Skip to main content

Multiwinner Voting in Genetic Algorithms for Solving Ill-Posed Global Optimization Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Evolutionary Computation (EvoApplications 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9597))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Genetic algorithms are a group of powerful tools for solving ill-posed global optimization problems in continuous domains. In case in which the insensitivity of the fitness function is the main obstacle, the most desired feature of a genetic algorithm is its ability to explore plateaus of the fitness function, surrounding its minimizers. In this paper we suggest a way of maintaining diversity of the population in the plateau regions, based on a new approach for the selection based on the theory of multiwinner elections among autonomous agents. The paper delivers a detailed description of the new selection algorithm, computational experiments that guide the choice of the proper multiwinner rule to use, and a preliminary experiment showing the proposed algorithm’s effectiveness in exploring a fitness function’s plateau.

The work presented in this paper has been partially supported by Polish NCN grant no. DEC-2015/17/B/ST6/01867 and by the AGH grant no. 11.11.230.124.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From the point of view of the elections theory, our setting is an example of two-dimensional Euclidean single-peaked preferences. Under two-dimensional Euclidean preferences, every voter and every candidate is a point in a two-dimensional Euclidean space and every voter (in our case, every individual) derives his or her preference orders by sorting the candidates (in our case, the individuals) with respect to their Euclidean distance from him or herself.

References

  1. Zeidler, E.: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Application: II/A: Linear Monotone Operators. Springer, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Črepinšek, M., Liu, S.H., Mernik, M.: Exploration and exploitation in evolutionary algorithms: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 45(3), 3–35 (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta, D., Ghafir, S.: An overview of methods maintaining diversity in genetic algorithms. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2(5), 56–60 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schaefer, R.: Foundation of Genetic Global Optimization (with Chap. 6 by Telega H.). Studies in Computational Intelligence Series, vol. 74. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg, D., Richardson, J.: Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. genetic algorithms and their applications. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 41–49 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bosman, P., Thierens, D.: The balance between proximity and diversity in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7(2), 174–188 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hutter, M.: Fitness uniform selection to preserve genetic diversity. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Congres of Evolutionary Computation, pp. 783–788 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matsui, K.: New selection method to improve the population diversity in genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 625–630 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elkind, E., Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., Slinko, A.: Properties of multiwinner voting rules. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 53–60, May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chamberlin, B., Courant, P.: Representative deliberations and representative decisions: proportional representation and the Borda rule. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 77(3), 718–733 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monroe, B.: Fully proportional representation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 89(4), 925–940 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Budgeted social choice: from consensus to personalized decision making. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 280–286 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Skowron, P., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.: Fully proportional representation as resource allocation: approximability results. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 353–359. AAAI Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Procaccia, A., Rosenschein, J., Zohar, A.: On the complexity of achieving proportional representation. Soc. Choice Welfare 30(3), 353–362 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Betzler, N., Slinko, A., Uhlmann, J.: On the computation of fully proportional representation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 47, 475–519 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Skowron, P., Yu, L., Faliszewski, P., Elkind, E.: The complexity of fully proportional representation for single-crossing electorates. In: Vöcking, B. (ed.) SAGT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8146, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Elkind, E., Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P.: A characterization of the single-peaked single-crossing domain. In: Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 654–660 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nemhauser, G., Wolsey, L., Fisher, M.: An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions. Math. Program. 14(1), 265–294 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Schaefer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Faliszewski, P., Sawicki, J., Schaefer, R., Smołka, M. (2016). Multiwinner Voting in Genetic Algorithms for Solving Ill-Posed Global Optimization Problems. In: Squillero, G., Burelli, P. (eds) Applications of Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31204-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31204-0_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31203-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31204-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics