Abstract
Alloy 430 stainless steel tube-to-header welds failed in a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) within one year of commissioning. The HRSG was in a combined cycle, gas-fired, combustion turbine electric power plant. Alloy 430, a 17% chromium (Cr) ferritic stainless steel, was selected because of its resistance to chloride and sulfuric acid dewpoint corrosion under conditions potentially present in the HRSG low-pressure feedwater economizer. Intergranular corrosion and cracking were found in the weld metal and heat-affected zones (HAZs). The hardness in these regions was up to 35 HRC, and the weld had received a postweld heat treatment (PWHT). Metallographic examination revealed that the corroded areas contained undertempered martensite. Fully tempered weld areas with a hardness of 93 HRB were not attacked. No evidence of corrosion fatigue was found. Uneven temperature control during PWHT was the most likely cause of failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.A. Streicher: “The Role of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Heat Treatment in the Dissolution of Iron-Chromium Alloys in Acids,”Corrosion, 1973,29(9), pp. 337–60.
Anon.: “Stainless Steel, Allegheny Ludlum Blue Sheets: Types 405, 410, 430, 439, and 446,” Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp., Pittsburgh, PA, 1980.
P.J. Grobner: “The 885 °F (475 °C) Embrittlement of Ferritic Stainless Steels,”Metall. Trans. A, 1973,4, pp. 251.
Metals Handbook, 9th ed.,Vol. 11, Failure Analysis and Prevention, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1986, pp. 98–101.
Metals Handbook, 9th ed.,Vol. 13, Corrosion, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1987, pp. 355 and 1265.
R.H. Espy, “How Composition and Welding Conditions Affect Corrosion Resistance of Type 430 Stainless Steel,” Preprint 22, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Cleveland, OH, 1968.
Anon.:ASME SA-268, Specification for Seamless and Welded Ferritic and Martensitic Stainless Steel Tubing for General Service, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, 2001.
Anon.:ASTM A 763, Standard Practices for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Ferritic Stainless Steels, inAnnual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.
Anon.: “ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code Section I, Rules for Construction of Power Boilers,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, 2001.
Anon.:ASME SA-450, Specification for General Requirements for Carbon, Ferritic Alloy, and Austenitic Alloy Steel Tubes, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, 2001.
M.P. Borden, private communication, ABB Alstrom Power Corp., Windsor, CT, 1999.
Y. Chung: Metallographic Evaluation of Type 430 Stainless Steel Economizer Tube/Header Weld Samples, Lab Test Report prepared by FTI Anamet Inc., Hayward, CA, 2000.
Anon.: “ASME B&PV Code Section VIII, Division 1, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, 2001.
Anon.:ASME SA-803, Specification for Welded Ferritic Stainless Steel Feedwater Heater Tubes, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, 2001.
Metals Handbook, 8th ed.,Vol. 8, Metallography, Structures, and Phase Diagrams, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973, pp. 403.
Anon.: “Alloy 430 Time-Temperature-Transformation Phase Diagram,” Carpenter Technology, Reading, PA.
D. Peckner and I.M. Bernstein:Handbook of Stainless Steel, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1977, p. 19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krafft, H. Alloy 430 ferritic stainless steel welds fail due to stress-corrosion cracking in heat-recovery steam generator. Practical Failure Analysis 2, 39–46 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715452
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715452