Abstract
One might just as well be machinic rather than literate, in the way one would “rather be a cyborg than a goddess.” Literacies are certainly “legion” but reach semantic saturation or exaggeration against an analog of mediation and machination.1 The sheen of the “new” is worn and tarnished, yet literacies are wont to saturate, while exhaustion sets in against a failure to reduce or subject everything to literal experience. Of course, the saturation of half of the thesis is well explored and exploited, but the machinic counterpart to the literate is entirely underplayed. Whether preliterate, aliterate, literate, or postliterate, the technological is characterized by machineries. Technologies and literacies are inseparable, subjected to the service of one another, but “machineries” productively generate a wide range of pre-and postliterate practices. To simplify, literacies signify reading and writing, while machineries signify processing and designing; literacies signify acquisition and gatherings, while machineries signify diffusion and assemblages. Both have realized significant semantic expansion and basically signify the creation of meaning, although for the latter, it is more a process of machining. With no intention of negating the literate, the goal is to recognize generations and significations of machineries over time. Documenting the exhaustion of literacies, this chapter informs and elaborates our conversation about what we have, know, or can acquire with what we became or what is becoming of human-machine assemblages, diffusion, and cyborgenic machinations. Henceforth and once again, claims staked on dimensions of natural, cultural, and artificial experience are contested: is it literacies or machineries at work and play?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Donna J. Haraway, “Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s,” Socialist Review 80 (June 1985): 65–108, on 101;
Jay Lemke, “Metamedia Literacy: Transforming Meanings and Media,” in Handbook of Literacy and Technology, eds. David Reinking, Michael C. McKenna, Linda D. Labbo, and Ronald D. Kieffer (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 283– 301, on 283.
See, for example, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane (New York: Viking, 1972/1977);
Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980/1987);
Félix Guattari, The Machinic Unconscious: Essays in Schizoanalysis, trans. Taylor Adkins (Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 1979/2011);
Félix Guattari, Chaosmosis: An Ethico - Aesthetic Paradigm, trans. Paul Bains and Julian Pefanis (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992/1995);
John Johnston, The Allure of Machinic Life (Cambridge, Postliterate Machineries 39 MA: MIT Press, 2008 );
Alistair Welchman, “Machinic Thinking,” in Deleuze and Philosophy, ed. Keith A. Pearson (New York: Routledge, 1997), 211–29.
Dave H. Ravindra, Adama Ouane, and Peter Sutton, “Editorial Introduction,” International Review of Education 35 (1989): 383–87, on 383
Dave H. Ravindra, Adama Ouane, and Peter Sutton, “Issues in Post- Literacy,” International Review of Education 35 (1989): 389–408
Sean Regan, “Postmodern Tenor,” AQ: Australian Quarterly 71 (September– October 1999): 6– 9, on 8; Nyíri, “The Humanities,” 113; Kristóf Nyíri, “Post- Literacy as a Source of Twentieth-Century Philosophy,” Synthese 130 (February 2002): 185– 99; and Kristóf Nyíri, “The Networked Mind,” Studies in East European Thought 60 (June 2008): 149– 58.
On the postperson, see Kedrick James, “Writing Post- Person: Literacy, Poetics, and Sustainability in the Age of Disposable Discourse” ( PhD diss., University of British Columbia, 2008 ), 3
and Allen Buchanan, “Moral Status and Human Enhancement,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (2009): 346– 81.
For the cyborg future, see Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline, “Cyborgs and Space,” Astronautics (September 1960): 26–27, 74–76, on 27.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 John R. Dakers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petrina, S. (2014). Postliterate Machineries. In: Dakers, J.R. (eds) New Frontiers in Technological Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394750_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394750_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-38632-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39475-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)