Skip to main content

Pedagogy, Practice, and the Allure of Open Online Courses: Implications for Schools and Their Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools

Abstract

The society in which we live has been transformed by technology and the subsequent provision of opportunities for education, connectedness, and communication. Advances in Internet technology see the online milieu playing a ubiquitous and influential role in the education of individuals and communities, as possibilities for learning continue to be reimagined. As access to education continues to expand in the online realm, this chapter provides an overview of current and emergent applications of online learning, with a focus on the implications of these developments for the school sector. The focus of this chapter falls upon the expansion of massive open online courses (MOOCs), with attention afforded to their manifestations in the education system. In this context, we consider both the merits and potential detriments of MOOCs within school settings, and consider if online learning is suitable as a teaching and learning mechanism for an increasingly heterogeneous cohort of high school students. As some nations signal movement towards acceptance of online courses in schools, this chapter also raises a number of implications for the policies and practices of schools, and the quality of learning students receive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anders, A. (2015). Theories and applications of massive online open courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (2013). The future as cultural fact. Essays on the global condition. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leaders. (2015). Teacher education ministerial advisory group—issues paper. Retrieved from November 23, 2015, from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/initial-teacher-education-resources/temag_submission.pdf?sfvrsn=2

  • Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, S. P. (2013). Assessing writing in MOOCs: Automated essay scoring and calibrated peer review. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (2014). MOOCs: Getting to know you better. Distance Education, 35, 145–148. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.926803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping-disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, A., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., Lodge, J. M., & Kennedy, G. (2016). A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs. Educational Technology Research & Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy, 22(52), 782–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clow, D. (2013, April). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 185–189). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 28–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), Art-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Barba, P., Kennedy, G., & Ainley, M. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a massive open online course (MOOC). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bortoli, L., & Thomson, S. (2010). Contextual factors that influence the achievement of Australia’s Indigenous students: Results from PISA 2000-2006. OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinham, S. (2013). The quality teaching movement in Australia encounters difficult terrain: A personal perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 57(2), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinham, S., Ingvarson, L., & Kleinhenz, E. (2008). Investing in teacher quality. EQ Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaebel, M. (2014). MOOCs: Massive open online courses. EUA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, J. (2013, November 21). MOOC attrition rates—Running the numbers. HuffPost. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-haber/mooc-attrition-rates-runn_b_4325299.html?

  • Halawa, S., Greene, D., & Mitchell, J. (2014). Dropout prediction in MOOCs using learner activity features. Experiences and best practices in and around MOOCs (p. 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2012). The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education: Special Issue, 3(2000), 41–61. U.K.: Elsevier Science.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technology: How new technologies are transforming learning opportunities. New York, NY: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2015). Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of instruction with progress monitoring and formative evaluation in the outcomes driven model. Cognitive and neurocognitive aspects of learning: Abilities and disabilities international conference May 19–21, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. (2014). The disruptive potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 18(1), 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V. (2009). Australian Indigenous students: Addressing equity issues in assessment. Teaching Education, 20(1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. M., & Lewis, M. J. (2015). Professional learning through MOOCs?: A trans-disciplinary framework for building knowledge, inquiry, and expertise. In L. McKay & J. Lenarcic (Eds.), Macro-level learning through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Strategies and predictions for the future. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, S., & Griffin, P. (2015). Mining a MOOC: What our MOOC taught us about professional learning, teaching and assessment. In L. McKay & J. Lenarcic (Eds.), Macro-Level learning through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Strategies and predictions for the future. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, S., & Stearns, E. (2012). Tracking Success High School Curricula and Labor Market Outcomes by Race and Gender. Urban Education, 47(6), 1025–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlenweg, A. M., & Puhani, P. A. (2010). The evolution of the school-entry age effect in a school tracking system. Journal of Human Resources, 45(2), 407–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved on October 10, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=1

  • Porter, S. (2015). To MOOC or not to MOOC: How can online learning help to build the future of higher education? Waltham, MA: Chandos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, G. (2000). Revitalising teaching: Critical times, critical choices. Sydney: NSW DET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., Crozier, G., James, D., Hollingworth, S., Williams, K., Jamieson, F., & Beedell, P. (2008). Re‐invigorating democracy?: White middle class identities and comprehensive schooling. The Sociological Review, 56(2), 238–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, J. (2015). Rebooting MOOC research. Science, 347(6217), 34–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, R. (2013). Measuring the MOOC dropout rate. Inside Higher Education, 8, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F. (2011). Theorizing student mobility in an era of globalization. Teachers and Teaching, 17(6), 693–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/ Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm

  • Siemens, G. (2013). Massive Open Online Courses: Innovation in education? In R. McGreal, W. Kinuthia, & S. Marshall (Eds.), Open Educational Resources: Innovation, research and practice. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoek, M., Swennen, A., & Van der Klink, M. (2011). The quality of teacher educators in the European policy debate: Actions and measures to improve the professionalism of teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 37(5), 651–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2011). The cultural politics of nation and migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron-Moore, P. N. (2013). Preparing Students for Global Citizenship: Role Play as a Pedagogical Tool. In 2013 APSA Teaching and Learning Conference Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., & Rose, C. P. (2013, December). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS Data-Driven Education Workshop (Vol. 11, p. 14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L., Powell, S., & JISC CETIS. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education: A White Paper. Accessed from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Dabrowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dabrowski, A., Lodge, J.M. (2017). Pedagogy, Practice, and the Allure of Open Online Courses: Implications for Schools and Their Students. In: Marcus-Quinn, A., Hourigan, T. (eds) Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33806-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33808-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics