Abstract
When using existing resources to plan and enact a series of lessons, teachers make various decisions, one of which is whether to follow or modify the sequence of tasks and lessons presented in the resources. One important question to ask is how teacher decisions on lesson sequence affect the quality of instruction and opportunities for students to learn. I examined ways in which teachers, using three different curriculum programs, sequenced tasks and lessons, and whether these sequences provided opportunities for students to engage with mathematical points of the lessons and a mathematical storyline through a proper learning pathway. Findings of the study have implications for teaching, teacher education, and curriculum development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.
Charles, R. I., Crown, W., Fennell, F., et al. (2008). Scott Foresman–Addison Wesley mathematics (Grade 4). Glenview, IL: Pearson.
Drake, C., Land, T. J., & Tyminski, A. M. (2014). Using educative curriculum materials to support the development of prospective teachers’ knowledge. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 154–162.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. (2007). The effect of mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Improving Curriculum Use for Better Teaching (ICUBiT) Project. (2011). A comparative analysis of mathematical and pedagogical components of five elementary mathematics curricula. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Kim, O. K. (2015). The nature of interventions in written and enacted lessons. In J. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Well (Eds.), Proceedings of 39th Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 153–160). Hobart, Australia: PME.
Kim, O. K., & Atanga, N. A. (2013). Teachers’ decisions on task enactment and opportunities for students to learn. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 66–73). Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
Kim, O. K., & Atanga, N. A. (2014). Teacher fidelity decisions and their impact on lesson enactment. Paper presented at 2014 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Conference, New Orleans, LA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council. (2001). In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Remillard, J. T., & Kim, O. K. (2017). Knowledge of curriculum embedded mathematics: Exploring a critical domain of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 65–81.
Rowland, T. (2013). The knowledge quartet: The genesis and application of a framework for analyzing mathematics teaching and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. Journal of Education, 1(3), 15–43.
Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281.
Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467–500.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21.
Singapore Ministry of Education/Marshall Cavendish International (2008). Math in focus grade 3 [Teacher’s edition]. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Sleep, L. (2009). Teaching to the mathematical point: Knowing and using mathematics in teaching (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Sleep, L. (2012). The work of steering instruction toward the mathematical point: A decomposition of teaching practice. American Education Research Journal, 49(5), 935–970.
Son, J., & Kim, O. K. (2015). Teachers’ selection and enactment of mathematical problems from textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 491–518.
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J. T., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–370). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
TERC. (2008). Investigations in number, data, and space (2nd ed.). Grade 5 Unit 4 What’s that portion? Glenview, IL: Pearson.
Acknowledgements
This paper is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants No. 0918141 and No. 0918126. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, OK. (2018). Teacher Decisions on Lesson Sequence and Their Impact on Opportunities for Students to Learn. In: Fan, L., Trouche, L., Qi, C., Rezat, S., Visnovska, J. (eds) Research on Mathematics Textbooks and Teachers’ Resources. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73252-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73253-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)