Abstract
The term “solidarity” has its roots in the Roman law of obligations. Here the unlimited liability of each individual member within a family or other community to pay common debts was characterized as obligatio in solidum. Since the end of the 18th century, this principle of mutual responsibility between the individual and society, where each individual vouches for the community and the community vouches for each individual, has been generalized beyond the law of obligations context and applied to the field of morality, society and politics.1 “Solidarity” is now comprehended as a mutual attachment between individuals, encompassing two levels: a factual level of actual common ground between the individuals and a normative level of mutual obligations to aid each other, as and when should be necessary. Without clearly acknowledging the difference between the two levels or their relationship to one another, it has repeatedly been supposed that factual common ground is sufficient justification for normative obligations. This supposition has been made easier by the assumption that actual common ground is not simply objective, but has an emotional dimension: from common ground a feeling of obligation thus spontaneously emerges, bridging the gap between what is and what ought to be.
Translated into English by Sarah L. Kirkby, B.A. Hons. Exon.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aristotle: 1949, The Nicomachean Ethics, The Works of Aristoteles, vol. IX, W. D. Ross (ed., trans.), Oxford University Press, London.
Aristotle: 1952, The Politics, The Works of Aristoteles, vol. X, W. D. Ross (ed., trans.), Clarendon Press, London.
Bayertz, K. (ed.): 1996, K. (ed.): 1996, `Staat und Solidarität’, in Politik und Ethik, Reclam, Ditzingen, pp. 305–329.
Camus, A.: 1951, L’homme revolté, Gallimard, Paris.
Durkheim, E.: 1902, Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studie über die Organisatiom höherer Gesellschaften, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1988.
Engels, F.: 1885, `Zur Geschichte des Bundes der Kommunisten’, in K. Marx and F. Engels, Collected Works, vol. 21, Dietz, Berlin, pp. 206–224.
Ferguson, A.: 1773, An Essay on the History of Civil Society,4th ed., T. Caddel et al.,London. Gauchet, M.: 1991, Die Erklärung der Menschenrechte. Die Debatte um die bürgerlichen Freiheiten 1789,Rowohlt, Reinbek.
Gewirth, A.: 1988, `Ethical universalism and particularism’, Journal of Philosophy 85, 283–302. Giddens, A.: 1992, The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Hare, R. M.: 1981, Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Hume, D.: 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, P. H. Nidditch (ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford (1978).
Kropotkin, P.: 1939, Mutual Aid. A Factor of Evolution, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth. Lukàcs, G.: 1919, `Die Rolle der Moral in der kommunistischen Produktion’, in Collected Works, vol. 2 (Frühschriften II: Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein), Luchterhand, Neuwied and Berlin, pp. 90–94.
Maclntyre, A.: 1988, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Marshall, T. H.: 1964, Class, Citizenship, and Social Development, Doubleday and Company, Garden City, New York.
Mill, J. S.: 1867, On Liberty, Longmans, Green and Co., London.
Mill, J. S.: 1882, Utilitarianism, 8th ed., Longmans, Green and Co., London.
Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford et al.
Rorty, R.: 1989, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge et al.
Sartre, J. P.: 1960, Critique de la raison dialectique, Gallimard, Paris.
Scheler, M.: 1916, `Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik’, in Collected Works, vol. 2, Francke, Bern and München.
Schmelter, J.: 1991, Solidarität: Die Entwicklungsgeschichte eines sozialethischen Schlüsselbegriffs, University of München, München.
Stephen, J. F.: 1873 (1993), Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, S. D. Warner (ed.), Liberty Fund, Indianapolis.
Taylor, C.: 1989, `Cross-purposes: the liberal-communitarian debate’, in N. L. Rosenblum (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London, pp. 159182.
Tönnies, F.: 1887, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie, new print of the 8th ed. 1935, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
Troeltsch, E.:1912, Die Soziallehren der christlichen Kirchen und Gruppen,J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Tübingen.
Wildt, A.: 1996, `Solidarität’, in J. Ritter and K. Gründer (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 9, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, pp. 1004–1115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bayertz, K. (1999). Four Uses of “Solidarity”. In: Bayertz, K. (eds) Solidarity. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5137-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9245-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive