Abstract
Interpopulation variation of relative and absolute genome size was studied in Fagus sylvatica subsp. sylvatica and subsp. orientalis. The study included 18 populations of beech planted in a common-garden experiment in central Slovakia and three additional populations from the Caucasus. Nuclear DNA content was determined by means of flow cytometry using the AT-specific fluorochrome 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and non-specific propidium iodide, and its associations with climate, growth, phenology and physiological traits were assessed. The approximate average nuclear DNA content (2C) across all samples was 1.178 ± 0.020 pg. The lowest mean relative genome sizes were observed in the Alpine range, whereas they increased toward the range margins; no clear trend was observed for 2C values. Temperature seasonality and temperature annual range were found to be negatively associated with genome size. Among phenotypic traits, the maximum chlorophyll a fluorescence yield (Fv/Fm) was found to be negatively correlated with relative genome size, whereas phenology and some photosynthetic parameters were correlated with the 2C values.
References
Barow M, Meister A (2002) Lack of correlation between AT frequency and genome size in higher plants and the effect of nonrandomness of base sequences on dye binding. Cytometry 47:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.10030
Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Patel S, Pendharkar A, Knight CA (2008) Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytol 179:975–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02528.x
Beaulieu JM, Smith S, Leitch IJ (2010) On the tempo of genome size evolution in angiosperms. J Bot 2010:989152. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/989152
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2005) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms—progress, problems and prospects. Ann Bot (Oxford) 95:45–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci003
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2011) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: targets, trends and tomorrow. Ann Bot (Oxford) 107:467–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq258
Bennetzen JL, Ma JX, Devos KM (2005) Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann Bot (Oxford) 95:127–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci008
Chen S-C, Cannon CH, Kua C-S, Liu J-J, Galbraith DW (2014) Genome size variation in the Fagaceae and its implications for trees. Tree Genet Genomes 10:977–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-014-0736-y
Chinchaladze TG, Tugushi KI, Todua BT (1974) Karyology of the beech Fagus orientalis Lipsky. Soobshch Akad Nauk Gruzinsk SSR 75:201–203
Chokchaichamnankit P, Anamthawat-Jónsson K, Chulalaksananukul W (2008) Chromosomal mapping of 18S-25S and 5S ribosomal genes on 15 species of Fagaceae from Northern Thailand. Silvae Genet 57:5–13
Doležel J, Doleželová M, Novák FJ (1994) Flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA amount in diploid bananas (Musa acuminata and M. balbisiana). Biol Pl 36:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02920930
Dzialuk A, Chybicki I, Welc M, Śliwińska E, Burczyk J (2007) Presence of triploids among oak species. Ann Bot (Oxford) 99:959–964. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm043
Emiliani G, Paffetti D, Giannini R (2009) Identification and molecular characterization of LTR and LINE retrotransposable elements in Fagus sylvatica L. iForest 2:119–126. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0501-002
Gallois A, Burrus M, Brown S (1999) Evaluation of the nuclear DNA content and GC percent in four varieties of Fagus sylvatica L. Ann Forest Sci 56:615–618. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19990709
Gömöry D, Paule L (2011) Trade-off between height growth and spring flushing in common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann Forest Sci 68:975–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0103-1
Gömöry D, Paule L, Vyšný J (2007) Patterns of allozyme variation in western Eurasian Fagus. Bot J Lin Soc 154:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00666.x
Gömöry D, Ditmarová L, Hrivnák M, Jamnická G, Kmeť J, Krajmerová D, Kurjak D (2015) Differentiation in phenological and physiological traits in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Eur J Forest Res 134:1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0910-2
Greilhuber J (1998) Intraspecific variation in genome size: a critical reassessment. Ann Bot (Oxford) 82:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.0725
Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysak MA, Bennett MD (2005) The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann Bot (Oxford) 95:255–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci019
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
Husband BC, Schemske DW, Burton TL, Goodwillie C (2002) Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Proc Roy Soc London, Ser B, Biol Sci 269:2565–2571. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2196
Jaretzky R (1930) Zur Zytologie der Fagales. Planta 10:120–137
