Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoluminal vacuum therapy for gastrojejunal anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a pilot study in a swine model

  • New Technology
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) consistently produces the most sustainable weight loss among common interventions for morbid obesity. Anastomotic leaks at the gastrojejunal (GJ) connection result in severe morbidity. We apply endoluminal negative pressure vacuum devices (EVD) to heal anastomotic leaks in a swine model.

Methods

RYGB was performed in 10 pigs (3 control, 7 experimental). GJ anastomoses were fashioned, and a 2-cm defect was made across the staple line. In controls, the defects remained open. In experimental pigs, the EVD was placed across the defect and kept at continuous 50 mmHg suction. All pigs were euthanized on postoperative day seven unless they displayed signs of peritonitis or sepsis. Fluoroscopy and necropsy were performed to assess a persistent leak, and tissue specimens were sent to histology to evaluate for degree of inflammation and ischemia.

Results

All three control pigs’ GJ anastomoses demonstrated evidence of a persistent leak. All seven experimental pigs with the EVD in place showed evidence that their leak had sealed at time of fluoroscopy (p value 0.008).

Conclusions

Endoluminal vacuum therapy is well tolerated in a swine model. GJ anastomotic leaks were consistently sealed with our device in place compared to controls. This therapy shows promise as a method to address GJ leaks in the bariatric population, and thus, we believe additional evaluation is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. [Internet]. World Health Organization Fact Sheet—Obesity and Overweight. 2015. Accessed 2015 Feb 1. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2014) Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 311(8):806–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kushner RF (2014) Weight loss strategies for treatment of obesity. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 56(4):465–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vest AR, Heneghan HM, Schauer PR, Young JB (2013) Surgical management of obesity and the relationship to cardiovascular disease. Circulation 127(8):945–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchwald H, Oien DM (2013) Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg 23(4):427–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Madan AK, Stoecklein HH, Ternovits CA, Tichansky DS, Phillips JC (2007) Predictive value of upper gastrointestinal studies versus clinical signs for gastrointestinal leaks after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 21(2):194–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S, Carmody B, Wolfe L, Demaria E, Kellum JM, Sugerman H et al (2007) Effect of location and speed of diagnosis on anastomotic leak outcomes in 3828 gastric bypass cases. J Gastrointest Surg 11(6):708–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yurcisin BM, DeMaria EJ (2009) Management of leak in the bariatric gastric bypass patient: reoperate, drain and feed distally. J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1564–1566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim J, Azagury D, Eisenberg D, DeMaria E, Campos GM, American Society for M et al (2015) ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(4):739–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller KA, Pump A (2007) Use of bioabsorbable staple reinforcement material in gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(4):417–421 (discussion 22)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sajid MS, Khatri K, Singh K, Sayegh M (2011) Use of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 25(9):2884–2891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SD, Khouzam MN, Kellum JM, DeMaria EJ, Meador JG, Wolfe LG et al (2007) Selective, versus routine, upper gastrointestinal series leads to equal morbidity and reduced hospital stay in laparoscopic gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(4):413–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiesser M, Kressig P, Bueter M, Nocito A, Bauerfeind P, Gubler C (2014) Successful endoscopic management of gastrointestinal leakages after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Dig Surg 31(1):67–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh C, Karmali S (2015) Endoscopic management of bariatric complications: a review and update. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7(5):518–523

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Freedman J, Jonas E, Naslund E, Nilsson H, Marsk R, Stockeld D (2013) Treatment of leaking gastrojejunostomy after gastric bypass surgery with special emphasis on stenting. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(4):554–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenberger LH, Shada A, Ritter LA, Mauro DM, Mentrikoski MJ, Feldman SH et al (2014) Delayed endoluminal vacuum therapy for rectal anastomotic leaks after rectal resection in a swine model: a new treatment option. Clin Transl Sci 7(2):121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shada AL, Rosenberger LH, Mentrikoski MJ, Silva MA, Feldman SH, Kleiner DE (2014) Endoluminal negative-pressure therapy for preventing rectal anastomotic leaks: a pilot study in a pig model. Surg Infect 15(2):123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 38(6):553–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolvos T (2015) The evolution of negative pressure wound therapy: negative pressure wound therapy with instillation. J Wound Care 24(Suppl 4b):15–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Selvaggi F, Canonico S (2015) Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in colorectal surgery. Effects on surgical site events: current status and call to action. Updates in surgery

  21. Nordmeyer M, Pauser J, Biber R, Jantsch J, Lehrl S, Kopschina C et al (2015) Negative pressure wound therapy for seroma prevention and surgical incision treatment in spinal fracture care. Int Wound J. doi:10.1111/iwj.12436

  22. Horch RE (2015) Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for high-risk wounds. J Wound Care 24(Suppl 4b):21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169(6):634–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Caulfield H, Hyman NH (2013) Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg 148(2):177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T, Spelsberg F, Jauch KW (2008) Endoluminal vacuum therapy for the treatment of anastomotic leakage after anterior rectal resection. Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti 87(8):397–402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weidenhagen R, Hartl WH, Gruetzner KU, Eichhorn ME, Spelsberg F, Jauch KW (2010) Anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection: new treatment options by endoluminal vacuum therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 90(5):1674–1681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Arezzo A, Miegge A, Garbarini A, Morino M (2010) Endoluminal vacuum therapy for anastomotic leaks after rectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 14(3):279–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Mark Mentrikoski for his help with the histological scoring of all tissue specimens.

Funding

No grants were used in the completion of this study. Senior author, Daniel E. Kleiner MD, independently funded the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel B. Scott.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Daniel E. Kleiner is the inventor of the described device and currently has a patent for this technology. He may at some point in the future have financial benefit for this device. There is no sponsoring company or financial agreements for this work. Drs. Sanford H. Feldman, Amber L. Shada, Lane A. Ritter and Rachel B. Scott have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scott, R.B., Ritter, L.A., Shada, A.L. et al. Endoluminal vacuum therapy for gastrojejunal anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a pilot study in a swine model. Surg Endosc 30, 5147–5152 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4823-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4823-z

Keywords

Navigation