Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape

  • Research article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contribution to urban green space by private or domestic gardens in residential zones was investigated in the city of Sheffield, UK, as part of a wider study of the garden resource and its associated biodiversity. The attributes of 61 gardens, including patterns of landcover and vegetation cover, were explored in relation to housing characteristics and the nature of the surrounding landscape. The number of surrounding houses, and the areas of buildings and of roads were negatively correlated with garden area. The proportion of a housing parcel comprising garden increased with parcel size, although the proportion that was rear garden remained relatively constant. Garden size played an overwhelming role in determining garden composition: larger gardens supported more landcovers, contained greater extents of three-quarters of the recorded landcovers, and were more likely to contain trees taller than 2 m, vegetable patches, and composting sites. Unvegetated landcovers made greater proportional contributions as garden size declined. All categories of vegetation canopy increased with garden size, and large gardens supported disproportionately greater cover above 3 m. House age was a less significant factor determining garden landcover. Gardens of newer houses were more likely to occur towards the edge of the urban area, and older properties, that contained fewer hedges, possessed less canopy between 2–3 m. The extent and occurrence of different landcovers in gardens, and their consequences for wildlife, are considered for residential patches in urban areas. The implications for urban planners are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • C. Baines (2000) How to Make a Wildlife Garden Elm Tree Books London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bolund S. Hunhammar (1999) ArticleTitleEcosystem services in urban areas Ecological Economics 29 293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Cannon (2000) Garden Bird Watch Handbook, 2nd ed British Trust for Ornithology ThetfordUK

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Curds (1985) ArticleTitleAn experimental ecological study of a garden compost heap Journal of Biological Education 19 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • G.C. Daily (1997) Introduction what are ecosystem services? G.C. Daily (Eds) Nature’s Services Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems Island Press Washington, DC 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • B.N.K. Davis (1979) ArticleTitleThe ground arthropods of London gardens London Naturalist 58 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameDEFRA (Department for EnvironmentFood and Rural Affairs) (2003) Working with the grain of nature. A biodiversity strategy for England DEFRA London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameDETR (Department of EnvironmentTransport and the Regions) (1999) Planning Policy Guidance 3: Housing Stationery Office London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR (Department of EnvironmentTransport and the Regions),2000Our Towns and Cities: the future - delivering an urban renaissance //wwwetr.gov.uk/regeneration/policies/ourtowns/cm4911/index.htm.

  • C. Denys D. Schmidt (1998) ArticleTitleInsect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient Oecologia 113 269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Dickman (1987) ArticleTitleHabitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environment Journal of Applied Ecology 24 337–351

    Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Dickman C.P. Doncaster (1987) ArticleTitleThe ecology of small mammals in urban habitats I. Populations in a patchy environment Journal of Animal Ecology 56 629–640

    Google Scholar 

  • C.P. Doncaster (1994) ArticleTitleFactors regulating local variations in abundance: field tests on hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) Oikos 69 182–192

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Dunnett M. Qasim (2000) ArticleTitlePerceived benefits to human well-being of urban gardens Hort Technology 10 40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Fernández-Juricic (2000) ArticleTitleAvifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape Conservation Biology 14 513–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J., Smith R.M., Thompson K. and Warren P.H. a. Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, in press.

  • Gaston K.J., Warren P.H., Thompson K. and Smith R.M. b. Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiversity and Conservation, in press.

  • S.S. Germaine B.F. Wakeling (2001) ArticleTitleLizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, ArizonaUSA Biological Conservation 97 229–237

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Goulson W.O.H. Hughes L.C. Derwent J.C. Stout (2002) ArticleTitleColony growth of the bumblebeeBombus terrestrisin improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats Oecologia 130 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Hamilton J. Owen (1992) The Living Garden A practical guide to gardening the natural way BCA London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • D.G. Hessayon J.P. Hessayon (1973) The Garden Book of Europe Elm Tree Books London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hey (1998) A History of Sheffield Carnegie Publishing LancasterUK

