Skip to main content

Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Chapter
Principles of Laparoscopic Surgery

Abstract

The preceding chapters in this text confirm how far laparoscopic surgery has progressed in the last four years. The complexity of laparoscopic procedures now being done attests to the dexterity, safety record, and ingenuity of the pioneers in this field. Basic and advanced laparoscopic surgery is safe but not risk-free. The rates of major and minor complications range from 0.5 to 5%. Mortality rates of gynecologic laparoscopic procedures are less than 0.1%.1–3 These rates may decrease but complications will not be eliminated. Awareness and understanding of the manner in which complications develop may reduce their occurrence. This chapter will summarize the major complications of newer laparoscopic procedures as well as those relating to the index operation, laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Many of the complications cited have been noted, analyzed, and corrected by laparoscopic gynecologists. They spared the general surgeons who later became interested much effort. These specialists have not received the credit they are due.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Levinson CJ, Hulka JF, Richardson DC. Laparoscopy. In: Schaefer G, Graber EA, eds. Complications in Obstetric and Gynecologic Surgery. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row, 1981. p.281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Philips JM. Complications in laparoscopy. Int J Gynaecology & Obstetrics 1977; 15:157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Philips JM, Hulka JF, Keith L. Laparoscopic procedures: AASGL membership survey for 1975. J Reproductive Med 1977; 18:227–288.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rose KD, Cohen MM, Soutter DI. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the anaesthetist’s view. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39(8):809–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodale RL, Beebe DS, McNevin MP et al. Hemodynamic, respiratory and metabolic effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J of Surg 1993; 166:533–537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson D, Litwin D, Osachof J, et al. Postoperative respiratory function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992; 2:221–226.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Putensen-Himmer G, Putensen C, Lammer H et al. Functional residual capacity, postoperative lung function, and gas exchange following open laparotomy or laparoscopy for cholecystectomy (abstract). Anesthesiology 1992; 77:A1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McAllister JD, D’Altoria RA, Snyder A. CT findings after uncomplicated percutaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Computer Assisted Tomo 1991; 15(5):770–772.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Craig DB. Postoperative recovery of pulmonary function. Anesth Analg 1981; 60:46–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wahba RWM. Perioperative functional residual capacity. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38:384–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shulman S, Chuter BM, Weissman C. Dynamic respiratory patterns after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (abstract). Anesthesiology 1991; 75:A136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pascual JB, Barnada MU, Turrero MT, et al. Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, bilateral pneumothorax and pneumopericardium after laparoscopy. Endoscopy 1990; 22:59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussain NH. Bilateral pneumothorax associated with laparoscopy: A case report of rare hazard and review of the literature. Anaesthesia 1973; 28:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heddle RM. Tension pneumothorax during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg April 1992; 79(4):374.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stein HF. Complications of artificial pneumoperitoneum. Am Rev Tuberc 1951; 64:645–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wittgen CM, Andrus CH, Fitzgerald SD, et al. Analysis of the hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1991; 126:997–1001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelman GR, Swapp GH, Smith I, et al. Cardiac output and arterial blood gas tension during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1972; 44:1155–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Motew M, Ivankovich AD, Bieniorz J, et al. Cardiovascular effects and acid-base and blood gas changes during laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 115:1002–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McLaughlin JG, Bonnell BW, Scheeres DE, et al. The adverse hemodynamic effects related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (abstract). Anesthesiology 1992; 77:A70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Joris J, Honore P, Lamy M. Changes in oxygen transport and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (abstract). Anesthesiology 1992; 77:A149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kashtan J, Green JF, Parsons EQ, et al. Hemodynamic effects of increased abdominal pressure. J Surg Res 1981; 30:249–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992; 2:191–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Borton M. Laparoscopic Complications Prevention and Management Toronto: IBC Decker, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scott DB, Julian DG. Observations on cardiac arrhythmias during laparoscopy. Br Med J 1992; 1:411–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Carmichael DE. Laparoscopy: Cardiac considerations. Fertil Steril 1971; 22:69–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shifren JL, Adlestein L, Finkler NJ. Asystolic cardiac arrest: A rare complication of laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol May 1992; 79:5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hulka JF, Soderstrom RM, Corson SL, et al. Complications committee of the American Association of Gynecological Laparoscopists: First annual report. J Reprod Med 1973; 10:301–306.