Skip to main content

Inclusion in Sharing-Based Services (I-SBS): An Analytical Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design for Inclusion (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 587))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The collaborative economy involves many different fields and it is difficult to define what activities are comprised. General impact evidence is inconclusive. However, some of them address problems about indirect discriminations, labour security and inequalities, the lack of regulation. Considerations about ‘inclusion’ and ‘exclusion’ states are needed for services involved in shared consumption. The authors propose the ‘Sharing-Based Services’ (SBS) conceptual framework to study and analyse a set of services. In particular, this paper describes an analytical tool (I-SBS) comprising an approach and the activities to consider the aspects of the ‘inclusion’ and ‘exclusion’ in SBS. The series of design workshops to evaluate the tool has been described in detail. The analytical tool, the design results, and the process of design workshops are presented as the main results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Carpooling service; it is the world's leading long-distance ‘ride-sharing’ community.

  2. 2.

    Short-time rental car for point-to-point rides; it is often defined as a car-sharing service.

  3. 3.

    Short-time rental bicycle in London.

  4. 4.

    Co-housing service based on mutual help. Abitare Solidale was started in Florence (Italy) and it is spreading in the Tuscany region. The project supports inter- and intra-generational cohabitation as an integrated solution to tackle different kinds of social problems [23].

  5. 5.

    It is a meal sharing service based on person-to-person relations and regulated on profit business by a web platform.

  6. 6.

    It is a local service in Seoul with the aim to promote a sharing food activity among neighbours.

  7. 7.

    It is a service concept for sharing kitchen workstations [24].

  8. 8.

    It is a kitchen sharing service self-managed by a community in Florence (Italy).

  9. 9.

    The conference was organised in collaboration with the ‘Chinese Ergonomics Society’ and ‘The 16th Academic Conference on Management Ergonomics’.

References

  1. Aria, M., Favole, A.: La condivisione non è un dono!. [Sharing is not a gift!]. In: Aime, M., Aria, M., Bodei, R., Bosio, L., Caillé, A., Favole, A., Latouche, S., Serianni, L. (eds.) L’arte della condivisione: per un’ecologia dei beni comuni. [The art of sharing: an ecology of the commons]. UTET, Italy (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belk, R.: Why not share rather than own? Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 611(1), 126–140 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belk, R.: Sharing. J. Consum. Res. 36(5), 715–734 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brinkø, R., Van Meel, J., Nielsen, S.B.: The shared building portfolio: an exploration and typology. In: Proceedings of CIB Facilities Management Conference 2014, pp. 154–165 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Codagnone, C., Martens, B.: Scoping the sharing economy: Origins, definitions, impact and regulatory issues. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/01. JRC100369 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edelman, B.G., Luca, M., Svirsky, D.: Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper 16-069 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ge, Y., Knittel, C.R., MacKenzie, D., Zoepf, S.: Racial and Gender Discrimination in Transportation Network Companies (No. w22776). National Bureau of Economic Research (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hall, J.V., Krueger, A.B.: An analysis of the labor market for uber’s driver-partners in the United States. Princeton University Industrial Relations Section Working Paper, No. 587 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Summers, L., Balls, E.: Report of the Commission on Inclusive Prosperity. Center for American Progress, Washington (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borcuch, A.: The sharing economy: Understanding and challenges. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Stud. (IJHSSS) II(V), 77–85 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G.M.: Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. J. Consum. Res. 39(4), 881–898 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Belk, R.: You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res. 67(8), 1595–1600 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schor, J. B., Fitzmaurice, C. J.: Collaborating and connecting: The emergence of the sharing economy. In: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption, vol. 410 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Botsman, R., Rogers, R.: What’s Mine is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. Harper Business, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jégou, F., Manzini, E.: Collaborative Services: Social Innovation and Design for Sustainability. Edizioni POLI.design, Milano (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Manzini, E., Coad, R.: Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schor, J.: Getting sharing right. Contexts 14(1), 12–19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clarkson, P.J., Dong, H., Keates, S.: Quantifying design exclusion. In: Clarkson, J., Keates, S., Coleman, R., Lebbon, C. (eds.) Inclusive Design, pp. 422–436. Springer, London (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Goodman-Deane, J., Waller, S.D., Williams, E.Y., Langdon, P.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Estimating exclusion: a tool to help designers. In: Proceedings of Include 2011, Royal College of Art, 18–20 April 2011

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clarkson, P.J., Waller, S., Cardoso, C.: Approaches to estimating user exclusion. Appl. Ergon. 46, 304 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clarkson, P.J., Coleman, R.: History of inclusive design in the UK. Appl. Ergon. 46, 235–247 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Waller, S., Bradley, M., Hosking, I., Clarkson, P.J.: Making the case for inclusive design. Appl. Ergon. 46, 297–303 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laino, E., Otto, A., Hamburg, W.L.H., Langer, A., Güntner, S., Witt, G.D., Müller, K.: Theoretically informed case study accompanying the film Abitare Solidale-Inter-and intra-generational cohabitation–Italy. INNOSERV - WP 7 Theoretically informed case study accompanying the visualization (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rinaldi, A., Tosi, F., Busciantella Ricci, D.: From “Liquid Kitchen” to “Shared Kitchen”: Human-centred design for innovative services of social inclusion in food consumption. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Kercher, P. (eds.) Advances in Design for Inclusion. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 500, pp. 13–25. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanington, B., Martin, B.: Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers, Beverly (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the following for their collaboration in research: the members of the Inclusive Design Research Center (IDRC) at the Design and Innovation College (Tongji University, in Shanghai, China); all the participants of the workshops series, i.e. the students of the ‘User Research and Design Innovation’ course; the participants in the workshop during the ‘International Symposium on Human Factors in Design’; the IDRC members that participated in the third workshop.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Busciantella Ricci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Busciantella Ricci, D., Dong, H., Rinaldi, A., Tosi, F. (2018). Inclusion in Sharing-Based Services (I-SBS): An Analytical Tool. In: Di Bucchianico, G., Kercher, P. (eds) Advances in Design for Inclusion. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 587. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60597-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60597-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60596-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60597-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics