Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to revisit the concept of tecnologia social, social technology in English, from a sociomaterial perspective. In my investigation of South American writings on social innovation, I found a vast and rich literature describing, analysing and theorizing around grassroots social innovations from the perspective of the underlying arrangements among people, artefacts and practices that brings an interesting view to the relationship between technology and society. The term tecnologia social is applied to those sociomaterial arrangements or assemblages whose goal is to promote social transformation. I am talking about a long tradition that seems to have started with Gandhi in India around the beginning of the twentieth century, had numerous but ephemeral trajectories in Europe and North America, and ended by reaching the minds of South American researchers and practitioners of social innovation by the 1960s. There, it has been transformed, blended and remixed, and its impacts have been very prolific.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahmad, A. (1989). Evaluating appropriate technology for development: before and after. Evaluation Review, 13 (3), 310–319.
Albuquerque, L. C. (2009). Tecnologias Sociais ou Tecnologias Apropriadas? O Resgate de um Termo. In Otterloo, A. (ed.). Tecnologias Sociais: caminhos para a sustentabilidade. Brasilia: Rede de Tecnologia Social, 15–24.
Alves, M. A. & Pozzebon, M. (2013). How to resist linguistic domination and promote knowledge diversity? Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53 (5), 629–633.
Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of Bicycles. Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Bourrières, P. (1983). La adaptaci?n de la tecnologÃa a los recursos disponibles. In A. Robinson (ed.). TecnologÃas apropiadas para el desarrollo del tercer mundo, 21–31. México: Fondo de Cultura Econ?mica (FCE).
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers R. D., Henfridsson O., Newell, S. & Vidgen, R. (2014). The sociomateriality of information systems: current status, future directions. MIS Quarterly, 38 (3), 809–830.
Chataway, J., Hanlin, R., Mugwagwa, J. & Muraguri, L. (2010). Global health social technologies: Reflections on evolving theories and landscapes. Research Policy, 39 (10), 1277–1288.
Dagnino, R. (ed.) (2009). Tecnologia Social: ferramenta para construir outra sociedade. Campinas, Sao Paulo: Instituto de Geociências da Unicamp.
Dagnino, R., Brandão, F. & Novaes, H. T. (2004). Sobre o marco analÃtico-conceitual da Tecnologia Social. In A. Lassance Jr. et al. Tecnologia Social: uma estratégia para o desenvolvimento, 15–64. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Banco do Brasil.
Darrow, K., Keller, K. & Palm, R. (1981). Appropriate Technology Sourcebook. Stanford: Volunteers in Asia Publications, vol. I–II.
Dickson, D. (1974). Alternative Technology and the Politics of Technical Change. London: Fontana.
Diniz, E. H. (2013) Correspondentes bancários e bancos comunitários de desenvolvimento. In Instituto Palmas (org) Banco Palmas 15 anos: resistindo e inovando, 75–82. São Paulo: A9 Editora.
Diniz, E., Jayo, M., Pozzebon, M., Lavoie, F. & Voguel, F. (2013). ICT helping to scale up microfinance: the case of a successful bank-MFI partnership in Brazil. Journal of Global Information Management, Special Issue on ICT in Brazil: Global Issues and Challenges, 22 (1), 34–50.
Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin Press.
Escobar, A. (2010). Latin America at a crossroads: alternative modernizations, postliberalism or postdevelopment? Cultural Studies, 24 (1), 1–65.
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fonseca, R. & Serafim, M. (2009). A Tecnologia Social e seus arranjos institucionais. In R. Dagnino (ed.). Tecnologia Social: ferramenta para construir outra sociedade, 154–183. Campinas, São Paulo: Instituto de Geociências de Unicamp.
Fraga, L. S. (2011). Autogestão e tecnologia social: utopia e engajamento. In É. A. Benini, M. S. Faria & H. T. Novaes (eds). Gestão pública e sociedade: fundamentos e polÃticas públicas de economia solidária, 101–124. São Paulo: Outras Expressões.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Hart, M. A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: the development of an indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1 (1), 1–16.
Henderson, C. R. (1901). The scope of social technology. The American Journal of Sociology, 6 (4), 465–486.
Herrera, A. (1983). Transferencia de tecnologÃa y tecnologÃas apropiadas: contribuci?n a uma vision prospectiva a largo plazo. Campinas, Brazil: Editora da Unicamp.
