Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison between computer modeled bioaerosol dispersion and a bioaerosol field spray event

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aerobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The observed deposition pattern from a field spray ofBacillus subtilus var.niger spores is compared with that of a computer simulated bioaerosol particle dispersion model. Using the same meteorological conditions as the field spray, the model produced a bioaerosol deposition pattern estimated to be reasonably similar (R 2=0.66) to the observed field pattern. Reasons for the differences between the deposition patterns are discussed. The comparison indicates that viable airborne particle deposition models may, with future testing, be useful tools for predicting near source aerial microbial dispersal and deposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop, Y.M., Fienberg, S.E. and Holland, P.W. (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis, Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flexner, J.L., Lighthart, B. and Croft, B.A. (1986) The effects of microbial pesticides on non-target, beneficial arthropods. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 16, 203–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, D.A. (1989) Advanced Spatial Statistics. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, S.R., Briggs, G.A. and Hosker, R.P.J. (1982) Handbook on Atmospheric Diffusion. Washington, DC, Technical Information Center, US Department of Energy, p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighthart, B. (1967) A Bacteriological Monitoring of Sewage on Passage Through an Activated Sludge Sewage Treatment Plant, Doctoral Dissertation. Seattle, WA, University of Washington, 119 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighthart, B. (1984) Microbial aerosols: estimated contribution of combine harvesting to an airshed. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47(2), 430–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighthart, B. and Frisch, A.S. (1976) Estimation of viable airborne microbes downwind from a point source. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 31, 700–704.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthart, B. and Mohr, A.J. (1987) Estimating downwind concentrations of viable airborne microorganisms in dynamic atmospheric conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 1580–1583.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthart, B. and Kim, J. (1989) Simulation of airborne microbial droplet transport. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 2349–2355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighthart, B., Spendlove, J.C. and Akers, T.G. (1979) Factors in the production, release and availability of biological particles. In: R.L. Edmonds (Ed.), Ch. 2, Aerobiology — The Ecological Systems Approach. Stroudsburg, PA Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross Inc., pp. 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighthart, B., Shaffer, B.T., Marthi, B. and Ganio, L. (1991) Trajectory of aerosol droplets from a sprayed bacterial suspension. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57(4), 1006–1012.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, P., Bassett, D.A. and Marsh, P.B. (1980) Dispersal ofAspergillus fumigatus from sewage sludge compost piles subjected to mechanical agitation in open air. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39, 1000–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E.W. and Lighthart, B. (1977) Estimation of downwind viable airborne microbes from a wet cooling tower, including settling. Microbial Ecol. 4, 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1989) SAS/STAT® user's Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Vol. 2, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidler, R.J. and Hern, S. (1988) Special Report: Release of Ice-minus Recombinant Bacteria. Corvallis, OR, Environmental Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Army (1991) Preparation of Bacteriological Simulants for Test Support, MT-L SOP 385, October 31, Dugway Proving Ground, UT, US Army, 5 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Lighthart.

Additional information

Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganio, L.M., Mohr, A.J. & Lighthart, B. A comparison between computer modeled bioaerosol dispersion and a bioaerosol field spray event. Aerobiologia 11, 183–188 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450037

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450037

Keywords

Navigation