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Hill (1996) Wildlife Gardening, A Practical Handbook Derbyshire Wildlife Trust Derby, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Jokimäki (1999) ArticleTitleOccurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad-scale variables Urban Ecosystems 3 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • A.P. Kinzig J.M. Grove (2001) Urban-suburban ecology S.A. Levin (Eds) Encyclopaedia of Biodiversity Vol. 5 Academic Press San DiegoUSA 733–745

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Kuschel (1990) Beetles in a suburban environment a New Zealand case study. The identity and status of Coleoptera in the natural and modified habitats of LynfieldAuckland 1974–1989 DSIR Plant Protection Report No. 3. DSIR Plant Protection AucklandNew Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Liu G.C. Daily P.R. Ehrlich G.W. Luck (2003) ArticleTitleEffects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity Nature 421 530–533 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntFSqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12540852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • London Biodiversity Partnership,2001,Private Gardens,http://www.lbp.org.uk/hsgardens.htm.

  • C.F. Mason (2000) ArticleTitleThrushes now largely restricted to the built environment in eastern England Diversity and Distributions 6 189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall A,Doar N,1997 The State of Scottish Greenspace Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 88

  • P. Miotk (1996) ArticleTitleThe naturalized garden – a refuge for animals? – first results Zoologischer Anzeiger 235 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Miyashita A. Shinkai T. Chida (1998) ArticleTitleThe effects of forest fragmentation on web spider communities in urban areas Biological Conservation 86 357–364

    Google Scholar 

  • M.D. Moran (2003) ArticleTitleArguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies Oikos 100 403–405

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Niemelä (1999) ArticleTitleEcology and urban planning Biodiversity and Conservation 8 119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Ødegaard B.Å. Tømmerås (2000) ArticleTitleCompost heaps – refuges and stepping-stones for alien arthropod species in northern Europe Diversity and Distribution 6 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Owen (1991) The Ecology of a Garden: the first fifteen years Cambridge University Press CambridgeUK

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Robinson W.J. Sutherland (2002) ArticleTitlePost-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain Journal of Applied Ecology 39 157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Rondini C.P. Doncaster (2002) ArticleTitleRoads as barriers to movement for hedgehogs Functional Ecology 16 504–509

    Google Scholar 

  • J.-P.L. Savard P. Clereau G. Mennechez (2000) ArticleTitleBiodiversity concepts and urban areas Landscape and Urban Planning 48 131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Saville (1997) The Secret Garden: report of the Lothian Secret Garden Survey Lothian Wildlife Information Centre EdinburghUK

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Soulé D.T. Bolger A.C. Alberts J. Wright M. Sorice S. Hill (1988) ArticleTitleReconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands Conservation Biology 2 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Stace (1997) New Flora of the British Isles, 2nd ed Cambridge University Press CambridgeUK

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J.S. Swan R.S. Oldham (1993) Herptile Sites Volume 1: National Amphibian Survey Final Report English Nature Research Report No. 38 PeterboroughUK

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Sukopp U. Starfinger (1999) Disturbance in urban ecosystems L.R. Walker (Eds) Ecosystems of the World 16. Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground Elsevier London, UK 397–412

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Thompson K.C. Austin R.H. Smith P.H. Warren P.G. Angold K.J. Gaston (2003) ArticleTitleUrban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context Journal of Vegetation Science 14 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Thompson J.G. Hodgson R.M. Smith P.H. Warren K.J. Gaston (2004) ArticleTitleUrban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn floras Journal of Vegetation Science 15 371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUNDP, UNEP, WB and WRI (United Nations Development ProgrammeUnited Nations Environment ProgrammeWorld Bank and World Resources Institute) (2000) World Resources 2000–2001: People and Ecosystems – the fraying web of life Elsevier Science AmsterdamThe Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDSD (United Nations Division for Sustainable Development),2003,Agenda 21,http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21toc.htm.

  • M.L. Vickery (1995) Gardens the neglected habitat A.S. Pullin (Eds) Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies Chapman and Hall London, UK 123–134

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard M. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, R., Gaston, K., Warren, P. et al. Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landscape Ecol 20, 235–253 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-3160-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-3160-0

Keywords

Navigation