Skip to main content
Log in

Oxyhydrogen combustion and detonation driven shock tube

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of combustion driver ignited by multi-spark plugs distributed along axial direction has been analysed and tested. An improved ignition method with three circumferential equidistributed ignitors at main diaphragm has been presented, by which the produced incident shock waves have higher repeatability, and better steadiness in the pressure, temperature and velocity fields of flow behind the incidence shock, and thus meets the requirements of aerodynamic experiment. The attachment of a damping section at the end of the driver can eliminate the high reflection pressure produced by detonation wave, and the backward detonation driver can be employed to generate high enthalpy and high density test flow. The incident shock wave produced by this method is well repeated and with weak attenuation. The reflection wave caused by the contracted section at the main diaphragm will weaken the unfavorable effect of rarefaction wave behind the detonation wave, which indicates that the forward detonation driver can be applied in the practice. For incident shock wave of identical strength, the initial pressure of the forward detonation driver is about 1 order of magnitude lower than that of backward detonation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradley JN. Shock Waves in Chemistry and Physics. London: Butler & Tammer Ltd, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  2. Resler EL, Lin SC, Kantrowitz A. The production of high temperature gases in shock tubes.J Appl Phys, 1952, 23: 1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rose PH. Physical gasdynamic research at the AVCO Research Laboratory. 1957, AVCO Lab, Res note 37

  4. Schultz HT, Hanshall BD. Hypersonic Shock Tuber Equipment at the National Physical Lab. UK. 1957, AGARD, Rep 142

  5. Nagamatsu HT, Geiger RE, Sheer RE Jr. Hypersonic shock tunnel.ARS J, 1959, 29: 332

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hertzberg A, Wittliff CE, Hall JG. Development of the shock tunnel and its application to hypersonic flight. In Riddell FR ed: Hypersonic Flow Research. New York: Academic Press. 1962. 701–758

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nagamatsu HT, Martin ED. Combustion investigation in the hypersonic shock tunnel driver section.J Appl Phys. 1959, 30: 1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis B, Von Elle G. Combustion, Flame and Explosion of Gases. New York & London Academic Press. 1961

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emrich RJ, Wheeler DB. Wall effects in shock tube flow.Phys Fluids, 1958, 1: 14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wittliff CE, Wilson M. Shock tube driver techniques and attenuation measurements. 1957, AFOSR TN-57-549

  11. Bakos RJ, Erdos JI. Options for enhancement of the performance of shock-expansion tubes and tunnels. AIAA 95-0799

  12. Hertzberg A, Smith WE. A method for generation strong shock waves.J Appl Phys, 1954, 25: 130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bird GA. A note on combustions driven shock tubes. 1957, AGARD Rep 146

  14. Waldron HF. An experimental investigation of the flow properties behind strong shock waves in Nitrogen, 1958, UTIA Rep 50

  15. Balcarzak MJ, Johnson MR. The gaseous detonation driver and its application to shock tube simulation techniques. In Moulton J F, Filler W S eds: Proc 5th Int Symp on Shock Tube. 1966. 1111–1119

  16. Yu HR. Shock tunnel and its application to aeroheating experiments. Thesis, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1963 (In Chinese)

  17. Coates PB, Gaydon AG. Simple shock tube with detonating driver gas. Proc Roy Soc (London), 1965, A283: 18–32

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee BHK. Detonation driven shocks in a shock tube.AIAA J, 1967, 5: 791–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gier HL, Johns TG. An investigation of a double diaphragm shock tube with a detonation buffer gas. In Glass I I ed: Shock Tubes. Univ Toronto Press. 1970: 538–549

  20. Edwards DH, Williams GT, Breeze JC. Pressure and velocity measurements on detonation waves in hydrogen-oxygen mixtures.J Fluid Mech, 1959, 6: 497–517

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Stalker RJ. A study of the free-piston shock tunnel.AIAA J, 1967, 5: 2160–2165

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu HR. Recent developments in shock tube application. In Takayama K ed: Proc of the 1989 Nat Symp on Shock Wave Phenomena. Sendai Tohoku Univ. 1990. 1–9

  23. Yu HR, Esser B, Lenartz M, Groenig H. Gaseous detonation driver for a shock tunnel.Shock waves, 1992, 2:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuehrer RG. Measurements of incident-shock test time and reflected shock pressure at full turbulent boundary layer test conditions. In Glass I I ed: Shock Tubes. Univ Toronto Press, 1970. 31–59

  25. Morrison WRB, Stalker RJ, Duffin J. New generation of free-piston shock tunnels. In Kim YW ed: Current Topics in Shock Waves. New York: American Institute of Physics. 1990. 582–587

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In memory of academician Kuo Yonghuai's 90th anniversary.

The project supported by State Science and Technology Committee, National Natural Foundation of Science of China (19082012), Chinese Academy of Sciences and Project of National High Technology of China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hongru, Y. Oxyhydrogen combustion and detonation driven shock tube. Acta Mech Sinica 15, 97–107 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02485874

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02485874

Key Words

Navigation