Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Social Solidarity

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity

Abstract

We believe it is necessary to understand solidarity as one mode of relation or operation among others in human social life. It is not the only mode of human relations in social life, but it is also a distinct type of human relating that is fundamental and necessary. In contrast to this multimode view of different types of human social relations, sociological theory has long been tempted to reduce all of human social experience to one or another mode of operation. One approach frames human social life as all about the group struggles for domination and status on fields of contention. Another theorizes social existence as all about actors following norms toward the meeting of the social system’s functional requisites to ensure society’s survival and proper functioning. Still another conceives of humans as atomistic, rational cost-benefit calculators seeking to maximize their own utility. The list of reductionistic theories that compress the complexities of human social life into one-dimensional descriptive and explanatory frameworks could be lengthened. By contrast, we approach the question as critical realists, understanding the task of social science to be best described by the philosophy of critical realism (Bhaskar 1979, 2008; C. Smith 2010; Danermark et al. 2002; Archer 1995; Sayer 1992). That means in part that we understand reality to be differentiated, stratified, emergent, and complex; that the job of theory is to well describe what exists in reality and how it works; and so theory must strive toward “adequate complexity” in its descriptive and explanatory accounts to capture and represent the real multidimensional nature of human life and experience, instead of providing what turn out to be simplistic accounts in the name of parsimony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, Dominic and Michael Hogg. 1990. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey. 2006. The Civil Sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1992. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret. 2013. “Solidarity and Governance.” Unpublished paper. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartky Sandra Lee. 2002. “Sympathy and Solidarity.” Pp. 69–89 in Sympathy and Solidarity and Other Essays, edited by Sandra Lee Bartky. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. 1991. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C, D. Lishner, A. Carpenter, L. Dulin, S. Harjusola-Webb, E. Stocks, S. Gale, O. Hassan, and B. Sampat. 2003. “As You Would Have Them Do unto You”: Does Imagining Yourself in the Other’s Place Stimulate Moral Action?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29:1190–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. 1995. “Prosocial Motivation: Why Do We Help Others?” Pp. 333–381 in Advances in Social Psychology, edited by A. Tesser. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayertz, Kurt. 1999. “Four Uses of ‘Solidarity.’” Pp. 3–28 in Solidarity, edited by K. Bayertz. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76:169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benlord, Robert and Scott Hunt. 1992. “Dramaturgy and Social Movements: The Social Construction and Communication of Power.” Sociological Inquiry 62:36–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. London: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy. 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, Hans-Werner. 2002. Prosocial Behaviour. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, Hans-Werner and Detlef Fetchenhauer. 2006. “How to Explain Prosocial and Solidary Behavior: A Comparison of Framing Theory with Related Meta-Theoretical Paradigms.” Pp. 225–242 in Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, edited by D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, and S. M. Lindenberg. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, Hans-Werner and E. Rohmann. 2004. “Altruistic Personality in the Context of the Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis.” European Journal of Personality 18:351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert. 1939. “Collective Behavior.” Pp. 221–280 in An Outline of the Principles of Sociology, edited by R. E. Park. New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2005. Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Translated by Jefferey Flynn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Craig. 2002. “Imagining Solidarity: Cosmopolitanism, Constitutional Patriotism, and the Public Sphere.” Public Culture 14(1):147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L. A. 1999. “Raising the Stakes in the Ultimatum Game: Experimental Evidence from Indonesia.” Economic Inquiry 27:47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., S. L. Brown, B. P. Lewis, C. Luce, and S. L. Neuberg. 1997. “Reinterpreting the Empathy-Altruism Relationship: When One into One Equals Oneness.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73:481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 1981. “On the Micro-Foundations of Macro-Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 86:984–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 1988. Theoretical Sociology. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis. 1964. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, K. and H. Bae. 1994. “Self-Effacement and Social Responsibility.” American Behavioral Scientist 37:653–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cureton, Adam. 2012. “Solidarity and Social Moral Rules.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15:691–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danermark, Berth, Mats Ekstorm, Liselotte Jakobsen, and Jan Ch. Karlsson. 2002. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, Paul. 2009. Sticking Together or Falling Apart?: Solidarity in an Era of Individualization and Globalization. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. and T. Boles. 1998. “Share and Share Alike or Winner Take All?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76:253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, Kevin. 1996. Solidarity: A Synthesis of Personalism and Communalism in the Thought of Karol Wojtyla/Pope John Paul II. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1897] 1970. Suicide. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1973. On Morality and Society. Edited by Robert Bellah. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, Nancy, Ivanna K. Guthrie, Bridget C. Murphy, Stephanie A. Shepard, Amanda Cumberland, and Gustavo Carlo. 1999. “Consistency and Development of Prosocial Dispositions: A Longitudinal Study.” Child Development 70:1360–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fararo, Thomas and Patrick Doreian. 1998. “The Theory of Solidarity: An Agenda of Problems.” Pp. 1–33 in The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models, edited by P. Doreian and T. Fararo. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst and Urs Fischbacher. 2003. “The Nature of Human Altruism.” Nature 425:785–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetchenhauer, Detlef and Hans-Werner Bierhoff. 2004. “Altruismus aus Evolutionstheoretisher Perspektive [Altruism from the Perspective of Evolutionary Theory].” Zeitschriftfür Sozialpsychologie 35:131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetchenhauer, Detlef and Rafael Wittek. 2006. “Solidarity in the Absence of External Sanctions: A Cross-cultural Study of Educational Goals and Fair-Share Behavior.” Pp. 191–206 in Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, edited by D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, and S. M. Lindenberg. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Alan Page. 1991. Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, Nelson. 1951. “Identification as the Basis for a Theory of Motivation.” American Sociological Review 16:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William. 1992. “Social Psychology of Collective Action.” Pp. 53–76 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publication Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G. and N. Eiseberg. 1997. “Agreeableness: A Dimension of Personality.” Pp. 795–824 in Handbook of Personality Psychology, edited by R. Hogan, J. Johnson, and S. Briggs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W. and R. Tietz. 1990. “Ultimatum Bargaining Behavior: A Survey and Comparison of Experimental Results.” Journal of Economic Psychology 11:417–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Edited by Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. 1964. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, J. E. S. 1959. “Solidarity: The Social History of an Idea in Nineteenth Century France.” International Review of Social History 4(2):261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, Michael. 1987. Theories of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel. 1992. “Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition.” Political Theory 20(2):187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, Juliet. 2009. Race and the Politics of Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Scott. 1991. “Constructing Collective Identity in a Peace Movement Organization.” PhD dissertation, University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Scott and Robert Benford. 2004. “Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment.” Pp. 432–457 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Soule Snow and Hanspeter Kriesi. New York: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, Raghaven. 1987. Human Solidarity: Universal Brotherhood. Santa Barbara, CA: Concord Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, J. L. Knetsch, and R. H. Thaler. 1987. “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics.” Pp. 101–116 in Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology, edited by R. M. Hogarth and M. W. Reder. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel and A. Tversky. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39(4):341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Alfie. 1990. The Brighter Side of Human Nature: Altruism and Empathy in Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komter, Aafke. 2005. Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B. and S. Nida. 1981. “Ten Years of Research on Group Size and Helping.” Psychological Bulletin 89:308–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, Victor. 1991. “Influence and Solidarity: Defining a Conceptual Core for Sociology.” Pp. 108–36 in Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity, edited by R. Robertson and B. S. Turner. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, Siegwart. 2006. “Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes.” Pp. 23–44 in Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, edited by D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, and S. M. Lindenberg. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, Siegwart, Detlef Fetchenhauer, Andreas Flache, and Abraham Buunk. 2006. “Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: A Framing Approach.” Pp. 3–19 in Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, edited by D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, and S. M. Lindenberg. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Translated by John Bednarz, Jr. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martes, Ana Cristina Braga and Dimitri Fazito. 2010. “Solidarity and Social Networks: Economic Sociology of International Migration and the Brazilian Case.” Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter 11(3):43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. and I. J. Deary. 