Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Experience of Bullying in Great Britain: The Impact of Organizational Status

  • Chapter
From Stress to Wellbeing Volume 2

Abstract

A number of studies recently undertaken in Europe, the US, and Australia into workplace bullying and closely related issues, under labels such as “mobbing” and “emotional abuse”, have documented the presence and severity of these problems. However, prevalence figures vary greatly between individual studies and between countries. In part this discrepancy reflects the use of different research methods. In general two main approaches may be identified: one group of studies follows, broadly speaking, the approach developed by Leymann (1992), where respondents are presented with an inventory of negative behaviours identified with bullying. Bullying is then operationalized by defining the criteria for when a person is being bullied. In Leymann’s study of bullying in Sweden, bullying was defined as weekly or more frequent exposure to at least one negative act or behaviour for a period of at least 6 months. In line with this approach Leymann found that 3.5% of respondents in his representative study of the Swedish working population were bullied. In an Austrian replica study the results span 17.5% to 26.6% depending upon occupational group surveyed (Niedl, 1995). By contrast, an alternative method has been to measure the prevalence of bullying by means of a “global” definition of bullying. Thus, those who consider their experience within a certain timescale to fit the definition will be considered to have been bullied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aquino, K. (2000). Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26, 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, D. (1999). Exploring “bullying” culture in the para-military organisation. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Hjelt-Bäck, M. (1994a). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behaviour, 20, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1994b). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behaviour, 20, 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, M.A., Boswell, W.R., Roehling, V., & Boudreau, J.W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coine, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M.J., & Cooper, C.L. (1992). Shattering the glass ceiling. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (1996). Bullying and harassment at work: Epidemiological and psychosocial aspects. Unpublished PhD thesis, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B.I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Raknes, B.I., Matthiesen, S.B., & Helleøy, O.H. (1994). Mobbing og Harde Personkonflikter: Helsefarlig samspill på arbeidsplassen [Bullying and harsh personal conflicts: Health damaging interactions at work]. London: Sigma Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organisations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C. (1979). Occupational segregation: A comparative study of the degree pattern of the differentiation between men’s and women’s work in Britain, the United States and other countries (Research paper no. 9). London: Department of Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., & Cooper, C.L. (2001). Origins of bullying: Theoretical frameworks for explaining workplace bullying. In N. Tehrani (Ed.), Building a culture of respect: Managing bullying at work (pp. 3–19). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., Rayner, C., & Cooper, C.L. (1999). Workplace bullying. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 195–230). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P. (1992). Reforming British health and safety law: A framework for discussion. Industrial Law Journal, 21, 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R.A. (1989). Control in the workplace and its health-related aspects. In S. Sauter, J.J. Hurrell, & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Job control and worker health (pp. 129–159). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., & Jagatic, K. (1999). Workplace abuse and aggression. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association conference, Chicago, IL, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, K., Elovainio, M., & Vathera, J. (2000). Workplace bullying and sickness absence in hospital staff. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, 656–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (1998). The social construction of workplace bullying. Unpublished paper, Warwick University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1999). Workplace bullying — interim findings of a study in further and higher education in Wales. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2000). Workplace bullying-a case of moral panic? In M. Sheehan, S. Ramsay, & J. Patrick (Eds.), Transcending boundaries: Integrating people, processes and systems (conference proceedings). Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1992). Vuxenmobbning på svenska arbeidsplatser. Delrapport 1 om frekvenser [Adult bullying at Swedish workplaces: Report 1 concerning frequencies]. Stockholm: Arbetarskyddstyrelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, P., Sheehan M., & Kearns, D. (1995). Managerial styles and their effects on employee’s health and well-being in organizations undergoing restructuring. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: School of Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedl, K. (1995). Mobbing/bullying am Arbeitsplatz [Mobbing/Bullying in the workplace]. Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Implementing the OECD job strategy: Assessing performance and policy. Paris: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price Spratlen, L. (1995). Interpersonal conflict which includes mistreatment in a university workplace. Violence and Victims, 10, 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, L. (1999). Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: Staff questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 318, 228–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C. (1997). The incidence of workplace bullying. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C. (1999). Workplace bullying. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C., Sheehan, M., & Barker, M. (1999). Theoretical approaches to the study of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1&2), 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman, J.A., Rospenda, K.M., Nawyn, S.J., Flatherty, J.A., Fendrich, M., Drum, M.L., & Johnson, T.P. (1999). Sexual harassment and generalised workplace abuse among university employees: Prevalence and mental health correlates. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 358–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savva, C., & Alexandrou, A. (1998). The impact of bullying in further and higher education. Paper presented at the Bullying at Work research update conference, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, M. (1999). Workplace bullying: Responding with some emotional intelligence. International Journal of Management, 20, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., Ironside, M., & Seifert, R. (1996). Classroom struggle? Market oriented education reforms and their impact on the teacher labour process. Work, Employment and Society, 10, 641–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2000). The scale of perceived occupational stress. Occupational Medicine, 50, 294–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. (1988). Keeping women in and out of line: Sexual harassment and occupational segregation. In S. Walby (Ed.), Gender segregation at work (pp. 91–99). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • TUC. (1997). Hard times: 5,000 reasons for new rights at work (Summary and analysis of calls to the TUC’s bad bosses hotline). London: Trades Union Congress, Campaign and Communications Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISON. (1997). UNISON members experience of bullying at work. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartia, M. (1996). The sources of bullying: Psychological work environment and organizational climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veale, C., & Gold, J. (1998). Smashing into the glass ceiling for women managers. Journal of Management, 17, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worral, L., & Cooper, C.L. (1999). Quality of working life 1998 survey of manager’s changing experiences. London: Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996). Longitudinal studies in organisational stress research: A review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Helge Hoel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cary L. Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brian Faragher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lancaster University, UK

    Cary L. Cooper

Copyright information

© 2013 Helge Hoel, Cary L. Cooper and Brian Faragher

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoel, H., Cooper, C.L., Faragher, B. (2013). The Experience of Bullying in Great Britain: The Impact of Organizational Status. In: Cooper, C.L. (eds) From Stress to Wellbeing Volume 2. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309341_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation