Abstract
This investigation was carried out to reveal the comparative production performances and effect of some environmental factors on the wool characteristics of Arkharmerino × Ghezel and Arkharmerino × Moghani crossbred sheep in third generation. The research material consisted of fleece samples taken during a period of two years (2007-2008) from the midside region of the animals. Each sample was measured for average fibre diameter, fibre diameter variability, staple length, proportion of medullated fibre, proportion of kemp and comfort factor. The comparative values for these fleece characteristics in F3th Arkharmerino × Ghezel were 28.78 ± 0.48µ, 36.84 ± 1.16%, 11.94 ± 0.35 cm, 7.07 ± 0.93%, 1.02 ± 0.23% and 68.93% and for, Arkharmerino × Moghani were, 29.79 ± 0.43µ, 41.86 ± 1.16%, 11.96 ± 0.37 cm, 8.13 ± 1.06%, 2.71 ± 0.45% and 63.33 ± 3.66% respectively. The effects of genotype, sex, birth type, and year of birth were studied. Genotype had a significant (P < 0.01) effect on average fibre diameter and proportion of kemp and Arkharmerino × Ghezel crossbreeds had lower diameter with a smaller proportion of kemp. The two differences in fibre characteristics that were attributable to sex were fibre diameter variability and proportion of medullated fibre and females had higher amounts than males for both trait. As a result of the statistical analysis, it was found that crossing with Arkharmerino generally had positive effects on the fleece, favouring its use in the hand-woven authentic carpet industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AWTA (Australian Wool and Textile Association), 2008. Wool diameter: fact and fiction. Australian Wool and Textile Association. Available at: http://www.awta.com.au/Publications/FactSheets/FactSheet005.htm.
Ayala C., 1999. Características físicas de la fibra de llams jóvenes. Progress in South American Camelids Research. EAAP Publication No. 105, pp. 27–34.
Bunge R., D.L. Thomas, T.G. Nash and C.J. Lupton, 1996. Performance of Hair Breeds and Prolific Wool Breeds of Sheep in Southern Illinois: Wool Production and Fleece Quality. Journal of Animal Science, 74: 25–30.
Cedillo R.M., W. Hohenboken and J. Drummond, 1977. Genetic and environmental effects on age at first estrus and on wool and lamb production of crossbred ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science, 44: 948.
Çolakoglu N, and C. Özebyaz, 1999. Comparison of some production traits in Malya and Akkaraman sheep. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 23: 351–360.
Çolakoglu S.G. and M. Evrum, 2000. Comparative studies on the production performances of Chios and Imroz breeds kept under semi-intensive conditionus II. Milk production, fleece yields and characteristics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 24: 545–552.
Dashab G., M.A. Edriss, A.A. Ghare Aghaji, H. Movasagh and M.A. Nilforooshan, 2006. Wool fiber quality of Naeini sheep. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2: 270–276.
Delgado J., A. Valle Zarate and C. Mamani, 1999. Fiber quality of a Bolivian meat-oriented llama population. Progress in South American Camelids Research EAAP Publication, 105: 101–109.
Delgado J., 2003. Perspectivas de la produccióon de fibra de llama en Bolivia. Dissertation, Universität Hohenheim, Germany.
Demir H. and H. Baspinar, 1992. Production performance of Kivircik sheep under semi-intensive conditions. 2. Fertility, milk production, body weight and wool characteristics of ewes. Journal of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University, 17: 13–24.
Dick J.L. and R.M.W. Sumner, 1996. Development of fiber and follicle characteristics related to wool bulk in Perendale sheep over the first year of life. Proceedings ofthe New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 56: 314–318.
Fahmy M.H., 1987. The accumulative effect of Finnsheep breeding in crossbreeding schemes: wool production and fleece characteristics. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 67: 1–11.
Iniguez L.C., R. Alem, A. Wauer and J. Mueller, 1998. Fleece types, fiber characteristics and production system of an outstanding llama population from Southern Bolivia. Small Ruminant Research, 30: 57–65.
Kempester A.J., D. Croston, D.R. Guy and D.W. Jones, 1987. Growth and carcass characteristics of crossbred lambs by ten sire breed, compared at the same estimated carcass subcutaneous fat proportion. Animal Production, 44: 83–98.
Lupton C.J., B.A. Freking and K.A. Leymaster, 2004. Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: III. Wool characteristics of Fj ewes. Journal of Animal Science, 82: 2293–2300.
Lupton C.J., A. McColl and R.H. Stobart, 2006. Fiber characteristics of the Huacaya Alpaca. Small Ruminant Research, 64: 211–224.
Martínez Z., L.C. Iniguez and T. Rodríguez, 1997. Influence of effects on quality traits and relationships between traits of the llama fleece. Small Ruminant Research, 24: 203–212.
McGregor B.A. and K.L. Butler, 2004. Sources of variation in fiber diameter attributes of Australian alpacas and implication for fleece evaluation and animal selection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55: 433–442.
Mehta S.C., S.K. Choprn, V.K. Singh, M. Ayub and V. Mahrotra, 2004. Production and quality of wool in Magra breed of sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 74: 792–794.
Mokhber M., 2005. Evaluation of wool characteristics of Arkharmerino × Ghezel and Arkharmerino × Moghani crossbreed sheep in second generation. MSc Thesis, University of Tabriz, Iran.
Parra G., 1999. Evaluacion del potencial productivo de la llama en la quinta seccion municipal charana. Tesis Ing. Agr., Universidad Mayor de San Simon, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Rafat S.A., H. de Rochambeau, M. Brims, R.G. Thebault, S. Deretz, M. Bonnet and D. Allain, 2007. Characteristics of Angora rabbit fiber using optical fiber diameter analyzer. Journal of Animal Science, 85: 3116–3122.
SAS Institute Inc., 2004. SAS/STAT Software Release 9.1.SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Safari E., N.M. Fogarty and A.R. Gilmour, 2005. A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science, 92: 271–289.
Shodja J., T. Farahvash and S.A. Rafat, 2004. The evaluation of fleece characteristics in ArkharmerinoxMoghani F1 crossbreds. Proceedings of the 11th AAAP Animal Science Congress. 5-9th September. Kuala Lumpour, Malaysia, pp. 624–626.
Sidwell G.M., R.L. Wilson and M.E. Hourihan, 1973. Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. IV: effect of crossbreeding on wool production. Journal of Animal Science, 32: 1099–1102.
Tabbaa M.J., W.A. Al-Azzawi and D. Campbell, 2001. Variation in fleece characteristics of Awassi sheep at different ages. Small Ruminant Research, 41: 95–100.
Tekin M.E., M. Gurkan and R. Kadak, 1998. The wool characteristics of Akkaraman, Awassi and their F1 and B1 crossbreed with German Blackheaded Mutton and Hampshire Down breed. Animal Breeding and Genetics, 118: 92–94.
Wolf B.T., C. Smith and D.I. Sales, 1980. Growth and carcass composition in the crossbred progeny of six terminal sire breeds of sheep. Animal Production, 31: 307–313.
Wurzinger M., J. Delgado, M. Nurnberg, A. Valle Zarate, A. Stemmer, G. Ugarte and J. Sölkner, 2005. Genetic and non- genetic factors influencing fiber quality of Bolivian llamas. Small Ruminant Research, 61: 131–139.
Yilmaz A., M. Ozcan, B. Ekiz, A. Ceyhan and A. Altinel, 2003. The body weights and wool characteristics of the indigenous Imroz and Kivircik sheep breeds of Turkey. Wool technology and sheep breeding, 51: 16–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Esfandyari, H., Aslaminejad, A.A., Rafat, S.A. (2011). Genetic and non-genetic factors influencing fibre quality of Arkharmerino × Ghezel and Arkharmerino × Moghani crossbreeds of sheep in third generation. In: Pérez-Cabal, M.Á., Gutiérrez, J.P., Cervantes, I., Alcalde, M.J. (eds) Fibre production in South American camelids and other fibre animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-727-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-727-1_5
Publisher Name: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen
Online ISBN: 978-90-8686-727-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)