1998. Personality Traits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. and P. T. Costa. 1999. “A Five-Factor Theory of Personality.” Pp. 139–153 in Handbook of Personality, edited by L. A. Pervin and O. P. John. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1988. “Getting Involved: Identity and Mobilization in Social Movements.” International Social Movements Research 1:329–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkonen, Simo. 2012. Journal of Cold War Studies 14(2):98–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. and A. Schneider. 1991. “Justice and Prosocial Commitments.” Pp. 58–81 in Altruism in Social Systems, edited by L. Montada and Hans-Werner Bierhoff. Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad, Sharon Erickson. 2004. Convictions of the Soul: Religion, Culture, and Agency in the Central America Solidarity Movement. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olinger, S. and P. Olinger. 1988. The Altruistic Personality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostermann, Alexander and Helmut Staubmann. 2000. “Book Review: Patrick Doreian and Thomas Fararo (eds.): The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models: Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers 1998.” European Sociological Review 16(1):115–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1964. Social Structure and Personality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott and Edward Shils. 1951. “Values, Motives, and Systems in Action.” Pp. 47–275 in Toward a General Theory of Action, edited by T. Parsons and E. Shils. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 2005. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Washington, DC: USCCB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro and Erik Vickstrom. 2011. “Diversity, Social Capital, and Cohesion.” Annual Review of Sociology 37:461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, Andrew. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, Sally. 2008. Political Solidarity. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Shalom. 1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” Pp. 1–65 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25, edited by L. Berkowitz. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Shalom and J. A. Howard. 1982. “Helping and Cooperation: A Sell-Based Motivational Model.” Pp. 327–353 in Cooperation and Helping Behavior, edited by V. J. Derlega and J. Grzelak. New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian. 1996. Resisting Reagan: The U.S. Central America Peace Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian. 2003. Moral Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian. 2010. What is a Person? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian, with Michael Emerson, Sally Gallagher, Paul Kennedy, and David Sikkink. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Sandra Susan. 2010. “Race and Trust.” Annual Review of Sociology 36:453–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Pitirim. 1947. Society, Culture, and Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Pitirim. [1954] 2002. The Ways and Power of Love. Philadelphia, PA:Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillman, Lyn. 2012. Solidarity in Strategy: Making Business Meaningful in American Trade Associations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stjerno, Steinar. 2004. Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Gregory. 1962. “Appearance and the Sell.” Pp. 86–118 in Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by A. M. Rose. Boston: Houghton Mufflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, William Graham. 1906. Folkways. New York: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Verta and Nancy Whittier. 1992. “Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization.” Pp. 104–129 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thome, Helmut. 1999. “Solidarity: Theoretical Perspectives for Empirical Research.” Pp. 101–132 in Solidarity, edited by K. Bayertz. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1971. “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.” Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Vliert, Evert and Siegwart Lindenberg. 2006. “Wealth, Climate, and Framing: Cross-National Differences in Solidarity.” Pp. 207–222 in Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, edited by D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, and S. M. Lindenberg. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Zee, Karen. 2006. “Ethnic Identity and Solidarity with Functional Groups.” Pp. 175–189 in Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, edited by D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, and S. M. Lindenberg. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Zee, Karen and Marco Perugini. 2006. “Personality and Solidary Behavior.” Pp. 77–92 in Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, edited by D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, and S. M. Lindenberg. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oorschot, W. J. H. 1991. “Solidariteit in Verzekering en Sociale Zekerheid: Analyse van een Begrip.” Sociaal Maandblad Arbeid 46:461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voland, E. 1999. “On the Nature of Solidarity.” Pp. 157–172 in Solidarity, edited by K. Beyertz. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, Lawrence. 2013. Global Solidarity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christian Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katherine Sorrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Vincent Jeffries

Copyright information

© 2014 Vincent Jeffries

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, C., Sorrell, K. (2014). On Social Solidarity. In: Jeffries, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391865_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation