Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teaching Electric Circuits: Teachers’ Perceptions and Learners’ Misconceptions

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An exploratory case study involving six grade 9 science teachers was undertaken to probe how teachers’ understanding of learners’ misconceptions relate to their perceptions about teaching simple circuits. The participants’ understanding of documented misconceptions in electricity were explored by means of a questionnaire, while their perceptions about teaching electric circuits were also explored in the questionnaire, followed by a semi-structured interview. Results were analysed using content analysis and interpreted using pedagogical content knowledge as a theoretical lens. The results indicated that understanding learners’ misconceptions did not always correlate with conceptual perceptions about teaching electric circuits. While fair understanding of misconceptions was demonstrated by teachers who studied Physics at undergraduate level, only those who also held qualifications in Education showed conceptual perceptions about teaching electricity. Teachers who did not study Science Education revealed technical perceptions, focused on facts, demonstrations and calculations. From these results, a developmental model for pedagogical content knowledge was proposed. It was recommended that teacher education programs should involve misconceptions and also facilitate the development of conceptual perceptions about teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen, R., Eylon, B., & Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: a study of students’ concepts. American Journal of Physics, 51(5), 407–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupin, J. J., & Johsua, S. (1987). Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: structure and evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(9), 791–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaigher, E. (2014). Questions about answers: probing teachers’ awareness and planned remediation of learners’ misconceptions about electric circuits. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2), 176-187.

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R., Mulhall, P., & McKittrick, B. (2009). Physics teachers' perceptions of the difficulty of teaching electricity. Research in Science Education, 39(4), 515–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: how many alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 97–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Shilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education., 39(4), 372–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, J. (2011). Inquiry teaching in primary science: a phenomenographic study. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küçüközer, H., & Kocakülah, S. (2007). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liegeois, L., Chasseigne, G., Papin, S., & Mullet, E. (2003). Improving high school students' understanding of potential difference in simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1129–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Teaching complex subject matter in science: Insights from an analysis of pedagogical content knowledge. Report: ED390715. 27 pp. Mar 1994.

  • Mansour, N. (2013). Consistencies and inconsistencies between science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1230–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C. (1991). Millikan lecture 1990: what we teach and what is learned—closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of pre-service teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82(2), 198–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodley, K. (2013). The relationship between teachers’ ideas about teaching electricity and their awareness of learners’ misconceptions. Unpublished Masters dissertation. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.

  • Morrison, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Science teachers’ diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 87(6), 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, P., McKittrick, B., & Gunstone, R. (2001). A perspective on the resolution of confusions in the teaching of electricity. Research in Science Education, 31, 575–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardhan, H., & Bano, Y. (2001). Science teachers’ alternate conceptions about direct currents. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peşman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redish, E. F., & Steinberg, R. N. (1999). Teaching physics: figuring out what works. Physics Today, 52, 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: a case study of south African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sencar, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediating the effect of gender on ninth-grade Turkish students’ misconceptions concerning electric circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 603–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, D. M. (1985). Electricity in simple circuits. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 32–50). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: a constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education., 24(8), 771–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. H., Chen, H. Y., & Chou, C. Y. (2007). Current as the key concept of Taiwanese students' understandings of electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usak, M. (2009). Pre-service science and technology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on cell topics. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practices., 9(4), 2033–2046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J.G. (1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial assistance of the National Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimera Moodley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moodley, K., Gaigher, E. Teaching Electric Circuits: Teachers’ Perceptions and Learners’ Misconceptions. Res Sci Educ 49, 73–89 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9615-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9615-5

Keywords

Navigation