Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confronting misconceptions in the domain of simple electrical circuits

  • Article
  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper starts from the assumption that learning is promoted through confronting students with the inconsistencies entailed by their own beliefs. The issue is explored in the domain of electricity in the context of simple DC circuits. Previous work is used as the basis for the construction of a programme of work that is undertaken by a group of students. This programme entailed the development of a computer-based modelling environment called ELAB. The underlying design principle is that students should be able to model electrical circuits at a level which permits them to express some of their explicit (possibly mistaken) beliefs about relevant concepts. Other, implicit, beliefs should also be detectable through use of the system. The results derived from observation suggest that computer-based modelling facilities can provide advantages over approaches exploiting other media. In particular, such systems can be used to promote the kinds of intellectual conflict that are believed to be beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archenhold, W.F. (1975). A study of the understanding by sixth form students of the concept of potential in physics. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Leeds.

  • Arons, A. B. (1982). Phenomenology and logical reasoning in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, G.W. (1977). Hierarchical learning in electrical science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brna, P. (1987a). Confronting dynamics misconceptions. Instructional Science, 16(4), 351–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brna, P. (1987b). Confronting science misconceptions with the help of a computer. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.

  • Brna, P. (1987c). A methodology for confronting science misconceptions. Research Paper 353, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillot, M. (1984). L'Intelligence Artificielle au service de la formation. Paper presented at FORUM EAO 84.

  • Cohen, R., Eylon, B. and Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electrical circuits: a study of students' concepts. American Journal of Physics, 51(5), 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In Gentner, D. and Stevens, A., (eds.), Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum Press.

  • Driver, R. (1981). Pupils' alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1983). The Pupil as Scientist? Open University Press.

  • Fredette, N. and Lockhead, J. (1980). Student conceptions of simple circuits. Physics Teacher, 18, 194–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. and Gentner, D.R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds, mental models of electricity. In Gentner, D. and Stevens, A., (eds.), Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum Press.

  • Johnstone, A.H. and Mughol, A.R. (1978). The concept of electrical resistance. Physics Education, 13 (1), 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Osborne, R.J. and Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in Science, The Implications of Children's Science. Heinemann.

  • Osborne, R.J. and Gilbert, J.K. (1980). A method for investigating concept understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education, 2(3), 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R.J. (1981). Children's ideas about electric current. New Zealand Science Teacher, 29, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R.J., Bell, B.F. and Gilbert, J.K. (1983). Science teaching and children's views of the world. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, D.M. (1984). A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, G.J. and Steele, G.L. (1980). Constraints—a language for expressing almost-hierarchical descriptions. Artificial Intelligence, 14, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A. and Delacote, G. (1976). Manipulations et representations de circuits electrique simples chez les enfants de 7 a 12 ans. Révue Français de Pédagogie, 34.

  • White, B. and Fredericksen, J.R. (1986). Intelligent tutoring systems based upon qualitative model evolutions. In White, Proceedings of AAAI-86, 313–319, American Association for Artificial Intelligence.

  • White, B. Y. and Frederiksen, J. R. (1988). Causal Model Progressions as a Foundation for Intelligent Learning Environments. Report No. 6686, BBN Laboratories. To appear in the Journal of Artificial Intelligence.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, 80 South Bridge, EH1 1HN, Edinburgh, Scotland

    Paul Brna

Authors
  1. Paul Brna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brna, P. Confronting misconceptions in the domain of simple electrical circuits. Instr Sci 17, 29–55 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121233

Keywords

Search

Navigation