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Diamant M, Benumoa JL, Saidman LJ, et al. Laparoscopic sterilization with local anesthesia: Complications and blood gas changes. Anesth Analg 1977; 56:335–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelman GR, Swapp GM, Smith I, et al. Cardiac output and arterial blood gas tension during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1972; 44:1155–1161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Myles PS. Bradyarrythmias and laparoscopy of prospective study of heart rate changes with laparoscopy. Austral-New Zealand J of OB-GYN 1991; 3:171–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bard PA, Chen L. Subcutaneous emphysema associated with laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 1990; 71:100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stanton JM. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anaesthesia 1991; 46:317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Beattie WS, Lindblad T, Buckley DN, et al. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women is influenced by the day of the menstrual cycle. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38:298–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hovorka J, Korttila K, Erkola O. Nitrous oxide does not increase nausea and vomiting following gynaecological laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36(2):145–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenblum M, Weller RS, Conard PL, et al. Ibuprofen provides longer lasting analgesia than fentanyl after laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 1991; 73:255–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Albert KS, Gernaat CM. Pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen. Am J Med 1984; 77:40–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Narchi P, Benhamov D, Fernandez H. Intraperitoneal local anesthetic for shoulder pain after day case laparoscopy. Lancet 1991; 338:1569–1570.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yuzpee AA. Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy: A survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. J Reprod Med 1990; 35:485–490.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Riedel HN, Willenbrock R, Lehnmann E, et al. The frequency of distribution of various pelviscopic operations, including complication rates: Statistics of the Federal Republic of Germany in the years 1983–1985. 2 Entralbl Gynakol 1989; 111:78–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Aivan MA. Report on presentation at the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Gen Surg News, July 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kaalis G, Barad DH. Incidence of bowel injury due to dense adhesions at the sight of direct trocar insertion. J Repr Med 1992; 37:617–618.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Byron JW, Markenson G, Miyazawa K. A randomized comparison of Verres needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 177:259–262.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, et al. Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78(l):148–149.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Baadsqaard SE, Bille S, Egeblad K. Major vascular injury during gynecologic laparoscopy; Report of case and review of published cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989; 68:283–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Corson SL, Batzer FR, Gocial B, et al. Measurement of the force necessary for laparoscopic trocar entry. J Reprod Med 1989; 34:282–284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Soderstrom RM, Levy BS. Bowel injuries during laparoscopy: Causes and medicolegal questions. Continuing Obs Gynecol 1986; 27:41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Voyles CR, Tucker RD. Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery. Am J Surg 1992; 165:57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Park YH, Usanian Z. Obstructive jaundice after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with electrocautery. Amer Surg 1992; 58:321–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Landen SM. Laparoscopic surgery and tumor seeding. Surgery 1993; 114:1.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Landen SM. Laparoscopic surgery and tumor seeding. Surgery 1993; 114:131.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Russi EG, Pergolizzi S, Mesiti M, et al. Unusual relapse of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1992; 70(6):1485–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Cooperman AM. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Difficult Cases and Creative Solutions. Quality Med Pub., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cooperman A, Neff R, Washington M. Gallstone induced abscesses: treatment by combined percutaneous approaches (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Johnston RV, Lawson NW, Nealen WH. Lower extremity neuropathy after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:835.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Maio A, Ruchman RB. CT diagnosis of post laparoscopic hernia. J of Computer Assisted Tomography 1991; 15:1054–1055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooperman, A.M. (1995). Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery. In: Arregui, M.E., Fitzgibbons, R.J., Katkhouda, N., McKernan, J.B., Reich, H. (eds) Principles of Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2480-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2480-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7555-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2480-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics