Skip to main content

The Complexity of Fully Proportional Representation for Single-Crossing Electorates

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8146))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the complexity of winner determination in single-crossing elections under two classic fully proportional representation rules—Chamberlin–Courant’s rule and Monroe’s rule. Winner determination for these rules is known to be NP-hard for unrestricted preferences. We show that for single-crossing preferences this problem admits a polynomial-time algorithm for Chamberlin–Courant’s rule, but remains NP-hard for Monroe’s rule. Our algorithm for Chamberlin–Courant’s rule can be modified to work for elections with bounded single-crossing width. To circumvent the hardness result for Monroe’s rule, we consider single-crossing elections that satisfy an additional constraint, namely, ones where each candidate is ranked first by at least one voter (such elections are called narcissistic). For single-crossing narcissistic elections, we provide an efficient algorithm for the egalitarian version of Monroe’s rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barberà, S., Moreno, B.: Top monotonicity: A common root for single peakedness, single crossing and the median voter result. Games and Economic Behavior 73(2), 345–359 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartholdi III, J., Trick, M.: Stable matching with preferences derived from a psychological model. Operations Research Letters 5(4), 165–169 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Betzler, N., Slinko, A., Uhlmann, J.: On the computation of fully proportional representation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 47, 475–519 (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bredereck, R., Chen, J., Woeginger, G.: A characterization of the single-crossing domain. Social Choice and Welfare (to appear, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chamberlin, B., Courant, P.: Representative deliberations and representative decisions: Proportional representation and the borda rule. American Political Science Review 77(3), 718–733 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cornaz, D., Galand, L., Spanjaard, O.: Bounded single-peaked width and proportional representation. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 270–275 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cornaz, D., Galand, L., Spanjaard, O.: Kemeny elections with bounded single-peaked or single-crossing width. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 76–82 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elkind, E., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.: Clone structures in voters’ preferences. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 496–513 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Budgeted social choice: From consensus to personalized decision making. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 280–286 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mirrlees, J.: An exploration in the theory of optimal income taxation. Review of Economic Studies 38, 175–208 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Monroe, B.: Fully proportional representation. American Political Science Review 89(4), 925–940 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Potthoff, R., Brams, S.: Proportional representation: Broadening the options. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10(2), 147–178 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Procaccia, A., Rosenschein, J., Zohar, A.: On the complexity of achieving proportional representation. Social Choice and Welfare 30(3), 353–362 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Saporiti, A., Tohmé, F.: Single-crossing, strategic voting and the median choice rule. Social Choice and Welfare 26(2), 363–383 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Skowron, P., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.: Achieving fully proportional representation is easy in practice. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 399–406 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Skowron, P., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.: Fully proportional representation as resource allocation: Approximability results. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 353–359 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skowron, P., Yu, L., Faliszewski, P., Elkind, E.: The complexity of fully proportional representation for single-crossing electorates. Technical Report arXiv:1307.1252 [cs.GT], arXiv.org (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, L., Chan, H., Elkind, E.: Multiwinner elections under preferences that are single-peaked on a tree. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 425–431 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skowron, P., Yu, L., Faliszewski, P., Elkind, E. (2013). The Complexity of Fully Proportional Representation for Single-Crossing Electorates. In: Vöcking, B. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8146. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41392-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41392-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41391-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41392-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics