Abstract
Marijuana (non-medical cannabis) is a well-recognized psychoactive herbal drug used for recreational purposes. The aim of this work is to describe and compare the performance and suitability of selected methods to analyze pesticide residues in marijuana. The fitness of three typical pesticide multiresidue methods [acetate buffered QuEChERS (method A), a modified citrate buffered QuEChERS (method B) and citrate buffered QuEChERS (method C)] were tested in marijuana through the LC–MS/MS determination of 61 LC amenable pesticides. Considering recoveries at the highest level for the selected pesticides in marijuana, from the 61 target analytes, 37 (method A), 40 (method B) and 46 (method C) compounds gave accurate results (70–120 % range). Method C showed the best performance for the target analytes in terms of recoveries, precision, limits of quantitation and matrix effect. Marijuana showed to be a highly complex matrix. Most analytes suffered high signal suppression (ME <−50 %) for method B while medium (−50 to 20 %) to low (−20 to 0 %) signal suppression was found for methods A and C. Moreover, high coelution of coextractives with the target analytes was observed. A pilot survey with real samples revealed that seized and legally produced marijuana samples contained pesticides. Residues of diazinon (0.03 mg kg−1), tebuconazole (0.19 mg kg−1) and teflubenzuron (0.11 mg kg−1) were simultaneously detected in one marijuana sample. The establishment of MRLs in a legal consumption scenario such as in Uruguay seems to be necessary in the near future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clarke RC, Merlin MD (2013) Cannabis: evolution and ethnobotany. University of California Press, p 464
UNODC (2015) World drug report. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna
Stone D (2014) Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 69:284–288
Parlamento de la Republica Oriental de Uruguay (2013) Ley No. 19,172: Marihuana y sus derivados: control y regulación del estado de la importación, producción, adquisición, almacenamiento, comercialización y distribución. Montevideo, Uruguay
Feldman J (2015) Pesticides and you. Beyond Pesticides 34:14–24
Landrigan PJ, Powell KE, James LM, Taylor PR (1983) Am J Public Health 73:784–788
Lanaro R, Costa JL, Cazenave SOS, Zanolli-Filho LA, Tavares MFM, Chasin AAM (2015) J Forensic Sci 60:S241–S247
Turner CE, Cheng PC, Torres LM, Elsohly A (1978) Bull Narc 30:47–56
Needham L, Paschal D, Rollen ZJ, Liddle J, Bayse D (1979) J Chromatogr Sci 17:87–90
Liddle JA, Needham LL, Rollen ZJ, Roark BR, Bayse DD (1980) Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 24:49–53
American Herbal Pharmacopeia (2013) Cannabis inflorescense. Standards of identity, analysis and quality control. American Herbal Pharmacopeia, Scott’s Valley, CA
Colorado State Department of Agriculture (2015) Pesticide use in marijuana production. https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/agplants/pesticide-use-marijuana-production. Accessed 22 Jan 2016
Wilson DK, Graff CL (2013) J Forensic Sci 58:220–223
Schneider S, Bebing R, Dauberschmidt C (2014) Anal Methods 6:515–520
Sullivan N, Elzinga S, Raber JC (2013) J Toxicol. doi:10.1155/2013/378168
McLaren J, Swift W, Dillon P, Allsop S (2008) Addiction 103:1100–1109
Ilias Y, Rudaz S, Christen P, Veuthey JL (2006) Chimia 60:846–851
Rajski Ł, Lozano A, Belmonte-Valles N, Uclés A, Uclés S, Mezcua M, Fernandez-Alba AR (2013) Analyst 138:921–931
Lozano A, Rajski Ł, Belmonte-Valles N, Uclés A, Uclés S, Mezcua M, Fernández-Alba AR (2012) J Chromatogr A 1268:109–122
European Committee for Standardization (2008) CEN 15662: foods of plant origin. Determination of pesticide residues using GC-MS and/or LC-MS/MS following acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and clean-up by dispersive SPE. QuEChERS-method. http://www.en-standard.eu/csn-en-15662-foods-of-plant-origin-determination-of-pesticide-residues-using-gc-ms-and-or-lc-ms-ms-following-acetonitrile-extraction-partitioning-and-clean-up-by-dispersive-spe-quechers-method/?gclid=CP35xIb2vcoCFVKQHwodjO0BSQ. Accessed 22 Jan 2016
Lozano A, Pérez-Parada A, Heinzen H, Fernández-Alba AR (2012) J AOAC Int 95:1520–1527
European Union Reference Laboratory (2014) Report of EU proficiency test for pesticides in fruit and vegetables 16 (EUPT-FV-16) 2014. http://www.eurl-pesticides.eu/docs/public/tmplt_article.asp?CntID=915&LabID=500&Lang=EN
European Commision (2013) Document no. SANCO/12571/2013. Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/guidance_documents/docs/qualcontrol_en.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2016
Russo EB, Jiang H-E, Li X, Sutton A, Carboni A, del Bianco F, Mandolino G, Potter DJ, Zhao Y-X, Bera S, Zhang Y-B, Lü E-G, Ferguson DK, Hueber F, Zhao L-C, Liu C-J, Wang Y-F, Li C-S (2008) J Exp Bot 59:4171–4182
Petrovic M, Lopez de Alda MJ, Diaz-Cruz S, Postigo C, Radjenovic J, Gros M, Barcelo D (2009) Phil Trans R Soc A 367:3979–4003
CORESTA Guide No. 1 (2013) The concept and implementation of CPA guidance residue levels (GRLs). http://www.coresta.org/Guides/Guide-No01-GRLs(3rd-Issue-July13).pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2016
United States General Accounting Office (GAO) (2003) Pesticides on tobacco. Federal activities to assess risks and monitor residues. Document GAO-03-485. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03485.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2016
Acknowledgments
Authors acknowledge Polo Agroalimentario y Agroindustrial from Paysandú (PAAP) for their facilities and funding support from PEDECIBA (Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas). Authors specially acknowledge Dr. Carlos García and Mr. Santiago Fernández for their teaching, assistance and remarkable discussions during the time this work has been done.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Published in the topical collection 5th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop with guest editor Steven J. Lehotay.
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3130-0.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez-Parada, A., Alonso, B., Rodríguez, C. et al. Evaluation of Three Multiresidue Methods for the Determination of Pesticides in Marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) with Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Chromatographia 79, 1069–1083 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3029-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3029-9