity. These findings inform the adaptation of US urban vegetation in cities in the face of global change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson DR (2008) Model based inference in the life sciences: a prime on evidence. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH et al (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281:20133330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson MF, Nilon CH, Lepczyk CA et al (2016) Hierarchical filters determine community assembly of urban species pools. Ecology 97:2952–2963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balvanera P, Siddique I, Dee L et al (2014) Linking biodiversity and ecosystem services: current uncertainties and the necessary next steps. Bioscience 64:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigirimana J, Bogaert J, De Cannière C et al (2012) Domestic garden plant diversity in Bujumbura, Burundi: role of the socio-economical status of the neighborhood and alien species invasion risk. Landsc Urban Plan 107:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B, et al (2017) rgdal: bindings for the geospatial data abstraction library. R Package Version 12-8

  • Brelsford C, Abbott JK (2017) Growing into water conservation? Decomposing the drivers of reduced water consumption in Las Vegas, NV. Ecol Econ 133:99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Cardinale BJ, Oakley TH (2008) Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17012–17017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron RWF, Blanuša T, Taylor JE et al (2012) The domestic garden: its contribution to urban green infrastructure. Urban For Urban Green 11:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayuela L, Stein A, Oksanen J (2017) Taxonstand: taxonomic standardization of plant species names. R Package Version 20

  • CLARITAS (2013) CLARITAS PRIZM market segmentation

  • Cohen DT, Hatchard GW, Wilson SG (2015) Population trends in incorporated places: 2000 to 2013. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Social and Economic Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook EM, Hall SJ, Larson KL (2012) Residential landscapes as social-ecological systems: a synthesis of multi-scalar interactions between people and their home environment. Urban Ecosyst 15:19–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie DJ (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal-and plant-species richness. Am Nat 137:27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahmus ME, Nelson KC (2014) Yard stories: examining residents’ conceptions of their yards as part of the urban ecosystem in Minnesota. Urban Ecosyst 17:173–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehnen-Schmutz K (2011) Determining non-invasiveness in ornamental plants to build green lists: determining non-invasiveness in ornamental plants. J Appl Ecol 48:1374–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DÍaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson TL, Foster BL (2011) Fertilization decreases plant biodiversity even when light is not limiting: fertilization, light and plant biodiversity. Ecol Lett 14:380–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T, Zhang W, Aubry BF (1991) Effects of rainfall, vegetation, and microtopography on infiltration and runoff. Water Resour Res 27:2271–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2017) ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine PVA (2015) Ecological and evolutionary drivers of geographic variation in species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 46:369–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Dickinson KJM, Porter S, van Heezik Y (2012) “My garden is an expression of me”: exploring householders’ relationships with their gardens. J Environ Psychol 32:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Smith RM, Thompson K, Warren PH (2005) Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 14:395–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB (2006) Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB (2008) Structural equation modeling for observational studies. J Wildl Manag 72:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE et al (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Cavender-Bares J, Bettez ND et al (2014) Ecological homogenization of urban USA. Front Ecol Environ 12:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Grove JM, Polsky C et al (2016) Satisfaction, water and fertilizer use in the American residential macrosystem. Environ Res Lett 11:034004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Lehmann A, Ferrier S et al (2006) Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions. J Appl Ecol 43:386–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate data analysis, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall SJ, Learned J, Ruddell B et al (2016) Convergence of microclimate in residential landscapes across diverse cities in the United States. Landscape Ecol 31:101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilaire RS, Arnold MA, Wilkerson DC et al (2008) Efficient water use in residential urban landscapes. HortScience 43:2081–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA (2009) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 24:599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M (2008) Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. J Bus Res Methods 6(1):53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W et al (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8788–8792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell F, Reich PB, Tilman D et al (2013) Nutrient enrichment, biodiversity loss, and consequent declines in ecosystem productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:11911–11916