Instituto Palmas (2013). Available at: http://www.institutobancopalmas.org/.
Jayo, M., Pozzebon, M. & Diniz, E. (2009). Microcredit and Innovative Local Development in Fortaleza, Brazil: the Case of Banco Palmas. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, Special Issue on Social Innovation and Territorial Development, Edited by J.-L. Klein, 32 (1), 115–128.
Jecquier, N. (1976). Appropriate Technology: Problems and Promises. Paris & Washington: OECD Publications.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Li, C. & Bernoff, J. (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
MacKenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Melo, J. (2014) Viva a Favela! São Paulo: Editora Ideias & Letras.
Mumford, L. (1964). Authoritarian and democratic technics. Technology and Culture, 5 (1), 1–8.
Neder, R. T. & Thomas, H. (2010). The Movement for Social Technology in Latin-America. Available at: http://www.barcelona.degrowth.org/fileadmin/content/documents/Proceedings/Neder.pdf.
Nelson, R. R. & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44, 31–54.
Novaes, H. T. & Dias, R. B. (2010). Contribuições ao marco analÃtico-conceitual da tecnologia social. In: Dagnino, R. (ed.) Tecnologia social: ferramenta para construir outra sociedade. 2nd edition, 113–154. Campinas, Brazil: Editora da Unicamp.
Otterloo, A (2009). Tecnologias Sociais: caminhos para a sustentabilidade. BrasÃlia: Rede de Tecnologia Social.
Pack, H. (1983). PolÃticas de estÃmulo al uso de tecnologÃa intermedia. In A. Robinson (ed.). TecnologÃas apropiadas para el desarrollo del tercer mundo, 209–226. México: Fondo de Cultura Econ?mica (FCE).
Pena, J. O. & Mello, C. J. (2004). Tecnologia Social: a experiência da Fundação Banco do Brasil na disseminação e reaplicação de soluções sociais efetivas. In Fundaçao Banco Do Brasil, Tecnologia Social: uma estratégia para o desenvolvimento, 83–88. Rio de Janeiro: Fundaçao Banco do Brasil.
Pinch, T. & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (eds). The Social Construction of Technological Systems, 17–50. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pozzebon, M. (2014). Reapplying is reframing: the challenge of replicating social innovations among different context, Working Paper. Québec, Canada: Centre de Recherche sur les innovations sociales (CRISES).
Robinson, A. (1983) (ed.). Tecnologias apropiadas para el desarrollo del tercer mundo, México: Fondo de Cultura Econ?mica (FCE).
Riskin, K. (1983). La tecnologÃa intermedia de las industrias rurales de China. In A. Robinson (ed.). TecnologÃas apropiadas para el desarrollo del tercer mundo, 75–100. México: Fondo de Cultura Econ?mica (FCE).
RTS (2010) (Org.). Tecnologia Social e Desenvolvimento Sustentável: Contribuições da RTS para a formulação de uma PolÃtica de Estado de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, BrasÃlia, Brazil: Secretaria Executiva da Rede de Tecnologia Social.
Rybczynski, W. (1980). Paper Heroes: A Review of Appropriate Technology. Dorchester: Prism Press.
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is Beautiful; Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Harper and Row.
Thomas, H. (2009). TecnologÃas para la inclusi?n social y polÃticas públicas en América latina. Buenos Aires: Redtisa. Available at: http://www.redtisa.org/Hernan-Thomas-Tecnologias-para-la-inclusion-social-y-politicas-publicas-en-America-Latina.pdf>.
Thomas, H. & Buch, A. (2013). Actos, actores y artefactos. SociologÃa de la TecnologÃa, Bernal, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes Editorial.
Vanhulst, J. & Beling, A. (2014). Buen vivir: emergent discourse within or beyond sustainable development? Ecological Economics, 101, 54–63.
Van Oudenhoven, N. & Wazir, R. (1998) Replicating Social Programmes — Approaches, Strategies and Conceptual Issues. Management of Social Transformation MOST — UNESCO Discussion Series N. 18. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/most/dsp18.htm.
Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 121–136.52–72
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Marlei Pozzebon
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pozzebon, M. (2015). Tecnologia Social: A South American View of the Regulatory Relationship between Technology and Society. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N., Lanzara, G.F., Mukherjee, A. (eds) Materiality, Rules and Regulation. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552648_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552648_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55262-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55264-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)