Kalendar R, Tanskanen J, Immonen S, Nevo E, Schulman AH (2000) Genome evolution of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) by BARE-1 retrotransposon dynamics in response to sharp microclimatic divergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6603–6607. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.110587497
Knight CA, Ackerly DD (2002) Variation in nuclear DNA content across environmental gradients: a quantile regression analysis. Ecol Lett 5:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00283.x
Knight CA, Molinari NA, Petrov DA (2005) The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. Ann Bot (Oxford) 95:177–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/rnci011
Kremer A, Casasoli M, Barreneche T et al (2007) Fagaceae trees. In: Kole C (ed) Forest Trees. Springer, Berlin, pp 161–187
Levin DA, Wilson AC (1976) Rates of evolution in seed plants: net increase in diversity of chromosome numbers and species numbers through time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:2086–2090
Magri D, Vendramin GG, Comps B et al (2006) A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytol 171:199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x
Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A et al (2013) The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497:579–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12211
Ohri D (2005) Climate and growth form: the consequences for genome size in plants. Pl Biol (Stuttgart) 7:449–458. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-865878
Ohri D, Ahuja MR (1991) Giemsa C-banding in Fagus sylvatica L., Betula pendula Roth and Populus tremula L. Silvae Genet 40:72–74
Otto F (1990) DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. Meth Cell Biol 33:105–110
Pellicer J, Fay MF, Leitch IJ (2010) The largest eukaryotic genome of them all? Bot J Linn Soc 164:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01072.x
Price HJ, Johnston JS (1996) Influence of light on DNA content of Helianthus annuus L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11264–11267. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.20.11264
SAS (2010) SAS/STAT® User’s Guide. Available at: http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/stat/index.html
Šmarda P, Bureš P (2010) Understanding intraspecific variation in genome size in plants. Preslia 82:41–61
Šmarda P, Bureš P, Horová L, Foggi B, Rossi G (2008) Genome size and GC content evolution of Festuca: ancestral expansion and subsequent reduction. Ann Bot (Oxford) 101:421–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm307
Van de Peer Y (2002) ZT: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. J Statist Software 7:1–12
Wakamiya I, Newton RJ, Johnston JS, Price HJ (1993) Genome size and environmental factors in the genus Pinus. Amer J Bot 80:1235–1241
Wetzel G (1929) Chromosomenstudien bei den Fagales. Bot Arch 25:257–282
Zoldoš V, Papeš D, Brown SC, Panaud O, Šiljak-Yakovlev S (1998) Genome size and base composition of seven Quercus species: inter and intra-population variation. Genome 41:162–168
Acknowledgements
The provenance experiment was established under the auspices of the Institute of Forest Genetics (Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute) in Grosshansdorf, Germany, and measurements were done within the COST Action E52 coordinated by G. von Wühlisch. We thank B. Kehrer (Hochschule Geisenheim) for laboratory support. Physiological measurements were done by Ľ. Ditmarová, D. Kurjak, J. Majerová, E. Pšidová and G. Jamnická. The study was supported by research grants of the Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-0135-12, Slovak Grant Agency for Science VEGA 1/0269/16 and internal funds of the Senckenberg Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling editor: Hanna Schneeweiss.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Information on Electronic Supplementary Material
Information on Electronic Supplementary Material
Online Resource 1. Geographical coordinates and climatic data for the studied populations.
Online Resource 2. Procedures for the assessment of physiological characteristics of beech trees.
Online Resource 3. Measured values and population averages (± SD) of relative (ratio DAPI) and absolute genome sizes (ratio PI, 2C values).
Online Resource 4. Fluorescence histograms of DAPI (a, c) and propidium iodide-stained (b, d) nuclei showing analysis of Fagus sylvatica subsp. sylvatica (provenance 17, tree 17-1-2-2) and F. sylvatica subsp. orientalis (provenance 57, tree 57-1-3-2) measured with internal reference standard Glycine max cv. Polanka.
Online Resource 5. Summary table of relative (ratio DAPI) and absolute genome sizes (ratio PI, 2C values) and GC content in samples analyzed with both fluorochromes.
Online Resource 6. Relationship between relative (ratio DAPI) and absolute genome size (2C value).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paule, J., Paule, L. & Gömöry, D. Small genome size variation across the range of European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Plant Syst Evol 304, 577–582 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-018-1501-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-018-1501-8