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jenerette GD, Clarke LW, Avolio ML et al (2016) Climate tolerances and trait choices shape continental patterns of urban tree biodiversity: toward a macroecology of urban trees. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:1367–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kembel SW, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP et al (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal D, Williams KJH, Williams NSG (2012a) Plant traits link people’s plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landsc Urban Plan 105:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal D, Williams NSG, Williams KJH (2012b) A cultivated environment: exploring the global distribution of plants in gardens, parks and streetscapes. Urban Ecosyst 15:637–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissling WD, Carl G (2007) Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp S, Kühn I, Schweiger O, Klotz S (2008) Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. Ecol Lett 11:1054–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp S, Dinsmore L, Fissore C et al (2012) Phylogenetic and functional characteristics of household yard floras and their changes along an urbanization gradient. Ecology 93:S83–S98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn I, Klotz S (2006) Urbanization and homogenization: comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany. Biol Conserv 127:292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Sorte FA, Aronson MFJ, Williams NSG et al (2014) Beta diversity of urban floras among European and non-European cities: beta diversity of urban floras. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb EG, Mengersen KL, Stewart KJ et al (2014) Spatially explicit structural equation modeling. Ecology 95:2434–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KL, Nelson KC, Samples SR et al (2016) Ecosystem services in managing residential landscapes: priorities, value dimensions, and cross-regional patterns. Urban Ecosyst 19:95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leduc A, Drapeau P, Bergeron Y, Legendre P (1992) Study of spatial components of forest cover using partial Mantel tests and path analysis. J Veg Sci 3:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or NEW PARADIGM? Ecology 74:1659–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong M, Dunn RR, Trautwein MD (2018) Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biol Lett 14:20180082

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecol 22:601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loram A, Thompson K, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2008) Urban domestic gardens (XII): the richness and composition of the flora in five UK cities. J Veg Sci 19:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Smallbone LT, O’Brien R (2009) Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: patterns in space and time. Ecosystems 12:604–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marco A, Dutoit T, Deschamps-Cottin M et al (2008) Gardens in urbanizing rural areas reveal an unexpected floral diversity related to housing density. C R Biol 331:452–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CA, Warren PS, Kinzig AP (2004) Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landsc Urban Plan 69:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini NF, Nelson KC, Hobbie SE, Baker LA (2015) Why “feed the lawn”? Exploring the influences on residential turf grass fertilization in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area. Environ Behav 47:158–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle MJ (2017) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.1-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AICcmodavg

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation: the impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naimi B, Hamm NA, Groen TA et al (2014) Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling? Ecography 37:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Wang Z, Dayrell E (2009) What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landsc Urban Plan 92:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL et al (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nychka D, Furrer R, Paige J, Sain S (2017) Fields: tools for spatial data. R Package Version 90

  • O’brien EM, Field R, v RJ (2000) Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water-energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography. Oikos 89:588–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al (2017) vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version 24-4

  • Padullés Cubino J, Kirkpatrick JB, Vila Subirós J (2017) Do water requirements of Mediterranean gardens relate to socio-economic and demographic factors? Urban Water J 14:401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis E, Blomberg S, Bolker B et al (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse WD, Cadotte MW, Cavender-Bares J et al (2015) pez: phylogenetics for the environmental sciences. Bioinformatics 31:2888–2890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse WD, Cavender-Bares J, Hobbie SE et al (2018) Homogenization of plant diversity, composition, and structure in North American urban yards. Ecosphere 9:e02105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, et al (2018) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version

  • Politi Bertoncini A, Machon N, Pavoine S, Muratet A (2012) Local gardening practices shape urban lawn floristic communities. Landsc Urban Plan 105:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polsky C, Grove JM, Knudson C et al (2014) Assessing the homogenization of urban land management with an application to US residential lawn care. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:4432–4437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P (1993) Factors affecting the diversity of flora and vegetation in central European settlements. Plant Ecol 106:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Jin Y (2016) An updated megaphylogeny of plants, a tool for generating plant phylogenies and an analysis of phylogenetic community structure. J Plant Ecol 9:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing

