Skip to main content
Log in

Economic considerations in agroforestry projects

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic benefits that can accrue to the small farmer from incorporating trees in his farm system, and the economic constraints and costs he may face in doing so, are reviewed. Various economic considerations other than cash outlays and incomings, such as impact of risk, need to be taken into account. Issues are discussed that can arise in identifying, designing and implementing projects intended to help farmers to capture the economic potentials of agroforestry and to avoid or remove related economic impediments. Correct understanding of the factors which will affect the success of project interventions, valuation of the costs and benefits of trees as perceived by the farmer rather than by outsiders, distributional and equity issues, and identification of operational measures to ensure tangible short-term economic benefits are highlighted. The need for giving priority to research into the economic impacts of agroforestry practices on small farmer situations is stressed.

Résumé

Les bénéfices qui reviennent au petit fermier de par l'acquisition des arbres dans sa ferme, de même que les frais et contraintes économiques auxquels il doit faire face, ont été reconsidérés. Plusieurs problèmes économiques autres que dépenses et revenus, tel que le risque, doivent être pris en considération. Les questions émanant de l'identification, de l'étude et de la mise en oeuvre des projets qui aident le fermier à s'accaparer des ressources économiques de l'agro-foresterie et éviter ou même écarter les obstacles, économiques, ont été discutées. Une juste interprétation des facteurs qui affecteront la réussite des projets a été mise en évidence, de même qu'une évaluation des frais et des bénéfices des arbres faite par le fermier lui-même plutôt que par des personnes de l'extérieur, les questions de répartition et de justice et aussi l'identification des mesures opérationelles pour assurer des bénéfices à court terme. L'accent a été mis sur la nécessité de donner priorité à la recherche en ce qui concerne les conséquences économiques des petits fermiers dans la pratique de l'agro-foresterie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal, Bina (1980) The woodfuel problem and the diffusion of rural innovations. Report submitted to the U.K. Tropical Products Institute.

  2. Alvim P de T (1977) Cacao. In: P de T Alvim and TT Kozlowsky (eds). Ecophysiology of tropical crops: 279–310. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ball JB (1977) Taungya in southern Nigeria. Project working document, FAO/ UNDP Forest Development Project NIR/71/546-–14, Ibadan, Nigeria.

  4. Brokensha D and Riley B (1978) Forest, foraging, fences and fuel in a marginal area of Kenya, Social Process Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara. Paper for USAID Africa Bureau Firewood Workshop, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Budowski Gerardo (1982). The socio-economic effects of forest management on lives of people living in the area: the case of Central America and some Caribbean countries. In: EG Hallsworth, (ed). Soio-economic effects and constraints in tropical forest management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Douglas J (1981) Consumption and supply of wood and bamboo in Bangladesh. Project Working Document No. 2, FAO/UNDP Project BGD/78/010, Dacca, Bangladesh.

  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1978) Forestry for local community development. Forestry Paper No 7, Rome.

  8. Gregersen HM (1982) Village forestry development in the Republic of Korea — a case study. Forestry for Local Community Development Programme series, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta T (1979) Some financial and natural resource management aspects of commercial cultivation of irrigated eucalyptus in Gujarat, India. Indian Journal of Forestry 2(2) 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoskins Marilyn W (1982) Benefits foregone as a major issue for FLCD success. Prepared for Community Forestry Workshop, Agency for International Development, Bureau of Science and Technology, Office of Multisectoral Development, Washington, DC, 12–14 July 1982.

  11. Hyman Eric L, Seggay EU, Joves RS and Carpio RC. Tree farming from the viewpoint of the smallholder: an ex post evaluation of the PICOP project (draft manuscript).

  12. King KFS (1968) Agri-silviculture (the taungya system). Bulletin No. 1, Department of Forestry, University of Ibadan.

  13. Maydell HJ von (1979) The development of agroforestry in the Sahelian zone of Africa. In: International cooperation in agroforestry, proceedings of an international conference. DSE/ICRAF.

  14. Noronha Raymond (1982) Seeing people for the trees: social issues in forestry. Prepared for the USAID Conference on Forestry and Development in Asia, Bangalore, April 1982.

  15. Okigbo BN (1977) Neglected plants of horticultural and nutritional importance in traditional farming systems of tropical Africa, Acta Horticulturae 53, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Openshaw K and Moris J (1979) The socio-economics of agroforestry. In: International cooperation in agroforestry, proceedings of an international conference. DSE/ICRAF.

  17. Poulsen Gunnar (1981) Malawi — the function of trees in small farmer production systems. Forestry for Local Community Development Programme Series, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raintree John B (1981) Bioeconomic considerations in the design of agroforestry intercropping systems. In: P. Huxley (ed) Plant research and agroforestry. Proceedings of consultative meeting, 8–15 April 1981. ICRAF, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reddy AKN (1983) Rural fuelwood: significant relationships. In: Wood Fuel Surveys, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Romm Jeff (1980) Assessing the benefits and costs of social forestry projects. The Indian Forester 106(7), July 1980.

  21. Seth SK (1981) Agroforestry in India and Sri Lanka. Forestry for Local Community Development Programme series, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soekiman Atmosoedarjo and Banyard SG (1978) The prosperity approach to forestry community development in Java. Commonwealth Forestry Review 57(2) pp 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Skutsch M, Allen J, Barnes D and Ramsay W (1982) Case study of social forestry in Tanzania: why people don't plant trees. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.

  24. Wiersum K (1981) Tree gardening and taungya on Java — examples of agroforestry techniques in the humid tropics. In Viewpoints on agroforestry, Agricultural University, Wageningen, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of parts of this paper was presented at the United Nations University Workshop on Agroforestry, Freiburg i. Br., 31 May-5 June 1982. The author wishes to express his appreciation for comments received on that draft of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnold, J.E.M. Economic considerations in agroforestry projects. Agroforest Syst 1, 299–311 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155937

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155937

Keywords

Navigation