  • Raciti SM, Groffman PM, Jenkins JC et al (2011) Nitrate production and availability in residential soils. Ecol Appl 21:2357–2366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Godefroid S, Celesti-Grapow L (2008) Common species have lower taxonomic diversity evidence from the urban floras of Brussels and Rome: common species have lower taxonomic diversity. Divers Distrib 14:530–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2005) Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landscape Ecol 20:235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trammell TLE, Pataki DE, Cavender-Bares J et al (2016) Plant nitrogen concentration and isotopic composition in residential lawns across seven US cities. Oecologia 181:271–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tredici PD (2010) Spontaneous urban vegetation: reflections of change in a globalized world. Nat Cult. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy AR, Grove JM, O’Neil-Dunne JPM et al (2007) Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environ Manage 40:394–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiros IX (2010) Assessment and energy implications of street air temperature cooling by shade tress in Athens (Greece) under extremely hot weather conditions. Renew Energy 35:1866–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heezik Y, Freeman C, Porter S, Dickinson KJM (2013) Garden size, householder knowledge, and socio-economic status influence plant and bird diversity at the scale of individual gardens. Ecosystems 16:1442–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilela B, Villalobos F (2015) letsR: a new R package for data handling and analysis in macroecology. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1229–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler MM, Neill C, Groffman PM et al (2017) Continental-scale homogenization of residential lawn plant communities. Landsc Urban Plan 165:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NSG, Schwartz MW, Vesk PA et al (2009) A conceptual framework for predicting the effects of urban environments on floras. J Ecol 97:4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanne AE, Tank DC, Cornwell WK et al (2013) Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506:89–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research funding was provided by the National Science Foundation Macrosystems Biology Program in the Emerging Frontiers Division of the Biological Sciences Directorate and Long Term Ecological Research Program. The senior author was supported by the “Yard Futures” project from the NSF Macrosystems Program (EF-1638519). Data collection was supported by the “Ecological Homogenization of Urban America” project, funded by a series of collaborative grants from the NSF Macrosystems Program (EF-1065548, 1065737, 1065740, 1065741, 1065772, 1065785, 1065831 and 121238320); and additionally by grants from the NSF Long Term Ecological Research Program supporting work in Baltimore (DEB-0423476), Phoenix (BCS-1026865, DEB-0423704 and DEB-9714833), Plum Island (Boston) (OCE-1058747 and 1238212), Cedar Creek (Minneapolis-St. Paul) (DEB-0620652) and Florida Coastal Everglades (Miami) (DBI-0620409). We are grateful to the botanical field teams involved in yard sampling and data organization: BAL-Charlie Davis, Dan Dillon, Erin Mellenthin, Charlie Nicholson, Hannah Saunders, Avery Uslaner; BOS-Emma Dixon, Roberta Lombardiy, Pamela Polloni, Jehane Semaha, Elisabeth Ward, Megan Wheeler; LA-Aprille Curtis, La’Shaye Ervin; MIA-Bianca Bonilla, Stephen Hodges, Lawrence Lopez, Gabriel Sone; MSP-Chris Buyarksi, Emily Loberg, Alison Slaats, Kelsey Thurow; PHX-Erin Barton, Miguel Morgan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 1479 Gortner Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    Josep Padullés Cubino, Jeannine Cavender-Bares & Sarah E. Hobbie

  2. Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA

    Diane E. Pataki

  3. Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA

    Meghan L. Avolio

  4. The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, 60532, USA

    Lindsay E. Darling

  5. School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5302, USA

    Kelli L. Larson

  6. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-4501, USA

    Sharon J. Hall

  7. City University of New York Advanced Science Research Center at the Graduate Center, New York, NY, 10031, USA

    Peter M. Groffman

  8. Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY, 12545, USA

    Peter M. Groffman

  9. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    Tara L. E. Trammell

  10. Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    Meredith K. Steele

  11. Baltimore Field Station, USDA Forest Service, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA

    J. Morgan Grove

  12. Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA, 02540, USA

    Christopher Neill

Authors
  1. Josep Padullés Cubino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah E. Hobbie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diane E. Pataki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Meghan L. Avolio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lindsay E. Darling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kelli L. Larson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sharon J. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Peter M. Groffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tara L. E. Trammell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Meredith K. Steele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. J. Morgan Grove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Christopher Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josep Padullés Cubino.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1627 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padullés Cubino, J., Cavender-Bares, J., Hobbie, S.E. et al. Drivers of plant species richness and phylogenetic composition in urban yards at the continental scale. Landscape Ecol 34, 63–77 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0744-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0744-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation